Jump to content

User talk:GermanJoe/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 10

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

MOOC types: Hybrid MOOCs

Hello GermanJoe, thanks a lot for advice regarding recent change of MOOC types. My contribution was based on academic articles, however, I will rewrite this section with a focus on neutral use of language. Best... JACKAL-XXX (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Bir yıldız da sizin için!

Düzeltmen Yıldızı
Thanx a lot for advice on neutral use of language JACKAL-XXX (talk) 20:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Do you want one Edit tab, or two? It's your choice

How to switch between editing environments
Part of the toolbar in the visual editor
Click the [[ ]] to switch to the wikitext editor.
Part of the toolbar in the wikitext editor
Click the pencil icon to switch to the visual editor.

The editing interface will be changed soon. When that happens, editors who currently see two editing tabs – "Edit" and "Edit source" – will start seeing one edit tab instead. The single edit tab has been popular at other Wikipedias. When this is deployed here, you may be offered the opportunity to choose your preferred appearance and behavior the next time you click the Edit button. You will also be able to change your settings in the Editing section of Special:Preferences.

You can choose one or two edit tabs. If you chose one edit tab, then you can switch between the two editing environments by clicking the buttons in the toolbar (shown in the screenshots). See Help:VisualEditor/User guide#Switching between the visual and wikitext editors for more information and screenshots.

There is more information about this interface change at mw:VisualEditor/Single edit tab. If you have questions, suggestions, or problems to report, then please leave a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) 19:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

20:45, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

20:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

23:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

18:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

WP:NONENGEL

Hi! I saw this edit and I would like to comment on it:

Wikipedia:External_links#Non-English-language_content says "It may be appropriate to have a link to a non-English-language site, such as when an official site is unavailable in English; or when the link is to the subject's text in its original language; or when the site contains visual aids such as maps, diagrams, or tables—per the guideline on non-English-language sites." (emphasis bolded)

Also, on many occasions the English-language websites of international schools originating from non-English countries (French schools, German schools, Italian schools, Japanese schools, etc.) are limited, especially when the host country is not English-speaking. In those cases it is necessary to link to the additional information in the "originating language". Also many of the readers will be from the host country (say a Spanish man reading articles on international schools in Spain on ENwiki, especially when such schools do not have articles on the Spanish Wikipedia because of that Wikipedia's notability requirements), and for them you need to link to the host country language sites.

Also in many cases those are the only external links for the subject, so there's no need to prune the links.

In summary: International school articles should link to the relevant other-than-English websites if those websites are of: the language of the host country and/or the language of the originating country (if those are not English). Often the "original languages" of the text will be in either one. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello @WhisperToMe:, while I am certain there are some notable exceptions to use non-English links as you pointed out above, this is not one of those cases. The removed URLs do not point to any specific unique original-language text, that may be of interest for an English-language reader (per WP:ELNO #1 all significant encyclopedic information should be in the article and the English-language version seems to contain a sufficient summary of additional information). Also, the Greek and French versions are easily accessible via a prominently placed language menu with flags in the top menu of the website. So, in my opinion, this case is not one of the exceptions you noted. On the other hand, I won't start to edit-war over 2 additional good faith-URLs in an article ;). Thank you for taking the time to explain your rationale and concerns, it's appreciated. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 01:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome. :)
I found on the French website an entry for the school's history. Unfortunately I haven't yet found an English version of that page, nor a Greek version.
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

CD3WD as "See also" in Survivalism?

Hello @Tronba:, I hope you do not mind when I answer your mail here. In my opinion, Wikipedia-related questions are best discussed on-Wiki (unless the topic is sensitive or of a personal nature of course) - this way other interested editors have the chance to see the discussion and add to it if they want. Regarding your question: the relevant guideline (WP:SEEALSO) gives some leeway for editorial judgement. In short: if you believe, that the article CD3WD could be a valuable and relevant additional link for readers of Survivalism, it should be OK to add an internal Wiki-link in "See also". If other editors disagree (not me - based on a quick, very brief check), they can simply remove the link later (with an explanation why) and/or start a discussion at the article's talkpage - but that's part of the normal editorial process on Wikipedia to find a consensus, when editors disagree on something. I hope, that somewhat general answer helps a bit. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 21:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Hay @GermanJoe:, Thanks for you explanation. I am pretty new to wikipedia article creation and editorial work but i will hopefully get the hang of it. I will add the link and follow the page / talkpage to see what other editors think. Again thanks for your feedback. (talk) 09:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Editing News #2—2016

Editing News #2—2016 Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

It's quick and easy to insert a references list.

Screenshot showing a dropdown menu with many items

Place the cursor where you want to display the references list (usually at the bottom of the page). Open the "Insert" menu and click the "References list" icon (three books).

If you are using several groups of references, which is relatively rare, you will have the opportunity to specify the group. If you do that, then only the references that belong to the specified group will be displayed in this list of references.

Finally, click "Insert" in the dialog to insert the References list. This list will change as you add more footnotes to the page.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Arabic and Indic scripts, and adapting the visual editor to the needs of the Wikivoyages and Wikisources.

Recent changes

The visual editor is now available to all users at most Wikivoyages. It was also enabled for all contributors at the French Wikinews.

The single edit tab feature combines the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab. It has been deployed to several Wikipedias, including Hungarian, Polish, English and Japanese Wikipedias, as well as to all Wikivoyages. At these wikis, you can change your settings for this feature in the "Editing" tab of Special:Preferences. The team is now reviewing the feedback and considering ways to improve the design before rolling it out to more people.

Future changes

The "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including: Arabic, Hindi, Thai, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Urdu, Persian, Bengali, Assamese, Aramaic and others.

The team is working with the volunteer developers who power Wikisource to provide the visual editor there, for opt-in testing right now and eventually for all users. (T138966)

The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. It will look like the visual editor, and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices around September 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.

Let's work together

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk), 21:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Applied Materials

Hey! I see you've previously been involved in improving Applied Materials, and I was hoping you could help me with another edit to that article. Currently it's flagged with two warning templates—"connected contributor" and "primary sources"—which are both several years old, and which I believe no longer apply. However, I work for a communications agency for which Applied Materials is a client, and due to this COI I can't edit the article myself. Would you be willing to take a look and remove the warning templates if you agree with my suggestion? Thanks for your time! Mary Gaulke (talk) 20:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello @MaryGaulke:, thank you for following Wikipedia's COI-guideline. I have removed the maintenance tags as they have been mostly addressed with recent edits (such tags should only be used on substantial ongoing problems), and left some additional thoughts and suggestions for further improvements on the article's talkpage. Any additional independent reliable source would also help to strengthen the article of course. GermanJoe (talk) 07:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your help! Mary Gaulke (talk) 22:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

15:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Two years ago ...
nit-picking tools
and brainstorming
... you were recipient
no. 920 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Help with Source Check for FAC

Hello, I apologize for the intrusion. I have noticed that you ran a source check for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Millipede/archive1 recently, and I was wondering if you could possibly run one for my nomination as well (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?/archive1). I would be more than happy to help with any other article/nomination if you do the source check. I understand however if you would not like to if you are either too busy or not interested. Thank you in advance either way. Aoba47 (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello @Aoba47:, if noone beats me to it, I'll try to have a look later or (more likely) tomorrow. If you haven't done so already, it might be a good idea to ask 1-2 more interested editors for a content review or post a reminder on the talkpages of interested projects. As long as you phrase such requests neutrally, there is nothing wrong with asking for additional reviews. Officially there is no fix number of course and every nomination is different, but 3 supports with some in-depth responses is generally a good number to aim for. GermanJoe (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice, and I will definitely follow it. I apologize for the inconvenience. I always feel really awkward when asking people for help. I greatly appreciate your support, and please let me know if there is anything I can do to help you to return the favor. Aoba47 (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello @Aoba47:, regarding your question about a full review (I answer here, as I don't want to distract your nomination's page with too much of my own chatter): I rarely do full content reviews as I am not a native English speaker. While I am reasonably sure about everyday conversations, the finer points of complex English grammar and good prose often elude me - so I focus on "technical" image and source reviews. Aside from that, I know next to nothing about the series and episode in question. It would be better if a native speaker interested in the topic would do a more qualified full review. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 10:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
No worries, I completely understand. Thank you for your help again! Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Media check on FAC

Hey GermanJoe, sorry for constantly interrupting you, but can you do another media check on Ride the Lightning? I've nominated it again for FA, and apart from the new picture in the background section, there's nothing new regarding audio files and other images. Here's the FAC and hope you can do the check. Have a nice day.--Retrohead (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

@Retrohead: And done :) - good luck with your nomination. GermanJoe (talk) 10:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)