User talk:LewisMCYoutube/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:LewisMCYoutube. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, LewisMCYoutube, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Yunshui ^雲 _水 20:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lewismc2000 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:22, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LewisMCYoutube (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I created this account to be able to fix short grammar mistakes. LewisMCYoutube is actually my Minecraft nickname (as Lewis is my real name). I have no idea who he/she is. LewisMCYoutube (talk) 18:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC) - See the edits below --LewisMCYoutube (talk) 10:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 18:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you want to explain this edit, how you even found that user (who was blocked in 2012), and why you thought it was a good idea?

You can say that it would not be very wise of a sockpuppet to go and edit pages of their own old accounts, but I've seen people do that just recently. I have no idea why they do that, but apparently it happens.

Also your edits to the article Evil were not very helpful. There's an obvious difference between immorality and immortality. You could have been genuinely confused, or you could have been trolling. I don't know. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 18:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

1) I found the user while searching for my own user page - I had no idea why it was a bad idea - After looking at the contributions, ask yourself a question. Do I really go around redirecting pages?

2) Exactly.

3) Exactly. I was editing this because there was a spelling mistake in the word immortality, meaning eternal or infinite life (which is what I am pretty sure it is supposed to say). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LewisMCYoutube (talk • contribs)

First of all: don't edit other people's comments like you just did here. That includes not inserting your comments inside other people's posts. In the end result it is not visible anymore who said what. Just put your comments below others' posts and then sign it with your signature. (Here I separated your comments from my original post, and signed it for you.)

Okay, it's somewhat believable that you found that user by trying to search your own name. Still it seemed really unnecessary and trollish to give someone a "trophy" for being blocked.

No, it's not a spelling mistake. Like I said, immorality and immortality are two different things, and the Evil article was taking about immorality i.e. lack of morality. You've heard about "morals" before, right? Anyway, it's believable that you were just trying to help. I suggest using the {{unblock}} thing again (below these posts here) so an admin can come and have a look again. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 11:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

1) Here. I'm formatting properly. Happy?

2) I never thought of that.

3) That doesn't make a bit of sense.

3.1) You: You've heard about "morals" before, right?

3.2) Me: Nope!

4) Seriously... check my IP.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LewisMCYoutube (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 15:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Benefit of the doubt

Having taken another look, I'm inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt - it's conceivable that you've simply been a bit careless, rather than deliberately disruptive. I'm unblocking this account under WP:ROPE; if you edit in a sensible manner from hereon in, you shouldn't have any further problems. Yunshui ^雲 _水 20:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Staying safe on Wikipedia

Hi Lewis. If what you wrote on your userpage is true (it's the section that I removed and I've hidden it in the edit history of that page) then please be very wary of what you post here. Whilst Wikipedia is largely a safe place for younger editors, it is not advisable to advertise your name, age, contact details or location anywhere online, especially not on one of the world's largest websites. I see you're working through the Wikipedia Adventure - hope you're enjoying it! - but when you've finished, you might want to have a read of this advice page before continuing. All the best, Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

I just put everything on there the Wikipedia Adventure told me to put on there (everything you are telling me not to put on there) --LewisMCYoutube (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll have a word with the guys that run the Adventure, then - whilst your userpage is a place you can write about yourself, it's important to be cautious in what you reveal. Don't worry; you haven't done anything wrong! Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

I've played through the Adventure and it did definitely not tell me to put up personal details. It just asked me to introduce myself or something like that. That's not the same thing. I would really recommend staying safe and not putting up info that other people really don't need to know. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 11:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

The box on lesson one said that you may want to put up your reason for joining, location, and education, and a few other things.

Emphasis on may. For an old fogey like me, sticking my real name and where I live on Wikipedia wouldn't be too big a deal (and despite that, I'm still extremely careful about staying anonymous). For younger editors, it's important to avoid posting too much personal information - by all means tell us what you like, what you're interested in and so on, but be careful not to give away anything that might allow someone to find you in real life. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why someone would knock down on every door in {{Insert City Here}}, but whatever. There is also Template:Location Map and Wikipedia:Userboxes/Cities to show your location.

Speedy deletion nomination of Pscychology

Hello LewisMCYoutube,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pscychology for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Mojang games

Hello LewisMCYoutube,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Mojang games for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. BuntyPathak (talk) 00:44, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion has been declined by Reaper Eternal, so you can ignore the above message. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Mojang games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, link fixed as soon as I saw the message. Thanks! --LewisMCYoutube (talk) 09:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia

I have declined your unfathomable speedy deletion nomination of Uncyclopedia. Not sure what you were thinking there, but no. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I am wondering why you declined my speedy deletion nomination of Uncyclopedia. Not sure what you were thinking there, but what? --LewisMCYoutube (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Edits at Talk:Main Page

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Talk:Main Page, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Organics ^talk 12:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

That was a FAC nomination, not a test edit. --LewisMCYoutube (talk) 12:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

My apologies, but your nomination appeared to be nominating the first archive of Talk:Main Page, which is not an article. Organics ^talk 13:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict)The main page cannot be a FAC as it contains no content, it's a portal for the various sections that appear on it, including Today's featured article. In the last hour all your edits have been bordering on disruptive. For someone who was blocked and subsequently unblocked after being given the benefit of the doubt, your actions are sailing close to the wind of getting reblocked. Nthep (talk) 13:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar of Awesome

	Barnstar of Awesome
	You are hereby awarded the Barnstar of Awesome for your amazing work adding published reliable sources, neutral and relevant information, clear formatting and beautiful images to the Wikipedia Adventure article on Earth. Keep up the stellar job you're doing. Yay you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LewisMCYoutube (talk • contribs)

Falsifying signatures on talk page posts, as you did in this edit in which you added this barnstar to your own user talk page, can really only be considered vandalism. Please don't do it again. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Dan, that may well have been a part of the Wikipedia Adventure. I'm not entirely in the know about it, but I do recall past discussions on the Village Pump of it causing your own account to post messages to your talk page in the guise of other users, in order to simulate interaction with others as part of the adventure itself. User:GaiaGirl86 would seem to confirm so. Organics ^talk 13:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Yup. All the messages from TWA go in a subpage though, he just moved the barnstar here. See User_talk:LewisMCYoutube/TWA#Barnstar_of_Awesome. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 14:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

@Organics: I was going to apologize to Lewis for my suspicions, but I see that his unorthodox editing following his recent unblock have gotten him reblocked. But I'll remember to keep the whole TWA thing in mind in the future. (It seems odd that the Wikipedia training program would cause user edits to be signed by another user. There has to be a better way. A topic for the Village Pump, I suppose.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

It's a fictional user created for the express purpose of being used in TWA, also the edit summaries always say something like "new message simulated by The Wikipedia Adventure" plus those messages are only intended to be posted on 'secret' subpages in the user's userspace. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 15:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi LewisMCYoutube! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:11, Monday, April 13, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Speedy deletion nomination of Template talk:Cycling team nolink

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham Beards (talk) 13:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

LewisMCYoutube (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I was blocked about 5 years ago for disruptive editing. I do not deny that I made disruptive edits to the site, though they were not out of malice. Before the disruptive editing block, I was banned as a suspected sockpuppet of a user named Lewismc2000. The only evidence I can provide that I am not and was not a sockpuppet is that I have used the username LewisMCYoutube actively since 2015, for example on my reddit account of the same name. I was hoping that you would be willing to forgive me. I have matured both physically and mentally over the past five years, and I swear that if I am unblocked I will only make edits that I am sure will be helpful to this encyclopedia. However, I do have something I must admit. Both today and yesterday I made an edit to the "Josh Pieters" article. Upon a reading of the rules, it is my understanding that I violated the rule against ban evasion by doing this. I understand why my appeal might be denied based on this, but I hope you understand that I was only adding new information to the article and not acting disruptively. Thank you. LewisMCYoutube (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Its been five years, and I believe time changes people. If you need some help or guidance, don't be afraid to leave a note on my talk page, I love helping new users, especially with creating content. Please be careful though with editing, especially in the first few weeks. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:01, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@Graham Beards: I know you blocked 5 years ago and might not remember much, but this is your block. I am inclined to unblock here, given how long it has been. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 17:01, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

CaptainEek, I agree, but I will monitor all this editor's contributions for a while. Graham Beards (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates

Read this in another language • Subscription list

Mockup of the new reply feature, showing new editing tools — The new features include a toolbar. What do you think should be in the toolbar?

This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.

Reply tool: This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature will get new features soon. The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing @. You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.
New requirements for user signatures: Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable. Most editors will not be affected.
New discussion tool: The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions. You can see the initial design on the project page.
Research on the use of talk pages: The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles. We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.

– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diane Chenery-Wickens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for David Cook (Northern Ireland politician)

On 22 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article David Cook (Northern Ireland politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, Lewis,

If you tag a page for deletion, you must post a notice on the user talk page of the page creator. This is made easy if you use Twinkle which will do this automatically for you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
I apologize if I have made a mistake, but I believe I have left a notice on the user talk pages of the creators of any articles that I have recently nominated or tagged for deletion. LewisMCYoutube (talk) 04:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Talk: Ding Lei (businessman, born 1963), this entry does not meet the specifications, I created a mobile application. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanxingtuan (talk • contribs) 09:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited USA Today, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Cite Unseen update

Hello! Thank you for using Cite Unseen. The script recently received a significant update, detailed below.

You can now toggle which icons you do or don't want to see. See the configuration section for details. All icons are enabled by default except for the new generally reliable icon (described below).
New categorizations/icons:
- Advocacy: Organizations that are engaged in advocacy (anything from political to civil rights to lobbying). Note that an advocacy group can be reliable; this indicator simply serves to note when a source's primary purpose is to advocate for certain positions or policies, which is important to keep in mind when consuming a source.
- Editable: Sites that are editable by the public, such as wikis (Wikipedia, Fandom) or some databases (IMDb, Discogs).
- Predatory journals: These sites charge publication fees to authors without checking articles for quality and legitimacy.
- Perennial source categories: Cite Unseen will mark sources as generally reliable, marginally reliable, generally unreliable, deprecated, and blacklisted. This is based on Wikipedia's perennial sources list, which reflects community consensus on frequently discussed sources. Sources that have multiple categorizations are marked as varied reliability. Note that generally reliable icons are disabled by default to reduce clutter, but you can enable them through your custom config. A special thanks to Newslinger, whose new Sourceror API provides the perennial sources list in a clean, structured format.
With the addition of the new categorizations, the biased source icon has been removed. This category was very broad, and repetitive to the new advocacy and perennial sources categorizations that are more informative.

If you have any feedback, requested features, or domains to add/remove, don't hesitate to bring it up on the script's talk page. Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

You are receiving this message as a user of Cite Unseen. If you no longer wish to receive very occasional updates, you may remove yourself from the mailing list.

Newspapers.com

Hey there. I saw you request quite a few articles from newspapers.com on the resource exchange. If you need an account, you can always apply for one with the Wikipedia Library here :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabel Bonner has been accepted

Isabel Bonner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 05:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffrey Archer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holloway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Isabel Bonner

On 24 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Isabel Bonner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actress Isabel Bonner died on stage while performing in a play written by her husband? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isabel Bonner. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Isabel Bonner), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations

Your DYK hook about Isabel Bonner drew 12,397 page views (1,033 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of March as shown at March 2021 DYK STATS. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 18:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omega Mart has been accepted

Omega Mart, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Omega Mart

On 1 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Omega Mart, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the supermarket Omega Mart has nut-free salted peanuts available for purchase? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Omega Mart. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Omega Mart), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Kay (journalist, born 1943), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Kay (journalist, born 1943), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Press Council.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Murder in Brentwood

Hello, LewisMCYoutube. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murder in Brentwood, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gerald Boyle

Hello, LewisMCYoutube. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gerald Boyle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Murder in Brentwood

Hello, LewisMCYoutube. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Murder in Brentwood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gerald Boyle

Hello, LewisMCYoutube. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gerald Boyle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Joan Wetmore

Hello, LewisMCYoutube. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joan Wetmore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Joan Wetmore

Hello, LewisMCYoutube. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joan Wetmore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)