User talk:TarnishedPath

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	I appreciated your comment about how to organize the sections in an RFC to promote discussion. I thought your approach is both realistic and helpful, and your explanation might encourage others to do the same. Thanks! WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of SDSS J0849+1114

Hello! Your submission of SDSS J0849+1114 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chaiten1 (talk) 08:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for SDSS J0849+1114

On 25 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SDSS J0849+1114, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that light travelled 1.06 billion light-years from a trio of galaxies in the constellation of Cancer, where three supermassive black holes were colliding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SDSS J0849+1114. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SDSS J0849+1114), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for responding to the StoneToss GA review while I wasn't there and for help along the way.—Alalch E. 21:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PARAKANYAA -- PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Removal of "where it is formally banned"

Hi there. Just querying your removal of "where it is formally banned" here. That appears to be supported by the source. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

If you look at the edit history I stuffed up my first attempt at restoring the material that Jamie had removed in the university section. I didn't intend on reverting all of their edits, just the first two out of three, as I was assuming good faith when they wrote "unsourced commentary" in their edit summary at Special:Diff/1254498510. As I did end up reverting everything I reinstated their third edit. I hope that all makes sense. As it turns out that the material is sourced, so I will self-revert now. TarnishedPath^talk 10:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Checking in

Hey, I wanted offer another apology now that the election results are out. I appreciated your courteousness and frankness in your comments to my election page. If you ever see me do something like that again, please tell me or notify someone else as soon as possible so that they can take action. I'm very sorry for any distress I caused. Keep up the hard work. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

@Pbritti, thank you for reaching out and once again thankyou for your candid response. I also would like to apologise if you felt aggrieved at my comments elsewhere. You weren't the subject of my comments but I could understand how you would feel aggrieved nonetheless as the person I was responding to had made you the subject of their comments.

I looked up the election results and I see you just missed out. I hope you get through next time you nominate. TarnishedPath^talk 03:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

No need to apologize for anything at all on your end. Your well-wishes are appreciated. I don't know if I want to go through RfA anytime soon and I look forward to aiming for a five FA year in 2025 (alongside offline life). ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

• From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation shares ANI lawsuit updates; first admin elections appoint eleven sysops; first admin recalls opened; temporary accounts coming soon?

• In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel

• Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship

• Gallery: Why you should take more photos and upload them

• In focus: Questions and answers about the court case

• Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?

• Technology report: Wikimedia tech, the Asian News International case, and the ultra-rare BLACKLOCK

• Humour: Man quietly slinks away from talk page argument after realizing his argument dumb, wrong

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Imane Khelif Lawsuit

“Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.”

I believe you are the moderator of the Imane Khelif talk page. I request it be opened back up for discussion of the reliable sources that have published news about her new lawsuit. LockheedChomsky (talk) 02:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi @LockheedChomsky, I'm not a moderator. The administrator who protected the article's talk page at Special:Diff/1255516068 is @El C. You'd need to direct your queries to them. TarnishedPath^talk 06:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration case request declined

Hi TarnishedPath. The Wikipediocracy-related conduct case request has been declined. While the arbitrators were closely divided, there was not an absolute majority to accept the case. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Candidates of the next Australian federal election

This page Candidates of the next Australian federal election is being subject to Inclusionism again IMHO. I removed the joint entry of Bradlow & Bock as Vic Senate Candidates but it was restored. As only a single person can add their name to the nomination form, this team will never become candidates. Added a note to Talk:Candidates of the next Australian federal election. Teraplane (talk) 02:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi)

The article Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) for comments about the article, and Talk:Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PARAKANYAA -- PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Unattributed quotation

Heya! Thanks for starting the new move request over at Talk:Great Replacement. I'm very happy to support. Looking over the previous move request which I started back in 2022 though, I noticed that my comment looked a lot like yours.

Here's what I wrote:

The title was changed from The Great Replacement conspiracy theory to Great Replacement as the result of an RfC just over 3 years ago. In that RfC, it seems that the primary argument against using "conspiracy theory" in the article title was WP:COMMONNAME. Since that time, however, it seems that a preponderance of reliable sources have shifted their usage, and that "Great Replacement conspiracy theory" or some very close approximation is now the norm. Some examples:

• News: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
• Academic: [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]
• Advocacy: [15][16][17]

And here's you:

The title was changed from The Great Replacement conspiracy theory to Great Replacement as the result of an RM about 5 years ago. In that RM, the primary argument against using "conspiracy theory" in the article title was WP:COMMONNAME. Since then, it seems that reliable sources have shifted usage, and that "Great Replacement conspiracy theory" or similar is now the norm. Some examples:

• News: [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]
• Academic: [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]
• Advocacy: [32][33][34]

I would argue that this level of copy/pasting from another user's comment is inappropriate, and might even trigger suspicions of socking. Again, I appreciate you opening up the new move request, but please be more careful about this kind of thing in the future. Cheers, Generalrelative (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

@Generalrelative, apologies I should have put an attribution in the edit summary at the very least. TarnishedPath^talk 01:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Ps, I didn't consider suspicions of socking. It should have occurred to me, but it didn't. TarnishedPath^talk 01:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

No worries, much appreciated! Generalrelative (talk) 19:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

• News and notes: Open letter to WMF about court case breaks one thousand signatures, big arb case declined, U4C begins accepting cases

• In the media: Summons issued for Wikipedia editors by Indian court, "Gaza genocide" RfC close in news, old admin Gwern now big AI guy, and a "spectrum of reluctance" over Australian place names

• Recent research: SPINACH: AI help for asking Wikidata "challenging real-world questions"

• News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Endowment audit reports: FY 2023–2024

• Traffic report: Well, let us share with you our knowledge, about the electoral college

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

I reverted you...

...at Imane Khelif and left an edit summary. In it, I was referring to this. This seems to show the current rag sheet publication is not itself notable in a way that can be reliably sourced. Thanks for all the work you've put into this article. I hope it simmers down soon. JFHJr (㊟) 03:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

@JFHJr thanks for the correction. I keep seeing posts in my feed on FB regarding Khelif that are straight up fake news (stuff stating that she has to hand back her Olympic medals because the IBA has disqualified her, which is straight up idiotic because the IBA don't have that power) and that appear to be generated from troll farm/s, so while I share your hope, I'm pessimistic. Once certain groupings decide something is going to be part of the broader culture war, they generally keep at it. TarnishedPath^talk 03:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

and that's really a shame because I was thinking about possible nominating the article for WP:GA but that's not really possible while all this disruption is happening. TarnishedPath^talk 03:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Give it time. We've no deadlines. It's never too late to GA, and this woman's encyclopedic story will keep developing. Sorry you even look at the 💩 feeds (pronounce that how you want). I'm here to help, so please don't hesitate to ping me re this article if it appears I'm not already looking. JFHJr (㊟) 03:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Moira Deeming

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Moira Deeming you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 07:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Moira Deeming

The article Moira Deeming you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Moira Deeming for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 10:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)