User talk:Lythronaxargestes

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Please put comments under separate sections.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding bringing Bulbasaurus to GA

Hi! Since you've worked on most of the Bulbasaurus page, would you be willing to bring it to GA status? A Wikipedia colleague of mine is working on Pokemon articles and is interested in improving as much articles related to the franchise as possible, so they'll need your help in you bringing it to GA. If you bring it to GA, we'd really appreciate it. Thanks! PrimalMustelid (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out! My time to edit is extremely limited these days, which is why I tend to stick to image review. So I probably couldn't take the lead on this but would be happy to contribute. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 14:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya! I'm the colleague in question (Been stalking this, sorry if I jumpscared you). I'm largely unfamiliar with the paleontology side of Wikipedia, but I'm willing to help improve this; any guidance would be greatly appreciated for this subject. Looking over the subject at a glance, what areas would you say need to be worked on before a potential Good Article nomination? Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One main thing - and this usually takes the most time - is just updating the article with subsequent literature. A cursory look on Google Scholar suggests there isn't a ton to write about Bulbasaurus, but it may be worth looking at general dicynodont or geikiid research (including phylogenetic analyses). The other main thing is that I wrote this article at a point where my prose was very inaccessible, especially in describing anatomy, so that probably needs a second pass. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 19:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]