User talk:Largoplazo/Archives/Archive 17

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Largoplazo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Speedy deletion nomination of Usuario;hugochinchilla

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Usuario;hugochinchilla, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OluwaCurtis The King : talk to me 14:46, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

@OluwaCurtis: I didn't create the page, I moved it to a proper title. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

the linguistic work about Tunisian Arabic

Dear Mr., As I have said, I have added some parts to the work. As these parts are not linguistic, you can review them. Moreover, as we are going to publish the work in Applied Linguistics, you have to give me your name and affiliation so that I can add you as an author for this work.

Tunisian Arabic: Wikipedia linguistic review

Houcemeddine Turki, Maik Gibson, User Largoplazo, Emad Adel

The work was edited using the English version of Wikipedia provided by Wikimedia Foundation. Maik Gibson from SIL International made the structure and the original version of the work in 2007 and brought the work to C Status, Houcemeddine Turki rewrote it and involved more details and references and brought it to GA Status, Emad Adel and Houcemeddine Turki collected reference literature for this linguistic review and User Largoplazo verified and adjusted the output of the work. Some other users of English Wikipedia (less than 60 words have been added to the work by each of them) had added further information to the work and contributed to the verification of the provided data.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 15:38, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Be sure you know the rules for copying content from Wikipedia and attributing authorship, which are here. I am not giving you my real name. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

I will do like this. See the Dengue Fever... If it is done before, I do not think that this will be against the Wikipedia regulations... Furthermore, Maik Gibson is a linguist and there is also Mr. Mohamed Maamouri who is reviewing my edits and who is a linguist and we will publish the work under CC BY-SA 3.0 License as well. So, I do not think that there is a problem in doing this. If I said something wrong, please tell me that soon. I apologize if you understood that as an interference in your personal life and social data. Separately, I had nominated the work as a good work. please give me your comments and opinions about what I should do to get the GA status.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 12:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Watlow Page

Hi Largoplazo,I removed the content which referenced the EEOC because I felt it did not align with the purpose and flow of the page. It seems to be a more broad, positive overview of the company's history and I thought your edit interrupted that. Respond with any thoughts you might have.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Heatersandsensorsthermal (talk • contribs)

@Heatersandsensorsthermal: Hello. Having articles serve as a "positive overview" is not a purpose of Wikipedia. In fact, Wikipedia has a strict neutrality policy. It was when I was looking up the company online to get a feel for whether it met Wikipedia's notability guidelines for inclusion (and I concluded that it did) that I came across the articles with information on the EEOC case. The articles themselves, appearing in high-profile publications, remarked on the significance of the size of the settlement, so I felt it was a sufficiently significant event in the history of the company to include it in an article meant to give a "broad" (your word) picture of it.

By the way, when you converse on Wikipedia, on talk pages and so forth (but never in articles), please WP:SIGN your articles. Just type four tildes, ~~~~, at the end of your contribution, and they'll be converted automatically to a signature when you save it. I used a template to sign your note above for you, it isn't automatic (though in some situations a bot comes by and does what I did). —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

About Real Name

My name is Edwin Molupe. Edwin &/or Edward are my real names. how's that affects? Ras Benjih 06:45, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Each Wikipedia user gets one user page, the one that goes with his or her user name. Yours is User:Ras Benjih. Articles themselves aren't for your personal use. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Acorn Growth Companies

Hi there - I understand the concerns and my apologies for the misunderstanding of policy on my part. What would you suggest? That I delete the page all together? Suggest that someone else creates it on behalf of the company? I did go over conflict of interest, and honestly I did think it was objective, but I can see how because it is tied to me it violates policy. Again my apologies, and willing to comply.

Please advise.

Thank you -

Thanks for your note. I think the article has details in it that a disinterested person wouldn't include in an article, more like a business profile than an encyclopedia article. It's been tagged accordingly, and we can see if anyone fixes it up. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

About publishing Tunisian Arabic

I will do like this. See the Dengue Fever... If it is done before, I do not think that this will be against the Wikipedia regulations... In fact and as said in the regulations, the works in Wikipedia can be republished under CC BY-SA 3.0 License and this is available in the Applied Linguistics journal. So, I do not think that there is a problem in doing this. Instead, this will give more trustworthiness to the work. Furthermore, Maik Gibson is a linguist and there is also Mr. Mohamed Maamouri who is reviewing my edits and who is a linguist. So, this work can be considered for a scientific peer review as it is written by several users and reviewed by several reference scholars. Separately, I had nominated the work as a good work. please give me your comments and opinions about what I should do to get the GA status. Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 12:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Dear Mr.,

I had discussed the publication of Tunisian Arabic in Applied Linguistics with Doc James. As you know, James Heilman or Doc James is a member of the Board of Trustees. He knows about advanced Wikimedia regulations. Furthermore, he is the user who published Dengue Fever in Open Medicine. He had said to me that Tunisian Arabic could be published if you include the names of significant contributors like you. There are four significant contributors to the work: Houcemeddine Turki (User:Csisc) (506 edits in 13:03), Maik Gibson (User:Maikgibson, User:Drmaik) (82 edits in 13:03), you (User:Largoplazo) (44 edits in 13:03) and Emad Adel (User:GeekEmad) (13 edits in 13:03 and searched for references with me). So, I have to include the four authors and inform them of publishing the work. After, the work should have FA Status. Then, the work should be published in a scholarly journal under CC BY-ND-SA 3.0 License. This is possible with Applied Linguistics but we should pay for that and this is also possible for free in Open Linguistics.

I ask if you agree on publishing Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 13:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Risto Airikkala

Hi. You tagged the Risto Airikkala article as possibly written by someone close to the subject. Instead, I think the article is very negative towards its subject and contains original research. We're trying to figure out in the Finnish Wikipedia how to deal with the article there, as the subject might not even be notable. I don't know how to deal with it here, so I thought I'd let you know about it. -Whitetabor (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

about my editing

Dear largo n whatever You people dont understand World language, you only read English ! So you have more research in every language of world .You illiterate man ,who don't understand Marathi,konkani ,Agri . I will teach you Marathi ,Hindi & Agri dialect free of cost Ha ha ha just joke of part Research in every language is important not only in English. Dhirajbhoir (talk) 12:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I know very well that lots of information is out there in languages other than English. I read a number of languages besides English, and I've translated non-English articles that people have posted to English Wikipedia into English. But I can't research in languages I can't read, especially when I don't know the writing system because then I can't even search on the terms I'm looking for. So I can't verify the information you've written. Others have tried to and also can't. If you can provide references to relevant reliable sources, please do. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quasiperiodic Function mistake

I wanted to write an article to the Spanish wikipedia, but I didn't correctly, so I published in the English wikipedia. So, I hope you will delete it as fast as possible. Now I discover I can use the translate tool to add articles to the Spanish wikipedia, so I added this one.

Best,

Ata0k — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ata0k (talk • contribs) 03:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi

i didnot write the whole article i just edit my pic and website thats all its written by someone else you can check yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dj1kamal (talk • contribs) 05:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

About Publishing Tunisian Arabic

Dear Mr.,

Publishing Tunisian Arabic in a scholarly journal would not be against Wikipedia Regulations. If you would like to add your name as a main author of the work, please give me your full name and your institutional affiliation. If you do not like to add your name as an author of Tunisian Arabic, you should give us the right to publish the paper without involving your full name and considering your valuable contributions here.

Thank you in advance for your answer and for the significant contribution you made.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 14:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

@Csisc: One of us is misunderstanding the copyright requirements applicable to freely contributed content on Wikipedia. My understanding is that you don't need anybody's permission to reuse freely contributed content from Wikipedia articles. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

@Largoplazo: That's true. However, I liked that all of the significant contributors who made an improvement of the this work would be included as authors. That is their right if they would like to be included in the authors' list. That is why I contacted all the contributors having more than 40 edits and asked for their permission to include their name in the list of authors. This is purely for ethical purposes and not for respecting Wikipedia Regulations.--Csisc (talk) 10:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

There are five authors for this work. Four of them had submitted to me their full names and affiliations. So, I began my discussion with the journal editor. So, if you like to include your name in the work, please send me a Wikipedia email. If you don't like to be included in the paper, write this to me. Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi

this article is not created by me , its created by someone else i just came here to edit my article

it was running ok , but since i start editing it was messed up can i revert back to 28 july or last month ?

You keep saying your game was "featured" in Defense Forum, but you posted it there yourself. Its appearance there, therefore, doesn't indicate that it received any sort of note. Every film that appears in a film festival isn't notable (see WP:NFILM), especially if the film festival itself isn't notable. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

hi

Music notability via itunes googleplay and other site what else we need more ?

There are many wikipedia page in my country which has no interview in newspaper or nothing but they are running since ages then why this one ?

see this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Syed_Jamal_Ahsan/Sharaf_Qaisar in reference there is no notability as well then why this page is running and not this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DJ_Kamal_Mustafa ?

Our music is on itunes , googleplay , emusic and other store then still notability needed for musician ?

Our films is featured in film festival still it needed notability ?

Our games is featured in DEFENCE FORUM still it needed notability ?

If yes then fix everything yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dj1kamal (talk • contribs) 20:17, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Posting your own stuff to download sites has nothing to do with them being notable. Please see WP:Notability for information on what Wikipedia looks at to assess the notification of something.

I am not personally responsible for every page on Wikipedia, and haven't looked at that other page. Either it does meet Wikipedia's definition for notability or else it is also subject to deletion. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for thoughts on the downside of comparing one page to another. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I just looked at the link you gave me for Sharaf_Qaisar. It isn't in the Wikipedia article space, it's under another user's personal area, which is probably why it escaped detection. I see that now that you have pointed it out, another user has flagged it for deletion as well, not because there's anything wrong with it but because it's an abandoned draft. I'm not sure that's actually a valid reason for deletion, since it's in the user's own space, but it might be subject to deletion because it appears to be a bit promotional, and promotional material shouldn't be anywhere in Wikipedia. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Canadian-based

Actually:

New faces, new hopes for Canadian-based NHL clubs [1] Globe and Mail
CANADIAN-BASED MULTINATIONALS: AN ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITIES AND PERFORMANCE[2] Industry Canada (Government of Canada)

I could go on. Horatio Bumblebee (talk) 18:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

@Horatio Bumblebee: Google finds over 31 million pages that have "separate" misspelled as "seperate", but I wouldn't agree that the latter is an accepted spelling for the word! This is a case where it becomes easier to see what's correct through similar examples. In this case, let's try cities. Would one be more likely to say that something is "Toronto-based" or "Torontonian-based"? "Vancouver-based" or "Vancouverite-based"? "Saskatchewan-based" or "Saskatchewanian-based"? Or try it with other participles: is a doughnut sugar-coated or sugarian-coated? —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The doughnut example may have been too far afield, but I think the others are illustrative because one wouldn't ordinarily say that, say, a company is a Vancouverite company or a Saskatchewanian company. We'd say that a company is based in Vancouver: it's Vancouver-based. At the national level we are more likely to use adjectives: it's entirely ordinary to identify a business as "a Canadian company". So in that case we have a choice between saying "the company is Canadian/it's a Canadian company" and saying "the company is based in Canada/it's a Canada-based company". This leaves the opportunity for the two to get confused, leading to the error of "Canadian-based". It's like saying something is "a piece of pie" or "easy as cake" instead of "a piece of cake" or "easy as pie". It happens, but it's a mistake. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

This isn't Google though, it's the leading quality newspaper in Canada and the government of Canada itself. Do you use the adjective form when you refer to cities or regions? No. But you do with countries eg you say American born, not America born, British made, not Britain made etc, you don't say America based, Britain based, France based, Germany based. Horatio Bumblebee (talk) 20:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

See this: "When it comes to combinations such as "community-based project", "Sydney-based office" the pattern is noun + -based + noun. The first two words are describing the noun at the end. These are nouns that have no altered adjectival forms. With nations, however, the adjectival forms are different from the noun forms. Thus, Britain is the noun and British is the adjective. However, some people get it wrong with nations and use the noun form when they should be using the adjectival form, so say things – incorrectly – like "Britain-based company". It should be British-based company, Swiss-based company, French-based company (not Britain-based, Switzerland-based, France-based etc). Yes, the companies are based in Britain (not "British") because it is "based in + noun". Move the noun in front of another noun to describe it then it becomes an adjective." Horatio Bumblebee (talk) 20:08, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

If a slip of usage finds its way into the leading quality newspaper in Canada, it's still a slip of usage.

It's correct to say that I was born an American, hence, I'm American-born. It isn't correct to say that my company is based in American. Similarly, by "British-made" I understand "made by the British". Yes, I absolutely do say "France-based", "Germany-based", etc. I would never say "French-based" unless I was talking about something based on the French language or French culture, such as a French-based creole or a French-based legal system (a legal system, like the one in Louisiana, that's based on the French one). —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Great that you say that, but it's wrong. You cannot just say something is "correct" when you have nothing to back it up besides your own ear. I just gave you a grammatical reference that explained the rules - that you use the adjectival form when you refer to nations, and you're arguing based on your personal preference? Really? I'm sorry but "France-based" is ungrammatical even if it's your personal preference and unless you can back up what you say with a source that's an expert in grammar you'll just have to accept that. Horatio Bumblebee (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

That page you referred me to is funny. It acknowledges the usual rule, and then declares there to be a different rule for countries without justifying it. And then he engages in the fallacious reasoning I discussed above:

I have a company.

I have a British company.

I have a British-made company.

I have a British-run company.

I have a British-based company.

In other words:

I have a company that is British.
I have a company that was made by a group of British people.
I have a company in Thailand that is run by a British conglomerate.
I have a company that is based in Britain.

The last is different. There is no obvious reason why it would suddenly became the same as the others just because you arrange the order of the sentence. Does he give a reason? No! He says, "You should now be able to see how wrong "Britain-based company" is." Ha! Not only don't I see it, I just demonstrated the fallacy in his reasoning.

His other examples are, again, not illustrative of "based":

An American-controlled operation is an operation controlled by Americans, not by America.
French-made wine is wine made by the French, not by France.
A Swiss-designed watch is a watch designed by Swiss designers.
Italian-grown produce is grown by Italians.
A British-led operation is led by British people.
Russian-inspired designs are inspired Russian designs/culture/whatever.

Not one of them sheds any light on why "based in [country]" becomes "[nationality]-based", in other words, why it would be different for countries and the word "based" than it is for any of his other examples. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:26, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

"You cannot just say something is "correct" when you have nothing to back it up besides your own ear. I just gave you a grammatical reference that explained the rules - that you use the adjectival form when you refer to nations, and you're arguing based on your personal preference?" I didn't just go by my own ear, I gave you step-by-step reasoning. The reference you gave me—who is that person and what makes him an authority? He chose to explain his position as a matter of logic and reason based on a list of examples he gave for comparison—and I just demonstrated the fallacy behind every one of them, which tells me that his judgment is irrational and not to be relied on. In every single example either from you or from the article, other than the "based" case, the word used (whether country or nationality) is the same regardless of its position in the sentence. Not a shred of evidence has been given to show that the combination of one word, "based", in conjunction with a place name at exactly one level (country) would have a special rule all its own such that the choice of word would depend on which side of the noun it appears, or why that one combination would have its very own rule. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:32, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

"It acknowledges the usual rule, and then declares there to be a different rule for countries without justifying it." Yes, that's called an exception. Grammar is full of exceptions and things that may not seem to make logical sense and you've stumbled upon one of them. Your argument is pure original research. I've asked you a few times if you have a grammatical reference to back up your claim and all you've responded to is your thinking and personal reasoning and your arguments about the way things should be. That's great, perhaps you can argue it out when you attend a conference of grammarians but unless you can actually point to an authoritative source that says that in the case of countries it is correct to say "Britain based" rather than British based I'm afraid you're on your own. Horatio Bumblebee (talk) 21:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I know what an exception is. Don't you think it's weird that somebody declares one to exist—and then tries to justify it by showing how it isn't an exception but, instead, is comparable to a lot of other examples—except that none of his examples are actually comparable? So I don't trust the one person you cited to me that there is a generally recognized exception, nor especially why I would trust that there is one. His whole article is sloppy and discredits him in my eyes as an authority.

I don't know why you keep asking me if I have a grammatical reference to back up my position that the general rule applies unless credible grammatical references say it doesn't. If you want to tell me that the plural of "spoon" isn't "spoons", it's up to you to support your claim as to the existence of an exception. It isn't up to me to cite an authoritative source stating explicitly that there isn't an exception for "spoon". —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I can see you can't cope with being corrected or accept when you might be wrong about something. Just don't go around changing "Canadian based" to "Canada based" again (or British based to Britain based) since you're not able to back up your position when challenged. Horatio Bumblebee (talk) 21:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I can see you can't cope with someone not accepting the existence of an exception to general English usage just on the word of a total stranger who gives no credible reason to believe it exists and who, in turn, cites as an authority a person who is too addle-pated in his explanation to be believed. I did back up my position, thoroughly, and tore yours to shreds. You're the one claiming an exception. The burden is on you to back it up. Credibly. Logically. Not because you say so, or because somebody who manifestly can't piece together the filaments of a rational argument pretends to arrive at it as a logical conclusion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Argue it here. Horatio Bumblebee (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Have moved to [page]. Horatio Bumblebee (talk) 00:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Page-deleted, thanks.

First of all, I would like to thank you a lot for your message as it explained a lot of things I needed to know really, thank you.

About the page "Jumzler" which deleted by an admin and you patrolled it (as I think), thank you for doing this. But, I would prefer to let for now. Our unique and amazing users will make it later (maybe a year) due the love we spread with them. Maybe not, it's okay.

I personally love Wikipedia, but it's not included in our short-term plans to startup or get traffic or something like this, I just had a few minutes (free time) which I thought about using them in writing a brief description about Jumzler. But the mistake is that this is the wrong period.

About being a Wikipedian, it's an amazing thing to spend your free time giving a value & providing helpful information by editing and creating articles at Wikipedia. But, Wikipedia really got few great admins "Kings of the kingdom" who got a great royal style that makes doing things sometimes not an enjoyable thing. And I personally love to do things I will enjoy, else, if you won't enjoy it, why you have to do it anyway?

However, royal age is over. And, I think really Wikipedia shouldn't be the royal kingdom. ( Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eslam Yosef (talk • contribs) 06:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Ras Benjih/Edwin Molupe

Thanks for deletion.

There are so many pages or sections I need them to be deleted, but I don't know how to tag them.

Please Help

Ras Benjih/^RasTalk 12:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

@Ras Benjih: Hi. To have any of your user pages deleted, put the template {{db-author}} at the top. An administrator will come by and delete the page. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Pangenom

Hi! Thank you for your helpful comments. I am new in Wikipedia so sorry for some misunderstanding. I do not think that it is correct to merge Pan-genome and Pangenom concept (it was published in 2005) because in stead they have close names their meaning is absolutely different, The Pangenom concept propose to work with whole genetic ecosystem of the world because all its elements are fully integrated in each other. I appreciate your collaboration, Best, George — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgetets (talk • contribs) 13:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

They don't have close names, they have the same name. You just keep misspelling it over and over, while ignoring me each time that I point it out, which is really strange considering that you appear to be collaborating with someone who is apparently a close relative of yours (son? father? brother?) on the topic of genomes, and considering that you are citing his paper in which he spells it correctly. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, The main reason why I removed your template is that I maked in the last e-mail. I insist that Pan-genome and Pangenom concept are principally different items. To merge them is the same as to merge themes "bacteria" and "genome". It is absolutely different things however you are right they belong to the close theme. Sincerely, George — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgetets (talk • contribs) 21:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. I started a process and it needs to work its way to the end. And I continue not to take your word as authoritative because of your inexplicable insistence on not even spelling the word correctly. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Looking at the text again, I really don't see what's supposed to be different about the concept as you expressed it, other than that instead of confining its use to the aggregate of the genes within a clade, you are speaking of the aggregate of all the genes in the ultimate clade, all of life. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:57, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Demokraták 2022

Hi

I have worked on Demokraták 2022 page what you guys deleted. If you delete my page because it is advertisement, how this Demokraták 2022 is not going to be advertisement ? Or why millions of other groups and parties can have wikipedia page and why Demokraták 2022 cannot have wikipedia page.? Please let me know what do i need to change on Demokraták 2022 page and I will do that. Thank you. Ben — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benlovas (talk • contribs) 15:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. There's no reason why there can't be a page about it, as long as it meets the notability guidelines. However, it would have to be a neutral reference article about Demokraták 2022, backed up by reliable sources that are independent of the topic. What you wrote was an advocacy piece presenting your own viewpoint about the state of affairs in Hungary, leading to your call for support for Demokraták 2022. That's advertising, advocacy. Wikipedia isn't for that. Look at the article about other parties that you mentioned to see what I'm talking about.

For more information on creating good articles, see WP:First article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Tagging of Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa. I do not think that Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because "For three periods he was member of the District Council Josefstadt} and stood top candidate in his constituency." is a claim of significance. I request that you consider not re-tagging Oliver M. Gruber-Lavin Ochoa for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk) 12:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 3 6+

Please undelete my page Ammad Azhar

Please undelete my page and i shall provide the necessary info.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shafaqammad (talk • contribs) 16:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I had nothing to do with the deletion of that page, and I'm not an administrator so I can't undelete pages. I see you've already left a message on the page of the administrator who deleted it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

regarding Ammad Azhar page deletion

Pls tell me if i have to make the page again or can u undelete it. I shall be busy again with my work so if u can reply early i can provide you with the needful data.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shafaqammad (talk • contribs) 16:25, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Please undelete Ammad Azhar page

Please undelete Ammad Azhar page. I was not in town and now that i am here will provide you with the necessary sources to verify the info. Looking Forward. Shafaqammad (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

what can i do

if uve not deleted it then can you please guide me as to how i can get the page back. Would really appreciate it! Im new to this and cant go through lengthy procedures

Thanks Shafaqammad (talk) 16:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC).

See WP:Deletion review. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tobinworld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glendale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

I NEED HELP

WHAT TO DO Jacksontime (talk) 18:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

@Jacksontime: Hi, what do you need help with? —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Tobinworld

I Need Help With Tobinworld Wikipedia @Largoplazo Message: Hi! I am new to this website! I wanted to say that I need help making a full-detailed Wiki Page! Tobinworld! Please! The Last Time I made a info bar like that and it just crashed and reset my Tobinworld Wiki Page! But Thank You For Helping Me With The Info Bar! And I Need Help Making A Long-Detailed Tobinworld Page, Do You Think You Can Help Me? User: UnknownUser1945802335 — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnknownUser1945802335 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

@UnknownUser1945802335: I can try to help. What would you like to do?

By the way:

When you left your note here, you deleted the note from the previous person who wrote to me here and my response. Please be careful about that. I've replaced what you removed.
Please sign your messages on talk pages, like this one, by putting four tildes (~~~~) at the end of them. When you save, Wikipedia will automatically turn it into a real signature.

—Largo Plazo (talk) 01:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

@Largoplazo Do You Think You Can Help Me With My Tobinworld Page! I Tried My Best Making A Detailed Page About Tobinworld, I had an infobar, stuff about tobinworld like where it is eg. "South Glendale , CA " and stuff they do like Reward Store, Contract Room and It Just Crashed My Page and turned it back into the oldest version! — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnknownUser1945802335 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

I saw you tried to put an infobar using a wikitable but it wasn't coming out well, so that's why I replaced it with the infobox using the {{infobox school}} template. I don't know why Reward Store and Contract Room would have crashed your page. When you say "crashed", what actually happened? —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

   @Largoplazo When I Saved It, I saved it as the same page name, Then Some errors came up , like you have an inappropriate school bar info , i did not put anything bad, why would it say that! I Dont Remember What It Exactly Said! Like I need a few stuff fixed! I dont remember what needed to be fixed I had an info bar like this!

I dont know how to break the lines!

Well, I've already added the infobox, so you don't need to do that. ("Closest school" doesn't really seem very interesting, though. There isn't a place for that information in the infobox.) Lines do wrap together, unless they're indented or bulleted or you put blank lines between them. Read about formatting text at Help:Wiki markup. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

From: UnknownUser1945802335 Message: How Do I Upload A Photo? Im New To Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnknownUser1945802335 (talk • contribs) 02:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

You still aren't signing your messages!

To upload a photo, see Help:Introduction to uploading images and then Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hey

I called no one racist. I don't know what his race is. Kaoszulu (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

OK. Reading it again, I can see how you could have been giving your experience having "faced a lot of hatred, racism, discrimination" as background to explaining your notability. But I can also still read it as a lead-in implying that you were seeing your treatment on Wikipedia as another instance of that hatred and racism. I'll take your word for it and give you my regrets over having misread your intent if you say that isn't what you meant.

For what it's worth, I've been accused here of racism on a couple of occasions when I've requested the deletion of material regarding someone of African heritage. The accusation would look absurd to anyone who looks at my history and (a) sees that I submit all sorts of content for deletion, based on failure to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines, and (b) finds the fully supportive work I've done on Funeka Soldaat (including adding a Notable People section to Khayelitsha so I could make note of her there), Mbom Mbom Julien, and, once I realized what name she's usually known by and could find info on her, Bona Mugabe. Even a white person accused me of that. Also, in response to various comments I've made around the Web I've occasionally been accused of homophobia, which is ridiculous because I'm gay and a staunch proponent for my rights. So, just for your information, people throwing accusations of prejudice around so recklessly that they don't even check first whether their accusation is even possible is not entirely unheard of. Unfortunately.

Regards. —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:46, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Great Northern Exhibition

Hi there. As you'll see, I've removed your speedy deletion tag from Great Northern Exhibition in favour of a notability tag. When I did a Google Book search for this historic fair, I found it had been discussed during sessions of the Ontario legislature. I don't think it's speediable. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Natoli and Virgin Mary

Yes, better the legend said these. Such as, Natoli was also the House of Levis and claimed - homophonic with the Jewish tribe of Levy - the direct descendants with the Virgin Mary, and some did not hesitate to change the well-known Catholic prayer, « Je vous salue Marie, ma cousine, pleine de grâces… » ("Hail Mary, my cousin, full of grace ..."). You can check about. --Alec Smithson (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

@Alec Smithson: That sounds like putting somebody in Category:Mormon because the Mormon church "baptized" the person, who was never a Mormon while alive, after the person's death. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taglish, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aspect and Make. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Art Resilience Movement

Hello, You are right, the movement has not notability, but it is new. I agree that we must remove the considerations on the proposals of members and remain only on the information. --AlexArago (talk) 15:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Others don't agree with you

I thought you are an administrator.فرید اصلانی your edit is reverted. Rhaworth deleted the pages you liked. Anyway thanks for your advice in my talkpage.--Action Hero Shoot! 12:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@Action Hero: He deleted it—and then undeleted it when I pointed out to him that I'd removed the speedy deletion tag and explained why. (Clearly he came across the version with the deletion tag on it before I'd removed it.) He hasn't explained why he then moved it to the user's space, but to do so just because it's in a foreign language would be highly irregular and I've observed him enough over the years to know that he's aware of WP:PNT and to assume that it was for a different reason from that. By the way, can you explain how my not being an administrator comes into this? I haven't done anything that's out of the ordinary for an active Wikipedia editor. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Besides that, you don't have to decide who to agree with. You can read WP:PNT for yourself. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alejandro Gomez Sigala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)