User talk:Kwamrak14

Welcome!

Hello, Kwamrak14, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Netipong Saenmahung, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Netipong Saenmahung

The article Netipong Saenmahung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Netipong Saenmahung

A tag has been placed on Netipong Saenmahung, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Netipong Saenmahung. Given that this is now the third time you've seen this article deleted, it should be pretty clear to you now that it does not meet the criteria for inclusion. If you create it fourth time, you will be blocked from editing. I should point out that using alternate titles to get around create protection is also disruptive. Finally, I'll assume good faith in assuming that your switching accounts was nothing more than simple lost password, but I should point out that using multiple accounts to avoid scrutiny is also likely to get you in trouble. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Netipong Saenmahung. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Patipan Pinsermsootsri. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — Smjg (talk) 10:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patiphan Pinsermsootsri

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Patiphan Pinsermsootsri, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Patipan Pinsermsootsri. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Patipan Pinsermsootsri, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why you change the name of Thai League in all club page

Do you know in Wikipedia Thai League name is Thai League 1 not Thai League T1!!!!! But you change name of league in all club page as Thai League T1 , Hey the name of league is THAI LEAGUE 1 NOT THAI LEAGUE T1. PLEASE BEWARE WHEN YOU EDIT ANYTHING BEFORE I WILL PROPOSE YOU TO BLOCK FROM EDITING. Best wishes, Ministerboy (talk) 12:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Singapore national football team , may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Bamyers99. I noticed that you recently removed content from Narongsil Chotweang without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taro Prasarnkarn

The article Taro Prasarnkarn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taro Prasarnkarn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taro Prasarnkarn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taro Prasarnkarn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohamed Salah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 20:02, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Alexander Hleb. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Montree Promsawat

Hello, Kwamrak14. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Montree Promsawat, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Montree Promsawat to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

CrossTemple Jay 19:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saringkarn Promsupa

The article Saringkarn Promsupa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saringkarn Promsupa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saringkarn Promsupa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saringkarn Promsupa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saringkan Promsupa

A tag has been placed on Saringkan Promsupa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anoptimistix Let's Talk 13:37, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Kwamrak14! Thank you for your contributions. I am Anoptimistix and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Anoptimistix Let's Talk 13:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Thailand national under-21 football team, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thailand national team.png is licensed as non-free content which means that each use of it on Wikipedia needs to satisfy all ten non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP. One of these criteria (more specifically one part of one of these criteria) is WP:NFCC#10c which says that a separate specifc non-free use rationale which clearly shows how each of these ten criteria are satisfied needs to be provide for each use. Furthermore, WP:NFCCE says that it is the burden of those wanting to use or retain non-free content in such a way to provide a required rationale for said use; otherwise, the file may be removed for lacking a rationale. So, if you feel that the non-free use of this file in Thailand national under-21 football team is justified, then please provide the required rationale. You should be aware, however, than the use of such logos in reserve or under-XX national teams is not automatically considered policy compliant per item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI because such teams are considered to be child-entities of the main men's and women's teams. However, at the very least you need to provide a non-free use rationale so that it can be evaluated and discussed at WP:FFD if necessary. You have added the file twice today and I have removed it twice, leaving edit sums each time explaining why. It's OK to make a mistake once and maybe even twice, but repeating the same mistake over and over again is disruptive. So, if you the file to the article one more time without providing the required rationale, you will have violated WP:3RR (consider this a warning to do do that) and I will ask at WP:AN3 for an administrator to intervene to prevent any further disruption. Please note that removing clear violoations of Wikipedia's not free content use policy is not considered to be a violation of the "three-revert rule" per WP:NOT3RR. If you have any questions about Wikipedia's non-free content use policy please ask them here, at WT:NFCC or at WP:MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2017 Port F.C. season

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Kwamrak14, thanks for creating 2017 Port F.C. season!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add clear sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Taro Prasarnkarn

A tag has been placed on Taro Prasarnkarn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 11:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Kantaphat Manpati. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 15:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Leatherface (2017 film), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dark Knight 2149 14:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thaweekoon Tong-on

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Thaweekoon Tong-on, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Abishe (talk) 11:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isariya Marom

Hello, Kwamrak14. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Isariya Marom, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kwamrak14. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wanchai Jarunongkran

The article Wanchai Jarunongkran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About Sirod Chatthong

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Sirod Chatthong a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Molecule Extraction (talk) 19:09, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saringkan Promsupa

A tag has been placed on Saringkan Promsupa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use of Indian national team badge

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically India national football team, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to Talk:India national football team#Indian national football team for more details. Also, you've been previously advised twice above at #Non-free image use and #Non-free image use_2 about adding non-free team badges to national team articles. It's OK to make mistakes when you edit, but repeating the same mistakes over and over again is not OK. If you're not sure whether a file is licensed as non-free, ask for help at WP:MCQ or WT:NFC. If you continue to inappropriately add non-free images to articles, an administrator will be asked to intervene and take appropriate action. You're not going to be warned about this again, so please try to be more careful when adding images to an articles. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello, can you please add WP:INLINECITED references to Kwanchai Suklom? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? At the moment this is an unreferenced biography of a living person, so is in danger of being tagged for deletion. 'External links' just emans suggestinos for further reading, so doesn't indicate what sources were used to create it. It is also a requirement that articles on living peoplehave WP:INLINECITED sources. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and communication

Please respond to my previous messages. WP:Communication is required on Wikipedia, as a matter of the policies WP:DISPUTE and WP:CONDUCT. I am trying to help - please just reply. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is my fifth message, which is disappointing when you have been blocked in the last year for the same issue. Please respond here. If you ignore this too, I'll initiate an WP:ANI in the hope of engaging you. Please work with me. Boleyn (talk) 15:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since I sent you my last message, you have created more articles without any references, such as Prin Goonchorn. Please add clear WP:INLINECITED sources. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prin Goonchorn

The article Prin Goonchorn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely. To appeal, please use your original account and follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. Alex Shih (talk) 14:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prin Goonchorn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prin Goonchorn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prin Goonchorn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thailand national under-21 football team results

The article Thailand national under-21 football team results has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 22:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]