User talk:Kosack/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kosack. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 12 |
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello Kosack,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Phil Dwyer
Anytime! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 10:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
Technical news
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
WikiCup 2020 July newsletter
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.
Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, 
MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Thank you for completing 8 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias talk 08:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
Congrats...
... on the Wales Football History FA. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 20:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for helping review the article. Kosack (talk) 20:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Four Award
|
Four Award | |
| Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on History of the Wales national football team (1876–1976). « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2006 Football League Trophy Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2006 Football League Trophy Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2006 Football League Trophy Final
The article 2006 Football League Trophy Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2006 Football League Trophy Final for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2006 Football League Trophy Final
The article 2006 Football League Trophy Final you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:2006 Football League Trophy Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Question
Hi Kosack, any chance you want to review FAC Burnley F.C.? Thanks in advance, WA8MTWAYC (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- @WA8MTWAYC: No problem, it is on my list to take a look at. I'll get round to it as soon as I can. Kosack (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Kosack. I'm certainly interested in your comments as you have reviewed older versions of the article and I'm curious where it now stands in terms of quality. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Addressed changes; let me know if anything more is needed. Thanks for taking time to review such a long article and for the helpful suggestions! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season
On 11 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during their 1925–26 season, Cardiff City suffered the heaviest league defeat in the club's history, losing 11–2 to Sheffield United? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Changes addressed; let me know if anything more is needed! Thanks for another review! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Deletion of Aberystwyth Town player articles
Hi Kosack,
I've been made aware of you proposing the deletion of several pages for Aberystwyth Town players.
It took me quite a while gathering lots of information for all the players. Yes the haven't played professionally, but I am in the process of creating articles for all players in the Cymru Premier.
I understand it isn't a 'fully professional league', but it is a top tier league, the highest division. Me and many others are trying to make a more professional look for the league and we feel as if Wikipedia pages would help with that.
I do hope you consider reversing your decision, because let's be honest they aren't doing any damage are they?
Callum CallumH3236 (talk) 20:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season
Hello! Your submission of 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
WikiCup 2020 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.
Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Hi, thanks for your comments on the FAC. I addressed some of the issues you pointed out (and commented on the rest). Can you please get back to me when you get the time? Thanks, Nehme1499 (talk) 23:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'll try and get back to this as soon as I can. Kosack (talk) 17:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, when you have time can you please take a look at the article? Nehme1499 (talk) 14:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season
On 6 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, during their 1928–29 season, Cardiff City F.C. were relegated from the First Division of the Football League despite conceding the fewest amount of goals in the league? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
History of the Wales national football team (1876–1976) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the History of the Wales national football team (1876–1976) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 27, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 27, 2020, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Four Award | |
| Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Cardiff City F.C. 2–1 Leeds United F.C. (2002). Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC) |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
October 2020 GAN Backlog drive!
 | October GAN Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the October 2020 GAN Backlog Drive starts on October 1, and will continue until the end of the month. |
-- Eddie891 Talk Work 13:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello Kosack. I hope you are doing well. The GOCE is done and I have tried to solve the issues. Is it ready for nomination? I don't want to see it fail this time. ❯❯❯ S A H A 19:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @ArnabSaha:, the article is in much better shape than when the last review closed. I don't really have the time to go over the minutiae right now. However, I would expect a good standard of writing coming from the GOCE review, the content is pretty wide ranging and the potential copyvios have been dealt with. I would ensure the sourcing of the article is solid, i.e. all information is supported by reliable sources, otherwise you'll only be causing yourself further issues down the line. If you're happy with the sourcing, I don't see why you shouldn't take another run at it as those are the major structural points covered and anything else could reasonably be dealt with during a review. Good luck. Kosack (talk) 20:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- thank you very much. your message motivated me a lot.
❯❯❯ S A H A 06:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- thank you very much. your message motivated me a lot.
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
Ready for a stab at FAC? My latest collaboration (with Harrias) just got promoted so if you're up for it, let's get it started! The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 16:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Sure, let's go for it. Kosack (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
Ajpolino • LuK3
Jackmcbarn
Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Your GA nomination of 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1925–26 Cardiff City F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020
|
WP:WOSO News: October 2020 |
.jpg) Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020.
Hello WOSO editors! Fall Focus: FA WSL articles
See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Initiatives/FA WSL to collaborate and organize with other editors. Every little bit helps! Thanks for your contributions!
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? |
|
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
 Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
FL question
So with the Wales national football team results 1920–1939 been up to a Feature List nomination, I was wondering if that might be my first FL considering I did help in bringing it up to standard much like the other two. HawkAussie (talk) 00:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, feel free to claim it too. Converting the table is probably the most tedious job in doing these pages, so it was much appreciated! Kosack (talk) 06:23, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Owen's height note
I will add a note about the height discrepencies like the one on Dan Henderson's page. Is there a reference or list of refs you would like me to use? Thanks. Mstchstickman (talk) 20:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Any reliable source is fine. I tried to avoid using johnnyowen.com when writing the article as it's not entirely clear that it would be considered a reliable source from what I can tell. The three I listed on Squared circle's talk page are all reputable if you're looking for one, but if you have any reliable sources in mind feel free. Kosack (talk) 20:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Boxrec.com changes Owen's height
After all that work, BoxRec changes Owen's height to 5'8" 😀 Merthyr matchstick (talk) 14:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
TFA
Thank you today for History of the Wales national football team (1876–1976) "about the first century in the history of the Wales national football team, covering the highs and many lows from its incarnation in the 1870s to the mid 1970s. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1926–27 Cardiff City F.C. season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1926–27 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1926–27 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1926–27 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1926–27 Cardiff City F.C. season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1926–27 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1926–27 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1926–27 Cardiff City F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1927–28 Cardiff City F.C. season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1927–28 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1927–28 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1927–28 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1927–28 Cardiff City F.C. season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1927–28 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1927–28 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1927–28 Cardiff City F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1928–29 Cardiff City F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by .svg){kind=small}
Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.
The other finalists were 
Hog Farm (submissions), HaEr48 (submissions), 
Harrias (submissions) and Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
- Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
- Rhododendrites (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
- MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
1989–90 Norwich City F.C. season
Thank you, that's exactly the sort of help and advice I needed! I can easily provide page references for the transfers. Do I need to provide a reference for each and every result? They're basically all on the same pages anyway. I was going to look and see if there's any individual reports online once I'd got the framework in place. Skteosk (talk) 12:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, thanks, although in the case of results it's going to be taken from several different pages, since different teams' information are listed separately. Skteosk (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- I can provide a general season overview page, it's just it won't contain all the information. Skteosk (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- I've added references for the transfers and the results page from Canary Citizen. Is that enough to resubmit it? (I'll refrain from editing it during the review period this time: I thought it would help but it may have counted against it.) Skteosk (talk) 09:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- I've resubmitted, see how it goes. Thank you very much for your help! Skteosk (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Changes addressed; thanks for the review! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1929–30 Cardiff City F.C. season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1929–30 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1929–30 Cardiff City F.C. season
The article 1929–30 Cardiff City F.C. season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1929–30 Cardiff City F.C. season for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tom Watson (footballer, born 1900)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tom Watson (footballer, born 1900) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jimmy Nelson (footballer)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jimmy Nelson (footballer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 00:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jimmy Nelson (footballer)
The article Jimmy Nelson (footballer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jimmy Nelson (footballer) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tom Watson (footballer, born 1900)
The article Tom Watson (footballer, born 1900) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tom Watson (footballer, born 1900) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tom Watson (footballer, born 1900)
The article Tom Watson (footballer, born 1900) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tom Watson (footballer, born 1900) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jimmy Nelson (footballer)
The article Jimmy Nelson (footballer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jimmy Nelson (footballer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 18:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
- Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
Technical news
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Curtis
Done the stats table. I'll try and add a bit of prose but there won't be much, my books don't seem inspired by years of lower-mid-table and worse in the top flight and the players who kept them there. Much more fun these days... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- Doesn't look quite as minimal now. The Matthews source for the purchase fee in the first sentence of the Bham section, currently ref #9, covers the whole sentence, I've left the 2 pre-existing refs in but they aren't actually needed for that sentence now.
- One thing, in the Personal life section, dunno if I'm just blind but I don't see his wife's name in either source cited? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- Gwendoline [1]. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Kosack,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi Kosack
I hope you're well. You kindly provided a review for my FAC with 2017 EFL Trophy Final, and I was wondering if you could do one for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2018 EFL League Two play-off Final/archive1 - it's a joint nom between myself and The Rambling Man. It looks like it might be in danger of petering out. Cheers! — Amakuru (talk) 20:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll try and take a look as soon as I can. Kosack (talk) 06:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
You have Mr. Jenkins graduating from university in 1963, when I think you mean 1983.Georgejdorner (talk) 23:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing that, fixed. Kosack (talk) 07:19, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Peer review WSL match
Hi Kosack, would you be willing to provide some guidance to improve my article about an FA WSL football match: Arsenal Women 11–1 Bristol City Women? I put it up as an FAC but reviewers felt it was not good enough yet and suggested a peer review first, before bringing it back. See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Arsenal Women 11–1 Bristol City Women/archive1. I have made quite a few changes already. I have added info to the Background and Aftermath sections. Would you be up for helping me? If so, shall I open a formal peer review, or shall we have discussions on the article's talk page? If it takes a lot of effort, then perhaps you can become a co-nominator when we bring it back to FAC. Whatever works for you. Thanks. Edwininlondon (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Edwininlondon:, sure I'd be glad to help out. I'd probably suggest opening a peer review just to increase the chances of getting more eyes on it before another run at FAC. PR is pretty quiet these days but it's worth a shot. I'll try and have a look tomorrow or Friday. Kosack (talk) 23:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Splendid. Here is the open PR. Edwininlondon (talk) 08:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
John Barnard Jenkins
I edited the article and added his death date and later info about the Cambria band and you deleted it. Balchder (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for John Barnard Jenkins
On 18 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Barnard Jenkins, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2008 FA Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2008 FA Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 05:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Yunus Musah
Hey Kosack!
I noticed that you corrected an edit at Bukayo Saka over his nationality - whether he was "English" or "Nigerian" - and so I was wondering whether you could give me some help on the Yunus Musah page. Musah was raised in Italy as an infant and then was raised in England (and also was born to Ghanaian parents), and although he was born in New York I'm not sure that that's enough to designate him as purely "American" as an editor has recently tried to do. What's the policy on this matter? It seems to me that players who may have multiple nationalities don't tend to state in their leads that a player is unambiguously from one nation but I could be wrong. In any case, some advice would be helpful if possible. Thank you. ErraticDrumlin (talk) 23:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1989-90 Norwich City F.C. season
I appreciate all your help in getting this page ready for main space, but wonder if I can impose upon you again. I've added a basic version of the home and away strips for the season, but Norwich's strip for the year had green stripes across the upper part of the shirt originating from the left side (or right, if you're wearing it) as seen in this image here. (The rarely-used away strip used the same stripes on the white shirt.) And I don't have the first idea how to include them. There was a "three blue shoulder stripes" template which would at least give the general idea but I couldn't work out how to render it in green. Do you have any advice? Skteosk (talk) 17:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks, I'll look into it. Skteosk (talk) 08:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2008 FA Cup Final
The article 2008 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2008 FA Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 05:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Season's greetings
and thank you for your message. All the best to you and yours for the festive season, and here's hoping for a happy and healthy New Year! cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
Twenty twenty one
Wishing you a Happy New Year Kosack and continue making Wikipedia as good as possible. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 09:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized