User talk:Fyukfy5

April 2024

Your recent editing history at Eicosanoid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are continuing to defend an unsourced statement - you need a WP:MEDRS source for such a broad claim (which does not apply in the definition for hormone). Zefr (talk) 15:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im not trying to war, I'm new to editing and I'm not sure why what I sources doesn't sufficed. I'd be happy for an explanation, furthermore, the article on hormones mentions eicosanoids being a hormone in the lead so this shouldn't be controversial Fyukfy5 (talk) 16:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The hormone article says "Among the substances that can be considered hormones, are eicosanoids" - that does not mean all eicosanoids are hormones. Zefr (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

- IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to violate WP:ECR as you did here you will be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asking a genuine question is a violation? I legitimately don't have/can't find that information Fyukfy5 (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, it is. You are not supposed to edit talk-pages (except for edit-requests) until you have been registered for 30 days, and have at least 500 edit. If you continue to violate that: expect to be blocked. Huldra (talk) 20:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't edit the page, I posted a reply as is allowed, the only edits I make are to my own comments if there's a mistake Fyukfy5 (talk) 20:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only edits you can make related to the Arab/Israel conflict are edit requests. You cannot take part in discussions until you are extended-confirmed. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyukfy5, are you able to advise how you happened across that RFC? Did anyone advise you of it occurring? TarnishedPath^talk 02:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh who are y'all Fyukfy5 (talk) 15:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for ECR violations, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was urged to (and I'm quoting) "participate in the ongoing discussion instead of making separate edit requests." By confirmed editor @DecafPotato

When I participate I'm told I can only make edit requests and when I make edit requests they're either ignored or I'm told to participate in the discussion.

So which is it? I'm just trying to make articles on the topic consistent Fyukfy5 (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."