User talk:Mauriziok/Miss World 2011

{{Talk header}} {{WikiProjectBannerShell|blpo=yes|1= {{WikiProject Beauty Pageants|class=list|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=low}} }}

Israel

Kim Edri was the first Runner Up earning the title of Israel's Maiden and she represents Israel in Miss Universe, Ella Ran is the actual Miss Israel and will represent Israel in Miss World — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.31.65.69 (talk) 10:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why Armenia and South Sudan withdrawed? Is there a secret reason? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.57.212.201 (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why was Ms. Trinidad and Tobago excluded from this listing in the top 30. She came 24th. Why leave the Caribbean out aren't we part of the world? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.213.22.178 (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Placements are 15 or 30?

About I've seen in related articles, in MW the "Fast Track" (FT) awards give a direct step to semi-finals. However, some winners of this FT (v.gr. Chile) don't were in the Top 15, but in the Top 30, and some editions have put that placements (so, semifinalists) are only 15. Rules changed or the FT already not classifies to semi-finals? ---- 186.104.75.80 (talk) 23:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be a new set of rules for Miss World 2011, where FT event winners does not automatically become semi-finalists, rather they receive points based on their rank at these FT events, and those points are tallied. Thus, the top 15 were those who got the highest total points, not necessarily the winners of the FT. GrayFullbuster (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding Top 20

Based on the official information from Miss World, only the Top 15 were announced. And from the Top 15, the top 7 and the winners were announced. So please stop adding Top 20 as it is not official. GrayFullbuster (talk) 00:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcasters relevant?

To my opinion it is not relevant to put in a massive list (full of links to disambiguation pages) of broadcasters around the world. I have removed the list several times, but an IP keeps putting them back. Who is right? Night of the Big Wind _talk 13:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that recent articles of pageants like this one, Miss Universe and Miss Earth seem to have the list of broadcasters in their articles. Unless we have a uniform rule, it would just appear that we are trying to single out this one. GrayFullbuster (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At least I single out this one, because it shows upo in the list Articles With Multiple Dablinks with 20 links. Restoring the list, but unlinking the links to disambiguation pages is from my point of view as link-to-disambiguation-pages-killer also okay. Night of the Big Wind _talk 16:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attention mr. IP

Due to you deliberate adding links to disambiguation pages, I have requested page protection. You can not keep adding those links and expect others to solve them. Because you do not responded on earlier request to stop, I just have to use this unfriendly way. Please, please stop adding links to disambiguation pages. Night of the Big Wind _talk 12:38, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Judges section restored

I have restored the judges section content (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. Information about the people who judge the performance of a large number of contestants in a contest is highly relevant. Provision of information regarding the judges is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Miss World 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]