Jump to content

User talk:Kerry Raymond/Archive 18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #29

18:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

Talk to me. 157.34.82.183 (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Category:Crematoria by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Brisbane edit

I should have probably used a clearer edit summary, but what I meant was that before my edit the stats were reflective only of 2022 data (which had a precipitation of 2036mm. I changed the stats to a 25 year Australian BOM mean as cited in the climate subsection. I apologise for any misunderstanding. VickKiang (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. Unfortunately that article gets a lot of problematic edits, so I tend to be on high alert. Kerry (talk) 23:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

Shute Harbour.

Hi Kerry, I recently updated the Shute Hbr Wiki as the info provided was extremely outdated. I am curious to know why you removed the text I provided which according to the Wiki history was tagged as inappropriate, when I think it was not only accurate but provide useful information. As a 32 year resident of the Whitsundays, and working as a local Tour Guide, I am constantly encouraging people to visit Shute Hbr and I think the facts I supplied would be very beneficial to those who would want to visit. Why did you think it needed to be deleted? Mr Patrick Wells (talk) 14:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

@Mr Patrick Wells: There were two issues. The first and foremost was the lack of citations for the content you added and the second was the somewhat promotional tone of the information added about the new terminal (and it was a bit excessive, airconditioned lounge, etc) and "Contact the Whitsunday Regional Council for bookings and enquiries" which sounded more like what you write in advertising copy tahn in an encyclopedia. Please feel welcome to add content to the article but try to take a less promotional tone and please include citations. Kerry (talk) 01:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Kerry Raymond!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your move of Template:RJL from article to talk in George Street, Brisbane

Hi Kerry, Template:RJL is intended to be applied to articles, not talk pages. There are approx 2300 pages where this is the case. Changing one is probably not a good idea, particularly as it will no longer appear on “missing”” lists. Cheers, John Downsize43 (talk) 07:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Ok, I've restored it. Kerry (talk) 09:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

for the record

I inherited a copy of wragges weather guide book from my fathers collection, and have a scan of the front page which I hope to put into the article - I note that the NLA has a scanned copy as well, thanks for your improving the article! JarrahTree 00:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

The page Kelvinhaugh (disambiguation) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. – robertsky (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Kerry Raymond,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice

The article United Prosperity (organisation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability per WP:NORG. Previously deleted and salted as United Prosperity

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Listen Out Merger

What's the status of your proposed merger of the two versions of listen Out? Its been over a month.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

I should have replied to you here as well as Talk:Listen Out. Short answer is that now you have done the good work of merging of the text, I have merged the articles. If you see any problems, let me know. Kerry (talk) 06:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Growth News, April 2024

18:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

Measurements

Hi Kerry, please don't adjust and revert any changes from the measurements, from GPO to CBD. They are based on mechanical books. They are what the accommodation industry are based on. The most common books being Brisway map books. These are used by the motoring and caravan groups to indicate national and international accommodation guides and literature. Thank you for your contributions across QLD, though please be mindful of the local values before editing. Some industries rely on the specific information. Usertodjdj (talk) 03:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

The convention that has been established over many years is that places within City of Brisbane have distances measured relative to the Brisbane GPO. Places beyond that in QLD are measured relative to Brisbane CBD and "Brisbane CBD" is explicitly named in the location field of the infobox of places in the neighbouring local government areas due to some past confusion (probably vandalism) where some people chose to believe that distance to the boundary of the City of Brisbane was more useful rather than to its centre (more useful if you are selling real estate perhaps!). Being consistent is important so people can use the data for comparison. I note we normally use online mapping sevices like Google Maps for distances in the infobox. My edit was simply to bring Petrie, Queensland into line with that convention, as there is no rationale for it being any different to the other suburbs of the City of Moreton Bay as it doesn't allow for meaningful comparison with other suburbs in that LGA. Kerry (talk) 23:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
My point is that the industries, including accommodation, mechanical and industrial industries have been established for decades under that system. These measurements have also been in place for many years. It would literally affect the industries and businesses negatively to adjust that. You'll find it is the same in other Brisbane suburbs, like Underwood. This is also because people are still using these motor association books from not only QLD, but also from interstate. The information is indicative. Please have some understanding for the GPO convention where applicable. It would cause hotels and other businesses to shut down without this information. I work in these communities so I am aware of the community standards and conventions. It can be used in comparison to suggest that these communities are servicing motor related industries. It's not an appropriate time to adjust the measurements system as yet. Usertodjdj (talk) 23:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
My point is that these measurements systems have been used for decades. Industries and businesses, such as hotels, mechanics and other businesses would be negatively impacted by adjusting the system. It would literally shut down businesses to adjust that. It's indicative that these communities are servicing the motor industries. You'll find that it is the same for other suburbs, such as Underwood. It's indicative of the motor association and insurance books that are used in QLD and interstate. Then there is also Supercheap head office in these communities. So it is used as a comparison base. It's important and necessary to retain this system where possible. It's critical to retain the system where it's required. I've worked in and with these communities for decades, so I am aware of the importance and the community standards and expectations. Usertodjdj (talk) 23:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
If people and industries want to use their traditional information sources and favourite measurement systems, they are free to do so (nobody is forced to read Wikipedia). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; it is not a street directory, an accommodation guide, nor a list of mechanical and industrial services in Petrie (see "What Wikipedia is not). Kerry (talk) 02:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
It is an encyclopaedia. It should be mindful and considerate of the local conditions when reporting or writing about such. It shouldn't override the conditions and be considerate.Usertodjdj (talk) 02:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

NSW State Heritage Register articles

Hi Kerry Raymond! I have started a discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#NSW State Heritage Register that you may be interested in contributing to. This relates to articles based on content added from the register by CC-BY, and the inclusion of Local Government Areas in addresses and lead paragraphs. Dfadden (talk) 21:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

G'day! I noticed while cleaning Wikidata that articles Gurulmundi, Queensland and Gurulmindi, Queensland appear to be about the same locality, both created by you. Could you have a look and merge the articles if it's the same place? Kind regards Samoasambia (talk) 11:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Well spotted! Yes, the same place! I will merge them. Kerry (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Done! Kerry (talk) 22:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

Notice

The article Jocelyn Dela-Cruz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic, has an h-index of 8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

Hello Kerry, Thanks for your fantastic work on Ravenshoe - one of my favourite places in Queensland. Great to see the article rated "B". Gderrin (talk) 00:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Gderrin! I've only had one opportunity to visit Ravenshoe and that was some years ago, but hopefully I might get there again soon on some retirement road trips. Kerry (talk) 00:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

Growth News, July 2024

15:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

Re: Welcome

Hello, Kerry Raymond. You have new messages at MrAussieGuy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MrAussieGuy (Talk) 04:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested images of flora of New South Wales indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 13:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

A tag has been placed on Category:South Murwillumbah, New South Wales indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Heritage Registered School Articles

Hi Kerry, while editing school articles, I have noticed that you have created or significantly contributed to school articles with the Queensland Heritage Register, so I thought you would be the best person to ask.

While editing Boondall State School, I came across the Brisbane City Council Heritage register and was wondering if school articles like this need to be formatted like Queensland Heritage Registered school articles? For example, I have started writing the Carina State School page and was wondering if it needed a Heritage listing section, like what you did on Albert State School?

If so, would I be allowed to copy and paste the criteria or would I need to rewrite it to avoid copyright infringement? 2024 is Underway (talk) 22:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

There is no Wikipedia standard for how such articles should be structured, so I followed the QHR's structure, since its content was already organised around those headings, so it would have been more work for me (over 1700 or so articles) to do it differently. At that time (2013/4?) I had a long discussion on the Australian Wikipedians noticeboard about what I was doing and I showed people some drafts to get a sense of what people thought before embarking on a roll-out of so many articles (if people aren't going to be happy, better to find out sooner than later) and modified how I did things based on that feedback. So the QHR article format you see was "agreed" at the time. The Wikipedia articles for places on the NSW HR and the Australian Heritage Database follow a similar pattern. Now the Brisbane HR seems to have followed a similar structure to the QHR, BUT it's not CC-BY and their explicit Terms and Conditions don't suggest a lot of wiggle-room. This is why I have not bothered with creating Wikipedia articles for BHR sites (with a few exceptions), all I mostly do is add them as a list items e.g. Greenslopes, Queensland#Heritage listings or maybe add a paragraph about them in the suburb article's history (or other section where appropriate). So, if you are intending to write an article on one of these sites, I'd suggest using the QHR style as a starting point for the structure, but realisticially the effort of rewriting everything in your own words to avoid copyright issues means you are probably going to want to minimise your effort and maybe just focus only on the sections of the heritage entry that interest you or you think will interest the reader, which is more likely to be the history and/or the description (depends on the place in question as to whether it is more interesting for its history or its physical form) than the criteria for its heritage listing, so I don't think the world comes to an end if you leave that stuff out of the Wikipedia article. The Wikipedia article will have a citation pointing back to the BHR entry so anyone desperate for additional information can still access it. As volunteers, nobody can force us to write more about a topic than we want to write! And, as I say, you might prefer to just add as much content as you are willing to rewrite into the suburb article as an alternative to creating a new article (which avoids issues of Wikipedia:Notability which local heritage register topics may struggle to meet). Kerry (talk) 01:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, this has really helped a lot! 2024 is Underway (talk) 01:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
You're welcome! Please feel free to ask any time. Kerry (talk) 08:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Just one more question regarding this, would articles regarding the Brisbane Heritage Register need their own category (i.e Brisbane Heritage Register) or is the subject too niche? 2024 is Underway (talk) 22:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
It already exists Category:Brisbane Local Heritage Register Kerry (talk) 23:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
My apologies, Thank you. 2024 is Underway (talk) 23:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Generally, you can create a category if there are a number of articles where the defining aspect of the category is "lede worthy", that is, something you would usually mention int the first paragraph of an article. Since we normally mention heritage listings in the first para (as we use them to establish notability which also needs to be done in the lede), this makes a heritage register acceptable as a category. Kerry (talk) 23:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
oh ok, that makes sense. Thanks again. 2024 is Underway (talk) 23:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
The name of the category (for which I suspect I am to blame) might be better renamed simply Brisbane Heritage Register. I note that the number of articles involved initially for a category can be quite small as long as it seems likely that more articles of that category wil be written. So you can't create a category Wives of Prince William as there is only one of them and no imminent prospect of any more. Kerry (talk) 23:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I did create the category, but I can see now why I included the word "local" as it was one of a number of Queensland's local heritage registers, see the Category:Local heritage registers in Queensland
I note that the heritage legislation in Queensland requires all local governments in Queensland to maintain a local heritage register which some have embraced with great enthusiasm (huge numbers of entries) while others seem to have yet to get around to it. Some do the lazy cop-out of copying the entries from the QHR that apply to their local area and call that their local heritage register and don't add anything additional. Kerry (talk) 23:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
In your defence, the site explicitly states that they are "Local Heritage," but I do suggest that the category be renamed. 2024 is Underway (talk) 23:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
I didn't see your two newest messages, I retract my statement 2024 is Underway (talk) 23:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, conversations taking place live do tend to have that problem. I am not insisting on the current category name, just recollecting why I probably named it as I did in the first place. But there is a reasonable argument for changing the category name if you want to get some experience at Wikipedia's weird and wonderful adminstrative processes. The guidelines for changing the name of anything are Help:Rename which points you to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion where you will see there is a "speedy process" for certain situations which are expected to be non-controversial, one of which would seem to be applicable here Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#C2D: Consistency with main article's name so if you want to rename it, go there and follow its instructions. OR a lighter-weight solution is not to change the name of the category but provide a redirection of an alternative name to the existing name. See Template:Category redirect by which the Category:Brisbane Heritage Register automatically redirects to the existing category, which makes it more discoverable. Kerry (talk) 00:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
I decided to just add a redirect to the category page (which I hope I accomplished correctly) instead of just renaming the category, could you please review it just in case I did it incorrectly? Thanks. 2024 is Underway (talk) 01:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
It seems to work. Kerry (talk) 08:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
oh good, thank you. 2024 is Underway (talk) 09:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

Noel Preston

Hi there. Thanks for your involvement in the editing of the entry for Noel Preston. I've left a comment on the Talk Page for this article - given you're an experienced editor, I'd be interested in your thoughts. HistoryEditor3 (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

Category:Groganville, Queensland has been nominated for merging

Category:Groganville, Queensland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 15:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Category:East Toowoomba, Queensland has been nominated for renaming

Category:East Toowoomba, Queensland has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 01:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Growth News, October 2024

Trizek_(WMF), 15:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)