User talk:Ghoul flesh

Ghoul flesh talk 00:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You've posted a lot of good articles and I appreciate it. TheFlame8 (talk) 19:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! :) Ghoul flesh (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Milwaukee riot

Watch your language, and please read WP:Identifying reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Malik Shabazz: What, just because the mainstream media (in your eyes CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC news and CNN) chose not to show the racism of rioters of the Black Lives Matter movement means its not noteworthy for the article? I find this absolutely disgusting and it needs to be mentioned. Did you even care to watch the video? It's a perfect source. Ghoul flesh

talk 04:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend you read the guideline and try to explain how the Libertarian Republic, Info Wars, and American Mirror satisfy the requirements of WP:IRS. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Malik Shabazz: I recommend you personally reply to me and stop acting like a Wikipedia bot. This event is clearly notable enough for the article. I hate that I have to provide it with right-wing sources, but the video clearly shows what really went down. Ghoul flesh

talk 04:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did reply to you. If the event were "clearly notable", then reliable sources would be reporting it. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Malik Shabazz: You clearly don't understand how the media works, you poor sap. CNN and NBC are not reliable, just saying. Also are you against my use of Fox News as a source? (I don't trust Fox News either, but) Is that what you're referring to when you say "The American Mirror"...? Anyway, this needs to be mentioned in the article. It was reported by several media outlets, just not the "major" ones. I just find it ridiculous to call the sources unreliable when that video clearly shows everything said in the article. Ghoul flesh

talk 04:19, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just keep up the insults. Fox News is not the source, American Mirror is. Try reading a little -- it might do you some good. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and for all your braying, you still haven't explained how any of the three sources satisfies WP:IRS. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Malik Shabazz: And you still fail to even directly reply to my comment about the video. Unbelievable. I bet you haven't even watched it yet. Probably won't either. And I said I don't care for Fox News and would try to find more reputable sources if needed (which clearly are) Ghoul flesh talk 04:28, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss first at Talk:Franchesca Ramsey

Please carefully review Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. It's obvious you have decided that Franchesca Ramsey isn't negative enough for your taste. Wikipedia policy doesn't consider a lack of criticism of living people to be an urgent problem. The burden is on those who would add controversial information, and we err on the side of caution to avoid harming anyone's reputation.

Rather than forge ahead trying to make crude changes to the article, you should use Talk:Franchesca Ramsey to seek consensus and get input from the wider community. Recklessly violating the BLP policy can easily get you blocked form editing, so why risk it? If consensus supports your changes, there's nothing lost in discussing it for a week or two first. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WikiFeet

The article WikiFeet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability for almost a year; no independent reliable coverage that establishes notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nathan^T 06:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ghoul flesh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sign language in popular culture

The article Sign language in popular culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just WP:TRIVIA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phil Anderson (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2020

Ghoul Flesh, I see you are a contributor on Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2020. On, January 9th Cecil Ince filed with the FEC. Committee ID: C00665208, If you could add Mr. Ince that would be great. You can find a photo at File:Cecil Ince 2.jpg in commons.wikimedia Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:C406:8CB3:4539:1B10:84AE:AF9D (talk) 10:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. He has been added to the article. Ghoul flesh • talk 23:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:WikiFeet concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:WikiFeet, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:WikiFeet

Hello, Ghoul flesh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "WikiFeet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larry Sharpe, Libertarian.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Larry Sharpe, Libertarian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notices

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Acroterion (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David Hogg (activist)

With your introduction of conspiracy and defamation, you are walking a very thin line. Acroterion, this edit is pretty damning, with the BS about "changing stories", although perhaps with this one they redeemed themselves a bit. Still, as Grayfell noted, this is unacceptable. Drmies (talk) 01:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm an idiot. I can see your anti-concealed carry tag on your page you biased ass. You will not suppress the truth. Ghoul flesh • talk 01:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an ordinary administrative block for personal attacks, not an arbitration sanction. That may come if this continues after the block is over. The term is longer than your first block for personal attacks, since this has happened before. Acroterion (talk) 01:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I'm JesseRafe. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Larry Sharpe (politician). Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! JesseRafe (talk) 17:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Aubrey Dunn, Jr.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aubrey Dunn, Jr.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ghoul flesh/billboard

A tag has been placed on User:Ghoul flesh/billboard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 19:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You already got me temporarily banned from editing for three days for a mere snarky comment. My personal user pages are none of your business. Stop harassing me. Ghoul flesh • talk 20:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not your personal webhost. Drmies (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of my activities on Wikipedia are not for you to review. The fact that you're still hovering/obsessing over my edits weeks later is disturbing and is stalking. I will alert appropriate Wikipedia administrators if you do not desist. Ghoul flesh • talk 23:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ghoul flesh, I've restored the speedy tag again. A patrolling admin will of course make the decision, but it looks like a pretty obvious violation to me. Drmies (an experienced admin, by the way) is not personally singling you out. In any case, the way to protest the speedy nomination is by clicking where indicated and making your case; I suggest you do that as soon as possible. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party banner logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party banner logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larry Sharpe, Libertarian.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Larry Sharpe, Libertarian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Larry Sharpe (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael McDermott

New York gubernatorial election, 2018 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael McDermott

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ghoul flesh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucy Brenton, Libertarian.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lucy Brenton, Libertarian.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lucy Brenton, Libertarian.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2018 Wisconsin State Assembly election) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2018 Wisconsin State Assembly election.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thank you for creating the page. A couple more citations would be good but the page looks fine nonetheless.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party of Wyoming.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of Wyoming.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Merced

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alex Merced requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hugsyrup (talk) 10:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Libertarian Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KMIT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notice carefully.

You are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.

A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jo Jorgensen 2020 presidential campaign logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Jo Jorgensen 2020 presidential campaign logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Libertarian Party of New Hampshire chairs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Libertarian Party of New Hampshire chairs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 20:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of supposed racist utterances in United States politics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of supposed racist utterances in United States politics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of supposed racist utterances in United States politics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 11:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jo Jorgensen 2020 presidential campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Sharpe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ghoul flesh

Thank you for creating Jo Jorgensen 2020 presidential campaign.

User:MJL, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article. Your work means a lot!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MJL}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LP of Hawaii.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LP of Hawaii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 20

Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --2600:8802:2200:1430:E4B0:311E:93D0:F82E (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sleepaway Camp (franchise) films has been nominated for renaming

Category:Sleepaway Camp (franchise) films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 16:57, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harry Browne, 2000.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harry Browne, 2000.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
[[User:Ghoul flesh|'''''Ghoul flesh''''']] • [[User talk:Ghoul flesh|''talk'']]

Fixed signature:
[[User:Ghoul flesh|'''''Ghoul flesh''''']] • [[User talk:Ghoul flesh|''talk'']]

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of libertarian socialist political parties moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of libertarian socialist political parties, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 03:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual fetish userboxes in wrong namespace

{{User balloon fetish}}, {{Userbox F-Fetish}}, and {{Userbox S-Fetish}} have nothing to do with building an encyclopedia. Please move them, and the other userboxes you created, to your user space per WP:UM. Thanks! – voidxor 16:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party of Maine.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of Maine.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party of South Carolina.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of South Carolina.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 23:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LP of Massachusetts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LP of Massachusetts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 00:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party of Illinois emblem.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of Illinois emblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 01:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Swiss Independence Party up! logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swiss Independence Party up! logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of libertarian socialist political parties

Hello, Ghoul flesh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of libertarian socialist political parties, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party of California.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of California.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2015 Springfield, Missouri mayoral election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Springfield, Missouri mayoral election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Springfield, Missouri mayoral election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm _Talk 04:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mayoral elections in Springfield, Missouri has been nominated for deletion

Category:Mayoral elections in Springfield, Missouri has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Hog Farm _Talk 05:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LP of South Dakota.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LP of South Dakota.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harry Browne, author.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harry Browne, author.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LP of North Carolina.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LP of North Carolina.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Libertarian Party of North Dakota for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libertarian Party of North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertarian Party of North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party of Rhode Island logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of Rhode Island logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LP of Hawaii.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LP of Hawaii.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian Party of WV.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party of WV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucy Brenton

The article Lucy Brenton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 17:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Halloween retailers

The article List of Halloween retailers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NLIST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 17:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Distortions Unlimited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Distortions Unlimited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arvin Vohra

The article Arvin Vohra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 17:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Distortions Unlimited

The article Distortions Unlimited has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article that fails to meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 22:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Halloween retailers

The article List of Halloween retailers has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Distortions Unlimited

The article Distortions Unlimited has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Libertarian National Committee vice chairs

A tag has been placed on Category:Libertarian National Committee vice chairs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International Alliance of Libertarian Parties for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Alliance of Libertarian Parties is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Alliance of Libertarian Parties until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sal2100 (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of U.S. Bank Building (Sioux Falls)

The article U.S. Bank Building (Sioux Falls) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Claim to notability is very weak (7th-tallest building in 130th-largest city in the US).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Jersey Libertarian Party.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Jersey Libertarian Party.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the International Alliance of Libertarian Parties.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the International Alliance of Libertarian Parties.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]