User talk:Malunrenta

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hümaşah Sultan (daughter of Şehzade Mehmed), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Param Sant Bahadur Chand (Vakil Sahib Ji)

Hi you have deleted a page called " Param Sant Bahadur Chand (Vakil Sahib Ji)"

I would like to highlight that he is a mystic / saint and a param sant in India. A successor of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sawan_Singh

There have been many branches of radha soami faith across the world and many furhter guru's even on wikipedia.

There are millions of followers of this guru and hence like the other guru's are on wiki even our guru needs to be there.

I can list out atleast 10 more guru's with similar radha soami faith which wiki is allowing.

Request you to pls have this page uploaded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justpk (talk • contribs) 10:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please, contact the administrator who has deleted the page. S/he can give you a heads up! Malunrenta (talk) 16:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About ULMA Group

Thank you for marking that the former version was too long, specially the history part and that It wasn't written in a neutral point of view. I have made a shorter version and I have rewritten it. The history part was too detailed and as far as I understand it the most interesting part was underlining its link to the Mondragon Corporation (Arizmendiarrieta’s influence, to be exact, the priest that founded this cooperative movement), since that’s what it gives ULMA its particular characteristics as a worker cooperative with a worldwide dimension. I have get rid of the certificates and qualifications part since I think it was too technical for the Wikipedia reader. The projects sections is far shorter, too. Just enough information to show its worldwide dimension which, again, it’s what I think makes ULMA particular, considering its nature as a worker cooperative which is usually linked to small businesses. Do you think that now it is good enough to be in Wikipedia? What changes should I do? --Ikerm (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Sirsat

User:Fredericknoronha is contesting your speedy deletion of Sonia Sirsat. User:Fred Bauder Talk 17:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you. --Malunrenta (talk) 17:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rajee En Kanmani - Additional Citation

Hi, I have given citation to the entire contents of the article. The main citation is a review of the film by a leading English language newspaper that is published for more than 100 years. If this is not a reliable source, there can't be another. The second citation is a database of "Film News" Anandan, who is a well-known and reliable person in the Tamil film world. His database is available in printed book form but I gave the web URL for easy reference. The website is also a reliable source run by a famous musical instruments company in Chennai. Please let me know why you decided these two are not reliable sources. --Uksharma3 (talk) 01:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rohith havaldar

I removed the speedy deletion from this page. You may want to put it up for deletion at WP:AfD as its claims for notability are small. Rmhermen (talk) 18:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Right circular hollow cylinder for deletion

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Right circular hollow cylinder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right circular hollow cylinder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. — Anita5192 (talk) 20:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability on JetPrivilege

Hi Malun, I noticed that you had put a notability tag on the page. JetPrivilege is a very old brand that has been revamped into a seperate frequent flyer program post jet airways and etihad business deal. The program is no longer restricted to only Jet Airways and now covers other airlines too. I believe this fact is quite enough to establish its notability. Apart from that i have added some more reference links that might help make the page look more notable. Request you to kindly review this page once again and let me know whether the page is notable enough, if not then what can be done further to establish notability. Awaiting your reply

Thanks, --Vishwanath7 (talk) 17:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User group: New Page Reviewr

Hello Malunrenta.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tanzanian draughts notation

Hello Malunrenta.

I am draughts researcher. I wrote a paper about draughts variants from all over the world. I wanted to add Tanzanian draughts. I want to ask you about the notation. Is it Numeric or algebraic? Here is my paper http://laatste.info/bb3/download/file.php?id=2554

regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sultan-ratrout (talk • contribs) 11:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Malunrenta. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello Malunrenta,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 807 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Malunrenta,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

Improve the tools: Vote here.
Reduce your review load: Vote here

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

Wow!

Your reaction time is amazingly quick!! Pdfpdf (talk) 06:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adrok Group

Hi, I removed speedy deletion tag from this article. I don't think A10 is a suitable criteria here when the existing content is still a draft, not a main namespace article. You may nominate it under different criteria. Regards. Hitro talk 09:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you. Malunrenta (talk) 10:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Thank you for reviewing the Marilyn J. Stokstad page. Netherzone (talk) 01:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Euclid Opportunities

Why you delete it. See digital asset holdings page. Muppet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattsowton (talk • contribs) 19:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User Deletion: Josh Ingram (Missouri)

Thanks for the notice. That sure was quick! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abracadabbbra (talk • contribs) 19:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Kristen Ulmer

Hello Malunrenta, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kristen Ulmer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguous advertising (can be cleaned without a fundamental rewrite). You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. So Why 21:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Malunrenta,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 807 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for reviewing Sanan Khan Qureshi. Cuterajoo (talk) 16:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Syrowski

Hi there! hope you are well, I am wondering why there is an issue with the page I wrote about Tom? Three are hundreds of wiki pages that list him in their credits of all of the music and also outside sources. Please help! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiLA2017 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please, check the message on your talk page. --Malunrenta (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I can't read the deleted page, but I imagine the issue might have been that the article was not written and referenced in an acceptable encylopedic manner, rather than the notability of Tom Syrowski. When I have a moment I may write a new article on Syrowski. Soniamaddox (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have now written that new article. Soniamaddox (talk) 12:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Malunrenta,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 807 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi

hi Inviter77 (talk) 17:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Katerina Giota

Hello Malunrenta, I have just formed the article of "Katerina Giota", citing at least three different sources 1. www.greekvolley.gr 2.www.cev.lu (official site of European Volleyball Federation) and 3.www.osfp.gr (official site of Olympiacos S.F. Piraeus). I can also cite a few more sites, but they would be in Greek language. However I believe that the above sites are enough about the informations I wrote. Please, let me Know if is really needed more sites, or if your refer has been made my mistake. Yours, friendly, --Οσελότος (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC) from Greece.[reply]

Article reviewed

Hi.. Thanks for reviewing the Mambai people (Timor) article that I've created. Also not to forget to remove the "New unreviewed article" tag in the article too. Really appreciate your time for going through the article. Thanks again. Jeblat (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abrah Comfort Rosemond

Hi. I've declined your speedy there as there is a claim to notability (which overrides the significance requirement at A7). She is stated to have been a Member of Parliament, which passes WP:POLITICIAN. MP is equivalent to US Congressman, and to pass politician, you only need state level, e.g. Arizona State Legislature, Scottish Parliament or Welsh Assembly, or the legislative assemblies of places like Kedah, Uttar Pradesh, and so on. It can get a bit tricky sorting out the titles of the various assemblies and their members world-wide, but Member of Parliament is a clear pass (unless it is clearly not through being a 'Junior' play version, of course - the ones we get of those are usually arrogant little b****rs who have to be explained to quite seriously that they aren't anyone notable yet...). Of course, a claim isn't always a certainty, and there can be hoaxes, but that'a a dirrerent kettle of fish. Peridon (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Juhani Toukonen

Hi! Could you please identify what do you mean by adding reliable sources. Toukonen's career is in Finland and there are more links in Finnish wikipedia. Karavanni zyntek 19:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karavanni zyntek (talk • contribs)

Deleting: Rajasthan Police Training Centre

Dear, this is a government organisation who trains fresh recruits and then sends them to designated places. Kindly restore this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parasgehlot007 (talk • contribs) 12:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability on Kulpreet Yadav

Thanks for remark. I am editing article and trying to meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline.

--Tusharshinde202 (talk) 25 March 2017 —Preceding undated comment added 17:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request to review the deletion nomintion

Hi I created the page Envision BI. It was not meant to be advertised. I collected the data from their website and tried to put the facts on the wikipedia page. This is similar to the Power BI page, if Envision BI is deleted then I believe Power BI page should also hold the same value and should be deleted. I request you to please have a look at the page and see the content in it, if there is something favoring or promoting it personally then we can rephrase the sentence but that BI tool is new in the market and needs to have a wikipedia page. Thanks, Rakesh

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your help moving my subpage!

Acosta94 (talk) 15:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Malunrenta,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 807 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for Gondaur

Hi Malunrenta, Thanks for viewing my newly created page. As per your suggestions Categories have been added to Gondaur. Regards--Yavarai (talk) 17:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Yavarai[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for viewing my article. Regards Yavarai (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for unbiased review of my newly created articles and you sincere guidance in this regard. Yavarai (talk) 17:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Malunrenta, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Amol Ramsing Kolhe

Hello Malunrenta. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Amol Ramsing Kolhe, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: starring in shows on a notable network indicates significance. Thank you. So Why 20:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not convinced that it passes BLP so I nominated it at AFD. --Malunrenta (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Edifecs Technologies

Hi I would like to know why the page Edifecs Technologies was deleted. I had put relevant citations in it. Can you let me know the exact issue?

Ashish verma1984 (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Ashish verma1984 (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Ashish_verma1984[reply]

Please read WP:COMPANY and WP:RS. --Malunrenta (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page "Masieh" should not have been deleted!

The page I created called Masieh BECAUSE HIS NAME IS MASIEH should not have been deleted.

Masieh is a famous YouTuber with over 58 THOUSAND subscribers and nearly 4.5 million views. He has also acted in a film that was aired on BBC TWO!!

RESTORE HIS PAGE — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrAnonymous123 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigations

Please note that I have mentioned your editing at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anatha Gulati. SmartSE (talk) 22:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse: I saw you linked me to the investigation but I am neither a sockpuppet nor I know any of these users and their pages. I reviewed many pages and helped deleting many promotional pages. I do not have any COI with the pages created by that sockfirm. --Malunrenta (talk) 17:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right..... SmartSE (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KrakatoaKatie: Why you blocked me? I am not at all related with any of these socks of OfficialPankajPatidar. --Malunrenta (talk) 21:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Malunrenta, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]