This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kerry Raymond. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Charters Towers Central requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ziad Rashad (talk) 05:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Postcodes in Queensland
Hi Kerry - A question. Over recent time you seem to have changed a number of locations in Queensland to show that they have no postcode - see the first 20 or so in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&limit=250&offset=0&target=https%3A%2F%2Fauspost.com.au%2Fpostcode However I believe this is incorrect. Take [[Wyuna, Queensland}]] If you click on the post code reference and then request Wyuna it shows 4723 for that location. I prefer the reference to show [1] which takes the user straight to the required information. Alternatively you can replace the "postcode/Wyuna" by "postcode/4723" if you know the postcode. Am I missing something?Fleet Lists (talk) 06:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
@Fleet Lists: Postcodes are not as stable as you might like to think they are. They seem to come and go for areas with very low/no population. I did a big push last year to put postcodes into every Queensland place article (or note if they didn't have a postcode). If I wrote a place did not have a postcode, then at the date in the citation, the Australia Post website didn't list a postcode for it. If that situation has changed, please free free to add a postcode into the infobox and remove the commentary about having no postcode. Wyuna QLD has evidently only recently been assigned a postcode. While it appears in their online lookup today, it does not appear in their downloadable list of postocdes which provides a document dated September 2020, which is consistent with my observation that it had no postcode in July 2020. Right now I am working on ensuring all Qld place articles have census 2016 data. When I've finished that, I might come back and look at the places without postcodes and see which ones have acquired postcodes in the meantime. With postcodes changing, electoral boundaries changing, censuses coming out every 5 years, there is an ever-increasing maintenance problem for Wikipedia for things that superficially appear as "stable" information, as I guess you know yourself with the public transport info. It frustrates me that I spend so much of my time doing this kind of maintenance and not writing more interesting content. Kerry (talk) 07:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Kerry. I have updated all the ones in the list shown above so they now all show the latest postcodes. I know what you mean about maintenance as I still need to do another postcode lists which use the http prefix which no longer work as the website now only accepts https, as well as a some localities in Sydney which had boundary changes resulting in new URLs which someone else included in Wiki but for some reason the council website changed the links before they were even archived so they need to be changed - a job for tomorrow and still over 1700 localities which need to have the post office histories changed to Phoenix Auctions. I also know that a lot of My School references no longer work. I dont have the answer to that as yet. That will keep me busy for at least six months.Fleet Lists (talk) 07:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
@Find bruce: It's actually easily explained. My heritage-article generator does not "read" in the way that a human does. It creates wikilinks in the History section of a heritage article by attempting to match words in the text against article titles within the Category:New South Wales (directly or indirectly). It is allowed to ignore parts of article titles in parenthesis, so when it sees the words "Walter Scott" in the history text and sees the NSW article Walter Scott (Australian politician)", it says "aha, this must be the Walter Scott being talked about" and links it. This heuristic works very well most of the time, as the content of the history section of a NSW SHR article is generally talking about NSW topics (a NSW politician is far more likely to be mentioned in a NSW heritage history than a Scottish poet), but of course there are exceptions (like this one). In the same way, in the Description section of those heritage articles it looks for words and phrases that match articles from architecture and construction-related categories, enabling it to correctly link to "pilaster", "string course", "king post" etc. In theory the person who uploads the generated text on Wikipedia is supposed to check the generated links, but, because the generator actually does a good job at getting the links right, it's easy to become complacent and not check carefully. Kerry (talk) 04:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Tattersall's
Hi Kerry, I'm just dropping you this note because I have too many other things on the go to investigate further just now, re the Tattersalls Club article. I am assuming that it lacks the apostrophe because the name on the building does not have one? Having just added that section about the Landscape Art Prize, it struck me that the club website uses the apostrophe everywhere, and so the article should probably use it where it refers to the club (unless there was an historical shift to adding the apostrophe at a certain point)? In the meantime, I have just added a redirect to the article from the version with apostrophe. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
@Laterthanyouthink: It's how it is because that's what the heritage register called it. But the club itself appears to have an apostrophe. I don't care which it is, feel free to change it as you will. 09:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Conflated Scope Repair Queensland Mountains and Localities
Hi I see you've worked on a bunch of locations in Queensland, Australia. A handful of them conflate the mountain and locality in both the intro and the about. I'm trying to cleanup WikiProject Mountains and dual category tags just don't make sense when the focus is a locality. It would be more consistent with the articles of the rest of the world with the project if the mountain name was used on a redirect with potential markup to the locality. This way the mountain name would be searchable and linked to a separate page with its own Wikidata ID and easier to identify where an article to expand on the topic is needed. Would you be interested in helping clean up these articles to match since you've worked on them before? I'm compiling a list on User:Wolfgang8741/TODO and fixed a few already. Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 13:50, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
@Wolfgang8741: I think you need to raise this at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board for two reasons. First, the issue is not confined to Queensland (which is the focus on my interest) and is primarily aimed at improving coverage of mountain (not an area of interest to me beyond noting basic facts about mountains like coords and height in articles about town/suburbs/localities). Secondly because the combining of the natural feature and the man-made feature in a single article goes back to quite early days of Wikipedia, there may be some long-established local consensus around doing it that way. While I do not normally create such an article myself, equally I do not change them if it's already done that way, because it happens enough that it looks like it may have arisen from consensus. I think the reasons you give are all good reasons to make the change but I need the Australian community to be happy about it and it may be useful to engage a wider group of people in the task in any case as I don't generally edit articles about other states (QLD alone keeps me very busy). BTW I'd suggest avoiding the use of terms like "conflated" and "repair". Perhaps "combined" and "improve" might be more diplomatic, particularly if a consensus is involved. Kerry (talk) 02:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
@Kerry Raymond: I appreciate your thoughtful reply. I may not have been clear in my improvement process, which I am following the consensus with combined article on geography and locality, but the inconsistency is how the introduction is being written in these few articles locally where a mountain and location are described in the same article. The intro lacks a focus on the location over a mountain as is the suggested practice when combined. The tagging practice of mountain category is mostly done by redirect across the mountain project and only a handful of locality and mountains coexist. The practice using the redirect tagged is the most common across the Mountain project. I reached out to you given you were a recent editor across many of these articles and might have been interested patrolling to keep the practice consistent in the area you focus. I plan to raise this cleanup to WikiProject Australia as well and discuss to gather consensus, it is why I did change the list. Thank you for your input and good luck with your work. Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 18:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Ha!
Thanks for that. Apologies for not responding your email during lockdown last year - it came in during a very busy work period and I just kept forgetting to reply...for however many months. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
I can find no evidence outside tourism listings for this mail run. Nothing in historic sources to indicate prior notability and no obvious merger target
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
(I've long been tempted to start an essayWP: Pathological Conciseness, but I worry that if other editors expanded on the subject, it might end up too long-winded and discursive for my liking.)
Apologies for this long-winded and discursive post. I will attempt to be more concise in future.
Pete - my middle name is "be at all times be as concise as possible" - AU aka,
Welcome to the eighteenth newsletter from the Growth team!
The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.
Structured tasks
A screenshot of "add a link" feature in development in beta.
"Add a link" is now being tested in production and is nearing release on our four pilot wikis (Arabic, Czech, Vietnamese, and Bengali Wikipedias). We'll be doing final tests this week and next week, and then plan to deploy to the four wikis either during May 24 week, or May 31 week. After two weeks, we will analyze the initial data to identify any problems or trends. We expect that this feature will engage new kinds of newcomers in easy and successful edits. If things are going well after four weeks, we'll progressively deploy it to the wikis with Growth features.
We are currently working on a Mentor dashboard. This special page aims to help mentors be more proactive and be more successful at their role. The first iteration will include a table that shows an overview of the mentors current mentees, a module with their own settings, and a module that will allow them to store their best replies to their mentees questions.
Community configuration editing form under development
We are working on project to allow communities to manage the configuration of the Growth features on their own. In the past, communities have needed to work directly with the Growth team to set up and alter the features. We plan to put this capability in the hands of administrators, through an easy-to-use form, so that the features can be easily tailored to fit the needs of each community. While we developed it initially for Growth features, we think this approach could have uses in other features as well. We'll be trying this on our pilot wikis in the coming weeks, and then we'll bring it to all Growth wikis soon after. We hope you check out the project page and add any of your thoughts to the talk page.
Scaling
Growth features are now available on 35 wikis. Here is the list of the most recent ones: Romanian Wikipedia, Danish Wikipedia, Thai Wikipedia, Indonesian Wikipedia, Croatian Wikipedia, Albanian Wikipedia, Esperanto Wikipedia, Hindi Wikipedia, Norwegian Bokmål Wikipedia, Japanese Wikipedia, Telugu Wikipedia, Spanish Wikipedia, Simple English Wikipedia, Malay Wikipedia, Tamil Wikipedia, Greek Wikipedia, Catalan Wikipedia.
A new group of Wikipedias has been defined for the deployment of Growth features. Please contact us if you have questions about the deployment process, or if your community likes to get the features in advance.
For everything that you do on Wikipedia to disseminate accurate information about Australia,including checking that all the typos that I fix are done correctly.Ira Leviton (talk) 16:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of 2016 census data in many Qld locality articles.
@Kerry Raymond:
Hi Kerry.
After removing dup census info from a couple of articles I realised that many more have this duplication. I assume you are aware of this and are OK with it. Can you let me have your views on this for my future guidance.
Thanks, John. Downsize43 (talk) 02:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@Downsize43: There isn't a problem with duplicating content from other parts of the article in the lede para (nor adding it to the infobox). I'm putting any census data with the census citation into the history where it can remain as a permanent part of the history after the next census. But after the next census, the census statements in the lede and infobox will be the 2021 data. Kerry (talk) 09:56, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@Downsize43: I like to hope the articles will get bigger some day. Indeed, it's what I'm working on at the moment but there's an awful lot of them to do. Kerry (talk) 07:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Kerry Raymond:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Do you happen to have a copy of the QHR text for this lying around anywhere? I've wanted to unentangle the mess of Castlemaine Brewery material for a while (numerous breweries dating back to the same two guys, at least three of which are heritage-listed, and all of which were floated into completely different companies with completely different histories) and I just noticed that it seems we never used the (perfectly good) QHR material on the Milton brewery. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
@The Drover's Wife: The current Castlemaine Perkins brewery at Milton isn't on the QHR (as far as I can see). The former Castlemaine Perkins brewery in the Brisbane CBD is on the QHR and has been uploaded at Castlemaine Perkins Building. The Milton brewery is on the Brisbane Heritage Register but is not CC-BY so I cannot generate from the BHR, but there's plenty of material there if you are willing to do DIY. Kerry (talk) 02:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
What if I was only editing the short description? As I recall, I only wrote a short summary of the article as a “cemetery in Australia” without citing any sources, which falls within standard procedure for description writing on this site. I would personally be open to adding a citation and revising the wording as needed, but I don’t see the former as necessary. Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 10:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Sorry I was trying to revert the previous edit but on a mobile device I managed to click the wrong edit to revert. I have restored your short description. Kerry (talk) 10:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
New Page Review queue September 2021
Hello Kerry Raymond,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cannon Hill, Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.
Hi, ive removed a photo following this message on my talkpage "Hi, I'm looking at the photo of Enith Clarke and Alexander Sverjensky on With Clarke's Wikipedia page and have been informed by Sverjenskys son that this photo is not of his father. Thanks Su Compton", regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
@Atlantic306: That's the same person who asked me (apparently at random) to upload the photos in the first place and provided the information on who was in the photo. But with photos, it's generally better to first fix what's on Commons (remove the guy's name) and then decide what to do with the articles that use the phto. I see no problem with retaining the photo on the Enith Clarke article so long as we don't name the guy. But the photo should be deleted from Alexander Sverjensky if it isn't of him. If things don't get fixed on Commons first, sooner or later someone will come along and add the photo or guy's name back again. If that suits you, I will do that. Kerry (talk) 00:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Done, apart from waiting on a Commons administrator to approve the renaming but it should all flow through automatically after that. I removed the photo from Alexander Sverjensky. I didn't re-add it to Enith Clarke as there are other photos there for her there. 00:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagmar, Queensland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Welcome to the nineteenth newsletter from the Growth team!
The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in Wikimedia projects.
Structured tasks
"Add an image" prototype, showing suggested image for the article
"Add a link" is the team's first structured task. It uses machine-learning to suggest wikilinks as easy edits for newcomers. It was deployed in May 2021 on four Wikipedias and then in July on eight more Wikipedias after we evaluated the initial results. So far, we've seen a high level of engagement from newcomers. Communities that have the feature suggested valuable ideas for improvement. We'll work on improvements and then contact more communities to deploy it.
"Add an image" is the team's second structured task, currently in development. It is an editing task that suggests Commons images for unillustrated Wikipedia articles. We have conducted many community discussions and tests. Then, we've decided to build a first prototype. We'll first deploy it only to our pilot Wikipedias, to learn whether newcomers can be successful with the task. The project page contains links to interactive prototypes. We are very interested to hear your thoughts on this idea as we build and test the early versions. These prototypes have already been tested by newcomers, in English and Spanish.
News for mentors
The Mentor dashboard is available at our pilot wikis: Arabic, Czech, and Bengali Wikipedias. It will soon be available at a few more volunteering wikis, as a test. [1]
At wikis where the mentor dashboard is deployed, a new filter is available for mentors. Mentors can monitor their mentees' activity in Watchlist and RecentChanges, so they can help support their mentees' work. For privacy reasons, this filter can't be accessed by someone else than the mentor itself. This filter only filters mentees assigned to the mentor. This filter is not visible for people who are not listed as mentors[2]
Community configuration
Communities now have the ability to configure how Growth features behave on their own wikis. At Special:EditGrowthConfig, community members can add a list of volunteer mentors, alter the templates used for suggested edits, update help links, and more. This special page is editable by administrators and interface admins.
Scaling
We are proud to announce that all Wikipedias now have the Growth features! Thank you to all the community members who helped the team build the features and bring them to their wikis. The only exception is Chinese Wikipedia (zh), for technical reasons. [3]
The wikis that have Growth features deployed have been part of A/B testing since deployment, in which some newcomers did not receive the new features. Now, all of the newcomers on 280 of the smallest of those Wikipedias have the features. [4][5]
A test is undergoing at English Wikipedia: 25% of newcomers receive the Growth features. The results from this test will be part of a discussion of how to proceed on that wiki.
Now that Growth features are available at Wikipedia, the Growth team considers to extend them to other projects. Some Wikisource users have expressed some interest in getting Growth features. There is currently a discussion about implementing them on Wikisource.
News for communities
Do you have questions about the Growth features? This translatable FAQ contains answers to the most common questions about the Growth team work.
The Growth features were recently used in a test amongst Latin American donors to give donors the opportunity to learn to edit. You can see the results here.
Interface translations are important for newcomers. Please help for your language, by translating or copyediting interface translations for the Growth features.
Help:GettingStarted was a feature developed in 2013, which directed newcomers to articles that needed editing. We recently removed this feature from all wikis, because it has been replaced by the Growth features.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah, Queensland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
the GeoGroup does nothing without data, there's only one GPS (Barakula) on the page, unless you manage to point the geogroup at another dataset Dave Rave (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
looking, let's try { GeoGroup | article=Category:Railway stations in the Hunter Region } - but with the correct category name need a new set of categories in Qld sub groups like some of the NSW ones have been - damn there's not an existing set of stations on a line, though we could easily figure it out Dave Rave (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
@Dave Rave: My plan is actually to add a route table within the article with coords for each station into the article for the railway line, but your idea of using the Category is an interesting approach but, as you say, if there was a category. I suspect many of the railway stations on that line would struggle with notability so using a category approach wouldn't work so well unless they all have articles. Then if anyone has the source material to create individual articles, they are free to create individual articles. My problem at the moment is that I am not getting a lot of Wikipedia time due to a family illness. Too much to do and too little time to do it. So my progress may be a bit slow on this. If you want to do anything in this space, I do have a spreadsheet with coords of all current railway stations in Queensland as well as some (but not all) historic ones. If you would like a copy of this, email me at kerry.raymond @ wikimedia.org.au and I will sent it to you (about 2000 entries in it). I have a citation for the dataset, which I can send you too (so it's just a copy-and-paste to cite).Kerry (talk) 00:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
the main stops have pages so that was easy, copy paste on the category got that down, I'd like to know how to make the inline route map, that also included the GPS but that would be duplicating work, I was starting a look at using wikidata but that got me to where it is already, so just the long words using the category name, does the geogroup go further down ? Dave Rave (talk) 00:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
@Dave Rave: Well it certainly reveals some interesting things are in that category, such as a school, but presumably such things can be sorted out. Aside, it took forever to load the Open Street Map (I am guessing it takes a while to process the category; did you experience that too? I am not sure exactly what you mean by "inline route map". Do you mean one like Template:South Coast railway line, Queensland (which can't take coords), or one like in the body of South Coast railway line, Queensland which is just a table and can include anything you want including coords, or do you mean a geographic visual map showing the route across the surface of the earth using something like Template:Maplink or similar etc (which is something I don't know how to do but would definitely like to learn how). Kerry (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
my loading took 'no' time, same with NSW Main Western, loads of points, no time The school will be some of the major points are towns, not railway stations, so there's GPS points being in article notated. I doubt the inline map template idea will work better than this category display which seems to be quite good, at least understood, easily maintained. Dave Rave (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
I did have an instance of the page taking forever, didn't load, but I think that was a wiki server error, not the GPS data Dave Rave (talk)
Looking at the Tablelands page, it's geogroup works but because the GPS is in the text. I think it is not a well laid out method, looking at the GeoGroup help a table for data is given, I've used that on Jamison Valley#Major lookouts but it makes a lot of space that isn't really useful to the article. Tablelands also works well as the GPS notes are displayed in sections, so looking at my sandbox page does this look like a neater method ? to save making a lot of station pages just to not include the school / post office but make the text prettier ... Dave Rave (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
I use GeoGroup a fair bit. But there is a bit of interplay between how the article is written and how useful the resultant GeoGroup is that has to be considered. Most of my uses of GeoGroup are for articles about towns and localities where there is quite a bit of structure in terms of headings, subheadings, and there aren't relationships between the points themselves (beyond the groupings that naturally arise through the heading structure), e.g. Boonah. Railway line articles are different because the best representation of a railway line is to actually draw the line on a map (which would be my preference if I had the skills). Because GeoGroup renders on top of Open Street Map, for a current railway line, Open Street Map should already include the line so just putting on the coords for the stations is probably OK, e.g. for Western railway line, Queensland. However, just marking the stations is more problematic for a closed line e.g. South Coast railway line, Queensland as the reader may infer that the lines shown on Open Street Map are the line for the South Coast railway (but are actually highways or the new Gold Coast railway line). I'm not a fan of hiding the coords in the article. If the only goal was the GeoGroup, then that's maybe OK, but what if the reader wants to see the actual coord, not a dot on a map? I incline towards not taking away information from the reader, so I would prefer to leave them in. When I am doing an article with a GeoGroup and there is a sequencing of the coords (such as in a railway line), I give some thought to the sequence of placing of the content and the coords so the ordering in the GeoGroup is sequential and not random. See the South Coast railway for this. I tend to try to list them north-to-south or west-to-east (depending on the overall route of the line) as that creates a more logical sequencing in the GeoGroup. The category approach gives alphabetic sequencing in the GeoGroup which I don't like, e.g. for the Western railway, Charleville comes before Cunnamulla and Toowoomba (the two end points), but that might OK for some categories where there isn't an inherent ordering of the points being displayed. But the solution to the problem may be at hand. I asked if anyone was able to do a session on making maps with Maplink etc and User:Canley volunteered, so I will let you know when that's scheduled. That might give us more options on the best approach in different circumstances. Kerry (talk) 02:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
I find alphabetical, you can't go wrong, as you're not stuck looking up and down a list for the one you've missed. I do like that line grouping where it's by the page sections. I have managed to make a kml file, Oberon railway line which looks like it doesn't work anymore? Dave Rave (talk) 03:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
It seems to work for me. I see a wiggly line that starts near Tarana railway station to the north and ends at the south near Gilmore Malachi Memorial Hall with various other points of interest marked on a yellow background. Is that what you expect me to see? Kerry (talk) 03:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
sounds like it, all three of my browsers aren't showing it, I get text or downloads, it should look like an OldStreetMap line on a map. I snuck those points out of a larger kmz collection, so the gold coast line could be extracted too Dave Rave (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
oh, up there, the route map button, i was looking down the bottom at the kml link below the refs. silly me Dave Rave (talk)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!21:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kerry Raymond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nerada Tea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
trust that you and friends are above the flood levels
trust thatthe state library has underwater breathing apparatus
in the 1990s when I was doing research in central java - one of the important archives I knew about had been lost in the 1960s due to an overflowing river and archives being kept in a basement - when I was visiting in the 1990s they were putting material in first floor location
SLQ in the 2011 flood@JarrahTree: Thanks for your concern. We are OK in terms of river flooding as, although we live near the river, we are high on a hill, but houses near to us but lower are suffering and the suburbs to the west of us are now cut off from supplies, which is also a risk we faced yesterday, but the shift of the rain south towards NSW seems to have reduced that risk for us, but has of course created a crisis in other places like Lismore. Yes, being adjacent to the river, the state library is not well-positioned for flood waters (see the 2011 photo) but they are well-aware of their risk, and have disaster planning around it, and the building usage reflects it, the lower levels being car parking and public spaces and the collections (especially the rare specialist ones) are in the upper levels. Kerry (talk) 05:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Very relieved - to hear you are safe - it sounds and looks very scary from Western Australia. Lismore sounds absolutely terrible, and the devastation in Brisbane on tv now is outright devastating. JarrahTree11:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
I was very disappointed to have missed your presentation, ankle biter minding at the time...
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Template:QldElectoralRedistribution has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kerry Raymond. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nerada Tea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
