User talk:Infinty 0

Hello, Infinty 0, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 02:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

November 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. BilletsMauves^€500 08:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

What do you mean disruptive editing? If you mean Sichuan Tengden, please provide evidence or reference that it is a state-own company or a branch of Chengdu Aircraft Design Institute.

While according to my research, it is a private company [1]. There is a picture of Ownership Structure in it.

Can you stop your threatening and smearing? Infinty 0 (talk) 09:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I mean much more than the Sichuan Tengden article; the problem with your edits has turned out to be bigger than that. I'm talking about poorly explained removal of sourced content on Shenyang J-11 (most of the articles on Soviet/Russian/Chinese aircraft have NATO codes, so no reason to remove it on one specific article), addition of unsourced content on CASC Rainbow and CAIG Wing Loong II, and changes to sourced content on Sichuan Tengden. If you want to change content in an article, then change the sources too. By the way, none of this is intended to be "threatening" or "smearing". Please assume good faith in your exchanges with other editors. Thanks in advance. BilletsMauves^€500 09:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Oh, thank you for your kindly instruction.

Maybe I will re-edit them with sources added and I'm looking forward your instruction with assumed good faith.

Plus I have a question, if you think Soviet/Russian/Chinese aircraft have NATO codes is a tradition or convention and no reason to remove it on one specific article, then why the article about Chinese aircraft like Wing Loong series use manufacturer name instead of the military designation as title particularly? Isn't it a convention too? Or you think it is better to make Wing Loong an exceptional case in the category of Chinese military aircraft? We have to settle this out or it will become a very bad and confusing precedent in the future when new Chinese drone articles added. Infinty 0 (talk) 10:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

The thing is that we have to use or at least mention the commonly used names for the aircraft we are talking about in the articles. Western sources often use NATO codes to name Soviet/Russian/Chinese military equipment, sometimes without giving the actual designation used by its manufacturer or its users. Hence, mentioning these NATO codes at least once is useful for the reader's orientation, even though these code names are often meaningless for the people who design, manufacture and operate this equipment.

Regarding the Wing Loong article titles, as I said before and per the WP:Article titles policy, for the article titles we have to use the names most commonly found in independent, reliable English-language sources. Now, this criteria still leaves room for personal bias: people prefer to read and use some sources over others, and this influences their perception of which name is used more than the others. Moreover, the use of a name over another can vary over time, especially for subjects that are in the news. This is the case for Chinese-made drones: right now, I would say that the name "Wing Loong" is more widespread than the name "GJ-1", but maybe in five years it will be different.

What differentiates Wing Loong and Wing Loong II from some of the other Chinese drones is that they are quite popular on the export market, and they have been intensively used in combat by some of the export users (notably by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia). Obviously, export users use the export name, not the one used by the PLA. So a lot of the reporting on these models also uses the export name. This is the reason why I think we should keep the designations "Wing Loong" and "Wing Loong II" for the article's names (but we should also mention the GJ-1 and GJ-2 designations in the main text, especially in the paragraphs dealing with the drones' use with the PLA).

I hope this clears things up, but don't hesitate if you have some further questions. Cheers, BilletsMauves^€500 11:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Xian Y-7 into List of aircraft produced by China. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

sorry, I don't know how to add attribution because I don't understand Wiki editing language(I'm using the visual editing). But I will study it, thank you. Infinty 0 (talk) 01:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

You do it via your edit summary. Like this: Diff of Seres Group. — Diannaa (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Oh, now I get it, thank you so much! Infinty 0 (talk) 01:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Why not contribute in Chinese wikipedia as well?

Hi there. Thank you for your contribution of Chinese car industry in English Wikipedia. However, since I noticed that you are also from China and your first language is Chinese as well, why not consider to contribute in Chinese Wikipedia as well? There are currently seriously lack of articles and updates about Chinese car models and brands in Chinese Wikipedia and even Ukrainian Wikipedia and Polish Wikipedia have more Chinese car articles than Chinese Wikipedia. So why not consider to contribute Chinese car articles in Chinese Wikipedia as well? It is so tragic to see that even other minor foreign language have more articles about Chinese car stuff than Chinese Wikipedia and Chinese car don't seem to have much attention in their "native language". I am currently uploading more HD Chinese car photos and creating some articles for Chinese Wikipedia in order to change this situation and I hope you could consider to contribute as well. Yours sincerely, User3204 (talk) 15:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

你好，谢谢你的关注。你所说的中文维基汽车词典的编辑我之前也考虑过，但因为政治原因在中国大陆地区无法正常使用维基百科，受众人群比起英文会少很多，加上中国有“汽车之家”“懂车帝”等多家专业汽车媒体APP，中国车在中国的信息会比维基百科更全更详细，所以就没有优先编辑中文词条。

不过谢谢你的支持，也许以后我会尽量抽出时间来编辑中文版。 Infinty 0 (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Shanghai Maple Automobile Logo and Maple Automobile Logo.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Shanghai Maple Automobile Logo and Maple Automobile Logo.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The logo of GAC Aion brand.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The logo of GAC Aion brand.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Export/Chinese names

Regarding the Jaecoo 7: if a car uses one name in all English-speaking markets, then that is the correct title for the WP entry. See WP:CARNAMES. While en.wp has a mostly global perspective, English is still the main language and English-speaking markets have primacy.

As for Livan, I replied on my talk page - one article for Maple and one for Livan is plenty and there is no need to list all of the unrelated old Maple products on the Livan page - only include things that overlap both names. Question: what is the IP editor trying to prove? Do they mean to say that Maple is still a separate brand from Livan? Is there any evidence to support their viewpoint or are they just being disruptive? Thank you,  Mr.choppers | ✎  18:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

Jaecoo is merely brands that Chery used in selected oversea markets, mostly mid-east countries and Russia (the same as Omoda brand). Jaecoo is far from a global brand and in some English-speaking countries like Australia and NZ, it still uses the Chery brand.

For Livan, and I don't really understand what the IP editor try to express. I'm a native Chinese and as far as I can find on the Chinese language sources, from the capital structure, SMA and Livan can be considered as the same company. The SMA ceased to be an independent brand since 2010 but exists as a subsidiary company that continued to produce Geely vehicles. In 2020, the Maple brand was revived as the Geely launched an joint-venture between SMA and Kandi while Geely further acquired its stake in the joint-venture and invite another new player Lifan (which was also acquired by Geely) to the JV and changed its name to Livan (Maple is not a separate brand anymore). Thus how it is comes to today. SMA never ceased to operate, the name "Shanghai Maple" ,"Maple" and "Livan" are different brand names that SMA used in past decades. This is why I try to prove that it is not necessary to set different articles for them, and the vehicle models that SMA produced should be showed together. They are just the SMA's legacies. Infinty 0 (talk) 22:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

That mostly makes sense. But Maple/Shanghai Maple are still distinct brands from Livan, just as how Simca became Talbot but remains a separate nameplate with a separate history and its own Wikipedia article; we do not include earlier Simca products at the Talbot page - only those cars which were also sold with Talbot badging. This is why the Livan article should not list anything before the Maple 30X (shouldn't it be "Maple 30x", by the way?). For some very shortlived brand like Dearcc, it might make more sense to move all content to Enovate, but Maple had significant history before being subsumed.

As for the Jaecoo 7 article, please start a discussion on the talk page. Provide a link to Australian market Geely-branded product and I will support restoring your title.  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

I believe it should be Chery you are referring to? Infinty 0 (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, of course.  Mr.choppers | ✎  15:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hi Infinty 0! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Jaecoo 7 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Jaecoo 7, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Infinty 0,

If someone reverts your edit or page move, you don't revert them back, you start a discussion on the article talk page. Please do that in the future instead of move-warring. Doing that persistently can lead to a loss of editing privileges. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Seres SF5

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Seres SF5, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leapmotor C01, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Executive. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Automotive industry in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BWM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Article will be deleted ❌

The article you created - List of SAIC vehicles will be deleted within 7 days. == Proposed deletion of List of SAIC vehicles ==

The article List of SAIC vehicles has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thanks, MrFlyingPies23 (talk) 09:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Good job👍✅

Great job fixing the article List of SAIC vehicles. Seeing you have fixed the errors that are needed for a standard Wikipedia page. The encyclopedia article is now closed for deletion. The page issue tags and {{subst:List of SAIC vehicle's|prod}} have been removed. Well done 😎 MrFlyingPies23 (talk) 23:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

fuck off Infinty 0 (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

huhMrFlyingPies23 (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

read Wikipedia:Etiquette & Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Be kind and don't harrass or speak Inappropriate to others. Listen, MrFlyingPies23 (talk) 23:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Wuling Motors

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wuling Motors, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AITO brand logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AITO brand logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Automotive industry in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of GAC vehicles with joint venture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of GAC vehicles with joint venture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of GAC vehicles with joint venture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 21:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jetour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pick-up.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Automotive industry in China, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Automotive industry in China. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please also review WP:BURDEN. Amigao (talk) 01:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Automotive industry in China, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Automotive industry in China, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 04:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Infinty 0, left a message for you on Talk:Automotive industry in China in an effort to build WP:CONSENSUS, a core WP:POLICY here. - Amigao (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Harmony Intelligent Mobility Alliance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Harmony Intelligent Mobility Alliance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Xiaomi Auto.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Xiaomi Auto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Seres_(automobiles)

Please explain what do you mean by "Not a U.S. based manufacturer" Its headquarters is in the U.S., therefore, that makes it a U.S. based manufacturer. Even if a company moved its headquarters from one country to another, it still gets the templates and categories of that country it moved to. Like for example, Sega was originally based in the U.S. (Hawaii) but have since then moved their HQ to Japan. And it gets the templates and categories of Japan as well. 2600:6C5D:5CF0:8420:A408:4F:34ED:2438 (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

The company you are talking about is SF Motors, a subsidiary of Seres Automobile.

There reasons I don't think it should be labeled as an U.S. manufacturer are simple and clear.

1. The SF Motors was an U.S. company acquired by Seres, and this article is about Seres not SF Motors
2. The SF Motors is an R&D company only, and never manufactured a single vehicle on the U.S. soil.

Infinty 0 (talk) 17:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Livian Automotive Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Livian Automotive Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Appreciate your past contributions to Automotive industry in China

Just want to say that your past contributions to the article Automotive industry in China is appreciated. It is unfortunate that recent edits have substantially altered the nature of the page. Iamnoone069 (talk) 04:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your encouragement, this is truly heart-warming. I didn't expect that the article would attract certain editor who has specific political agenda against China, which made the article less informative and neutral. This is completely contrary to my original intention.

To avoid spoiling the appetite of readers who genuinely love cars, I have stripped out the information about brands and manufacturers of China into a new article. Automobile manufacturers and brands of China. You may check it. Infinty 0 (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Tim Wu (talk) 04:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Comac C909. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 10:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Note that I've just filed a request at WP:RM/TR; the article should be moved to the new title shortly. Rosbif73 (talk) 10:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Livan Automotive

added a link pointing to Kandi

Shanghai Maple

added a link pointing to Kandi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Your recent editing history at Automotive industry in China shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Amigao (talk) 21:05, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 07:40, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Infinty 0 (talk) 08:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Infinty 0 (talk) 08:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Why I am banned? Please check the edit history and talk page again. The user Amigao made a substantial change first to the article without explanation or consensus. Even after the discussion was initialed, he kept editing it as he wish before any consensus is reached. What I did was just restoring the article to the point before all the conflict started, how it becomes my fault? @Daniel Case Infinty 0 (talk) 08:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

As it says quite clearly in the notice above, you made more than three reverts to an article within a 24-hour period. This is the brightest bright-line rule of Wikipedia. There are some exceptions, but restoring a prior version you believe to be better is not one of them. And when there is ongoing discussion on the talk page, as there has been here, this rule is especially important.

You aren't "banned", just blocked temporarily. But it does not seem from the above that you are learning anything from this. I just gave you that opportunity. If you don't take it, and continue the same behavior, the next block will be longer. And if you keep doing that, it would be within an admin's discretion to block you indefinitely, effectively a ban. Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Response

Hycan was made by GAC and Nio, Nio left and now GAC has majority ownership, And according to carnewschina, Kaiyi is backed by chery. Thank you. JamAlBorey (talk) 11:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

@JamAlBorey Kaiyi is 82% owned by the government of Yibin and 18% by Chery. Hycan 68% owned by a private company Pearl River Investment and 25% by GAC and GAC Aion. You can double check it on their official website. Infinty 0 (talk) 11:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, my bad. JamAlBorey (talk) 11:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

@JamAlBorey You are welcome. I am very gald to see there is new editor for the topic of Chinese automotive industry. Thank you for your contribution. Infinty 0 (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

You are welcome. JamAlBorey (talk) 12:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, there is some explanations for the revert/editing in List of automobile manufacturers of China.

1.I've done some search for the Costin and Radten of Chery you have edited, but can not find any evidence that these two brands have ever come into operation.

2. Hozon Eureka is just a concept car of Neta Auto and it is not a manufacturer or marque.

3. Xpeng Mona is a product line, not a marque.

4. Letin and Weltmeister are completely bankrupt right now and there is no trace that they are still in operation. Infinty 0 (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

1. Costin and Radten were featured on carnewschina.

2. You are correct.

3. You are kind of correct, But Xpeng will spin them off into their own brand (Mona), And carnewschina says they are their own brand as well.

4. Letin(Levdeo) and Weltmeister completed reorganisation on April and March, (According to their Wikipedia pages), Thank you. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Jiyue stopped existing as of 2025, Baidu and Geely stopped funding. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

The information on Carnewschina is often incorrect and outdated. Maybe you can check the Dcar or Yiche, which are the most popular and authoritative car website/application of China.

Letin and Weltmeister claimed to be under reorganization but such claims are mostly commercial propaganda, and it should be considered as bankrupt until further evidence is available (resuming operations or production).

Jiyue is experiencing an operational crisis, but I don't think it should be considered as "bankrupt" before Geely or Baidu makes an official statement. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Idk if the information from carnewschina is incorrect and outdated.. And I can't access Dcar and Yiche, And Jiyue, put it in Defunct as Geely and Baidu said they have removed all financial aid to the company, and they have stopped most operations, the same with Hycan, And supposedly, Letin started operations according to Catnewschina. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

https://www.dongchedi.com/search?keyword=%E9%9B%B7%E4%B8%81&currTab=1&city_name=%E6%B7%B1%E5%9C%B3&search_mode=sug

As you can see on Dcar, Letin has already been labeled as defunt.

https://www.dongchedi.com/search?keyword=%E5%90%88%E5%88%9B%E6%B1%BD%E8%BD%A6&currTab=1&city_name=%E6%B7%B1%E5%9C%B3&search_mode=sug

https://www.dongchedi.com/search?keyword=%E6%9E%81%E8%B6%8A&currTab=1&city_name=%E6%B7%B1%E5%9C%B3&search_mode=sug\

Both Jiyue and Hycan are still in operation. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

There is a high probability that Hycan and Jiyue would go bankrupt, but it is best to wait patiently for more accurate official news. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

• Carnewschina

JamAlBorey (talk) 18:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

I found information about Radten and Costen from Chinese sources. Costen is a local state-owned brand in Shandong, and Radten is a start-up company located in Hebei. Both brands are manufactured (OEM) by Chery, but news about their prototypes only appears in In 2021, and there is no information about the launch. It can be speculated that the two brands are already ceased(or they never start) operations. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

IDK one dude said on china car forums that Radten was merged into exeed but I can't verify that, Anyway, Can you tell me what are the best websites to learn about Chinese Auto news, and provide links? JamAlBorey (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Well I think the best source is Dcar, Yiche and Autohome.

These three websites cooperate with most of China's automobile manufacturers, and the car model information on them is highly consistent and has high credibility.

The only problem is that it is all in Chinese, maybe you need to use some translation software if you don't know Chinese. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Costin EC1 rebranded to Chery Wujie Pro in 2022, Just wanted to tell you.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

can you provide some sources? I can't find any on Chinese website. Infinty 0 (talk) 17:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I already provided sources for Jiangnan and EEZI in the page..

Maybe you can't search them because I provided the names in English.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Why did you remove them? They are 100% correct. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

No， EEZI is an independent company which is not under Zotye Auto or Jiangnan. They don't have any capital relation. If you read the article which you referred, the EEZI and Zotye just signed a strategic cooperation agreement which enable EEZI to source the vehicle from Zotye(Jiangnan). Infinty 0 (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I didn't put them under Zotye, 2nd, why did you remove meizu, Saleen, and others? JamAlBorey (talk) 18:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

1.Meizu has only released a concept car, and it is not clear whether the brand will be put into operation. According to the current trend of Geely Group's brand contraction and merger, it is highly likely that Meizu will not be put into operation. It is recommended to wait for more accurate news or announcement before adding it to the list.

2. Saleen is an American company.

3. Yes you do put EEZI under the Zotye, you can check the history. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

1. Pls provide source as I can't find anything about Meizu you have said.

2. Saleen was listed as a Chinese company in multiple different sources.

3. I fixed my mistake later before you even noticed.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

1.There is no production car from Meizu currently. It is just a concept car which was made by Geely and a concept car only doesn't make it a manufacturer. We just need to be patient enough to see whether it could come true.

2.Saleen is an American company that experienced a famous fraud in China. [2] Read this. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

OK, But isn't Qiantu and LinkTour active? LinkTour has a 2024 car called the yue 1, And Qiantuntook a 2 year break from 2020 to 2022, But r3started operations in 2022.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

I am sorry for some of my mistakes, A lot of car brands I don't have alot of info on them, So I do my best to find info on them, But alot of times, I find a little bit of unverified info, Do I do my best to try and come up with a conclusion, I wish their was a site in English that has the same amount of indo as Chinese ones.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

It's okay. It is no one's fault. There is just not so much information about Chinese car brands and manufacturers in English. I'm a native Chinese so I can try best to verify those information which I hope you won't mind. Anyway, thank you for your contribution and if you have any question about my editing please feel free to ask me. Infinty 0 (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I can't find enough info about Farnova Group Holdings Ltd... JamAlBorey (talk) 17:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I found that the Farnova has been renamed to Jiading International Group Holdings Ltd. But it seems a advertisement/media company? Infinty 0 (talk) 17:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Thx for the info, But you still didn't answer my question why did you remove the stuff that I added, it was all correct.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I made a lot of edits, I think all of them are correct.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey?? They are correct why remove them? JamAlBorey (talk) 17:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

which one do you mean? I can explain Infinty 0 (talk) 17:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Everything, From JMEV to LeSEE to Zinoro and so on, All are correct.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

1.JMEV is a joint venture which is invested by Renault which has already be mentioned in the joint venture section of Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi.

2.LeSee has not produced any production car, they only had a concept.

3. Again, Zinoro was a joint venture brand between BMW and Brilliance, but the BWM has already acquired majority stakes over Brilliance Auto. So technically It became a foreign brand then and has been mentioned in the foreign manufacturers/brands section.

any more question? Infinty 0 (talk) 17:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

The rest, Dadao, And others you have deleted.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Dadao is mere a product line under JMC. It is not a brand independently operated. Infinty 0 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Nearly all articles say it is a new brand under (JMC), and all of their cars have different logos.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

A different logo doesn't make it an independent brand. You will find that it is still under the JMC brand if you check the JMC official website. Whether a brand has the characteristics of independent operation depends on its capital relation and sales channels. At present, it has not made the distinction. Infinty 0 (talk) 17:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

explain to me why you deleted the rest JamAlBorey (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Why did you remove xgjao, and many others? bro pls answer me.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

XGJAO is a motorcycle brand, not a car brand. you can google it. Infinty 0 (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Nor are many of the brands that were mentioned in th article. Some make heavy-duty trucks, not cars.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

what exactly do you mean? Infinty 0 (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

brands like CNHTC only make heavy-duty trucks, not cars, so why are they included? JamAlBorey (talk) 17:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, don't cars and heavy-truck are "automobiles"? Infinty 0 (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

so do Motorcycles :) JamAlBorey (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

no, there is an article about what automobile is on wiki, please check the definition. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

It depends on who you ask, Some say it is a Motor with wheels that runs on roads, some say it should have 4 wheels, but in general, Motorcycles are Automobiles.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Every single car brand that you deleted, You will explain to me why.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Anything you mention. Infinty 0 (talk) 17:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Projen, Chana, Costin.. JamAlBorey (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

1.Chana is just a former name of Changan, not other brand.

2. I finnally found info about Projen, it is a commerical car brand under Lifan. I added it.

3.Still can't find anything about costin Infinty 0 (talk) 18:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

1.Chana is just a former name of Changan, not other brand.

2. I didn't delete Baoya

3. Jiangling Motor Holdings is under Ford (Ford 32%, JMCG 25%, Changan 25%), technically it is not a Chinese state owned brand. please check their website for ownership info or the article. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

What about XGjao?

Costin was rolled back to chery in 2022, Their only model (The EC1) was rebranded to Chery Wujie Pro, I think you can't search for it because it has a different name in Chinese.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I found information about Costin, which is called Qilu(奇鲁) in Chinese. It is a private enterprise located in Shandong Province. This Costin was originally produced by Chery, but later the two parties cancelled the cooperation for unknown reasons, which means that this brand called Costin did not exist in the first place and had nothing to do with Chery. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Chana's official Wikipedia page shows that it is a brand itself.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I think it is a mistake. There is a report about Changan's renaming. Changan was rename from Chana in 2010. Please check. Infinty 0 (talk) 18:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

thx for telling me about Chana.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:37, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Now I wrote you many messages about brands you have deleted, Now can you tell me, WHY? JamAlBorey (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey man, I am really sorry that I have annoyed you.. JamAlBorey (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

No worry, I glad to verify any information. Infinty 0 (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Do you know anything about REECH Auto? JamAlBorey (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

I found that Reech Auto (绿驰汽车) was manufacture back by Henan government, but they failed to produce one car and bankrupted. See this [3] Infinty 0 (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Do you know anything about Hybrid Kinetic Group? JamAlBorey (talk) 09:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hybrid Kinetic (正道) was a America-based Chinese company which made several concept car but was also failed to make any production ones. Its activities have ceased since 2016 and it is presumed bankrupt https://www.yoojia.com/article/10095627427480636147.html Infinty 0 (talk) 11:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Can you pls answer me? Do you know what is going on with REECH AUTO, Hybrid Kenitic and Qingyuan (QYEV)? JamAlBorey (talk) 08:01, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

There is an article about Qingyuan Auto. I think it is a proper manufacturer that can be added to the list. Infinty 0 (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the info.. JamAlBorey (talk) 11:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

According to Wkikproject: Chinese cars , Reech is still in operation and it is the restructured version of LVCHI, Nut I have absolutely nothing to verify that.. Do you have? JamAlBorey (talk) 11:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

LVCHI is just the Chinese name of Reech. It has gone bankrupt and has had its production license revoked, see link above. Infinty 0 (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

which link? JamAlBorey (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI1MjkzMTcwOQ==&mid=2247594550&idx=1&sn=060f824258c9c536ab3f57902a90e081&chksm=e9df0924dea8803216a7abe690657772b82a7046ce8a6891f493dcf5a997ff4b68694f2eec71&scene=27 Infinty 0 (talk) 13:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

thx JamAlBorey (talk) 13:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

XGjao, Baoya, Jiangling Motor Holdings.. JamAlBorey (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Geely into Geely Auto. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)