User talk:JohnnyBflat/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:JohnnyBflat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi JohnnyBflat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 05:34, Wednesday, November 13, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Sandbox
Please note that sandbox pages are not allowed to be included in articlespace categories. I note that each time you've overhauled your sandbox page to work on a new topic, somebody has had to come in and decategorize it again — so just a reminder that you must either (a) include categories only in disabled form (e.g. with a leading colon in front of the word category so that it turns into a link to the category instead of inclusion in the category, or wrapped inside nowiki tags), and then reenable them when you're actually moving your work into a real article, or (b) just leave categories off the page entirely, and add them for the first time only when you're actually moving your work into a real article. But it is not allowed to appear in any mainspace categories while it's still in your own sandbox, so you have to do one of those two things. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Bearcat, I thought I'd broken the link but obviously not. I'll get it right next time. :) JohnnyBflat (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
C class update on Roberto Burioni
Hi Johnny,
Good job on the article. However I changed the layout, since his activism results in him producing more works, and it is breakthrough.
Also all featured article bios have usually been standardized to a three paragraph intro, I never give an article a B unless it has a three or two chunky paragraph. A solid one from his early career to his breakthrough, another one about from that point to present day.
See for yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles
Another thing is between 2004 and 2016 there is no record of what he did.
Buroni moved to the medical school at the Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele in Milan in 2004, first as an Associate Professor and later as Full Professor of Microbiology and Virology.
His he still working there?
I believe once you have settled these element your will probably earn more than a B.Filmman3000 (talk) 07:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
The WikiLoop Battlefield weekly barnstar
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, JohnnyBflat You have been recognized as the weekly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield quarterlyly barnstar
|
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, JohnnyBflat You have been recognized as the quarterlyly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield monthlyly barnstar
|
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, JohnnyBflat You have been recognized as the monthlyly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
Super impressive
Hey JohnnyBflat, it is super impressive to see you raise to the Top 1 of WikiLoop Battlefield reviewer by number. Kudos! xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 06:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, xinbenlv. I've kinda got hooked and I especially love being able to revert serious vandalism within a minute or two of it occurring. I'll be using WikiLoop Battlefield for some time to come, I think. Cheers! JohnnyBflat (talk) 07:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
The WikiLoop Battlefield dailyly barnstar
|
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, JohnnyBflat You have been recognized as the dailyly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield weeklyly barnstar
|
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, JohnnyBflat You have been recognized as the weeklyly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield weeklyly barnstar
|
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, JohnnyBflat You have been recognized as the weekly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / yearly) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
Feedback
Hi Johnny
Our award-winning MVP Johnny!
As a power user of WikiLoop Battlefield who receives more(actually, most) barnstar than others, if it ever bothers someone for receiving barnstars, you probably would be the most. My question for your valuable feedback is: do you enjoy receiving the Weekly barnstar or do you prefer we lower the frequency like only awarding it per Month/Quarter?
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 19:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Xinbenlv: Hi and thank you. I think monthly/quarterly would probably be better otherwise I could end up with a long wall of weekly barnstars.
𝄞: JohnnyB𝄬 𝅘𝅥𝅮 Sing with me𝅘𝅥𝅮 05:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Suggestbot
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
Dear JohnnyBflat,
Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Why do you keep editing pages with lies ... ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.150.83.182 (talk) 08:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- @180.150.83.182:You're going to have to be more specific about what you're talking about. I only edit using reliable sources as per Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:Reliable sources. 𝄞: JohnnyB𝄬 𝅘𝅥𝅮 Sing with me𝅘𝅥𝅮 10:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your opinion. Again I do believe there is a conflict of interest and that you are in fact involved with the people who edited a page based on an unreliable source. I think you need to be investigated as an editor. The edits made to that page were in fact the truth but I guess Wikipedia doesn’t care much for truth or fact. At the end of day nobody come to wiki as a reliable source either. But I am satisfied that I have left a comment attached to your page. I would hate this someone died of an overdose because they did not seek helped based on an edit you did to a page. That’s something you’ll have to answer for not me . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.150.83.182 (talk) 13:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @180.150.83.182:You seem to be confused about how Wikipedia works. Articles on Wikipedia assert facts, not opinions, as per Wikipedia policy found here Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Editors add information on topics from reliable sources that are freely available to the public. You don't get to remove reliably sourced information just because you don't like it. You start a discussion on the article talk page and demonstrate why it should be removed. Your beliefs are irrelevant, you must present evidence. if you do this and act in a civil manner, other editors will happily engage with you and correct any mistakes you have found. Have a great day! 𝄞: JohnnyB𝄬 𝅘𝅥𝅮 Sing with me𝅘𝅥𝅮 13:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
2 years on and you still haven’t corrected your misinformation . You do realise people can read wiki and then cross reference. It make this info look very out dated .
Cherryblossom1976 (talk) 17:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
I am opening a discussion of a possible conflict of interest. As you are not allowed to disclose who a person is on here I believe you work for a newspaper and you have not truthfully being reporting facts on an organisation. You have been editing their page with your paid opinion which goes against the rules of Wikipedia.
It’s required that before it is posted on the Conflict of interest board and investigated that you are given a chance to discuss this .
It is also required by Wikipedia that you edit with reliable sources - which you have neglected to use. Using yourself as a reliable source isn’t quite using a reliable source - you are editing with your opinion Cherryblossom1976 (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Cherryblossom1976:. I can assure you that I do not work for a newspaper, am not paid to edit Wikipedia, and have not used myself as a source as I have not written anything published outside of Wikipedia. If you feel that the sources I have used are not reliable and can demonstrate why in the context of Wikipedia rules, I am happy to discuss it further with you. Have a great day! 𝄞: JohnnyB𝄬 𝅘𝅥𝅮 Sing with me𝅘𝅥𝅮 15:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
If you have a look at the stories that have been used as a ‘reliable’ source come from the same source which has long published hate against the organisation in question . If I could suggest you having a look at the many stories on the internet regarding an organisation.. not just one source that has an underlying agenda. I can assure you a lot of what has been said is in no way fact, just because a person was able to publish what they wanted people to read in no way make it a reliable source.. the source used was pretty much like using the Daily Mail and saying it’s reliable . Cherryblossom1976 (talk) 15:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- I would suggest first familiarising yourself with what constitutes a reliable source here Wikipedia:Reliable sources. A source is not unreliable simply because we disagree with what they have written or don't like what they have to say. Also, if you have read something on Wikipedia that you believe is not factual and you can reliably demonstrate it is incorrect, you should bring it up on the article talk page. You will find that most editors are more than happy to discuss things and make reasonable changes when civil discussions are held. You will also find that if you start deleting information from pages without prior discussion, your edits are more than likely to be reversed. If it keeps happening, the page will get locked and you can potentially have your account blocked. Basically, if you learn the rules of being an editor and play nice with everyone, you'll achieve more and have a good time doing it. Let me know if I can be of further help. Have a great day! 𝄞: JohnnyB𝄬 𝅘𝅥𝅮 Sing with me𝅘𝅥𝅮 11:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback on recent update for DoubleCheck
Hi JohnnyBflat/Archive 1,
You have been a top contributor of reviewing Wikipedia edits leveraging WikiLoop DoubleCheck (formerly WikiLoop Battlefield), we recently roll out some features, as you may notice them, most specifically the new feed mechanism and action panels. We wonder if you have any feedback because power users like you probably knows the best. Thank you!. Developer of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 22:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi JohnnyBflat/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI JohnnyBflat/Archive 1,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Potter's House Christian Fellowship I added a source from Mitchell's book, about why he discouraged bible colleges. Im not sure why it was removed. It was a direct source which means it's reliable and not my own opinion Lahvis (talk) 13:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Lahvis:. Mitchell's book is a primary source and as such should not be used. Wikipedia policy is to cite from secondary sources. Please have a look at WP:Primary which explains why it is done this way. If you need any further assistance on properly editing Wikipedia pages, I'm happy to help. Cheers. 𝄞: JohnnyB𝄬 𝅘𝅥𝅮 Sing with me𝅘𝅥𝅮 14:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism
Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.
The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.
Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)