User talk:ImperatorExercitus/Archives/2009/August
This is an archive of past discussions with User:ImperatorExercitus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Reply
Not really. I don't think the hook is funny enough. --BorgQueen (talk) 20:08, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Robert Edward Mulvee
Wikiproject: Did you know? 14:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Re:Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride and An Elephant Makes Love to a Pig
Sure, I'd love to help out and get these up to GAN. I think it should be pretty easy to get it up to the standards. However, this week is going to be a bit hectic because it's my last work week before I go on vacation. I should have Internet access on vacation, and maybe I can help you work on it then? If you'd rather finish it yourself in the meantime that's fine, but if you still need help in a week I'll be happy to jump aboard... — Hunter Kahn (c) 02:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
AfD closing
I've noticed that you are now closing AfDs by putting {{subst:afd top}} below the section header (e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unification Church and antisemitism). I've updated the template using span id to create sections, so that is no longer necessary. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
AfD closing
I've noticed that you are now closing AfDs by putting {{subst:afd top}} below the section header (e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unification Church and antisemitism). I've updated the template using span id to create sections, so that is no longer necessary. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I would like to request this page to be deleted. This is a hoax station. Raven Broadcasting Corporation is a FM-only radio network here in the Philippines, with most of their stations based on key cities and they do not own any AM stations, especially this one. Thanks. -danngarcia (talk) 06:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
PTV GAn
I've fixed your comments on the "PTV" GAn.--Music26/11 13:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Towelie
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Towelie, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please make sure you include reliable, verifiable sources when adding material to articles. If you have any other questions about editing, just let me know. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 01:14, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for not citing that information, but the truth was I was sorta busy that day. The intended reference is here :[1] :) Could you please re-add the information with the reference? Again, I apologize for not adding the source. Cheers, I'mperator 15:01, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Adoptee
Look in the adoption place please. I have section. It explains it. It should be the bottom one. Mhera (talk) 22:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Agaricus perobscurus
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Considering there was a lack of sources about the show and all the keeps appeared to be from the subjects website, I was expecting more of an explanation than just a 'keep' and why it isn't a WP:1E.--Otterathome (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, the primary reason I didn't place an explanation for my vote was, while the majority of the users whom turned the sway to "keep" were from the website, their arguments were perfectly valid. Also, I felt that this debate summed up the AFD pretty well:
Cheers, I'mperator 22:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Your reply is no help at all, what arguments are perfectly valid? And which part of all those paragraphs sum it up?--Otterathome (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, the last bit...about how we should try to clean it up? Specifically, the end of the debate. Of course, if nobody bothers to clean up the article, then it could easily be re-entered for deletion. Cheers, I'mperator 17:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I'll send back to deletion at the end up of month. That gives editors plenty of time to dig up any sources so it passes WP:N.--Otterathome (talk) 18:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
RfA !vote (Headbomb)
You opposed !voted neutral on my RfA based on a lack of nomination statement. Due to several people raising this concern, I've placed one a couple of days ago. I'm letting you know that your !vote might be outdated and I would appreciate it if you would reconsider it. If there's anything unclear or that you would like to have additional information on, please feel free to ask me a question. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 17:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I voted neutral, not oppose :) I'll take the time to read over the nom statement late Cheers, I'mperator 18:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Uh yes, yes neutral my mistake. Thanks for being willing to review your position (no matter what option you end up picking). Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 19:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Emily Newell Blair
Wikiproject: Did you know? 02:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
AFC/R
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for the comment, I've replied. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 13:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
TB
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Replied. Cheers, I'mperator 19:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
South Park GAN
Sorry about that, I had Internet access on vacation but no Lexus Nexus, and ended up not having as much time as I hoped I would. I'll try to get to them in the upcoming week. Sorry again! — Hunter Kahn (c) 20:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Did you know problem
Hello! Your submission of Agaricus benesii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 00:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Move
hehe i hate it when redericts are made while a move a page. Avono♂ (talk) 19:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Agaricus benesii, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mykoweb.com/CAF/species/Agaricus_benesii.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed; statement about habitat was too close to that of source. Thanks for the heads up. Cheers, I'mperator 21:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi ImperatorExercitus. While patrolling WP:SCV, I came across Agaricus benesii and took a look at the link provided by CorenSearchBot. In my opinion, the article seems to be a very close paraphrase of that link. Are all fungi articles like that, or can this one be rewritten to sound less like the source? Regards, Theleftorium 21:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- More or less, yeah. Especially this bit on Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing: "GFDL-compatible sources may be closely paraphrased, and limited close paraphrasing may also be permitted as fair use. Attribution is always required." That, plus I reworded it more since the warning (the main concern was about the habitat and the introductory paragraph, which I both changed). Thanks for the heads up. CHeers, I'mperator 21:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- The source is not GFDL-compatible, though, but I guess it can be considered fair use. Anyway, I have another question. You uploaded File:Agaricus benesii.JPG under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License, but this is not stated in the source. How do know its released with that license? Theleftorium 21:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- See User_talk:ImperatorExercitus/Archives/2009/March#Possibly_unfree_File:Agaricus_lilaceps_veil.JPG for a related issue. The copyright rights from the website "Information from this website (such as wildlife reports) may be listed in articles, websites or other sources, but ONLY with full credits to www.wildaboutdenmark.com." and this. Cheers, I'mperator 21:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- That is only for text. "All photos posted in the gallery are the property of the original photographer and must not be reproduced in any format without the express written permission of the photographer." Theleftorium 21:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. Must have missed that. Could you please ask Paul via e-mail (http://poulevaldhansen.dk/) Thanks. Cheers, I'mperator 21:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't know a lot about image copyrights (yet). Perhaps you could ask someone with a bit more experience? You need to get him to send it Wikipedia via OTRS, I think. Regards, Theleftorium 21:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. Must have missed that. Could you please ask Paul via e-mail (http://poulevaldhansen.dk/) Thanks. Cheers, I'mperator 21:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- That is only for text. "All photos posted in the gallery are the property of the original photographer and must not be reproduced in any format without the express written permission of the photographer." Theleftorium 21:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- See User_talk:ImperatorExercitus/Archives/2009/March#Possibly_unfree_File:Agaricus_lilaceps_veil.JPG for a related issue. The copyright rights from the website "Information from this website (such as wildlife reports) may be listed in articles, websites or other sources, but ONLY with full credits to www.wildaboutdenmark.com." and this. Cheers, I'mperator 21:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- The source is not GFDL-compatible, though, but I guess it can be considered fair use. Anyway, I have another question. You uploaded File:Agaricus benesii.JPG under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License, but this is not stated in the source. How do know its released with that license? Theleftorium 21:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I've been slow
I've been slow to do that review on you, but I'll make every effort to do so this evening... I started looking last night.---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 15:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, thanks. I was afraid you'd forgotten :P Cheers, I'mperator 16:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey Imperator. Ok, I've done some work on Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride. Unfortunately, things have been hectic lately and things will continue to be busy in the next few weeks (my wife's birthday, my first anniversary and my sister-in-law's wedding are among the items on my calendar :D) but I will try to keep working on this one and An Elephant Makes Love to a Pig where I can. (I'll try to work on Best Friends Forever too, but I want to focus first and foremost on the other two since the South Park featured topic drive is currently focused on season one. Please take a look at my recent contributions to the Big Gay Al article. Your stuff was really good and the article was already better than most South Park episode articles before I even started working on it! But in addition to adding some new content, I also made a few minor changes. Some were grammatical and others were structural; for example, I moved Reception to the bottom of the article and split part of "Cultural references" into a Theme section, which is consistent with other SP episode articles. I know there are more sources out there on this episode and I plan to add them in the near future, but I did want to get a bit of a start on it. Let me know what you think! — Hunter Kahn (c) 00:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Also, two questions for you. 1) You mention someone named "Gardiner" in the article, but you don't mention his full name or who he is (he's not in the source citation either). Could you drop that in? Also, I get the feeling Gardiner's thoughts belong in Theme, not Reception. What do you think? 2) In the Chan bit, you mention that this article was rated the second best sports episode. Out of curiosity, what was the first best? Do you think we should add that in? Something like "was the second best sports episode, behind "Title here"? — Hunter Kahn (c) 00:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
First off, no problem! Don't worry about it :P Thanks for the great work you've done so far. For Q1, I'm not exactly sure myself :/ However, if you want, the source [5] is here, so you can determine it for yourself. It's probably mentioned before the page I provided. Also, now that I look at it more closely, I agree; it does belong in the Theme's section. I'll move it right away. As for Q2, it was "Up the Down Steroid" (I've added it to the article already). Again, thanks a ton! Cheers, I'mperator 13:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, and could you get another image for me? The current one is just...hideous. Thanks. Cheers, I'mperator 14:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- You meant the infobox image? Sure, I can get to that later today or tomorrow... — Hunter Kahn (c) 15:28, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Reply from Eric Edwards/Иван Богданов
I know it will be harder for another editors, but it is my own name and it means a lot for me. Thanks for your concern, anyway. -- Eric Edwards (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
RfA
Hi! I shall try not to get discouraged and heed your advice. Hope to make the cut some other time. Thank you. --AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 15:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Agaricus benesii
NW (Talk) 17:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Simpsons
I'm being lazy, so if you wanted to work on Brother, Can You Spare Two Dimes?, that'd be great too :) CTJF83Talk 01:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem :) Just as soon as I finish the production section for Burns Verkaufen der Kraftwerk. Cheers, I'mperator 01:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, great! CTJF83Talk 02:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Nice work on the articles. Did you get the DVDs? :) By the way, you should try to avoid big paragraphs. Theleftorium 09:28, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- I did! :P Thanks for the advice; I'll keep it mind for next time (I'm breaking down the paragraphs as I type :) Cheers, I'mperator 13:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Looks good, let me know when you are going to submit it for GAC, and I'll do a copyedit for you :) CTJF83Talk 17:22, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I did a copy edit, and it looks good! Is this necessary for this episode page "Though Nancy Cartwright usually provided the voice for Maggie Simpson, her daughter baby, Lucy, voiced Maggie once in "Lisa's Substitute""? CTJF83Talk 19:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Co-nom?! Thank you! I don't think I did enough work though. Do you wanna work with me on Smithers or a Family Guy episode? CTJF83Talk 03:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'll help you with season 10 :) CTJF83Talk 18:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Co-nom?! Thank you! I don't think I did enough work though. Do you wanna work with me on Smithers or a Family Guy episode? CTJF83Talk 03:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I did a copy edit, and it looks good! Is this necessary for this episode page "Though Nancy Cartwright usually provided the voice for Maggie Simpson, her daughter baby, Lucy, voiced Maggie once in "Lisa's Substitute""? CTJF83Talk 19:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Looks good, let me know when you are going to submit it for GAC, and I'll do a copyedit for you :) CTJF83Talk 17:22, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi ImperatorExercitus. :) Not to sound rude or anything, but I don't think Brother, Can You Spare Two Dimes? meets the GA criteria yet. I could find several problems just by reading through it quickly. If I were you I would withdraw it and submit it for a peer review first (where I could leave some comments for you). The decision is up to you, though, and I'm not going to force you into withdrawing it. Theleftorium 18:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Couldn't you just tell us here, instead of peer review? :) CTJF83Talk 18:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'll post them on the GA review page instead when I have time. Theleftorium 18:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I reviewed the changes that you made, and...they seemed more of a preferential opinion rather than a (lack of) compliance to WP:MOS. That, plus I've fixed the {{cn}} tag. With all due respect, the current article does seem to comply with the GA criteria. Sorry if this seems a bit blunt... Cheers, I'mperator 18:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- +Fixed concerns on review page (so far). :) Cheers, I'mperator 19:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I reviewed the changes that you made, and...they seemed more of a preferential opinion rather than a (lack of) compliance to WP:MOS. That, plus I've fixed the {{cn}} tag. With all due respect, the current article does seem to comply with the GA criteria. Sorry if this seems a bit blunt... Cheers, I'mperator 18:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'll post them on the GA review page instead when I have time. Theleftorium 18:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- ^ LaCounte, Cathy. Awake & Aware Top Priority:. CreateSpace 4 Cathy LaCounte. pp. 47–48. ISBN 1442196351, 9781442196353.
{{cite book}}
: Check|isbn=
value: invalid character (help)