User talk:Lazman321/Archive 2022

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Enigma - Sadeness (Part I).ogg

A tag has been placed on File:Enigma - Sadeness (Part I).ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mitar (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Peer review

Hey there, thanks for reaching out to me. I don't feel like I have the bandwidth to give the article a good peer review, but I could suggest a few people who've recently taken video/computer game articles through FAC. See if you can get a hold of User:GamerPro64 or User:Shooterwalker; they should have a good feel for what the article might need in its final push towards FA status. bibliomaniac15 05:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

@Bibliomaniac15: Thanks for the reply. I might try to get a hold of Shooterwalker. However, I will probably wait until after the Good Article review of Metroid: Samus Returns is finished as GamerPro64 is the nominator and I am the reviewer. Lazman321 (talk) 04:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 13:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game)

The article LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game)

The article LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 14:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game)

On 10 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that LittleBigPlanet, a video game that allows the player to create levels, coincided with the rise of user-generated content? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

FA Review

Hey, I wanted to message you about the Chibi-Robo FA review you did recently. First of all thank you for pointing out the flaws in the article, I very much appreciate it as to hopefully rectify my mistakes. However, I want to say sorry for the delay in the fixing of the mistakes, suddenly life became very busy on a shorthand notice so I haven't been able to do much work. I aiming to get back to working on the article on Monday. Thank you once again for the review. CaptainGalaxy 22:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Master (Fallout)

You should request a histmerge of The Master (Fallout) to Master (Fallout), previously redirected as non-notable. -- ferret (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

In appreciation

	The honourable opposer's award
	By the authority vested in me by myself I present you with this award in recognition of one or more well argued opposes at FAC. I may or or may not agree with your reasoning and/or your oppose, but I take a Voltarian attitude towards your right to state it. Thank you, such stands help to make Wikipedia stronger. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Master (Fallout)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Master (Fallout) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Master (Fallout)

The article The Master (Fallout) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Master (Fallout) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All the Light We Cannot See

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All the Light We Cannot See you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of All the Light We Cannot See

The article All the Light We Cannot See you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:All the Light We Cannot See for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Review swap

Hi Lazman, I've currently got an FAC nomination for Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine live. If possible, would you be willing to review that and I'll review your Fallout nom? Anarchyte (talk) 07:44, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@Anarchyte: I will try to do a general source check for Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine for the FAC in exchange for one on Fallout. However, due to school, it might take awhile to finish. I will try my best. Lazman321 (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, sounds good. However, Monaco has already received a source review. If you're still willing to do a prose review, I can do the same for you. Anarchyte (talk) 05:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't need a prose review; TheJoebro64 already assessed the prose. I just need a source review for formatting and reliability. Also, at least two users on your FAC have already assessed Manaco for its prose. It appears that the two source reviews you received did not perform spot checks. I could perform spot checks for your FAC, and you could perform a source review for my FAC. Lazman321 (talk) 13:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Works for me. Will do tomorrow. Anarchyte (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

A belated welcome to the club

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 20:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Fallout (video game)

Congratulations, Lazman321! The article you nominated, Fallout (video game), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carrie (novel)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carrie (novel) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carrie (novel)

The article Carrie (novel) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Carrie (novel) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)