User talk:Neelesh Pandiyath

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 07:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Draft:Ramapati Singhania (RS)

Your recent item has been moved to draftspace as above. It appears to be a copy of an earlier version of Draft:Ramapati Singhania (without all the necessary corrections made by others) which has twice been declined and subsequently rejected but then moved to draftspace out of process. As a result it was sent to WP:AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramapati Singhania as not suitable for Wikipedia. It was then returned to draft by the item creator. Re-creating this item in this manner is not acceptable; the item is most unlikely to be accepted and further attempts to manipulate the system could lead to the loss of editing privileges. Eagleash (talk) 03:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Further if you are operating more than one account, this should be declared. See WP:ALTACCN. Eagleash (talk) 03:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raj Shukla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ramapati Singhania (RS)

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ramapati Singhania (RS), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Neelesh Pandiyath, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dr vulpes were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not move this page into Article or Wikipedia space.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 04:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Neelesh Pandiyath/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM 2 (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AK Channan (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Ashwani Kumar Channan, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AK Channan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwani Kumar Channan (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashwani Kumar Channan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DreamRimmer (talk) 12:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regional Ayurveda Research Institute (RARI), Trivandrum (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one of the sources cited is secondary, and it alone isn't enough to establish notability per WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Regional Ayurveda Research Institute (RARI), Trivandrum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Poojappura. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sir for the guidance. I apologies for my mistake. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Neelesh Pandiyath! Your additions to Draft:Regional Ayurveda Research Institute (RARI), Trivandrum have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Nair (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Nair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regional Ayurveda Research Institute (RARI), Trivandrum (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs in depth coverage in independent secondary sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Regional Ayurveda Research Institute (RARI), Trivandrum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Nair (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Nair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 03:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rabinarayan Acharya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rabinarayan Acharya. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabinarayan Acharya (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabinarayan Acharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeshree Singhania moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rajeshree Singhania. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajeshree Singhania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajeshree Singhania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajeshree Singhania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, Request for your kind assistance to improve the article please. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Rajeshree Singhania, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, I will comply to your esteemed directions. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 15:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, we're still waiting. What is your relationship to the various people you are writing about? If you are being paid for your work, you must disclose it, otherwise you may be blocked. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am an Ex-servicemen of Indian Army. I started Wikipedia account after my retirement. My interest was to update about my about My Village "Mullassery". Meantime according to the number of edits, I got more access and I became excited and also felt help. The people I created article draft article where Ashwani Kumar Channan, Rabinarayan Acharaya, Rajeshree Singhania, Sunil Nair. These people where well known person whom I heard about while my military service and before my military service. When I searched I didn't find their name in Wikipedia. Hence I attempted. I am not enough capable to write any article or such big things in Wikipedia. Moreover I am not an IT personal. I am just a clerk retired from Indian Army and presently working in public firms on contract basis. I didn't get any financial benefit yet and I don't know how to claim it from Wikipedia Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

You cannot claim any payment from Wikipedia, because Wikipedia is based on volunteer contributions and does not pay for editing work. If someone, such as the subject of an article you're creating, pays you to write about them, that's a different matter of course.

You say you "didn't get any financial benefit yet" – does that mean that you expect to get something later on? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, if get a job in Wikipedia for clerk/office related works. I am willing to join. I have 20 years of military service experience as a clerk and PA in Indian Army Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 16:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid Wikipedia is just a wonderful hobby. It's for you to enjoy, and to enjoy doing well. Satisfaction of doing a good job well is our reward. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, Ok Sir. I am enjoying and getting satisfaction. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 02:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also felt happy. Not help Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 15:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RespectedSir, My two articles, one on Rajeshree Singhania and other on Rabinarayan Acharaya has been deleted. It would be grateful if it be kept in draft so that work on the same article to improve. As a beginner I put lot of efforts on both article. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 14:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They were both moved into the draft space precisely so that you could improve them; I know, as I did this in both cases myself. You then moved them back into the main article space. That is considered 'disputed draftification', and after that they can no longer be moved to drafts. Both articles were discussed at Articles for Deletion (AfD) for a period of one week, following which they were both deleted yesterday. This is why they should not have been prematurely published, as it leaves new article patrollers no option but to propose deletion.

You are free to request that the deleting administrator restores the articles back to draft space for you, but note that this is far from guaranteed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sir. Understood. Will try with a new article. Also will send a request to deleting administrator Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 16:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You stated above that "these people where well known person whom I heard about while my military service and before my military service." However, you uploaded their images (and others) claiming they are your "own work." You elude to having never met them yet you would have had to meet them to take their photos. Are the images taken from somewhere else or have you met them? You responses to the questions about conflict of interest editing have been quite evasive so far. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, I got multiple opportunities to attend some official programs and party where I got some photos. I saw them multiple times, but never got chance to speak or introduce as we were not permitted to meet them for casual talks as they were senior officials..Some photo were taken from photos itself. Photos of religious places is located in my Village. That I taken through mobile. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 14:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come on now! You are seriously expecting anyone who has seen the photographs in question to believe that? They are clearly posed photographs, not just odd snaps made by some member of the public attending an event. The image File:Maj Gen Ashwani Kumar Channan.jpg in particular is a very formally posed photograph. Either your claim that you took the photographs yourself is inaccurate, or your claim that you have not had personal contact with the people involved is inaccurate, or both. I don't know what you expect to gain by making such claims, but I advise you that your future credibility will be increased if you clarify the situation. JBW (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, I started Wikipedia editing as a time pass. When I got some personal satisfaction, I took more interest and attempted to publish some articles. As I am not fully aware about rules I made some mistakes. You may please delete all my articles, edits and photos published, if it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serving_generals_of_the_Indian_Army Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 17:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please state whether your claim that the photographs are your own work is inaccurate or whether your claim that you have had no personal contact with the persons concerned is inaccurate. As I have pointed out above, they can't both be accurate. JBW (talk) 22:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, Sorry for delay in replying. I do not have any personal contacts with the persons whom I created article/draft article. Most of all photographs are my own work. I remember two photographs i clicked from album/screen shot. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 01:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rabinarayan Acharya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rabinarayan Acharya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabinarayan Acharya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, Request for all assistance to improve the article in accordance with Wikipedia policies. I will always comply to your esteemed guidance. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramapati Singhania (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The referencing consists of only primary sources and passing mentions. And not only is there no evidence of notability, there isn't any obvious claim of noteworthiness, either, meaning this would be an obvious A7 speedy candidate if accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramapati Singhania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabinarayan Acharya (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not quite enough independent significan coverage or hits im scholar

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabinarayan Acharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan, PVSM, SM

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Major General Ashwani Kumar Channan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabinarayan Acharya (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabinarayan Acharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, With reference to your esteemed guidance I have worked more on the article on Draft:Rabinarayan Acharya and submitted for review. Kindly review and request for your valuable assistance and directions please. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anurag Awasthi

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anurag Awasthi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, Please delete Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 15:36, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabinarayan Acharya (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please avoid citation overkill. To meet notability guidelines you should find reliable, secondary sources with significant coverage. Thanks

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabinarayan Acharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lewcm Talk to me! 17:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, Thank you very much for reviewing the article and for the valuable guidance. I will work again for complying to your directions. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 08:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sanjeev Nair has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sanjeev Nair. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, Thank you for your esteemed guidance. I will correct the mistakes. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 17:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Nair (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Nair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 19:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabinarayan Acharya (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabinarayan Acharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Regional Ayurveda Research Institute (RARI), Trivandrum

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Regional Ayurveda Research Institute (RARI), Trivandrum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramapati Singhania (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a promotional piece, a vanity bio more suitable to Linked In--and that's without even looking at the sources, which at first glance do not impress. A spam link for a self-published book doesn't help, of course.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramapati Singhania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 01:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramapati Singhania (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since last decline. Also, this is a small issue but does he have a birthdate instead of 'birthdate'?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramapati Singhania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Nair (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

0 improvement since last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Nair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabinarayan Acharya (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

0 improvement since last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabinarayan Acharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajeshree Singhania (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

0 improvement since last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajeshree Singhania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitting drafts

Please don't resubmit a declined draft without making any changes to address the reason for the decline. Doing so serves no useful purpose and takes up the time of reviewers who could have better spent the time on more useful tasks, such as reviewing genuine new submissions. JBW (talk) 20:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabinarayan Acharya (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Myrealnamm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Adding more secondary sources that makes the person notable would be helpful to making to draft accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabinarayan Acharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 16:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, help to add secondary sources Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 16:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitting drafts (2)

After receiving my message above, you have done the same again. Take this as a final warning: you may be blocked from editing if you continue in the same way. JBW (talk) 22:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabinarayan Acharya (September 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm afraid there is simply no real claim to notability here, and comparing this draft to the version that was draftified after the article was deleted in AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabinarayan Acharya) shows that the reasons for deleting it still apply: Acharya does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF, which are the relevant notability guidelines. It's been almost a year since the deletion discussion, and nothing new has emerged, so this must be the end of the line for this draft.

bonadea contributions talk 15:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir. Will prepare a fresh draft. Neelesh Pandiyath (talk) 01:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sanjeev Nair

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sanjeev Nair, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sanjeev Nair

Hello, Neelesh Pandiyath. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sanjeev Nair".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]