User talk:M1nhm

Welcome!

Hello, M1nhm! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! JustBerry (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Copyright violation

Your addition to Fajr decade has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --HyperGaruda (talk) 21:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ruhollah Khomeini into Ruhollah Khomeini's return to Iran. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marjan nazghlich

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Marjan nazghlich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:26, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marjan Nazghlich

Hello, M1nhm. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Marjan Nazghlich at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 20:55, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Encyclopaedia Islamica.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greatest Jihad.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:04, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ruhollah Khomeini's life in exile

Thanks for creating Ruhollah Khomeini's life in exile.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

The article as written is unfocused, and provides too much detail about Khomeini's life outside of his exile. I would suggest that you either significantly cut back on the background content (while also providing links to the main article Ruhollah Khomeini). Alternatively, this article could be scrapped entirely, and content merged into Ruhollah Khomeini#Life in exile

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, M1nhm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jafar ibn Ali al-Hadi, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Third party calls. Putting references that link to Amazon, which are against WP Terms of Use. scope_creep^Talk 17:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. JZ CL 18:03, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iran's next supreme leader moved to draftspace

The title of an article you recently created, Iran's next supreme leader, is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL, as it is speculation about a future event. There appear to be multiple different ways to resolve this issue, and I would appreciate your input on what you think would be the best decision. One option is to attempt to merge the content of the article into the article for Supreme Leader of Iran, into Elections in Iran, or into Assembly of Experts. Alternatively, the article can be made more general, to discuss the process of the selection of the Supreme Leader in general (both historically and in the future), ideally creating an article that would follow the format of Papal conclave, which appears to be a somewhat similar selection process (if you can think of any other head of state selection systems that might be a better comparison, we can see what methods they've used to document the process on Wikipedia). Let me know what you think, and once we've come to a decision, we can move the content out of the draftspace as appropriate. Regardless of the final decision, it will likely be appropriate to redirect the title "Iran's next supreme leader" to whichever article ends up hosting the relevant content. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The matter doesn’t include WP:CRYSTAL, according to WP:CRYSTAL "all articles about anticipated events must be verifiable(theguardian,latimes,al-monitor,reuters,tasnimnews), and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred" and RS is supporting this subject. Because this article has a page in Persian which is presented with RS, the subject has been argued again and again. However, I prefer the second alternative, I don’t agree with merging the content of the article into the article for Supreme Leader of Iran, into Elections in Iran, or into Assembly of Experts. Finally, I have a question, While the notability of Iran's next supreme leader has been proven, is the presented and general subject (by you) notable? M1nhm (talk) 11:01, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is a widely held convention that articles of the format "Country's next leader" are unnecessarily difficult to maintain, because they need to be completely rewritten every time the leadership passes to someone else. There's a variety of other ways to present the information on this page, either by renaming the article something more general or by merging the information into other closely related articles, and honestly I'm open to any of them. My concerns in editing this article are simply to make sure that information is both easily accessible to readers and efficient to maintain by using consistent methods of organizing articles about governments. I'm not suggesting that any of the content in the article should be deleted, simply that it should be presented differently. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 08:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill:i don't have a problem with changing name of article to selection of Iran's next supreme leader , what do you mean by "it should be presented differently"?, I can add a new section titled "history" and try to explain how Iran's next supreme leader has been selected during time .M1nhm (talk) 09:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think that adding a History section will address the issue of presenting it differently (along with the article title change). Essentially, I think it should be made clear to readers that the election process is the focus of the article, not speculation over specifics of a future election. What do you think would be an appropriate title? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: What do you think about this title, the selection of Iran's next supreme leader?M1nhm (talk) 06:03, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is the word "next" necessary? The information in the article is already just about the process in abstract. I would suggest that because most information about the current predicted candidates is speculation, the best way to represent that information would be as a list article, which the current article title can be a redirect to. Thus we'd have Supreme Leader of Iran selection process, List of potential candidates for the 3rd Supreme Leader of Iran, and Iran's next Supreme Leader as a redirect to the list. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 08:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bihar al-anwar.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures

Hello, M1nhm. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Kaffarah moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Al-Kaffarah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources.

Specifically, we require secondary sources - publications other than the origial source that have discussed the subject (theological papers, well-known essays, published statements by scholars etc.). Currently this is basically a Quran exegesis; sorry, that is not what Wikipedia is for. An article needs to feature substantial coverage by commentators, not just a summary of a primary source (compare, for example, Indulgence for a vaguely similar Christian concept).

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures

Hello! Your submission of Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

M1nhm, it turns out that the article is too short to qualify for DYK unless you expand it further. I hope you see this soon and are able to address this issue and the others raised on the nominations page. You asked us not to ignore you; I hope you will extend us the same courtesy. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to BlueMoonset, the article now meets DYK requirements. However, there are still concerns that the reactions section is too positive and does not include any negative reactions. Please address this if you still wish for the nomination to continue; the nomination may be closed in one week if you are still unable to reply. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I explain the matter in DYK M1nhm (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Kaffarah has been accepted

Al-Kaffarah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

I would like to point out to you that this is completely unaccaptable. If you ask for a resource you do not have access to at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request and I send you a private link to a copy of it in my Google Drive account, it stands to reason that must not share that link in a Wikipedia article (or, for that matter, anywhere else). I see that you've been pointed to Wikipedia:Copyright on your talk page before (apparently not to much avail) but this is not just a copyright infringement on your part, you also put me at risk since 1) the copy is in my Google Drive account and 2) includes information on the institution through which I accessed it, enabling the publisher get me in trouble in various way (e.g. through a complaint to my institution).

I specifically told you in my email that I provide the requested entries to you "exclusively for personal use" and that they "may neither be distributed nor communicated to the public". Please, by all means, be more careful about such issues going forward (or don't make such requests in the first place). — Pajz (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2019 (UTC) (I have taken the file down now, obviously.)[reply]

Pajz, sorry I didn't see that when reviewing the article. I have removed the link. Do you want it revision-deleted, so that it is no longer visible in the page history? We'd have to ask an admin to do that. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:00, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elmidae, thanks. Since the copy is no longer accessible, I think there's currently no need to delete the affected revisions. Best, — Pajz (talk) 23:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pajz: I am sorry. It was my negligence. As I am a newcomer, Can I ask u why give me the google drive link? What was the problem with the source?M1nhm (talk)

Ok. Well, because it's not possible to send files using Wikipedia's email facility. So I need some other way to get the file from my computer to yours. — Pajz (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures

Hello, M1nhm. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:29, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures

On 22 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the fatwa against insulting revered Sunni figures issued by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was described as winning "widespread praise"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fatwa of Ali Khamenei against insulting revered Sunni figures), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammad Bagheri (Iranian commander), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faculty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian politics general sanctions notice

Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Iran's next supreme leader concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Iran's next supreme leader, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Next Supreme Leader of Iran election has been accepted

Next Supreme Leader of Iran election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hack of Jeff Bezos' phone

Hello, M1nhm. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Hack of Jeff Bezos' phone at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've improved Hack of Jeff Bezos' phone for you. It'll go on DYK in May. There were significant omissions from the article, I'd have to say. starship .paint (talk) 11:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hack of Jeff Bezos's phone

On 21 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hack of Jeff Bezos's phone, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that FTI Consulting has concluded with "medium to high confidence" that Jeff Bezos's phone was hacked by a file sent from the Saudi Arabian crown prince's WhatsApp account? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hack of Jeff Bezos's phone), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 07:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 12:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of The UNSC and the United States resolutions on the Iran Arms

Hello! Your submission of The UNSC and the United States resolutions on the Iran Arms at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 01:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 I am sorry for the delay. I requested a copyedit while uploading the article but no one accepted my request. M1nhm (talk) 11:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi M1nhm, it usually takes a couple of weeks before an article is copyedited with GOCE. Since the article has been promoted, I will do a copyedit of the article in the next few days (and I'm sure other editors will also do their own copyedits). Although not required, can you provide sources for the citation needed tags in the article? This will make the article even better for its appearance. Let me know if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

M1nhm I finished a copyedit of the article. Please check my edits to make sure I did not change the meaning of any of the phrases. Thanks. Z1720 (talk) 04:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 I check your edits and fix the tag problem. Thanks. M1nhm (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the nuclear program of Iran

On 27 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the nuclear program of Iran, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on 18 October 2020, all previous United Nations arms resolutions on Iran expired based on Security Council Resolution 2231? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The UNSC and the United States resolutions on the Iran Arms. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the nuclear program of Iran), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the nuclear program of Iran

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning the nuclear program of Iran has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:36, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Twofingered Typist Hi, thanks for accepting my request. why can not we use a flag of countries on the reactions part? M1nhm (talk) 06:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@M1nhm: They are generally used on charts in sports articles, auto racing etc... They are completely unnecessary in an article like this. In my opinion, using them like they were in the article is simply decoration. Twofingered Typist (talk) 11:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Explosions on 21 April 2022 in Afghanistan

The article Explosions on 21 April 2022 in Afghanistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Generally duplicates the 2022 Mazar-i-Sharif mosque bombing article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 15:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Explosions on 21 April 2022 in Afghanistan

The article Explosions on 21 April 2022 in Afghanistan has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Explosions on 21 April 2022 in Afghanistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doha Agreement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sakina bint Husayn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Amali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Kingsif. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Your edit to 2022 FIFA World Cup controversies has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Kingsif (talk) 11:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read sources more carefully

Your addition here to Human rights in Saudi Arabia has been reverted as it's not supported by the source you give. Please read sources more carefully. Bishonen | tålk 20:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: Hi, I used Human Rights Watch site which is reliable source. Every year the list of human rights violators is published by this organization. If you have a problem with the source, please raise it on the article's talk page before removing it. Thanks. M1nhm (talk) 05:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you click on my links, such as this one, which explained why your edit was reverted? Did you not understand the explanation in the edit summary? I'll quote it here: This Human Rights Watch source wasn't ranking Saudi Arabia in second place. It was saying that an article to do with executions in Saudi Arabia was the second-most-read article of 2023. That doesn't seem newsworthy. Human Rights Watch is a reliable source, but you misread it. I'm surprised I'm having to tell you twice. I guess you didn't read my note carefully either. Bishonen | tålk 08:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Awad bin Mohammed Al-Qarni

The article Awad bin Mohammed Al-Qarni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Other than his arrest, no in-depth coverage about this individual. Seems to be a case of WP:BIO1E.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Al-Wafi kashani.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al-Wafi kashani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The front cover of The CIA Insider's Guide to the Iran Crisis book.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The front cover of The CIA Insider's Guide to the Iran Crisis book.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 12:42, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve War crimes by unconventional weapons

Hello, M1nhm,

Thank you for creating War crimes by unconventional weapons.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is only covering alleged activities of USA. Also some of the listed weapons would be "conventional"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of War crimes by unconventional weapons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article War crimes by unconventional weapons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War crimes by unconventional weapons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mztourist (talk) 04:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]