User talk:ManhattanSandyFurystorm

This is ManhattanSandyFurystorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome!

Hello, ManhattanSandyFurystorm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- John of Reading (talk) 07:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An unclear edit

Portal:Tropical cyclones/Selected picture/6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I've undone the edit you made here, since the redirect target Portal:Tropical cyclones/Selected picture/Sandy Oct 28 2012 16.00(UTC) does not exist. I'm not familiar with the tropical cyclones project, so I'll leave it to you to fix this up if you wish. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline and Affects of the 2012 Extranonconcentrational Storm Season

The article Timeline and Affects of the 2012 Extranonconcentrational Storm Season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extranonconcentrational only used on Wikipedia, no evidence of it matches any reliably sourced concept

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prosfilaes (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated it for speedy deletion. United States Man (talk) 20:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm TropicalAnalystwx13. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tornadoes of 2013 because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 21:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at April 25–28, 2011 tornado outbreak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. United States Man (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Prosfilaes (talk) 23:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Extranonconcentrational storm articles

What are the extranonconcentrational storm articles for? Inks.LWC (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have listed all of your subpages for deletion, as it's been almost a week since I inquired about them, and they all appear to violate the policy against fake articles. Feel free to participate at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ManhattanSandyFurystorm subpages if you would like to discuss why the subpages should not be deleted. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:53, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Extranonconcentrational Storm 1AU.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Extranonconcentrational Storm 1AU.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 23:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tornadoes of 2013

When I take something off with a good explanation, don't add it back without even providing an edit summary. That event was too small for a section and we really don't need you making things difficult. If you want to help, good, but don't get in the way. United States Man (talk) 13:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember this article is only about tornadoes, not about wind damage. The tornado in Fayette County didn't cause much damage. Most of that was straight-line winds, which, as I said, should not be included. Since there were only ten tornadoes with three different systems, I don't think it qualifies as big enough for a section. United States Man (talk) 14:26, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, there WERE three systems: the 24th, the 26th-28th, and the 29th. Also, as I said, the tornado in Fayette County did not cause much damage (unlike TWC may let on). Here's a piece of advice: Do not trust anything The Weather Channel says. They are almost always wrong and care more about social media than the weather. Ten tornadoes with three systems is by far too small to be included. United States Man (talk) 16:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue adding Original Research to both the Tornadoes of 2013 article and the May 18–20, 2013 tornado outbreak article. Only 17 tornadoes have been officially confirmed by the National Weather Service. The EF? tornadoes listed in the articles are merely reports and are not actually confirmed tornadoes. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tornadoes of 2013, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not change dates without a valid reason as that is considered vandalism. Jeffrey Gu ^{Love China?} 00:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tornadoes of 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mid-Atlantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added the word states to it. ManhattanSandyFurystorm (talk) 11:25, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TOR:CON Index

Hello ManhattanSandyFurystorm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged TOR:CON Index for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ochiwar (talk) 06:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

==Repost of TOR:CON Index==

A tag has been placed on TOR:CON Index requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. ManhattanSandyFurystorm (talk) 11:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Yintan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tornadoes of 2013, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yintan 12:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. United States Man (talk) 01:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High Temperatures

What you posted was horribly inaccurate. Please do not use that feature for determining temps unless there is an "OK" on the "Quality Control" heading. Please notice that on the 28th, the temp. "magically" jumpped from 60 to 106 in one hour. Not likely. Other websites list highs in the 80s. Please wait for verifications next time. Thanks, United States Man (talk) 03:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted back for reasons explained in the edit summary (and please remember WP:3RR). You are posting that to the wrong town anyway. The page you are using clearly says Kettle Falls, Washington, which is in another county. According to all other available observations, temperatures were in the 80s/90s. The temperature was nowhere near the 130s so please stop changing it. United States Man (talk) 20:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you understand. And I would caution that certain data page in the future. United States Man (talk) 20:25, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm United States Man. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Baltimore, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. United States Man (talk) 23:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Tornadoes of 2013. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. United States Man (talk) 17:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Valdez, Alaska, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. United States Man (talk) 00:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Track map

No, the other part is not on there yet. As I said about the August section of Tornadoes of 2013, I really have no idea what you are talking about. United States Man (talk) 16:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that now, but it will be moved back to the infobox anyway. United States Man (talk) 20:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"We" didn't do anything. I changed it to be more compliant with MoS. United States Man (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style. United States Man (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Superstorm/ Furystorm concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Superstorm/ Furystorm, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions for tornado outbreaks

There is currently a discussion ongoing regarding altering the naming conventions for tornado outbreak and tornado outbreak sequence articles. Please feel free to view and comment on the discussion here. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E) via User:Ks0awb} 22:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC) You are receiving this notice because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Severe Weather. If you would not like to receive future WikiProject Severe Weather notifications, please add your signature at User:Ks0stm/Notify list.[reply]

File permission problem with File:Doonebury July 1, 1975.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Doonebury July 1, 1975.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MSF, I deleted the file, because it's not in the public domain. Public domain has a very specific meaning, and even if something has been made available for free doesn't mean there is no copyright on it. Feel free to ask if you have further questions. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Finland War Result.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Finland War Result.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Superstorm/ Furystorm

Hello ManhattanSandyFurystorm. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Superstorm/ Furystorm".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Superstorm/ Furystorm}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 05:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on changes to the format of the tornado table

Due to your membership in WikiProject Severe weather, I thought that the discussion going on there regarding proposed changes to the tornado table might interest you. If you are interested in participating in discussion, please feel free to join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather#Reference column in the tornado table. All views are welcome, and please do not feel obligated to participate if you are not interested. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox

I've noticed that you don't appear to be using your sandbox for the purpose it was intended for. You appear to be copying existing Wikipedia articles to the sandbox and then altering the text with nonsense and with references to your friends (or other people). Your sandbox is for edits intended to create or improve articles, not for idle messing around or personal amusement. In addition, the copying of WP articles without attribution may constitute a copyright violation. I suggest that you blank the mess that's currently there; otherwise, I will nominate the page for deletion per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Deor (talk) 12:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ManhattanSandyFurystorm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ManhattanSandyFurystorm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ManhattanSandyFurystorm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019 WPTC Newsletter

Volume XIV, Issue 39, May 31, 2019

The Hurricane Herald is the arbitrarily periodical newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006; it has been almost thirteen years since that time. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from April 14–May 31, 2019. This edition's editor and author is Hurricane Noah (talk · contribs).

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.

← 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 →

Article of the month, by Jason Rees

History of tropical cyclone naming - The practice of using names to identify tropical cyclones goes back several centuries, with storms named after places, saints or things they hit before the formal start of naming in each basin. The credit for the first usage of personal names for weather systems is given to the Queensland Government Meteorologist Clement Wragge, who named tropical cyclones and anticyclones between 1887 and 1907. This system of naming fell into disuse for several years after Wragge retired, until it was revived in the latter part of World War II for the Western Pacific basin. Over the following decades, various naming schemes have been introduced for the world's oceans, including for parts of the Atlantic, Pacific and the Indian Ocean. The majority of these lists are compiled by the World Meteorological Organization's tropical cyclone committee for the region and include names from different cultures as well as languages. Over the years there has been controversy over the names used at various times, with names being dropped for religious and political reasons. For example, female names were exclusively used in the basins at various times between 1945 - 2000 and were the subject of several protests. The names of significant tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean and Australian region are retired from the naming lists and replaced with another name, at meetings of the various tropical cyclone committees.

Storm of the month and other tropical activity

Cyclone Fani was an extremely severe cyclonic storm that made landfall in Odisha, India on May 3. The storm achieved peak intensity as a near Category 5-equivalent cyclone with 3-minute sustained winds of 215 km/h (130 mph), 1-minute sustained winds of 250 km/h (155 mph), and a minimum central pressure of 937 hPa (mbar). Fani caused over $1.8 billion (2019 USD) in damage in India and Bangladesh and killed at least 89 people.

Since the last newsletter, twelve systems have formed.

Southwest Indian Ocean
In the Southwest Indian Ocean, Cyclone Kenneth made landfall in Mozambique approximately 1 month after Cyclone Idai, causing widespread flooding and destruction. Overall, Kenneth killed at least 52 people and caused more than $100 million in damage. Additionally, Tropical Cyclone Lorna formed over the eastern portion of the basin in late April and dissipated in early May without affecting land.
Australian Region
In the Australian Region, cyclones Lili and Ann formed in early May and both affected land. No deaths were reported, although Lili caused moderate damage in the Maluku Islands and East Timor.
South Pacific
In the South Pacific, a tropical depression formed in mid-may, but failed to intensify and dissipated a few days later.
South Atlantic
In the South Atlantic, Subtropical Storm Jaguar formed in late May and lasted for approximately two days before becoming extratropical.
Western Pacific
In the Western Pacific, three weak tropical depressions existed during the first half of May.
North Atlantic
In the North Atlantic, Subtropical Storm Andrea formed on the same day as Jaguar, but failed to intensify and dissipated on the next day.

The Eastern Pacific hurricane season began on May 15.
The Atlantic hurricane season will begin at 2:00 AM EDT on June 1.
The Central Pacific hurricane season will begin sometime after 12:00 AM HST on June 1.

Recent storms of the month
Edition	Storm
36	Cyclone Idai
35	Typhoon Wutip (2019)

New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter in April 2019

More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue in April 2019. Sorted chronologically. Struckout users denote users who have left or have been banned.

Super Typhoon Eden (talk · contribs)
SaiTheCyclone (talk · contribs)

To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!

Editorial for welcoming new users, by Hurricanehink

Every year, editors new and old help maintain the new season of season articles. The older users are likely used to the standards of the project, such as how to Wikilink and reference properly. Newer users might make mistakes, and they might make them over and over again if they don't know better. If anyone (who happens to read this) comes across a new user, please don't bite, because with enough pushback, they'll decide that this group of editors is too mean, and unfun. This is all a volunteer project; no one can force anyone to do anything. We're all on here because of our love of knowledge and tropical cyclones. If you find someone new, consider using the official WPTC welcome template - Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Welcome.

I also encourage that if you know any tropical cyclone researchers, please speak up and try recruiting them to edit. Veteran editors can't keep editing forever. Life gets busy, and the real world beckons!

Member of the month (edition) – Yellow Evan

Yellow Evan has been involved with WPTC since 2008. Since the last newsletter, Yellow Evan has taken 5 typhoon articles to good article status as well as created 2 more. Overall, he has created and/or significantly contributed to more than 130 good articles. Your work in the Western Pacific Basin is invaluable... Thank you for your contributions!

Latest WikiProject Alerts

The following are the latest article developments as updated by AAlertBot, as of the publishing of this issue. Due to the bot workings, some of these updates may seem out of place; nonetheless, they are included here.

Article alerts

Proposed deletion of File:Extranonconcentrational Storm 1AU.jpg

The file File:Extranonconcentrational Storm 1AU.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 04:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]