User talk:Gabbec

Getting started: Make a short userpage! Everyone's wary of a redlink. Edit your preferences to verify your email and set up email alerts, say for when someone leaves you new talkpage messages.

Helpful links: Editing || Writing a great article || Naming and Merging || Style Manual || Policies
Reassigning old edits || What Wikipedia is not

Maintenance: Deleting articles || all maintenance tasks (see also open tasks, below)

Uploading images: please note the origins and copyright status of every image you upload.

To sign your comments, type four tildes like this:  ~~~~. 
This automatically adds your name and the current time.

I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian on en:. You can also leave questions on my talk page. :)

Regards, +sj +

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar

None

More... • Learn how

Fix wikilinks

More... • Learn how

Update with new information

More... • Learn how

Expand short articles

More... • Learn how

Check and add references

More... • Learn how

Fix original research issues

More... • Learn how

Improve lead sections

More... • Learn how

Add an image

More... • Learn how

Translate and clean up

More... • Learn how

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

nice work from jd

Nice work so far in the Peruvian 2006 Election page. I'll be contributing to it soon enough. Also, if you are interested in Peru-related articles you should check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru where we work on such articles. All you have to do to join is add your name to the list of participants if you are interested. Also, you should make a user page since it would give you better credibility (people see red links and automatically think possible anon new user not knowing what he is doing or vandal) and it would make you easier to contact (I for instance had to type in your user talk page to contact you). Anyway, thanks and bye.--Jersey Devil 07:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, nice work on the page!--Jersey Devil 19:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome pt. dos

Hey Gabbec! Thanks for joining the Project Peru. I hope you can help sort any misrepresentations on the page and help expand other parts.

If you would like to talk more to me, and collaberate or discuss some things about Peru or the spanish language, please add a comment to my talk page. I welcome any discussion. Pvt Mahoney 23:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your welcome, hopefully we can do some good work on the Project. --Gabbec 01:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peruvian elections

You really seem to be on the up-and-up concerning the elections in Peru. Thanks for doing such a great job on that article. I wonder if you know where I could find the election results for Huancayo. One of the main candidates for governor there is my friend's father, and I am very interested in finding out if he won. If one of the pages that you look at might be of any assistance to me, I'd appreciate it if you let me know. Thanks. --Descendall 02:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. Well, I guess he is running for Congress, there are no governor elections today. Huancayo is in the Electoral District of Junín, and so far I've only heard presidential estimates from there (Humala first at 43%). I'll let you know if I know anything else. What's his name and party? --Gabbec 02:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and thanks for your contributions to the article as well, any help is appreciated.--Gabbec 18:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I meant congress. Sorry. Anyway, thank you very much for the information. It was Edgard Reymundo whose daughter I know. Funny to see myself two degrees away from the Peruvian congrees. --Descendall 10:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May Collaboration

I know you are pretty busy with work on the 2006 election page but you should also know that the May Wikiproject Peru collaboration has just started for Peruvian Army. If you are not to busy you should check it out.--Jersey Devil 16:28, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World cup mascots

I will not object if you revert. ed g2s • talk 20:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peruvian Congress?

How is the outcome of the Congressional side of the election coming out? I am thinking about starting to work on that side of the Peruvian elections aside from the Presidential race.--Jersey Devil 03:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, the count is beyond 99.9% complete. I was waiting for the full results before updating the article, but the results in terms of seats and elected congressmen are probably unchangeable at ths point. This gives a good breakup of the results. You're more than welcome to develop the article in that respect, it's certainly lacking there. Let me know if you need any help. --Gabbec 03:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:BoNM-Peru.png		The Peruvian Barnstar of National Merit
		I, Jersey Devil award you with this Peruvian barnstar of national merit for your countless work on Peruvian-related articles, in particular in celebration of the 2006 Peruvian election which is being held today and who's article would be little more than a stub without your valuable contributions. Thanks and keep up the good work!--Jersey Devil 22:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contact information

I'm writing an article on media and "social media" coverage of the election. Would you contact me, please? cbrayton@gmail.com, The New Market Machines

Main Page

Peruvian national election, 2006 is on the main page now. :)--Jersey Devil 00:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, thanks for letting me know. --Gabbec 01:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the template for the Peruvian parties a user wants to add the Green Alternative Ecologist Party of Peru. Please see the discussion there on whether to keep that party there. Template talk:PeruParties.--Jersey Devil 21:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Markham College

Hello, I saw your edits on Markham College. I'm currently a student there, and was wondering if you were. If you were, could you try to send me an email? I've allowed it through Wikipedia.--Predius

Hey, I had just changed emails and had not validated it. Your's doesn't work either Predius 01:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peruvian Leftist Parties

Alright, I am getting some confusion about Alberto Moreno and exactly what "party" he represents. He is the general secretary of Patria Roja but also the President of the New Left Movement (MNI). The elections page says that he "ran" under the MNI but from here it says "El, candidato presidencial del Frente Amplio de Izquierda, Alberto Moreno Rojas..." [1] Of the Broad Left Front, which makes sense as he was running for the coalition not just the MNI (which gets me thinking that maybe we should change the party affiliation on the election page for Moreno). From my understanding the Broad Left Front is a coalition of leftist parties of which both Patria Roja and the MNI are members. The part that seems to have confused me though is this party template on the spanish wikipeda. [2] It lists the MNI as a "coalition" but isn't that wrong? I'm only interested because Humala just met with members of the MNI and Patria Roja causing some people to divert from the UPP. So their relevance in here could rise a bit and I don't want to have inaccuracies on their pages.--Jersey Devil 07:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your edits to the 2006 Peruvian Election article. You are the fucking man.--Jersey Devil 06:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thanks. Feel free to add more stuff, there were parts, like the 2nd round results, where I didn't now what more to add, and other parts still need to be cleaned up. Saludos, --Gabbec 06:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you maybe check out the flag in the Peru article? The Wikipedia Es es:Perú page uses the national flag without the seal (which pretty much all non-english wikis do\) but our page uses the flag with the seal. So I changed it to fit with the other wikis (even though obviously the seal flag is most often used) and it was reverted. Are they completely interchangable in these circumstances?--Jersey Devil 03:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noticed something that could be wrong in the Wiki Es. Check this out...es:Escudo del Perú...isn't it the other way around? And if you see the es:Peru page you can see the war seal used in place of the seal. The articles of es:Escudo de Armas del Perú and es:Escudo Nacional del Perú seemed to be named incorrectly...shouldn't they be the other way around.--Jersey Devil 03:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Encyclopedia Britannica both are officially "national flags" and so they can be used interchangebly.--Jersey Devil 17:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Rebranding of championships

Please, do not forget to move all redirects as well to avoid double-redirects. Regards —Lesfer ^(talk/@) 20:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I got rid of all the double redirects. I guess some redirects should stay for references to the previous names. --Gabbec 21:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HappyApple contact

Hello, i noticed you disagree to neutrality on Nicolas Lucar article. I think the previous version was neutral at all. But if you have problems with that i think i can accept your recent edits. However there is some information missing from the previous version that has been deleted after your edit because, here my impressions:

"La revista dominical" -> "The sunday report" not "The sunday review", although there was not an official translation to the name of this show (not to mention that, it has never been aired on US, not even in CBS en español or Telemundo or Univision back in the 1990s), the most closest word on english to the work what Lucar did on that show is report rather than review, like other shows did back then, like Channel 2's Ayer y Hoy, that in fact was a review of the week.
According to IBOPE Time Peru, the raitings company, simmilar to Nielsen Raitings in the US, Channel 9 or ATV has indeed a huge audience in the prime time slot, and in since the fall of 2005, the channel has gained more audience as a result of world cup pre-reports and Brazilian soap operas. I think on the article it should say, that at least, Nicolas Lucar returned to a highly watched channel.
The public opinion has changed towards Nicolas Lucar over the years: In fact yes,if we see this as a result on the raitings. According to IBOPE TIME, his program nearly encompassed on the raiting to Jaime Bayly's show "El Francotirador" on its first broadcast.
Many peruvians remember him as a devoted Journalist rather than a controversial figure, i can say yes to this sentence because, if you ask someone (in Peru) about what comes to his mind first when metion Nicolas Lucar, people will say about their "fancy" years at La revista dominical, rather than his other low budget and low quality shows like Tiempo nuevo, that were obviously backed by the infamous Montesinos.
Bill Kurtis, why him?. Because he like Nicolas Lucar, Bill started his investigative journalism career as a spin of from their reports at the 10 o' clock news show on America Noticias. I am not sure if you had watched America TV news from 1985-1987, but on their 10 o' clock report, Nicolas was a consumer and even socialwork reporter like Bill Kurtis from WBBM-TV's in 1980s, Nicolas even worked alongside Cesar Hildebrant on his show "Vision" in mid 1980s. Although both (Nicolas and Bill) have a different background, a parallel can be made from their work and i think he is a good example to show readers this.

By the way sorry for a delay in response but, i had being studying to final term tests at Saint Mark's so i could'nt answer on time.--HappyApple 23:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi over there, thank you for your assistance on Nicolas Lucar article, i just have changed the sentence, "The public opinion has changed towards Nicolas Lúcar over the years..." to your proposal "Peruvians are divided over Lúcar, regarding him as anything between an outstanding journalist and a controversial figure". I also agree with you that the word many is quite arbitrary and i have avoided to use it. I'm glad we could reached an accord on this article, cheers.

By the way perhaps i will need your assitance in future as you are a "certified physicist" ?. If you need help on chemistry feel free to ask me, anyways thanks. :) --HappyApple 23:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peruvian Congressional Template

I just made this template. You might want to check it out and add to it. Here is the full list of Congress members. [3] --Jersey Devil 02:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That OPNE website isn't working for me. I click the districts and nothing comes up. Know of any other websites that show the Congressmen by the "regions" they represnt?--Jersey Devil 01:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot, you do the Lima ones and I'll finish off the rest of the regions. If we both work at this we'll get it done much faster.--Jersey Devil 01:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peruvian stubs

Please add Category:Living people to the stubs of the current congress. Thanks. Carlossuarez46 03:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Presidents of Peru

Please see the "Presidents of Peru" section at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru and share your opinion with the project.--Jersey Devil 02:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to send you an e-mail to do this but you don't seem to have one registered on this account. Anyway, I was going to ask you if you were interested in joining this discussion/political forum. I don't like to advertise around forums on here but I figured that we could probably use the "Off-Topic" section there to discuss improvements to the Wikiproject Peru (which because of it's format makes it much easier to communicate and I am usually online there). Anyway, its up to you. Later.--Jersey Devil 21:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The off-topic section is titled "After Hours Bar". You still seem to be in the "validating" stage, so you may not be able to post. I'll ask for you to be approved quickly.--Jersey Devil 22:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you've been validated.--Jersey Devil 23:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Please see the section titled "Tumi" in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 23:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Editor Review

Hi, I just started an editor review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Jersey Devil and am trying to get feedback on my edits. Feel free to leave a review or comment. Thanks and bye.--Jersey Devil 01:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Gold Cup

Hi. I have not reverted anything but I noticed you changed the Qualification section. I think it should stay as the Qualifiers since that is the method by which the teams will eventually participate. Especially since this time there are no invites. Libro0 20:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

club world cup round 6 template

Hi, I saw the club world cup template and was wondering if you could help me in making a different template/bracket. If there's a tutorial on how to make brackets in wikipedia it would great if you gave the the link to it because I've been looking for it. But if not, can you please help me make a bracket. The Bracket would be: 4 stages; 1st stage- Group Stage= 4 groups of 4, 2nd stage- Super 8= 1 group of 8, 3rd stage- Semi-finals= 2 groups of 2, 4th stage- Final= 1 group of 2. It would look similar to this but the second round would be 1 group instead of two and of course it would be horizontal. I'm truly sorry to bother you but it would be great if you could help me out here. --Thugchildz

Image:Mercosurmap.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mercosurmap.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 00:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rwc2007.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rwc2007.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World's Smallest Political Quiz userbox

You may be interested in User:Audacity/Userboxes/WSPQ, which is a replacement for the old Political Chart userbox. The new userbox takes the two variables (economic and personal freedom), calculates which political alignment they place you into (Statist, Libertarian, Liberal, Centrist, or Conservative), and links your userpage to the appropriate category.

Please reply to User talk:Audacity, as I will not be watching your talk page. Λυδαcιτγ 07:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sanagustin.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sanagustin.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Avanza País.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Avanza País.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alianza para el Progreso.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alianza para el Progreso.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IEA logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:IEA logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CAN logo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:CAN logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Peru

Hello, as a fellow member of WikiProject Peru, I thought you might want to check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Article improvement drive. We're having a new article improvement drive, also, lots of things going on at the WikiProject. Hope to see you around. Greetings, --Victor12 01:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2011 FIFA Women's World Cup

Hi Gabbec!

I just realized that you undid my change made on May 13 on the Germany bid for the 2011 FIFA Women's World Cup. I don't really understand why you did so as the DFB's website contents the following page with the World Cup candidate stadia. I will undo your change now. Thanks for your understanding. --217.248.48.129 08:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Just wanted to say hi, haven't talked to you in like forever. See you are sticking to soccer articles for the moment. :) Anyway, later...check out the wikiproject sometime we have a new IRC channel that we communicate on.--Jersey Devil 11:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:U19 thailand.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:U19 thailand.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 15:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Partido Socialista Peruano.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Partido Socialista Peruano.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Renacimiento Andino.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Renacimiento Andino.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UPP 2006.png

Thanks for uploading Image:UPP 2006.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:World Cup 2010 logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:World Cup 2010 logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:U20canada2007.png

Thanks for uploading Image:U20canada2007.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Unidad Nacional.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Unidad Nacional.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Union por el Peru.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Union por el Peru.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:El Comercio 07APR06.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:El Comercio 07APR06.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frente de Centro.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Frente de Centro.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frepap.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Frepap.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PSFC logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:PSFC logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

greetings

I just updated the welcome on this page, since it wasn't formatted properly :) +sj +

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Con Fuerza Perú.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Con Fuerza Perú.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Marca cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Marca cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Concertación Descentralista.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Concertación Descentralista.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BolivarianGames 2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BolivarianGames 2005.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Galaxy 2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Galaxy 2006.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Movimiento Nueva Izquierda.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Movimiento Nueva Izquierda.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Perú Posible.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Perú Posible.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Latin-American Wikipedia Meeting

"Latin-American Wikipedians,unite us!"

Hi wikipedian!Today I'm going to talk you about a new proposal that can to advantage you and many other users of Latin America.

You,that is from Latin America (second your userbox),already shall to have observed the importance of the Wikimedia Frojects in the region.Only Wikipedia represent 40% of the internet access^[1].With every this importance,why don't we make a big meeting?

Of this idea,was borned the proposal for a Latin-American Wikipedian Meeting.Various Wikipedists has Latin-American users and this is a proposal of a culture and ideas interchange,that can be help all projects.Above this,comtemplate to help in the formation of new WMF chapters in Latin America.

The main page and the talk page is originally in English,with translations in Dutch,French,Portuguese and Spanish(Translation NOT YET).

Tosão (talk) 19:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:RPP.png

Fair use rationale for File:RPP.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RPP.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gazzetta.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Gazzetta.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Recopa sudamericana.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Recopa sudamericana.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 04:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Gabbec! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 25 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Isaac Serna - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rafael Yamashiro - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Luis Gonzales Posada - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Edgar Núñez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Karina Beteta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Aníbal Huerta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
José Saldaña - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hilaria Supa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Víctor Mayorga - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Oswaldo Luizar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Martín Pérez 12. Luis Negreiros 13. Werner Cabrera 14. Eduardo Espinoza 15. Rosa Florián 16. Alejandro Rebaza 17. Cecilia Chacón 18. José Antonio Urquizo 19. Elizabeth León 20. Pedro Santos (politician) 21. Rocío González 22. Álvaro Gutiérrez 23. Juan Carlos Eguren 24. Santiago Fujimori

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Alfredo Fuentes Hernández

I have nominated Alfredo Fuentes Hernández, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfredo Fuentes Hernández. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MBisanz ^talk 01:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:UPP 2006.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:UPP 2006.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 19:44, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RPP.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RPP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:56, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Reniec.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Reniec.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Markham College.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Markham College.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:U20canada2007.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:U20canada2007.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juvenal Silva

The article Juvenal Silva has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GSMR (talk) 18:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:PSFC logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PSFC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Perú Posible.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Perú Posible.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New template

Hi, Gabbec! Please, create the Template:24TeamBracket-2LegNoSeeds. I saw your work and I ask for your help, because I am not able to create!

Nomination for deletion of Template:Peruvian congressional election, 2006

Template:Peruvian congressional election, 2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Peruvian legislative election, 2006

Template:Peruvian legislative election, 2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 18:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Peruvian presidential election, 2006

Template:Peruvian presidential election, 2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 18:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Renacimiento Andino.png

The file File:Renacimiento Andino.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

low quality, not used anywhere

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alianza por el Futuro.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alianza por el Futuro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Unidad Nacional.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Unidad Nacional.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Frepap.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frepap.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Frente de Centro.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frente de Centro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Congress seats Peru 2006 2011

Template:Congress seats Peru 2006 2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:6TeamBracket-WC

Template:6TeamBracket-WC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:16TeamBracket-2LegNoSeeds

Template:16TeamBracket-2LegNoSeeds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 21:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Peruvian national election, 2006 candidates

Template:Peruvian national election, 2006 candidates has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of José Cardó Guarderas

The article José Cardó Guarderas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable politician as per WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 22:31, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of José Cardó Guarderas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Cardó Guarderas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Cardó Guarderas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 23:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ Comscore tracked 26 million out of 63 million (41% reach) viewed Wikipedia sites in Latin America (June 2008)

[1] Comscore tracked 26 million out of 63 million (41% reach) viewed Wikipedia sites in Latin America (June 2008)

[1]