Jump to content

User talk:JJPMaster/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User talk:JJPMaster/Archive 1

[edit | purge | talk | history | move | return to start]

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Welcome!

Hello, JJPMaster, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hacker.io, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hacker.io

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hacker.io requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Implicit differentiation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Implicit differentiation. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Implicit differentiation (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Implicit function. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references.

Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.

This draft does not appear to have any more information than is currently in Implicit function, to which implicit differentiation is currently a redirect.

If this draft is expanded, with references and additional content, then whether a separate article should be accepted can be discussed at Talk:Implicit function.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, JJPMaster! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

"Is this the real life" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Is this the real life. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 4#Is this the real life until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Killing in the Name, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robvanvee 06:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Information icon Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Red Hot Chili Peppers, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Robvanvee 18:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at These Are the Days of Our Lives, you may be blocked from editing. Robvanvee 06:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

"Main Page (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Main Page (disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 11#Main Page (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Main Page (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Main Page (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. (t · c) buidhe 22:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quick note on Thorn Within

Redirect  Fixed. Please check. Best regards Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 15:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
180 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Street style (talk) Add sources
728 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B 2017 Major League Baseball season (talk) Add sources
2,243 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B The Velvet Underground (talk) Add sources
2,039 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Bubble tea (talk) Add sources
33 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Six Feet Down Under (talk) Add sources
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub So What! (talk) Add sources
578 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Vallejo, California (talk) Cleanup
332 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Kele Okereke (talk) Cleanup
196 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Fade to Black (song) (talk) Cleanup
840 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Captain Price (talk) Expand
2,748 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Reign of Terror (talk) Expand
122 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Japan–Korea disputes (talk) Expand
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Escape from the Studio '06 (talk) Unencyclopaedic
466 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C One (Metallica song) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,142 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Emo rap (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,379 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Inbreeding (talk) Merge
270 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Hong Kong–Mainland China conflict (talk) Merge
88 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Tuesday (ILoveMakonnen song) (talk) Merge
28 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Israeli hip hop (talk) Wikify
874 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Trivium (band) (talk) Wikify
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Asian hip hop (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Psychosocial Genomics (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start CapoeirArab (talk) Orphan
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Guitar Rock (Time-Life Music) (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Charlottenlund SK (talk) Stub
43 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start The Metallica Collection (talk) Stub
37 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Limited-Edition Vinyl Box Set (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Metallica: This Monster Lives (talk) Stub
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Moth into Flame (talk) Stub
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Live at Grimey's (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of No personal attacks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, No personal attacks, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of No personal attacks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on No personal attacks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_20#No_personal_attacks. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 13:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of No original research

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on No original research requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_August_3#No_original_research_→_Original_research. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Captain Calm (talk) 13:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi JJPMaster! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:27, Tuesday, November 10, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Template:Too many sections

Hello JJPMaster, do not move a page that had an RM closed by another editor. That is not your responsibility, nor did you fill out the "Reason:" section as to why the template was moved. I also now have to move the documentation page/s individually when I could have done it simultaneously while moving the template. Jerm (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Signature

Hello, JJPMaster,

You have a very distracting signature. Please consider changing it to one of a simpler design. See guidelines at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing your signature. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

I have changed it to a simpler design. Please observe. --> JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 11:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Drmies (talk) 21:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Moving right along

Hi, JPP - Part 2 is ready. I fixed the formatting so go ahead and begin when you're ready, and please follow inline with Reviewee summary - for your answers as I demonstrated in the section about it. I used yellow highlight for my responses to your questions. Happy editing!! Atsme 💬 📧 20:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

@Atsme: It does appear that you have not graded my Pt. 4 assessment yet. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 15:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Promise - I haven't forgotten you, but for future reference, my weekend editing can be a little spotty. I'll try to finish up #4 today. Atsme 💬 📧 15:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Ok - Pt. 5 is ready for you - BTW, I meant to tell you to sign your last paragraph in each section. Don't worry about Pt 1-4, but do sign each section in Pt. 5. Atsme 💬 📧 16:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation of Gail Smith

Good evening - Could you comment further on why you would like to speedy delete Gail Smith (disambiguation)? There are two articles about people named Gail Smith, and one for someone named Gayle Smith. It seems that if you only heard the name "Gayle" or "Gail" spoken, as opposed to written, and you wanted to learn more about that person, that those names would be easy to mix up. Thus, I enhanced the page for Gail Smith and related pages, including creating Gail Smith (disambiguation). I don't see how it would make WP better to get rid of that page. Thanks for your contributions. KConWiki (talk) 00:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

@KConWiki: I speedy deleted it because it was a redirect to Gali Smith's article; it wasn't an actual disambiguation page. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 00:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Well, it left the several Gail / Gayle Smith articles with red links at the top; I am going to go back and clean those up. KConWiki (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
I apologize, I failed to realize that it was a redirect to a disambiguation page. I have recreated it. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 00:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
OK, no problem - Thanks again for the work you do to make WP better. KConWiki (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations! You passed NPP training.

I've left instructions on the training page. You can add your Certificate of Completion to your user page, or wherever else you choose. Happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 12:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi JJPMaster! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What is the difference between deletion review and requests for undeletion?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, JJP - congrats on receiving your extended user rights as a reviewer! Re: the above question at Tea House - did you ever get an answer to your question, or did you figure it out on your own? Atsme 💬 📧 11:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

@Atsme: I did get a response to the question. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 11:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi JJPMaster. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by JJPMaster was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 14:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Almost forgot

Almost all public schools & universities and accredited private schools & universities are considered notable, regardless of the number of cited RS. Sports articles and athletes get a lot of leeway, and so do movies, music and video games. If you come across one that you're not quite sure about, go to the topic's project page and post your question there. Also, when reviewing in NPP and you notice that the article doesn't have a Talk Page, go ahead and create one and add the WikiProject(s) in the talk header. Happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 21:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:JJPMaster/Another very useless test page has been accepted

User:JJPMaster/Another very useless test page, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Project-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 20:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Speedy deletion endorsed

Template:Speedy deletion endorsed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ionmars10 (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello JJPMaster,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, JJPMaster. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— -- Luk talk 19:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
For triggering DQB bot with User:A promotional username that implies shared use, and making me rush to check if the account was a troll. Nice one :-) Pahunkat (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Before I forget, what would you think of a trip of the stocks for moving the sandbox as per the Bushranger? Pahunkat (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Pahunkat, Feel free to add me to the village stocks. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 21:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Endorsed speedy deletions

Hello, JJPMaster,

This category you created has been tagged for deletion. What was your intent in creating it and why did you put an {{emptycat}} tag on it? Pages that have been tagged for speedy deletion can be immediately deleted after being reviewed by an administrator and don't need to be "endorsed". Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

I see you also created Template:Speedy deletion endorsed which was deleted. I'm not sure what you were thinking when you created these pages. Liz Read! Talk! 03:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
@Liz: I thought that something like PROD endorsed applied to speedy deletions as well as PRODs as both involve deletions, but, technically, it would be pointless for an administrator to ever use this template as they could just delete it. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
When you create unnecessary templates, categories and pages like WikiProject DAWE/"Universe is a universe" I have to question whether you are mature enough for advanced permissions like page reviewer. Please only create drafts of articles you are working on, not joke pages. These pages are not appropriate. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
@Liz: I was not aware that the category and template were not needed at the time that I created them. I created the WikiProject page originally in my userspace ([1], but I moved it to project space as it is an example of what I described in the page's parent page. I forgot to properly tag it as a humor page, however. I can move "DAWE" back to my userspace if you please. Also see [2] for further context as to what that page means.

JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

But I also see you going to WP:REFUND asking for "humor" pages that have been deleted to be restored, for no apparent purpose other than to satisfy your curiosity. I see you are part of NPP so I don't know why you are spending your time on these other pursuits. As for the Endorsed Speedy Deletion pages, as of January, Wikipedia will have been around 20 years...don't you think that if these pages were appropriate, they would already have been created, decades ago? I hope you resume patrolling new pages and spending your time on constructive activities. Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:List of Iranian Heritage Abroad

He moved it to List of Iranian artifacts abroad by cut n' paste! Johnbod (talk) 02:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Anarchyte (talk • work) 13:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi JJPMaster. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: Thank you! Also, don't worry, I won't add rollback to my achievements list. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 19:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Edits to Chitra Bharati Kathamala

The edits are absolutely neutral. I am trying to complete the list. Please let me know which part you find as non neutral. 2601:206:8000:1F70:A0ED:D250:F6F5:323D (talk) 22:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

@2601:206:8000:1F70:A0ED:D250:F6F5:323D: My mistake. I believe that I accidentally rolled back all of your edits while using Huggle. I have undone my reversion. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JJPMaster/Archive_1&oldid=1048429307"