User talk:Mansmithyutd

Welcome!

Hello, Mansmithyutd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bob talk 17:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sam johnstone

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Sam johnstone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:00, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gemma Thompson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gemma Thompson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 14:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Football transfers

Please note that football transfers currently being announced do not take affect until the transfer window opens on 1 July. Please do not modify current squad sections of club articles to reflect these transfers until then. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive

Please stop making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Wes Brown, John O'Shea and Park Ji-Sung have not left Manchester United. Those are not the only unconstructive edits you have made, but I have neither the time nor the inclination to go through your edit history and point out all the mistakes you've been making. Don't get me wrong, some of your edits have been helpful, but they are far outweighed by the bad ones. – Pee Jay 16:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Man Utd Vs Barcelona 2011

The article Man Utd Vs Barcelona 2011 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Friendly/exhibiton matches, regardless of teams, temporal context or any other parameter involved, are usually not notable enough to rectify an article, per WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 16:49, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Man Utd Vs Barcelona 2011 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Man Utd Vs Barcelona 2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man Utd Vs Barcelona 2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 23:01, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to continue you article, and recreate some of the deleted ones above, you can do it here. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 02:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to John O'Shea. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Pee Jay 16:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive edits

DUDE! Would you stop making changes based on stuff you heard from your mate down the boozer? As I have said to you before, you do make some good contributions, and we would hate to lose someone from Wikipedia who clearly cares about Man Utd, but you need to stop making changes without sources and pay attention to Wiki policies. For example, Ben Amos has not been given the #13 shirt, and nor is Sam Johnstone currently considered a first-team player; Ben Amos is tipped to go on loan to Hull in the next few days anyway, so why would Fergie give him the #13? It's far more likely to go to Lindegaard (but don't let me catch you making that change without a source either). – Pee Jay 21:21, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marouane Fellaini. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 22:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |ntupdate= or |nationalteam-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 13:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm JMHamo. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Christian Benteke, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 21:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]