User talk:Lyndsay Dart
December 2021
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Christmas tree, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 15:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Lyndsay Dart, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Lyndsay Dart! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Lyndsay Dart! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
December 2021
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elon Musk have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Elon Musk was changed by Lyndsay Dart (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854874 on 2021-12-24T19:56:50+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Elon Musk, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop attempting to push a pro-Musk tone. All of the edits you have proposed have already been discussed and declined. QRep2020 (talk) 21:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Elon Musk. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. OhKayeSierra (talk) 22:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Elon Musk. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhKayeSierra (talk) 23:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lyndsay_Dart reported by User:Andyjsmith (Result: ). Thank you. Andyjsmith (talk) 23:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Lyndsay Dart. I reviewed the complaint against you that was filed at WP:AN3. Though the report wasn't correctly filed, it was clear that you were edit warring. You may be blocked the next time you revert at Elon Musk unless you have received a prior consensus in your favor on the article talk page. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)