Jump to content

User talk:Happy-melon/Archive 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15

The file File:TracklistBoxFlow.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Old orphaned esoteric file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 17:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Happy-melon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Quidditch balls.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Quidditch balls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

No objection to this deletion. Happymelon 12:58, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SnitchHP1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SnitchHP1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

No objection to this deletion. Happymelon 12:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Yesno

Template:Yesno has been nominated for merging with Template:If affirmed. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 19:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LOCErequest/Yes

Template:LOCErequest/Yes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Listen/core

Template:Listen/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DannyS712 (talk) 05:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

... and again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

"Template:AUCK" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:AUCK. Since you had some involvement with the Template:AUCK redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Magioladitis (talk) 06:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:WPBannerMeta

Hello HM, I understand from the response to my post over at WP:VPT that you are one of the experts in all things {{WPBannerMeta}}. My question is this: I know by adding the /inactive suffix, one can reflect that a stand-alone WikiProject is inactive, such as {{WikiProject The Supremes}}. But is there similar code that will show a WikiProject (or task force) as inactive when it is part of a larger, still active project? For example, how can we show the Transport in Scotland project as inactive in {{WikiProject Trains}}? (seems would be better than just deleting the subproject code completely). Can we just add a TF_x_Status = inactive parameter to the {{WPBannerMeta}} code? Thanks in advance for your help! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there. Sorry for the belated reply; I'm afraid that while I was once a lead developer of WPBM, it's been years since I actively worked on it, so I'm not really able to advise. I hope you found an answer to your question from another source. Happymelon 16:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, I am looking to make myself useful. Is there any projects that you know of that need templates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Max Pigeon (talkcontribs) 20:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice

The file File:MartinMAC250.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Notice

The file File:IRV eg 1.1.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Are you still operating User:MelonBot/Member lists?

If so could you run it for WikiProject Backpacking? —¿philoserf? (talk) 22:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

My song, "Tools"

You just stay around to keep the tools, you just stay around to keep the tools! You think that we're all fools, you just stay around to keep the tools! Making minute edits every year, you make minute edits every year! We can see it's very clear, you make minute edits every year! Users such as yourself who make a significantly low amount of edits just to keep your administrative tools sicken me and many others. Just give up the tools already!!! What are you holding on to them for anyways!! What a selfish thing to do!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.35.97.209 (talk) 00:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

What a jolly ditty :p I'd agree that it would be selfish to deprive a more active user of the 'chance', if there were a limited number of mops to pass around. But since there is no such limit on bucket capacity, and that holding a mop is no big deal, I'm afraid I can't agree. I'm sorry that it makes you feel so strongly. FWIW, I fully intend to return to Wikipedia just as soon as my diet kicks off, ie very soon...  :( Happymelon 19:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Yayyyyyyy --Izno (talk) 00:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
What tune should this be sung to? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Old peer reviews using manual archive naming requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Db-t3

Template:Db-t3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Primefac (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cleanup category

Template:Cleanup category has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Ohio/hide

Template:WikiProject Ohio/hide has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:57, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject The Beatles/hide

Template:WikiProject The Beatles/hide has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Space/class has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 01:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ambox/core

Template:Ambox/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tmbox/core

Template:Tmbox/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

TemplateStyles for mbox classes

I will be removing mbox related classes from Common.css soon as part of TemplateStyles. Your script User:Happy-melon/global.js appears to rely on those for styling. You can either consider loading the associated style sheet at Module:Message box/fmbox.css as part of the script or you may style this yourself. Izno (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage/checkextended has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage/checkimportance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage/checknormal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

"Template:Db-t3/date" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Db-t3/date and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 23#Template:Db-t3/date until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Site JS editnotice

Template:Site JS editnotice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Voir ici, per favor

Hi Happy-melon.

This

(Not Pierrot lunaire) aka User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of my page

...

I was working on that.

Gun Nut perk (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

WP:SALT Request

Hi @Happy-melon, Hope you are doing great? I want to request for Marathi Hosahalli to be Wikipedia:SALTED as there's a possibility it'll be recreated. It's already been deleted thrice and sent to draft once. From my experience the user will definitely attempt tp recreate it. Jamiebuba (talk) 18:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done for 3 months. Happymelon 14:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Welcome Back

Hi. Yours is not a name I know and I'm guessing mine isn't a name you know. But we're both admins. One of my current ongoing projects is to increase the number of admins we have. I primarily do this through RfA but I continue to think one of our best pool of candidates to be admin are people who had been admins. So if I can do anything to help you with your transition to semi-activity please don't hesitate to reach out. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Welcome back from me as well! Legoktm (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! It's good to be back tbh, I've meant to (and promised to) for a very long time. Now I just need to remember how to do basic wikimarkup again...  :-/ Happymelon 08:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

List of Nazi monuments in Canada (delete request)

100% you are correct that the page move is controversial. But I think User:Storchy asked you to delete the page above to enable a controversial move to be reverted. i.e. The page above should be deleted, so that a controversial move can be undone back to that location. CT55555 (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

You're quite right, and actually it's a right mess of moves over there, isn't it! I've restored the article to its original title and move-protected for a short time, as there has clearly been some move-warring over the past couple of days. Happymelon 15:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Partly this is my fault because I started the article and the sourcing was decent but not bullet-proof to begin with, which was a factor in some people making bold moves. Thanks for taking the time to understand the short but already complicated history of the article. CT55555 (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Nazi monuments in Canada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Nazi monuments in Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nazi monuments in Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦Слава🇺🇦Україні🇺🇦Героям🇺🇦Слава🇺🇦(talk)🇺🇦 20:33, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. John Milum 10:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Please see WP:COIN#Draft:R/WallStreetSilver - you are briefly referenced there. John Milum 10:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I know that both pages exist, but neither page mentions the term. What would you suggest? Onel5969 TT me 15:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I'd suggest listing it at AfD, if you think it should be deleted. Happymelon 15:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Velca Design

I hope not to bother @Happy-melon, me and other users had to create (for an Educational Project) this draft page: Draft: Velca Design, we have submitted it on 9th of December and we wanted to kindly ask you if you could have a look and tell us how to improve it in order to fix all the mistakes. Thank you for your time. Fraliuc2 (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Fraliuc2, congratulations on writing a great first draft :-) I think the most important thing that the article is lacking is a few references for key statements, like "went on to become one of the biggest suppliers of office furniture". The History section is also a bit jumbled up time-wise, with the "Early Years" section including information about the ending of the company, followed by other sections that describe its operations at an earlier time. You might be able to reorganise that section to read more clearly. But in general that's a great draft. Happymelon 08:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LOCEproof

Template:LOCEproof has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LOCEcomplete

Template:LOCEcomplete has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LOCE

Template:LOCE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Dance/class

Template:WikiProject Dance/class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hustle Series 5 Episode 3 extract.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hustle Series 5 Episode 3 extract.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Strictly Come Dancing table key

Template:Strictly Come Dancing table key has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/aclass

Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/aclass has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/peerreview

Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/peerreview has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/qualitycats

Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/qualitycats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/core

Template:WPBannerMeta/core has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/locwarning

Template:WPBannerMeta/locwarning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/class

Template:WPBannerMeta/class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage

Template:WPBannerMeta/templatepage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

Information iconThis is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Charles III task force

Template:Charles III task force has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject British Royalty. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 11:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Terry Pratchett's The Colour of Magic

Terry Pratchett's The Colour of Magic has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 02:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

WP page deletions

Hi, Happy-melon! Happy New Year! I want to draw your attention to two related/similar pages you've had a hand in in the past, as well as your bot: this and this. As much as this is archiving historical info and discussions here, I felt that upon a closer investigation, this warrants no subpage archiving, as I saw and see no bloated discussion in-page to justify a bits-and-pieces page info archiving. I've merged the discussions in equality and trajectory/in arranging order of comment and suggestion additions into the former redirect. In good faith following established principles, I see and predict no reason to justify keeping the archived sub-pages in this era; could you please delete them from view? Thanks! Intrisit (talk) 13:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

"Merge" has been undone, fwiw. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Nomination for deletion of Template:Class mask/doc/custom

Template:Class mask/doc/custom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Wicked (musical)

Wicked (musical) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)