Jump to content

User talk:Loriendrew/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

Deletion of Weathermandan page

Talk:Weathermandan From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Contested deletion[edit] This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (This is a new type of school project that my teacher assigned. So if possible, could I keep this picture up, as it is factual but might not appear to be relevant. Thank you, Mncreations or WeatherManDan ) --Mncreations (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mncreations (talk • contribs) 04:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Older Jane

I've declined your request as speedy for significance doesn't apply to fictional characters. I'd suggest prod or AfD which are better places for this. The part is in the lower part of the list, but the actress has films against her name - but I'm not going to try to assess whether or not she deserves an article yet. This is a credited part, but looks minor (not only in age...), but I don't think it merits an article. Peridon (talk) 16:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

I've sorted out the wikilinks in it, just in case it survives. Peridon (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
BLP's are easy, notability of fictional (or historical fiction) characters is another thing. Guess I'll just AfD them in the future.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:34, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

what do you people have against having pages for GWAR characters on this site

seriously Gojirafan91 (talk) 20:58, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

ELNO

Hi Lorian, I got your massage that you deleted my two links from wikipedia pages and told me that it was not relevant to the pages. But i did add those only when I saw that there was dead link and I did add relevant link to the pages. Please review and check that again. If you think that it is not relevant you can remove those links any time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamsinner (talk • contribs) 11:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Read the external links policy as given on your talk page.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 11:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

The Republic of Briansistan

Please explain to me how the article breaks wikipedia's terms. I do not see, as a country and as it's leader, how you can say that an article about a real country violates terms and rules. Please advise. Thank you Megastringcheese (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santosh Mehrotra

Dear Loriendrew, just a little note to ask you, if you have the time and inclination, to have another look at the page on Santosh Mehrotra that you thought ought to be deleted. I know this persons work (I read the book with Jolly) and believe him to be notable. I think think I have done enough to remove the autobiographical stuff - and would be inclined to remove lots of the references to reviews of the books once the AFD is over if it is kept as they don't seem helpful to the article but might be useful for some of the technicalities of the Afd. Would you have any suggestions to improve the article - and are the other things that you think might best be removed or added? I think Deacon's quote and his work on the Indian HDR stuff could be enough. Best wishes, (Msrasnw (talk) 11:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC))

another article

You might want to add Shawangunk Ridge to your watch list, as the same IP-hopper has been vandalizing and edit-warring on that one too. Cheers, Softlavender (talk) 02:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

How pleasant... done and thanks.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Upper State New York University USNYU

Hello There,

Hope all is well. I saw your WP:RS tagged to the Upper State New York University USNYU article for deletion. It appears that the University did exist at one point. I see some past students have LinkedIn accounts.

See LinkedIn Alumni-->https://www.linkedin.com/edu/alumni?name=Upper+State+New+York+University&trk=prof-edu-school-name

Thanks and happy holidays to you and yours

Linkedin is not a reliable source.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I understand that your personal opinion as to linkedin may not be a reliable source, but my point was that the University had to have existed if former students listed this school on their resumes. Furthermore, you can't add schools on your resume as potential employers will check to confirm. Although there's not a lot of references, the article was built on information that was available. It's kind of hard to pull information from a defunct university. Please note that linkedin is a public website just like wikipedia Millions of people rely on linked to look at resumes of potential employees. So I wouldn't say that it's not reliable.

Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cabdkc123 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Unwarranted removal of edits.

Your removal of my edits to the grand jury page presents harm to the general public. Please refrain from such future removals of my content, even if it is in fact not constructive in your opinion. If you have an issue with specific information, use my talk page, or enter dispute resolution, don't simply remove or revert the information, as it will only serve escalate an issue that could readily have you answering to a grand jury.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew J Falkner (talk • contribs) 17:37, 29 December 2014

How to communicate?

Clearer instructions on how to respond to messages within the Wikipedia system would be helpful.Jaeze (talk) 16:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Writing on talk pages is one way, just make sure to create a new section so it does not fall into someone else's conversation. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Heads Up!

I'd keep an eye on this IP Address https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/176.250.207.185 and it's socks if I were you, it seems to be adding useless catigories to Video Game and Fictional Character Articles, as if they where produced by Movie Companies! --Vaati the Wind Demon (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

A few have been given temporary blocks. User keeps IP jumping though.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Artist deletion under section A7

Hi Loriendrew,

I saw you nominated my artist (Cameron Adair)'s page for deletion under Wikipedia section A7.

I have thoroughly reviewed the Notability Guidelines and Notability Guidelines (music) to meet the general Notability criteria and that for Musicians and Ensembles and would like to please contest this decision.

Cameron has performed at Walt Disney Concert Hall during his education at California Institute of the Arts in Los Angeles. His debut studio album was recorded and mixed by Multiple Grammy Award Nominee Chris Gehringer at Hyde Street Studios in San Francisco and Sterling Sound Studios in New York. It received worldwide distribution. He is also a former staff audio engineer at Hyde Street Studios and has worked with notable artist and engineers including Patrick (Bischoff) Brown, John Vanderslice, JMSN, and others.

He is performing at Noise Pop Festival in 2015 alongside Mick Jenkins (rapper).

In 2013 he was the subject of an intervention by Kristina Wandzilak, creator of Addicted (TV series) and was admitted to Crossroads Centre where he became friends with Anthony James (artist) and Alice Dellal.

It appears these credits meet the Verifiability criterion for Notability. Can you please advise? Thank You, Kristen Tyler (Cameron Adair MGMT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KristenTyler1 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Incorrect, I nominated the article for deletion via WP:AFD under the criteria that it fails WP:MUSICBIO, it was another person who made the WP:A7 nomination which you inappropriately removed. You also have a conflict of interest with the subject.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Loriendrew. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal talk 05:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol

Thanks for your anti-vandalism efforts. I can semi-protect your user page to keep vandals off of it if you agree to it.– Gilliam (talk) 02:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

That would be wonderful, pre-thank you very much.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Request for your opinion

Good morning Loriendrew! I noticed you've edited the topic Jimmy Edgar somewhat recently, and was hoping to collect viewpoints on an aesthetic issue. If you had a minute to contribute to the discussion/vote on the infobox photo, that would be very helpful. Earflaps (talk) 11:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Turtlevokia Page Deletion

I now understand that this was not the place for this, because this is an encyclopedia, which contains facts, not fabricated stories. Sorry to waste your time. JRpuffNstuff (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki

Hello, Loriendrew, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Edits in war

Nope, the edits weren't tests. They were meant as clarifications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.235.22.114 (talk) 19:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

They did not clarify.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Redirection of Harpur's Ferry page

Hi Loriendew. I know that we spoke about this topic a while back. I gave you some links to articles and sources for Harpur's Ferry SVAS. Why was the article deleted? HFSVAS is a nationally recognized collegiate agency. I see other wiki articles on collegiate EMS agencies as well. Is there someone that can explain better to me why this article was removed? I put a lot of work into that page and made sure to cite sources only to see it removed with no clear explanation. It is very discouraging when people come along who know nothing about your topic and seem to arbitrarily decide it is not noteworthy despite clear references.

Please let me know.Unwitnessed (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Eek! Forgot about that. Ok, to answer your questions:
That being said, I will work on it tonight. Everything after vehicles will probably get removed, the upper and lead cleaned up, references/citations be put inline, and have to try to find a couple more significant notability things that I can recall.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Ignoring some minor markups that will be fixed, take a look at User:Loriendrew/Harpur's Ferry. I'd love to have an allowable image/logo of "the patch" to be used.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 04:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


Corn Nuts

Not sure why we cannot add that CORN NUTS is a registered trademark of Kraft Foods in the first section to make sure that the public knows CORN NUTS is not a generic term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.236.202.6 (talk) 23:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC) Plus the information you added is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.236.202.6 (talk) 23:17, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

  1. To start, Corn nut is a generic term. Cornnuts or Corn nut#CORNNUTS is a specific product, now currently owned by Kraft. It has its own section within the article along with other brand names in different locations. If someone searches wiki for "Cornnuts" they will be taken directly to that section.
  2. I changed the citation from the USPTO search to another location. It satisfies the need to prove the claim of trademark ownership. It was the only thing added. According to the trademark search Kraft owns the name. Which part is "wrong"?--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Corn Nuts

FYI - Cornnuts is not a generic term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.236.202.6 (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Correct, I never said otherwise. Not sure why you keep arguing that point. Please understand that the article is about Corn nuts, which has a section on Cornnuts (the brand).--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


Alison Sudol

hi loriendrew - i'm new to wikipedia so i hope this works! :-) the reason i have created a new page for alison sudol is that she is no longer working under the A Fine Frenzy moniker. as a historical page dedicated to AFF i assume the wiki/afinefrenzy page should remain but as she moves forward with her new vocation as an actress this is very separate to her previous career as AFF. ie. Alison Sudol is not just A Fine Frenzy and as such deserves a different wiki entry. i hope that makes sense? thanks

Dannyduncombe (talk) 04:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I started a discussion on the article name change at Talk:A Fine Frenzy#RfC for article name change. Please comment there.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 04:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Scott Shad

Why is it for deletion explain maybe I forgot to remove the links — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asusx10 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Shad as mentioned in both the article and your talk page.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk Page for Crisis Intervention was Deleted

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crisis_intervention&action=edit&redlink=1

I have never seen an entire talk page be deleted before. How can discussion take place on improving the article if there is no talk page? The editor that deleted the talk pages cites it was an "attack page" and a "Biography of a living Person". If such content was on the page the logical thing would have been to undo it from the talk page if valid; not remove the entire talk page. If you are an Admin then please do something to get this talk page restored to Wikipedia. It seems some powerful special interest group does not want any discussion on this article topic. If you are not an Admin then please bring this to the attention of some Admins of Wikipedia. 71.79.56.225 (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

@Yunshui: might be the better person to ask as they are the one who deleted the page.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 10:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

List of tallest people

Hey, why did you revert my useful edit to this article? Osama bin Laden is the tallest mass murderer. You can find that on Google. No other mass murderer was taller than Osama bin Laden! Samhan Dobo (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Find a reliable source.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:15, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Shaila Scott WBLS radio personality page deleted

Hi Loriendrew I am baffled as to why my page was deleted. I saw you made a change to the WBLS page so I Thought you may be able to help get it replaced? Thanks for your help n(ShailaScott Radio (talk) 18:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)) Here's the link

You can look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaila Scott for the reasons that article was deleted. To reintroduce the article you would need to overcome the issues brought forward in the discussion.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Zama

So, you reverted my edits to the battle of Zama. Ha. Well that wasn't very nice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnRoe76 (talk • contribs) 04:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Possible Extinction

Talk:Wyattford From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Contested deletion[edit] I do not want my page deleted because it is incomplete. I also added some more citations and a lot more information that you deleted. Please undo what you have done to my page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyattford (talk • contribs) 02:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

The discussion about the article can be made on the talk page or at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possible Extinction as explained in the note left for you as well as on the box in the article.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Wikicology. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Talking About, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 21:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Placing an article under CSD should not "curate" an article. Alas, consensus does not agree.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

little help

I need a help your expensive (a): Loriendrew do a rename the article recently created by me, about the artist is best known by the stage name Eduardo (rapper) make a change to this name please. Vyblushy077 (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

The article has been moved at your request. Enjoy!--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for helping revert vandalism! Archanine (talk) 02:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Jr. comma RfC

You're invited to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#RfC:_Guidance_on_commas_before_Jr._and_Sr. Dohn joe (talk) 02:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Eduardo (rapper)

I am closing the AfD on this article as a Redirect, which is why I removed the AfD tag and pointed the article elsewhere. Thus, I am reverting your reverting of my redirect. Thanks. And Adoil Descended (talk) 03:23, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Going to have to disagree with your closure and ask for a review. Three delete and redirects vs one redirect does not make for a redirect.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 03:27, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
There was no consensus to keep it, admittedly, but every participant beyond the nominator believed the article should be redirected. Admittedly, it is a WP:BOLD closure, but anything otherwise would ignore the underlying consensus that those seeking information on Eduardo should be redirected to article about his band. And Adoil Descended (talk) 03:33, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
All I see is an edit war over this. @Loriendrew, did you request a "review"? I restored the redirect for the moment, but I don't want to see any more edit-warring over it.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
@Bbb23: I CSD'ed it due to the IP renewing the article from before the redirect, not because of the resultant AfD action. I did ask for a Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 April 18, closed without participation.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Let's see if I have the history straight. The AfD was closed with a redirect. You reverted that redirect once back in April. The AfD closer reverted you. Then we get to July. The IP restored the article. You reverted, which is fine. You and the IP went back and forth a couple of times. You tagged it per A4 while it was in the redirect state. Your motive may have been good, but that makes no sense. At the point that you and the IP were going back and forth, you should have sought semi-protection for the redirect. Then the IP restored the redirect. I'm assuming that was a mistake because they were so intent on removing the tag, but who knows? Anyway, then I stepped in ... and out, as it were. As of now, the redirect is holding. The article is unprotected. I'll enforce the redirect as necessary by keeping the redirect on my watchlist. I have a very big watchlist, so in case I miss something exciting, please let me know.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

My edits

I was actually running a test. I planted spelling errors on 5 pages. Good job finding them and fixing them. I congratulate you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voteforthisguy (talk • contribs) 01:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism, nontheless.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Please recreate the items I wrote about Danila Popel, they are real and up to date.

He would become more popular in further times, just let him be up there or he would not get any popularity on the internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Log1calGaming (talk • contribs) 01:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

You mean the inappropriate entry to List of tallest people? Please read WP:What Wikipedia is not.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Aaron Hernandez's name is wrong on his wiki page

Aaron's middle name is Josef, not Michael. His listed on the MA dept of Corrections Inmate locator as "Aaron J Hernandez" https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/detailsAction.do?siteId=20000&agency=1&id=W106228&searchType=offender

It is also listed as Josef in numerous documents filed by his attorneys. For example, page 5 of a request to release his medical records found here: http://ftpcontent2.worldnow.com/whdh/pdf/140617-hernandez-patriots-medical-subpoena.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.34.33.0 (talk) 00:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of employment practices section on Burger King, Arby's, KFC, and Wendy's pages:

Hello. It is my feeling that you need to cite a source that shows that none of these chains are involved in the citations that I referenced for each of those chain's pages'.

Here is the link to one: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Burger_King&oldid=prev&diff=660276260

Best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwiikkeeppeeddiiaa (talk • contribs) 04:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

I disagree, you posted the same quote to four different articles, just changing the company. As mentioned by another person, it belongs on a "fast food service" article.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 09:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your writing. I would like to note, that while you have recommended that the Anzalone Liszt Grove Research concerning wage theft and Berkley University data concerning worker reliance on public assistance be added to a page be added to a page called, "fast food service"-- this page does not exist. I would further like to add that all four of the companies' pages I added this research to, are a few of the most prevalent fast food companies in the U.S with heavy presences in New York City making the sources applicable to them. All of those companies are cited in another report that states," Low wages and lack of benefits at the 10 largest fast-food companies in the united States cost tax- payersanestimated$3.8billionperyear" (see citation below). I am thinking it might be applicable to cite the heavy presence of the restaurants in New York City as an additional source for the first source, though not the Berkeley one.

https://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/2015/03/NELP-Super-Sizing-Public-Costs-Fast-Food-Report.pdf

Best.Wwiikkeeppeeddiiaa (talk) 02:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Use of CSD G4

Hey Loriendrew. I have deleted A Fantástica Fábrica de Cadáver under CSD A9. I just wanted to let you know why it was not eligible under G4 as you tagged it. That criterion, linked above for you to review, is only for article that were considered on the merits at a deletion discussion such as at AfD, MfD, etc. It never applies to pages that were speedy deleted (or prodded). Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Although not G4, the album was mentioned as part of the AfD for the artist. It was A9'ed at the time. I just flagged it so the admin can see the discussion.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Tuskegee Football

Can you please explain why you deleted the fact I left that TU leads the nation in DII football attendance? Broadmoor (talk) 19:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

As explained in the revert message, the citation/reference you supplied did not show or explain how that statement is true.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Create music

Frytl songs of Javad Ramezani and Alexander Rybak is not to be confused with the girl fairies.--2.180.59.50 (talk) 10:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Girl fairies are notable and have an article. Songs by artists who do not have any notability need to be significant in some format. Neither the song nor the artist meet those requirements. How they relate to fairies is beyond me.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Coffee

Do you see the discussion on the talk page? I dont agree that my edits are disruptive. Zekenyan (talk) 00:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Eight minutes after posting to the talk page you made the edits. That is not waiting for consensus, given the weeks of discussion previously made (see archive 4 for the latest).--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes yes I apologize. Zekenyan (talk) 00:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

WQXR, WNYC and New York Public Radio

I don't understand why you keep removing New York City on WQXR because while they are licensed to Newark, their studios and antenna are located in Manhattan and their ID says Newark and New York. They basically are a New York City station despite the Newark license city. For WNYC, I was trying to make a section for Parent company New York Public Radio, which keeps redirecting to WNYC's page. There should be separate pages for New York Public Radio and WNYC. Finally, I put WQXR's logo with their Ossining repeater on it and that also got removed. Suediaz104 (talk) 00:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Radio stations are licensed to a location. This place can be found on the FCC license which is linked at the bottom of most station articles (external links section). To be specific, WQXR-FM is licensed to Newark, NJ, per the FCC license. They may service the NY metro area, have their main transmission antenna in NYC, and even their main studio, but they are licensed to Newark. As for your addition of the image, it was removed from wikicommons due to copyright infringement. Thank you for reminding me about your sockpuppetry.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 03:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Eye

Im new here and I don't know if Im supposed to reply here. I have made some good faith edits. Im not sure what you when you ask me if this is a test. I did not test you. I don't even know what you mean by test. Lastly I apologize if I did anything wrong. Im still trying to get the hang of this. Womanspresstoday — Preceding unsigned comment added by Womanspresstoday (talk • contribs) 00:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

A test edit is one where you are experimenting with edit functions. You seem to be removing spaces at the beginning of certain sentences. There is a space between a period, or of other punctuations, and the beginning of a new sentence.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok,Im so sorry. I thought I was cleaning it out and putting even spaces between subjects Im not a puppet I'm wommenspresstoday. Please explain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finalpoint (talk • contribs) 00:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Swinton image in entry for 1st Duke of Wellington

I saw you recently undid my edit on the Wikipedia entry for 1st Duke of Wellington. The Swinton image on this page, captioned as being of Kitty Pakenham, is incorrect. The painting is definitely of Elizabeth hay, 2nd Dss of Wellington. Please help me get this caption changed. I see this Swinton painting every day at my place of work. It is not of Kitty. I am not computer savvy enough to get this glaring error changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Copenhagen12 (talk • contribs) 07:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations

There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country#RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

H.M.Y.O.I Glen Parva

What citation can I get I know he served time there I was there and also a song mentions him and "getting boyed off on unit 14 in Glen Parva" Johnny5alive2015 (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing that bad edit I made :)--216.186.185.230 (talk) 03:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Leighton Meester is Pregnant

Where have you been lately? Have you seen any articles on her being pregnant? Here is proof: http://celebritybabies.people.com/2015/05/18/leighton-meester-pregnant-expecting-first-child-adam-brody/ (Muye123 (talk) 22:18, 13 July 2015 (UTC)) Muye123 (talk) 22:18, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Nowhere in that article does it say that she says she is pregnant. It is a picture of a woman. Infer what you want for yourself, but never assume a woman is pregnant unless she (or someone authorized on her behalf) says so.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Agreed. They haven't officially confirmed anything. She could just be putting on weight or wearing a fake baby bump for a role or something. Unlikely, but since it is still speculation, no adding. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 22:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)


Mobile Payments

If you have an objection to my edit please raise it on the talk page of the article. I raised my edit as relevant on the talk page in 2013; there were no observation or objections. I have some time now to improve this section. I'd be pleased to note any suggestions you have for improvement. Ensygnia and its IP is by far the single most relevant company in this space as far as my research has shown. Its IP is of encyclopaedic note. It is appropriately referenced to Tech Crunch a leading and well respected publication. I don't see the relevance of GO4Q - especially in isolation. More detail and work is needed on this section and there are more companies to add. I started work on this a number of years ago, but took a wiki-break. If you have more to add to improve the section please do so. But please do not revert my edits, it is not appropriate to do so unilaterally - especially when this has been raised on the talk page without objection - and there has been ample time to comment. Thank you.

Amicaveritas (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello question

The item has to be renamed to English? Why it happened so I can do this step. L3onardo1996 (talk) 14:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

WQXR New York

Most of WQXR's listeners are in New York City. WQXR serves New York City, their tag line is "New York's Classical Music Station" and in their legal ID, they say "Newark AND New York. Their underwriters are New York City Classical music organizations. Check out WQXR.org to see what it says on there. Loriendrew, I have a question: Are you a listener and member of WQXR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.152.62 (talk) 03:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


New York Public Radio

I wanted to know why New York Public Radio does not have a separate article from WNYC? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.152.62 (talk) 03:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Your assistance required, please!

Hello Loriendrew. How can I communicate with you privately? Best wishes, EditBGN — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditBGN (talk • contribs) 18:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

You can try following the instructions at Wikipedia:Emailing users although any response from me will not be occurring via email but here on wiki. If the communication is about the conflict of interest notice, it would be more appropriate to read through the notice you were given and at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:00, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

If content needs to be deleted or amended with this article, please advise. The guidelines clearly state that you should not use the COI tag unless there are significant or substantial problems with the article's neutrality as a result of the contributor's involvement. The article is neither too flattering nor too disparaging. On the contrary, negative source notes (such as the Mail newspaper article) have been left in place. All the amendments are derived from information which is in the public domain. No opinions have been expressed, merely facts recorded, all of which are verified by external sources.

We would remind you that a public pronouncement of conflict of interest (which this amounts to) could be construed as harassment, unless it is substantiated. Kindly elaborate on the “significant or substantial problems with the article’s neutrality”, or else remove the tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditBGN (talk • contribs) 06:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

18:30 21 August (GMT) We repeat: the guidelines state that you should not use the COI tag unless there are significant or substantial problems with the article's neutrality as a result of the contributor's involvement. If content needs to be deleted or amended with this article, you must specify which section/s need to be modified, or the tag will be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditBGN (talk • contribs)

Your account appears to be the epitome of Conflict of Interest:
  1. Edits appear to have the sole purpose of editing one article, see WP:Single-purpose account
  2. Wording above indicate the account is being used by more than one person, see WP:NOSHARING
  3. The selected username indicates a connection to the one and only article you/y'all have edited, see WP:GROUPNAME
  4. A case of WP:SOCKPUPPETRY can be made, given that a new user removed the COI tag as their first edit.
I advise you to proceed carefully with future edits and posts.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Please advise as to how to undo the edits and return the page to its original content, so that the tag can be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditBGN (talk • contribs) 03:43, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Benedict Grant Noakes is now somewhat cleaned and formatted.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

WQXR Broadcast Area

One last thing. I looked at 105.9 FM's wiki before WQXR and WCAA swapped frequencies and it said WCAA, City of License: Newark, New Jersey and Broadcast Area: New York, New York. Why can't WQXR-FM's wiki say the same thing since the city is the main place where the signal comes in. Please don't put New York Metro Area since the signal only reaches mostly the 5 boroughs of NYC. I would rather put New York, New York. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.107.60.19 (talk) 04:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your opinion cannot override sourced information.
  1. Per their website: "WQXR is at 105.9 on the FM dial in the New York City metropolitan area"
  2. It does not matter what population is served, the station is licensed to a specific location. The City of license in the infobox reflects to where the FCC license is granted.

--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Hii :(

I want to meet with Mr amitabh bachan Saimgurwara (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a social networking service--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Check his contributions. He is a Troll. A fine specimen. It should be monitored closely. - Nirinsanity (talk) 21:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

todd claus

Hey, you edited my addition to todd claus. That was an integral part of his character. I know him personally. Who are you to say that my story is incorrect? I was there to witness the event. Were you? Mattmeish (talk) 09:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Eyewitness accounts are considered original research. Unless accompanied by reliable sourcing it is considered to be a violation of the WP:BLP policy and is considered to be vandalism.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 10:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear sur,

Hi sur , I am Youssef Stevanovisky .Lately I was trying to create my new page in wikipedia which is Kingdom of Etlopya talking about a new micronation country in Asia, however, it always end up with deleteing the page...,so I wrote all the rules ... and finally I create the page again depend with wikipedia's rules . So I wish that you can have a look on my page and tell me if there is any thing I made wrong to can fix it instead of deleting my page every time. Youssef Stevanovisky (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Without any form of reliable sourcing, your article is nothing more than something made up, pure vandalism, or a hoax. As such it will be deleted and you will find yourself blocked from editing if you continue to reintroduce it.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


WQXR Branding

Hi Loriendrew, I just wanted you to know that the branding for WQXR is Classical 105.9 FM WQXR. It's the branding the station uses so please don't revert my edit because it's correct. Thank you so much for your attention. Also, if WQXR is licensed to a city about a half hour away from the city and the station are based in the city, can it still be considered a New York City station. The license is not the problem. NPR's station list is. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.107.60.19 (talk) 04:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Read the section below on city of license. As for branding, nowhere on either their main website nor About WQXR is there any indication of this branding.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:31, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


Well, they say that branding on the air. The hosts say on Classical 105.9 FM WQXR, music of composer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh.diaz1096 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

findwiki Hi lorien

Actually I'm not a new on wiki. so that was I have deleted some change on Medical auditing page. can you suggest me how to write about on this page and with under wiki guidelines. let me know some other replated points. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Findwiki (talk • contribs) 12:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

HI I want to know why you delete my Contribution

Why you delete my contribution as I only update features of RTLS applications as other did. If you targeting me as I am promoting my site so check out reference number 3,4,5 on the same page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_locating_system — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophia Andre (talk • contribs) 13:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing those out. Generally do not provide a reference/source that also sells the product. Please read about reliable sourcing.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Wiki Page About Solar Power

Can you withdraw your nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Wiki Page About Solar Power? I had been discussing with the creator about moving it to their user space, and I think it's a better outcome than going through AfD.

We can always come back later and MfD it or CSD it with U5. —C.Fred (talk) 01:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

That was annoying but done.. that closing template should be put over in WP:NACD--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:36, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Don't think I can move it without leaving a redirect, if you would be so kind.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Regarding Blair Waldorf

Hi, Lorindrew!

I'm sorry that I deleted the conversation about Blair Waldorf. I was actually trying to add a message regarding why I had changed her picture and I accidentally deleted the whole discussion while trying to delete a sentence I wrote. (Whoops!) I tried to revert it but I couldn't figure out how to, so I just added my message (which got lost in your revert) and explained why I had changed the picture. I re-added a message (without deleting the text :)) if you want to look at it, but I'm going to give you a synopsis anyways.

I think that Blair's picture should be one of her as portrayed in the TV show by Leighton Meester because all of the other characters have pictures of their TV portrayers as their profile picture, so why shouldn't Blair? I am an actively engaged Gossip Girl watcher and I often look at Wiki pages while I am watching to clarify some things in the show, and I do not like that all of the other characters have pictures of the actors but Blair does not. Also, the book is more popular than the TV show, and Blair is more widely recognized as Leighton Meester; not the unknown model on the cover.

And I'm sorry for all of the edits I made a few days ago with the pictures, I couldn't figure out how to add one, so they are all from my failed attempts at changing the picture.

I am a supervisor over at WikiAnswers, and while I know it is different than WikiPedia, I know how it feels to have your work that you are so proud of changed by some random kid on the internet. I eventually realized that other people have opinions and I needed to respect that. I know how the revert system works and how some IP user changing your authoritative answer/article is really annoying but please take the time to acknowledge other users opinions. Because IP users are actually the majority of viewers to your article. (I would've made an account but I don't really want to because I have no use for it).

Thanks for listening to my concerns!

65.189.2.184 (talk) 20:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)XOXO, Gossip Girl

Hello there

I am forced to notify you of this Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you..

Sorry but it had to be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by THGFangirl (talk • contribs) 20:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Did you disgruntle someone recently?

WP:ANI#Lorindrew.

I notice the IP above made the same misspelling of your username. Do you suppose the new account from the ANI thread is the same person? —C.Fred (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, that was interesting. If so they wrote a nice dialog first, and actually progressed to discussing something on an article talk page which was then followed by the trolling without further involvement from me. /shrug--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism

This username has been involved in a great deal of vandalism edits/reverts. Please refrain from editing/reverting without discussing on the article's Talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.203.114.77 (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

A twitter account is not a reliable source considering an entire article is devoted to the subject.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Philip II of Macedon

Please interpret or rewrite the verification I added somehow instead of removing sources of Cambridge University and Oxford University - the best universities worldwide. It is exactly mentioned "truly" and "purely".Judist (talk) 03:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Harassment? Not a chance

I was not harassing RyanTQuinn, every time I make a non-vandalism, correct edit on Ed Sheeran's page, he's always there to delete them, calling my edits "weak". Check the edit history for the 21 of November, he's basically stating that my edits aren't important enough to be on the page, and won't even discuss it with me, instead just delete EVERY edit without even reading them. Since I joined Wikipedia, no one has even touch Sheeran's page, so I decided to update it with recent events and his accomplishments. But now RyanTQuinn just comes out of nowhere deleting and calling my edits weak? And there're not warned about that, but I get accused of harassment? Where's the justice? Kalope (talk) 07:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Linda Thompson

Hello Loriendrew, thank you for your help with the citations I added to the Linda Thompson page. I would like to ask your advice on how it could have been done better. For the film and TV credits, what would be a more reliable source? For example in this line:

"She later had small one-episode parts in such television shows as "CHiPs , Starsky and Hutch, Vega$, Fantasy Island, The Fall Guy, and Beverly Hills, 90210."

Small one-time appearances might never have gotten a journalistic mention per se (let alone academic), so then how could these credits be verified to Wikipedia standards? They do seem relevant, particularly in aggregate, but how can they be verified?

As to Amazon also not being a valid source, this confuses me because I read in this guideline that, while journalistic or academic sources are preferred, a link to a commerce site for book or a piece of music can serve to verify "things like titles and running times". In this case, to put a citation to co-authorship of song lyrics, I added a link to the print version of those lyrics, where the authors are clearly stated... does that not seem valid?

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mityorn (talk • contribs) 18:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Descendants Wikipedia

Descendants was the only nominee for the 2016 Writers Guild Awards "Children's Longform Program" category. so by default they have won. On their Wikipedia it says they were nominated when they're really the winners. Please fix that. Descendants2015 (talk) 01:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

The award ceremony has not taken place, therefore they are still nominees.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

WP:BOLD.

My edit was not "unconstructive" - I made a bold edit and you have unfairly labeled my editing as disruptive, which it clearly is not. --109.149.121.174 (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

It was not Bold, but WP:RECKLESS, especially given the edit summary. As suggested, discuss it on the article's talk page and develop a consensus (again).--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

78.26's RFA Appreciation award

The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Black Supremacy

Uh no. This is not disruptive. If you would actually read what you are trying to edit war over, I am trying to remove a "Citation Needed" which claims that "Black supremacy or black supremacism is an racist ideology" needs a citation. Anyone with an IQ over 25 could tell you that is not necessary. This is objectively disgusting. Quit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.242.159.99 (talk) 20:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

IP, did you know there's a talk page you could bring this up on? I notice you haven't chimed in on the (extremely long-running) discussion. clpo13(talk) 20:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
(to the IP)-In that case it should be easy enough to find a valid reliably sourced reference.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Jay L Hawkins Wikipage

Hello and good morning. Yesterday I published a biographical page for myself for the purposes of my work (film industry professional) and I wanted to know if my references have been reviewed and if I need to change more information. Im not too familiar with Wiki but if I know what I need to change then I will be sure to figure it out. Thank you!

Page in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_L_Hawkins — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaystunts (talk • contribs) 17:37, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

A number of serious problems are evident:
  1. It is an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY
  2. As an autobio it is assumed to be a promotional article
  3. There are no valid and reliable sources, essentially references "about" you, not "by" you
  4. There is no evidence of notability to warrant inclusion as an article
Generally, once a person meets those standards someone will write an article about them.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Notability on Year lists

I just want Loriendrew to notice that the two people I added to 1991 births, Rachel Ballinger and Gabbie Hanna are both famous youtubers where,

  • Rachel is over 1 million subscribers on YouTube, which is excellent, and is the younger sister of the impersonator of Miranda Sings, who is very well known.
  • Gabbie is verified on YouTube and Vine, because she is a famous person who deserves to be put on that page

Loriendrew just a piece of advice, look the people up before you delete them off of the page, because they are famous.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AJRBPB (talk • contribs) 00:56 2 January 2016

If a person is not notable enough to have an article, they do not belong on a list of notable people with birthdays. See WP:LISTN and WP:WTAF--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 05:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Josh Jones (Actor)

Thanks for your review, but, can you be specific on what is making this article a deletion candidate or what is lacking in this article to be accepted? I've reviewed the deletions page on Wiki and this article seems to meet all the necessary requirements for it not to be deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Baseballjj (talk • contribs)

A person must meet certain notability requirements which do not appear to be met at this time, also known as WP:TOOSOON. The large box on the article explains the process and the discussion about the article.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 03:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. Josh's movie has been released and is found on the website referenced with credit to Joshua Jones. This article really seems to meet the notability requirement. Is a donation required for acceptance of the article? Also, I checked on Josh Jones the Rugby player on Wikipedia, per that article, it seems that the "notability requirement" threshold is actually quite low.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Baseballjj (talk • contribs)

Sock Puppetry

I can assure you that I only operate this account. I happen to be personally invested in the article on Joseph M. Brook as he has had a profound impact on my life. I believe that the criteria for his article to be considered significant has been met. Zarnacle (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your edit history and actions can appear to indicate some form of collaborative process.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 03:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Gram rec

I repeat: So why Kendric Lamar is on the artcle? -es:Usuario:Progenie

I do not see him at Grammy Award records#Most nominations without winning.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
And what abou Nicki Minaj and Wiz Kalifa?? Progenie (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Those do not belong either, until they qualify by not winning. Removed.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 18:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what What should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loriendrew/Archive_4&oldid=1144368189"