User talk:ErceÇamurOfficial

December 2022

Hello! I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit(s) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Christopher Comstock, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Comstock

Hello. Re your move of Christopher Comstock, please use the WP:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves process to propose a page move. As you can see on Talk:Christopher Comstock, there was previously a move discussion and a decision not to move the article at that time. Station1 (talk) 18:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link to the disscussion? ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 15:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's at Talk:Christopher Comstock. - Station1 (talk) 06:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"King James (person)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect King James (person) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § King James (person) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Bagumba (talk) 15:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Tarheel95. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eddie (given name) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tarheel95 (Talk) 20:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I removed a WP:CSD tag from Calvin Cordozar since it doesn't seem to meet any criteria. If you disagree, feel free to nominate it at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion. Skynxnex (talk) 20:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We should keep it and not nominate it ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 10:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ErceÇamurOfficial! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Meters (talk) 18:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to John Cena. Thank you. Meters (talk) 18:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

His father may have the same given name, but that does not mean that he uses the name "John Cena Jr" Meters (talk) 18:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vin Diesel

You want me to give you the sources? Perhaps you should actually read the article and find them yourself. The sources are clearly given in the "Early life" section. His birth name is "Sinclair". "Vincent" is his stepfather's surname. Please don't introduce errors based on your lack of comprehension. Meters (talk) 18:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhh yeah, you are right... ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Bow Wow (singer)

Hello ErceÇamurOfficial. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Bow Wow (singer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. BangJan1999 12:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:DwayneJohnson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DwayneJohnson.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Michael Sylvester Gardenzio Stallone

Hello ErceÇamurOfficial. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Michael Sylvester Gardenzio Stallone, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Use redirects for discussion instead. Thank you. BangJan1999 17:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"J. Jonah Jameson (Raimi-Verse)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect J. Jonah Jameson (Raimi-Verse) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 6 § J. Jonah Jameson (Raimi-Verse) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Leroy Jackson (actor)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Leroy Jackson (actor) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 6 § Leroy Jackson (actor) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a shared account?

Per your recent edits and responses, I have to ask: Is this account used by more than one person? Steel1943 (talk) 15:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 15:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to get the page Han Lue deleted. ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Dwayne Bowles" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dwayne Bowles has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 27 § Dwayne Bowles until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Phil Bale" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Phil Bale has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 27 § Phil Bale until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Archives

Please read the top of the archive page. Do not edit any archived talk pages as you did here. See WP:ARCHIVE for more information. If you want to continue any old discussions, then make a new discussion on the main user talk page. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 21:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn't seem to be any actual discussion going on at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 31#Move (song). Please add the actual discussion to RFD because you did tag the redirect. If you don't list this redirect and only tag it, it could be seen as disruptive. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 15:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move (song)

Hello,

You placed a rfd tag on the page Move (song) but you did not actually add it to add it to the discussion log. Just wanted to let you know so that you can fix this. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's fixed now. I used twinkle twice. ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Sheri Moon Cummings" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sheri Moon Cummings has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 8 § Sheri Moon Cummings until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Jeff Jorgensen" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jeff Jorgensen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 9 § Jeff Jorgensen until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 00:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bill Bixby, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gru (disambiguation). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Steel1943 (talk) 16:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:Ous" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Template:Ous has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 20 § Template:Ous until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend not editing redirects or WP:RFD for a bit

Multiple editors have now pointed out to you that your edits and nominations on WP:RFD are problematic. Many of the redirects you have been nominating have clearly been useful in their current configuration for several years, and some of the redirects you have been nominating our redirects that are helpful for maintenance purposes, such as {{R from alternative name}}s and {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}s. The simplest way for me to put this would probably be the following: at this point, if you consider a redirect a "useless redirect" or that it should be "speedy delete", I recommend you don't bother posting that nomination on RFD at all. I'm trying my best to assume good faith here, but it does not seem like that you are learning from any of the edits that you are performing, and repeating the same issues (see WP:CIR). At this point, take this is my last warning regarding this: If this keeps up, I will consider reporting you to WP:ANI so the community can possibly impose editing restrictions on you; Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and you seem to be acting on your own and repeating potentially troublesome edits without learning from others, which is not really compatible with the mission of Wikipedia. Steel1943 (talk) 19:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Steel1943. I suggest you carefully read the criteria at WP:GCSD and WP:RFD#DELETE. Many of your redirect nominations do not contain any rationale other than "useless redirect", for example here, here, and here. If you think a redirect is not useful, you need to state the reasons. I have myself stumbled at redirects which I thought were "useless", but I don't nominate them for deletion because I know there aren't policy-based rationales to do so. Regards, Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 01:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 21:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 22:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ErceÇamurOfficial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not even doing anything at all after my warnings ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 10:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to develop a better attention to detail

Creating a redirect from "Samuel Thomas Wilson" to Falcon, i.e. the bird? When what you were aiming for was Falcon (comics). Be sure of the target BEFORE creating a redirect, please. Zaathras (talk) 13:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Luther

You are right that it it not needed to repeat the article name in an infobox, but to make an edit for just that is called "cosmetic" - also not needed. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ben Carlton

Hello, ErceÇamurOfficial

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dr vulpes and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Ben Carlton, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 8#Ben Carlton.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dr vulpes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 06:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Game (rapper). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Dwayne the Rock" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dwayne the Rock has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 9 § Dwayne the Rock until a consensus is reached. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WJBJ

A tag has been placed on WJBJ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"FAUK" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect FAUK has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14 § FAUK until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. Twitter is not a reliable source. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 15:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chris Williams (actor), you may be blocked from editing. Fandom is not a reliable source. Please read WP:RS and take some time to learn how to assess whether a source is reliable or not. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"JDRO" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect JDRO has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 16 § JDRO until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:24, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 3 § Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Melissa Odabaş

A tag has been placed on Melissa Odabaş requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]