Jump to content

User talk:Eastmain/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
 Start a new talk topic.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Eastmain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

[edit]

Hello Eastmain,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.


Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.


Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kuzhur Wilson

[edit]

Hello there, Have edited Kuzhur Wilson page that was moved by you to draft. Could you please take a look... Kuzhur is a poet who writes in Malayalam, a regional language and has a wiki page in Malayalam. His works have been translated into other languages - I have added relevant links, removed a few and edited out information that do not have any source. Thank you, Bhairavimajunukali (talk) 08:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

[edit]
Eastmain,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! North America1000 14:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.


AfC notification: Draft:Precision and Future Medicine has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Precision and Future Medicine. Thanks! Randykitty (talk) 09:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Král železný, král zlatý

[edit]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Král železný".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

East China School District

[edit]

Scratch that PROD, I have reverted it and added WP:PRIMARY references to at least show info for each school, and added reflist and updated the official website. The article needs a loooot work though. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iype Cherian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae

[edit]

oof! You might want consider not templating the regulars. Better sometimes to type a note. Cheers, Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mexican Society of Physics

[edit]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mexican Society of Physics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Recording Industry of Japan Logo 85px by 49px.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Recording Industry of Japan Logo 85px by 49px.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira Emblem.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ramakrishna Mission Vidyamandira Emblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Every Child Ministries Logo 2007.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Every Child Ministries Logo 2007.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.17

[edit]

Hello Eastmain,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord Abbett Knight Logo.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lord Abbett Knight Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my goodness!

[edit]

Thank you for finding many useful references to put up to Xiamen Bridge. Now nobody can say that it's lacking references. You're such a good helper, I just wanted to stop by and tell you (I also thanked your draft edits). Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 01:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFD

[edit]
An article you created or have contributed to has been nominated for deletion
Hello!
Click the image for an important message.
Like, it's April Fools' Day today, you know?
So...
 

Keep

 

on

Drew Binsky

[edit]

Here there I think we can agree to remove the notability thing on Drew Binsky. That's because we have a page for Nuseir Yassin. IsraeliIdan (talk) 13:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pennzoil Logo white bg.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pennzoil Logo white bg.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. I am asking for your advice related to a properly stated conflict of interest edits to a Benjamin Wey's article. I created a discussion at WP:Law and invited you to participate, acknowledging your experience in editing Wikipedia. Thank you in advance! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Julia M Carson Transit Center

[edit]

Hi,

Saw your post on the talk section of the article Julia M. Carson Transit Center. In case it gets deleted, I thought I would answer your question here about the older version of the article. It still exists at Draft:Julia M. Carson Transit Center. Stephen! Coming... 16:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Sjb72:. Thanks for the information. If you think the draft is ready, could you approve it and merge its history with the existing article? I'm not going to say that all bus stations are notable, but I think this one is adequately referenced. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm rather rusty with page moves and merges, so I think it best if someone with a bit more experience has a go at that. Stephen! Coming... 17:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

41st Avenue

[edit]

I believe Boundary Road (Vancouver) is more important than 41st Avenue so I removed a PROD done by the same person as PROD'ed 41st AveAerostar3 (talk) 03:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Aerostar3: Thank you. If you can find even more references from reliable sources about Boundary Road and the other Vancouver-area roads that have been tagged for PROD or AfD, please add them so that nobody will be able to claim that Boundary Road lacks notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 41st Avenue (Vancouver), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SkyTrain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.18

[edit]

Hello Eastmain,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corina Smith

[edit]

Thank you for considering the article, examining it and giving it a try.
That is, Praxidicae considers that it is the same article. How could it be the same as the 2015?
Even Praxidicae did not take the cost of examining it.
I look relevant this article more than, some other examples that explain in the page of discsion of the article, since it is required by the articles:

Praxidicae only eliminates and eliminates, users as I create and create, and try to keep the encyclopedia.
I hope that bureaucracy changes one day.
And I hope that one day too, and stop being threatening this article (Corina Smith) with the elimination.
Thank you...
Erickespinal26 (talk) 12:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, while you were correct in this case, please do not remove G4's from articles, but instead let an admin decide. You do not have the ability to determine whether or not G4 is applicable as you cannot see the deleted article history. You basically were correct through pure luck this time. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @TonyBallioni: Not by pure luck, but by observation. The old article was from 2015 and the new article had significant text relating to the period after 2015, and was therefore different. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Nope. It is 100% possible for G4 to apply in those circumstances. The question is substantially identical, not word for word identical with no changes. It is impossible for you to know this as you can't see the deleted text. Please don't do it again. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

[edit]

Information iconHello, Eastmain, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:Eastmain/René Levasseur. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). Thank you. GretLomborg (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'Heartland Alliance' Wikidata item

[edit]

Hello, I see you linked an article I created (Heartland Alliance) to a Wikidata item ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30141628 ). I'm afraid I'm not at all familiar with Wikidata and I can't find a lick of human-readable info on that item page that explains why it would be linked to this article, and no others. It seems to refer to a directory of research institutes? Perhaps I'm missing something but Heartland Alliance is not a research institute, curious if you can help me understand how this is relevant. Walkersam (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thanks for weighing in about keeping the page Barry J. Gillis. Hopefully it's not deleted. Much appreciation to you Eastmain . Barryjedmonton (talk) 23:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hardcastle syndrome has been accepted

[edit]
Hardcastle syndrome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NCAA Division I Baseball Championships recent history for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NCAA Division I Baseball Championships recent history is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NCAA Division I Baseball Championships recent history until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jay Jor (talk) 19:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mobarz Kidifa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

[edit]

Should you be interested, we can have a go at it. Lourdes 05:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Real Food Healthy Body (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Links from other sites to their recipes do not help to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 08:54, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Eastmain! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:54, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating zh:蒋单单

[edit]
  • Thank you for creating zh:蒋单单 on Chinese Wikipedia! However her notability is really doubtful. Though she has some significant coverage from some media, those media are Citizen media and not that reliable. Just FYI, before nominating it for deletion on our project, we normally list it at zh:Wikipedia:关注度/提报#蒋单单 and wait for 30 days to give sufficient time for improvement and after 30 days if the sourcing is still a problem, someone might nominate it for deletion. Viztor should have watied for 30 days. And it seems that Viztor has withdrawn their nomination for deletion. But thanks for being bold to creating an article on Chinese Wikipedia anyway! --94rain Talk 04:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plazmatick (June 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Mjs1991 (talk) 05:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

There is an on-going discussion at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#Alternatives to deletion in which you may be interested. Otr500 (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

[edit]

Hello Eastmain,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wertachtal transmitter site

[edit]

Hello, special thanks for translating "my" article "Centre d'émission de Wertachtal" to English. I reviewed the English article, so that it could be moved to the article-space. If you would do, please make a rename to "Wertachtal transmitter site" instead of "Wertachtal transmitter center" before moving. I also left a comment on the talk to the draft.
Thanks!--OldfashionFreak (talk) 13:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wertachtal transmitter site has been accepted

[edit]
Wertachtal transmitter site, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rose Funja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kartica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Card (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Eastmain/Archive 12,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

[edit]

Hello Eastmain,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomer Zvulun has been accepted

[edit]
Tomer Zvulun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Eastmain/Archive 12,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peak Scientific (September 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Barkeep49 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Additional references don't help establish notability under NCORP.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Barkeep49 (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Barkeep49: Could you please take another look at the references? They include two daily newspapers and https://www.insider.co.uk/ , which appears to be reliable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Eastmain, do you have a COI? If not and you think it should be in mainspace there's nothing wrong with you doing that. If you'd want a second pair of eyes you can unreview your own stuff now so a NPP would look at it. If you have a COI or something else preventing you from moving it feel free to ping me again and I'll explain what I saw from the sources. I'm not trying to be evasive here just pointing out that if you think something belongs in mainspace and improve it well that's a great outcome for the encyclopedia. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarcoidosis Vasculitis and Diffuse Lung Diseases (September 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:
Has this been submitted by accident? It has no sources, and still has the 'work in progress' template on.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GirthSummit (blether) 09:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Eastmain - apologies if I've misunderstood what happened here, this draft looked like you were still working on it, I assumed you had submitted it accidentally. If you'd like do discuss, or I've misunderstood, please let me know. GirthSummit (blether) 09:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Eastmain/Archive 12,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

[edit]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.



You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Admin's Barnstar
Thank you for your decision in changing the name of Christ University according to the recent amendments, even though there was a huge discussion and fighting over it. Tobin Koshy 06:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

[edit]

Hello Eastmain,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 804 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-gale-cengage-com.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-gale-cengage-com.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Helena Estrada

[edit]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Helena Estrada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WRLH-TV Logo2001.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WRLH-TV Logo2001.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

[edit]

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays

[edit]
Merry Christmas, Eastmain!
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. And for all the help you've thrown my way over the years. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Min Minxin

[edit]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Min Minxin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 08:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Precision and Future Medicine concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Precision and Future Medicine, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathalie Bondil for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathalie Bondil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie Bondil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Nick India Logo.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Nick India Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 14:13, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Precision and Future Medicine

[edit]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Precision and Future Medicine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

[edit]

Hello Eastmain,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Logo 2016.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Logo 2016.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eastmain/Archive_12&oldid=1079161011"