Jump to content

User talk:KCVelaga/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 9

A-Class Medal

 The Military history A-Class medal 
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the A-Class Medal for your excellent work on List of Indian Coast Guard directors general, INS Vikrant (R11), and List of Indian naval air squadrons. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Many thanks, HJ Mitchell. By the way, can I you put back Sam Manekshaw and K. M. Cariappa's reviews? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Call me Harry. And yes, as long as you've got time to keep on top of them and the list of frigates. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Kodandera M. Cariappa

On 27 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kodandera M. Cariappa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kodandera M. Cariappa is one of only two Indian Army officers to hold the five-star rank of field marshal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kodandera M. Cariappa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kodandera M. Cariappa), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  • European Union Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  • Japan 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Images from Indian Army & Indian Air force

Wikimedia India is advocating for release of Images from Indian Army & Indian Air force under Commons Acceptable licenses. Please see the discussion on WMIN's domain. Also share this message among your fellow Wikimedians. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charles Murray (political scientist)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Charles Murray (political scientist). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hello Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 15,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 21:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Request on 16:18:50, 6 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Vailjazz


My article was not approved because it states that it is lacking reliable sources that can be verified. I have cited several events/claims through the only newspaper that has covered them, the Vail Daily. The Vail Daily is an independent daily newspaper published by Colorado Mountain News Media that covers news and events in Eagle County, Colorado. Is this the source that is getting flagged as being unreliable? If not, can you help advise how to substantiate the article with reliable sources, since we are based in a small resort town and often only have one news outlet that covers our events?

Vail Jazz 16:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

4th GA Cup - The Final

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Final

Hello, GA Cup competitors!

Sunday, February 26 saw the end of Round 3. Shearonink finished in first with 616 points, which is more than the point totals for all the other competitors combined! In second place, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an impressive 152 points, followed by Sturmvogel_66 in third with 111 points. Chris troutman and Kees08 each received a wild-card and were able to advance to the Final Round. There was a major error on the part of the judges, and initially, 8 users were advanced instead of 5. This has been corrected, and we sincerely apologize for this confusion.

In Round 3, 71 reviews were completed! At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 7 months; at the end of Round 3, the longest wait is still holding steady at a little over 6 months, the same as for the previous round. By the end of all three Rounds, the total number of nominations increased slightly - this suggests that users are more willing to nominate, knowing that their articles will be reviewed. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in the Final so we can keep tackling the backlog.

In the Final Round, the user with the highest score will be the winner. The Final has already started and will end on March 31st at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Finals and the pools can be found here.

Good luck and have fun!

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot policy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Bot policy. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Ships list

I'll be glad to help. I'm not an expert on ships, but perhaps that's what's needed. Cheers. auntieruth (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@Auntieruth55: Are you talking about the "List of frigates of India"? I would be glad to work with you. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Anuradha T.K. for deletion

Hi, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. Thanks for actively watching my articles. I understand your concerns about the article I created as part of Women in Red. If you feel that the article fails the General Notability Guidelines, help by improving it since it is important to have articles on women in science. I believe that deleting only takes us back to square one where there is a red link(again), whereas improving it would take us forward as a community. ManasaRao (talk) 06:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@ManasaRao: Firstly, sorry for nominating your article for deletion. Making it clear, I am watching over you articles, as New pages patroller, this page showed up in the new pages feed. I want to make it clear that I am not against the article. Anyways, I see that the article will be kept and has gained enough references to pass WP:GNG. Regarding "deleting only takes us back to square one", if it is to be deleted it is to be deleted, there is no case in that. Improving can be done, if the subject meets the notability standards. Here per the deletion policy, the nominator doesn't have any responsibility of improving the article prior to its nomination. Wish you all the best for you articles on women in science. As I can see that you have recently started contributing to English Wikipedia, I extend my support and ask you not to hesitate for any query or help. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

GA review

Are we done with Hülsen? Everything is checked and signed. auntieruth (talk) 19:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

@Auntieruth55: Last week, I was a bit busy. Will get to it. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

First good topic from Indian military history

Indian military history topic area gets its first good topic with the promotion of Field marshal (India) to good topic status today. The topic comprises of three articles including the main article—Field marshal (India), and the two holders of the rank—Sam Manekshaw and Kodandera M. Cariappa. Happy editing. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Param Vir Chakra FLC

Hii, I think you should attract more editors to comment at your nomination like user:Vivvt who is expertised in such lists. Otherwise it might fail. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history

You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Indian defence services

You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

You cant' close and archive that discussion yourself, especially since (a) you've just replied to someone and they may want to reply back, (b) the Commons link you refer to is nowhere near being ready, (c) editors at WT:INDIA might be interested in reading other editors' views and feedback on that or similar issues; in other words, that discussion has begun, and has a life of its own, even if it is not directly beneficial to your goal, and (d) let someone uninvolved close and archive later, typically after a week. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Zorobabela Kaʻauwai/GA1

Hello, KCVelaga. You have new messages at Talk:Zorobabela Kaʻauwai/GA1.
Message added KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your GA nomination of Somnath Sharma

The article Somnath Sharma you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Somnath Sharma for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion to restart Indian collaborations of the month.

A discussion on INCOTM's talk page has been initiated. It includes various steps to be taken to keep the project alive and also regarding electing the coordinators. Please discuss. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anti-fascism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anti-fascism. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Somnath Sharma

Hello! Your submission of Somnath Sharma at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Jan to Mar 17 Milhist article reviewing

 The WikiChevrons 
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 43 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period January to March 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
@AustralianRupert: Many thanks for that. The only thing that is distressing for me is your break from reviewing. You've always been my inspiration when it comes to reviewing articles at various levels. Hope to see you around again. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Somnath Sharma

On 14 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Somnath Sharma, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Major Somnath Sharma, a Param Vir Chakra recipient, and General Vishwa Nath Sharma, former chief of the Indian Army, were brothers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Somnath Sharma. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Somnath Sharma), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Vat Purnima

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Vat Purnima has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:31, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Thanks for the help. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Param Vir Chakra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wartime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Battle of Tripolje

Hi, since you have undertook GA review I want to inform you I added some stuff to the article. By the way there are ongoing discussions on the talk. The first topic is Anzulovic, a source that was deleted by nominator even though they needed to find an agreement before doing so. They seem to refuse to seek an agreement on talk and are near an edit war. The article is continuously a target of vandalism and edit warring by IPs linked to a blocked editor. The reason is disagreement on use of Anzulovic as a source. The other topic is more complicated and can be read on the talk page of article. Regards. Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

@Ktrimi991: Thanks for informing, I'll look into it. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Multi-scale camouflage

Hi, I guess you're busy. It would be great to get going on the review soon! Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@Chiswick Chap: Sorry for the delay. Will review withing a day or two. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:25, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:/r/The Donald

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:/r/The Donald. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Review

Hi! Can you say if there are any improvements to be made to Columbidae, for GA? Also, can you review the article too? Thank you. :) Adityavagarwal (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

@Adityavagarwal: Please provide with the link to the article. I'll take up the review, if you if it is a Warfare related article, because I'm most familiar with the MoS of MILHIS, else I'll put up comments. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Columbidae Here is the article. However, it is not on Warfare. It is on animals. :P However, can you add your invaluable suggestions? Adityavagarwal (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
@Adityavagarwal: I'll put up suggestions within a couple of days, on the talk page of the article. As I am not that familiar with the subjective, I may overlook some subjective issues, but I'll take care of the language, point of view, MoS, flow, sources and images. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
  • Japan 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
  • Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)


Please review wikipedia article (02 May 2017)

Hi Krishna, Could you please review the article which i had written recently but no one picked up for review till now :( Article: Ravi D. Channannavar. Thank you in advance. In case of any concern, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. NaveenNkadalaveni (talk) 11:27pm, 02 May 2017 (IST) —Preceding undated comment added 18:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much for Reviewing Ravi D. Channannavar article :) Have a Great day! NaveenNkadalaveni (talk) 07:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Krishna, Will fix those page issues which you have highlighted today. Thanks. NaveenNkadalaveni (talk) 03:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox person

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

What is the best way to reach you?

Hey,

I tried adding you on Facebook but you didnt respond there. What will eb the best way to reach you?

Cheers, Soni (talk) 16:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Mail me at Special:EmailUser/Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Please respond

There are some issue that need attention Commons talk:Wiki Loves Uniformed services (India)/Scope please do respond with the same ..--✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello KCVelaga,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 805 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

4th GA Cup - Wrap Up

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Wrap Up

Hello, GA Cup competitors!

Saturday, April 1 concluded the 2016-2017 GA Cup. 64 reviews were completed by our finalists. Although the backlog increased by 42 over the reviewing period instead of declining, the increase suggests that the contest is encouraging editors to nominate articles for review.

Congratulations to Shearonink, who is the winner of the Cup, finishing with 672 points! Once again, just as in last round, this is more than the point totals for all the other competitors combined! It was a close race for second place between Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, who achieved 164 points, and Sturmvogel_66, who earned 150. Though Sturmvogel_66 reviewed one more article than Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga managed to earn 14 points more due to reviewing older articles. Our two wildcard competitors, Kees08 and Chris troutman, came in fourth and fifth, respectively.

There were some bumps in the competition this time: The sign-up deadline and the first round were both extended due to fewer competitors signing up then was planned for. And there were delays in tallying points and getting out the newsletter. The judges apologize for this latter difficulty. Lastly, mid-way through the competition we bid farewell to Zwerg Nase, who stepped down from their position as judge due to other commitments. Information about the Final can be found here.

Thank you to all of our competitors, and congrats to our winners!

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
Thanks, well done. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 18:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:En Marche!

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:En Marche!. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the UNESCO Challenge!

Hi,

Thank you for participating in the UNESCO Challenge! I hope you had as fun as we did!

If you could take a minute to answer our survey, we would be very grateful. Your answer will help us improve our Challenges in the future.

Best,

John Andersson (WMSE) (talk) 08:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Robert Mueller

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Mueller. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gold (2018 film)

Hello, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gold".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 21:58, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

UNESCO Challenge book prize

Hello! Thank you for your contributions about the Swedish World Heritage! You are now eligeble for a book prize. Please send an address where you want it shipped to jan.ainali@raa.se. If you prefer to not provide an address, the book is also available for download here (pdf, 5 MB). Best regards, Ainali (talk) 14:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ainali: When will the prize be delivered? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
It was shipped yesterday, but I have no idea on how long it will take. Ainali (talk) 10:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Indian Navy

[1]. Is there a reason why you couldn't fix the issues yourself? From what I can see, you've not improved this article in the slightest by adding these tags. But then that's the easy option, isn't it. CassiantoTalk 11:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@Cassianto: Thanks for ping. Actually there is a lot of incorrect information presented on the page. It needs to be worked up from the scratch and even the most of the cited links are dead. So I am about to start to work on it, and it would take at least 2–3 weeks to make up good content. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monarchy of Canada

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monarchy of Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Operation Trident (1971) finally corrected

Hello, this message is to let you know that I have now, finally, fixed the errors that you introduced on the article Operation Trident (1971), after you did nothing to fix the problems even despite my letting you know about your serious errors several months ago.

Please could you make sure to be much more careful when interpreting sources in the English language -- you completely misunderstood this source and did not correct your serious errors even when I highlighted them to you. If you are not fully confident with the English language then it may not be appropriate for you to "worked up from the scratch" and "make up good content" as you state above in your talk page that you plan to do. Thank you for your understanding of my concerns. MPS1992 (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

@MPS1992: Sorry for that. I missed them somewhere. Please accept my apologies and thank you for fixing the errors. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Women's Equality Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Women's Equality Party. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

COH Challenge

Hi!

Thank you for your contribution to the UNESCO Challenge a couple of months ago.

I don't know if you have noticed, but there is a new competition starting tomorrow, that is co-arranged by UNESCO and Wikimedia Sverige – the COH Challenge. This time, the purpose is to get as many of the images uploaded as part of the Connected Open Heritage project (e.g. of world heritage sites, the images can be found here) as possible to be used in Wikipedia articles (however, at most five images – with caption – per article).

I hope you want to participate! :)

Best, Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue Sky with a White Sun

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Sky with a White Sun. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Apr to Jun 17 Milhist article reviewing

 Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) 
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 10 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period Apr to Jun 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello KCVelaga, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump's disclosure of classified information to Russia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump's disclosure of classified information to Russia. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

BAP Unión

Hi, Im who nominated BAP Unión for a GA status. I Just want to say that someone told me that a good articule should have some bibliographic sources. I understand this. The problem is that the Union is a ship recently built (2015) and commissioned (2016), so for now there is no bibliographic (books) sources. All sources we have are internet sources. I hope you consider that. Regards --Elelch (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

@Elelch: As far as I as know, there is no such guideline, the only thing is that all the sources must meet WP:RS. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: I did the corrections that you recommended in BAP Unión, so I hope it now filled the requirements to get GA status. Regards.--Elelch (talk) 19:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! --Elelch (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karam Singh

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Karam Singh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karam Singh

The article Karam Singh you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Karam Singh for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Crack (2017 film) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Crack (2017 film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Crack (2017 film)

Hello, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Crack".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 18:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:/r/The Donald

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:/r/The Donald. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White House Press Secretary

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White House Press Secretary. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello KCVelaga, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karam Singh

The article Karam Singh you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Karam Singh for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European Union

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European Union. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Theresa May

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theresa May. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello KCVelaga, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lee Rhiannon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lee Rhiannon. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

INS Vikrant (R11) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the INS Vikrant (R11) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 22, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 22, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Precious

Indian military history

Thank you for quality articles on Indian military ships such as INS Vikrant (R11) and List of destroyers of India, about historic officers such as Rama Raghoba Rane, for your service as a Member of the Executive Committee, Wikimedia India, - Krishna, newcomer of 2016, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Adding a category to your user page

G'day Krishna, with your election as a co-ord of the Milhist Project, I would normally add the you to this category: Category:WikiProject Military history coordinators. Doing this allows you to trigger Milhist bot when closing A-class reviews. However, your current user page doesn't seem to allow me to add this category. Do you know if there is a way to do this? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

@AustralianRupert: Oh! I've tried some, but didn't workout. This is basically because as I use Global User page from Meta-wiki, I'll ping Kirill Lokshin, because he does a similar practice. We'll see if he can help us out. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Coordinator of the Military History Project, September 2017 – September 2018

In recognition of your election as one of the Military History Project's Co-ordinators, please accept these Co-ordinator's stars. Welcome aboard. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

@AustralianRupert: Greetings Rupert, thanks for the welcome. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Congrats on the new position! I'll be honest, when you first joined I was a bit worried (lots of newbie errors and the like) but you've turned into an A-class editor! Keep it up! Onward and upward! Primefac (talk) 01:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
@Primefac: Thank you Prime, and you've been patiently mentoring me all those time. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Jul to Sep 2017 Milhist article reviewing

 Military history reviewers' award 
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of six Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period Jul to Sep 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Please comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:34, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Antonov An-70 review

Hello Krishna. I've resolved your points over at Talk:Antonov An-70/GA1. Please have a look at them and also see if the article has any other issues. Thanks, --Sp33dyphil (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold (2018 film) (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Gold (2018 film) instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karam Singh

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Karam Singh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karam Singh

The article Karam Singh you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Karam Singh for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karam Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pashtun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karam Singh

The article Karam Singh you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Karam Singh for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

@Peacemaker67: Hey PM, thanks for the review. I just that you've passed the article, but do you have any clue regarding the above message? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
I think Legobot had a conniption. I added the icon manually. I have had it happen before on a second or third GAN. Whoever runs Legobot could probably tell you what happened. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello KCVelaga, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

  • Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catalan independence referendum, 2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catalan independence referendum, 2017. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Edward Snowden very long tag

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, the {very long} tag that you added to Edward Snowden on 12 May 2016 has become a permanent fixture. I would like to reduce the article's size but cannot locate the any corresponding thread in the Talk Page archives where editors forged a consensus that it was then discussed it being overlong. Please, can you help me? In order to move us closer to ultimately removing your tag, it is essential that I understand the thinking that went into placing it there in the first place. Also, if you could take a quick look at this BLP as it stands, I'd appreciate your thoughts on its current length, nearly 1½ years after your tagging. Thank you! KalHolmann (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Just to note, a talk page consensus is not required to add a tag or template to an article. MPS1992 (talk) 17:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
MPS1992, thanks for clarifying. I have revised my preceding comment accordingly. KalHolmann (talk) 17:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
@KalHolmann: Compared to versions that I've tagged, the present one seems quite good. You may remove the tag. Thank you MPS1992 for replying. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Karam Singh

On 27 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karam Singh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Karam Singh was the first living recipient of the Param Vir Chakra, India's highest military decoration? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karam Singh. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karam Singh), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #284

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Continued working on persistent storage of edits on Lexeme pages
    • Fixed an encoding problem in the SVG download of query results in the query service (phabricator:T178564)
    • Fixed a problem with change dispatching changes to Wikipedia and co, that sometimes lead to single wikis falling way behind. (T179060)
    • Added full URIs for external identifiers to the RDF export
    • You can leave feedback on how improved fulltext search result page should look like

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here.



About adding images to Dhyana Buddha

Sir, In the recent edit edit you made to Dhyana Buddha statue, you have added too many images, such that they even dominated the article. As per MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE an article should not have many images, since Wikimedia Commons serves the same purpose.—IM3847 (talk) 06:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

  • Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
  • Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
  • Featured List – Canada Bloom6132 (submissions) and Japan 1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
  • Featured Pictures – Cascadia SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
  • Featured Topic – Denmark MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
  • Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
  • Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
  • In The News – India MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
  • Good Article Review – India Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KCVelaga/Archive_4&oldid=1088847803"