User talk:east718/Archive 8

; ; Archives
	Current; Late 2004 and onwards; March 2006 and onwards; November 2006 and onwards; July 2007; August 2007; September 2007; October 2007; November 2007; December 2007; January 2008; February 2008; March 2008; April 2008; May 2008; June 2008; July 2008; August 2008; September 2008; October 2008; November 2008; December 2008; January 2009; February 2009; March 2009; April 2009; May 2009; June–July 2009; August–December 2009; January–June 2010; July 2010 and onwards;

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please contact me on my talk page.

Nextmedium Entry

Greetings - we're not sure exactly how/why our entry got deleted. We're genuinely not trying to use Wikipedia for promotional use but simply to have an entry for our company as Google, Verizon and other companies do. We've reread the spam criteria and edited our proposed article to match (although without more information as to what we did wrong, we fear we might be wasting our time). Feel free to send an email or perhaps we can talk here to get more clarity. We love Wikipedia and we'd like to be part of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim-nextmedium (talk • contribs)

Please refrain from deleting pictures from the "chile" article

if you have a compelling reason to do so, please use the discussion section first.

thank you. Likeminas 01:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism question

this user is just off a 31 hr block, and is vandalizing again, i gave him a final warning, but does he even need that before he can be blocked, or can he just be blocked now, since he just got off the block? Ctjf83 02:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection help

I've requested Mermaid Melody Pichi Pichi Pitch on WP:RPP for semi-protection because various IPs (all from the 61.*.*.* range and are all from Indonesia) have vandalized the article by inserting unrelated Digimon information. The two anime are not related in any way, BTW. I know anime is not your cup to tea (I'm sure of it), but can you help me on this. I've posted a second request because the first request was denied and a new incident occured shortly after. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 04:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of South Korea

Hi, your edit summary here [1] sounded as if you were going to lift protection, but you apparently didn't. Am I missing something? (Just my 2c, I would support unprotection.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no. i support protection. Jjk82 Edit are inappropriate POV. [2]Jjk82 certainly POV troll. see his talk page. he did many vandalsim.[3]

even Sennen goroshi who supported Jjk82's edit [4] said, "jjk82's edits were a stupid. sorry if that messed up the article for you, i assume those edits are not on there now."[5] 774townsclear 14:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Admin. need Protection

Yeongeunmun Gate. some Japanese user edit like this.[6] I find This edit by Nightshadow28 edited list. It's Totally Hoax. It's purely fabricated edit. cite is nothing,too. see discussion page. nobody prove it. And see article history. some korean correct rightly, Japanese Pushing POV trolls continuously revert it, too. I'm very supprised this fabrication. Please protect this article from Hoax. 774townsclear 14:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Useless dab question

Re: this revert -- there's a question mark in your edit summary. What's the question? -- JHunterJ 14:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

With the shock of getting blocked, I forgot to thank you at the time for your Perspicacite alert.

What a pity I did not notice it earlier and realise its significance... Alice.S 15:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Comic Guaranty LLC

FYI, the edit warring on Comic Guaranty LLC has continued after the protection was lifted. Some of us from WikiProject Comics are attempting to get a dialog going on the talk page, but it hasn't been particularly successful so far. I've tried to get rid of some of the POV and unreliable sources (message boards) on this page before, but it proved too much of a headache. --GentlemanGhost 23:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, Yeah...

Usually when the result is delete, you probably should actually delete the article. Haha! I'll take care of it, dood. the_undertow ^talk 00:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O, you are going to like this. I checked the history for Gridiron Victoria instead and then proceeded to delete it. Yep, I completely deleted an innocent article. What's even stranger is that nobody said anything?! Sorry East - my bad. the_undertow ^talk 21:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for page protection

Hi. I left a request for protection for the Karyn Kupcinet article, but it was skipped over for some reason. Could you possible review it and grant or decline the protection? If you have any questions about the situation, please let me know. Thanks! Pinkadelica 01:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image deletion

Hey east - thanks for getting back to me about that image. The URL it directs to is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Jon_Coffelt_at_Schedler_Minchin_in_2006.jpg

When I look there, I see "why" it was deleted, I'm just not sure how to mark it so that it is not deleted. The image was provided to me by Jon Coffelt, who owns it (even tho he did snap take it); and he gives permission for use on Wikipedia (including putting it under GDPL). What am I doing wrong? Thanks! NathanielS 09:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion summaries

Please stop writing "CSD G0: None ← That is a lie, it was actually an uncontested proposed deletion" in deletion summaries. I don't know if you're trying to be funny or something, but it looks stupid. Just give the reason and be done with it. Thanks – Gurch (talk) 14:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Query about deletion of Page

Hi,

You seem to have removed an entry on "Dina Nath Walli", the famous Kashmiri Pundit watercolor artist. This person is real and the facts about him on the page were taken from his biography on various websites and personal information that I know of (I am his great grand daughter). He is even listed here "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Kashmiri_Pandits" under "Art, Design & Painting", and seems to be the only person in that category to have lost his wiki page.

If there is problem with the page, please let me know, else please restore it.

Thanks so much, Riddhi Kaul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riddhikaul (talk • contribs) 16:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retirement

Do0d, I'm terribly sad to see you go. Damn. Well, despite having opposed my RfA, you were one of the most helpful admins in giving me pointers and advice. Thanks for that. I hope to see you around now and then. Good luck with your training... and break a leg! (Then come back to WP ;)) Lara❤Love 05:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I'll miss you man. Don't think I interacted much with you on wiki, but I remember seeing you a bunch on IRC. :\ EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise. You were always a help around here. Come back whenever you can lend a minute. :) GlassCobra 06:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be sure to stay around buddy! Kwsn (Ni!) 13:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do the good ones have to go? Anyway, I wish you all the best in your endeavours. Peace bro :) Spellcast (talk) 00:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. I honestly should watch user pages more closely, I miss these sorts of things :( Really helpful one, always beating me to RFPP :) Spebi 07:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping me see the lighter side of adminship. You're a good one. Come back soon. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't leave me alone with the "list of current world boxing champions"... ;-) Happy "retirement"! claudevsq (talk) 16:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bah! Congrats on the health, and maybe see you back here someday! :) Jmlk 1 7 11:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nas image

What are you doing? You say if I put back that old image I'll get blocked. Wtf are you on about? That image is free and what do you mean by "troll meme"? Sorry explain it a bit better I put that image in the bottom of the page though.--Flesh-n-Bone 21:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Massive disruption of flag templates

Your recent edits to the country data templates have caused massive disruption across thousands and thousands of pages. You accidentally put a newline character into these templates by not putting the trailing </noinclude> on the same line as the opening double braces of the template code. As it turns out, all you needed to do was make a single edit to Template:Country showdata to add {{pp-template}} to all 893 country data templates in a single stroke. I really wish you had posted something to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Flag Template before undertaking such a task. I am currently working quickly to repair all the damage. Andrwsc (talk) 20:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Big Classic

Could you please resurrect this page, I would like to get it up to quality standards and would like to use the old data as a starting point. - Jeremy (Jerem43 (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Signature question

Hi, East718! I've been admiring your signature for the past few months, and have been wondering how I can pull off something similar. What I want is exactly as my signature appears now, except with the timestamp inside the span. I can get a template to subst in my preferences field, but I can't figure out how to suppress MediaWiki's automatic timestamp as you seem to do.

What I have now is: [[User:Voyagerfan5761|Tuvok]][[[User talk:Voyagerfan5761|T]][[Special:Emailuser/Voyagerfan5761|@]][[User talk:Voyagerfan5761|lk]]/[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Voyagerfan5761|Improve me]]]. Do you have any tips for getting the timestamp in before that closing ? Thanks! Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 10:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So I didn't miss a way of getting four tildes to work, eh? Rats. You might have noticed my self-reversion on WP:RPP last night. I used Twinkle to request it, and TW and Friendly autosign with four tildes. I take it you don't use many automated tools with your account.

Somehow, I thought the solution would be to use three tildes. Having my timestamp non-breaking isn't worth the extra trouble it would cause with tools like TW, Friendly, VP, and NPW, though. But thanks for sharing your advice, just the same. :) Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 16:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That actually hadn't occurred to me. I guess with Friendly getting updates about every week, I don't want to keep updating my own code. I don't even know how I'd tweak apps like VP or NPWatcher. Whatever; is it really worth all that just so my signature doesn't break across lines? Personally, I think not. But you have good ideas; perhaps you could get a bug passed to make timestamps a user preference in MediaWiki? Cheers! Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 16:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: --DUP

Just delete them all. A complete list is at User:ST47/--DUP. These are the pages that previously had WP: prefixes, but are no longer needed due to the merge with the Wikipedia namespace (see Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#WP: vs WIkipedia:). —Remember the dot ^(talk) 00:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That was fast. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 01:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted images

I wanted to appeal the recent removal of the images of the Waspinator and Alpha Trion toys. Both these image were removed under the grounds that the images could be replaced by freely available images, but I don't think this would be possible. Both toys were never released, and these images of the prototypes of the figures are the only pictures taken of the toy known to exist. No one can replace them with GFDL images. Mathewignash (talk) 02:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The images in question are Alphatrion-universe.jpg and Waspinator-universe.jpg thanks. Mathewignash (talk) 03:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

Hi - I didn't think your response to this unblock request was appropriate [7]. Sometimes humour does not translate well and playing it straight would be more appropriate. --Matilda ^talk 04:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect Injection lipolysis?

As the blocking admin, do you think it may now be appropriate to unprotect injection lipolysis? It seems that the furor has died down. Thanks, Ante lan ^talk 05:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll come back soon if the furor kicks back up again. Ante lan ^talk 05:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops

Didn't notice that Taiketsu had already submitted a request. :\ JuJube (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure if I've been doing a good job of staying cool (I was rash in submitting a WP:AIV before noticing that the guy was changing the article up so it wasn't vandalism), but I've been trying to follow through with the other steps. I opened a section on the talk page. It's just that, really, nobody really gives a damn about Yu-Gi-Oh! GX to follow through on the comments anyway and this guy is honestly under the impression that this is "American Wikipedia". I'm probably going to have to go to WP:RFC on this. JuJube (talk) 05:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Two concerns:

1) I'm relatively certain that the user whom most concerned me in a RL sense, as well as any relevant RL people in my community have no idea who (or where) I am on WP. If that link Jeff posted (I think, with some initial malice, as one has to dig to find it) stands much longer, I may have some problems. I'll let you know if it becomes an issue where I feel I need to vanish more permanently, in which case you would be the only one I informed of my next incarnation.

2) The underlying frivolous (in my opinion, shown by the diffs) complaint needs to be dealt with as well. Nick put it best when he asked "why is this here?" Perhaps we could resolve that complaint with an admin letting DCV know that bringing petty perceived problems to AN/I is not really the best option. Especially after I had clearly agreed to abide by her petty ban of me from her talkpage.

Thanks for all your help. Mr Which ??? 15:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attack page

Hi: with respect to User talk:Drewshallperish, would you mind having a look and doing whatever you think is appropriate? I'm the subject of this, so I don't think it's appropriate for me to take a hand, but I note you gave this individual a final warning a few minutes ago. Thanks in advance for any assistance you'd care to offer. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I'm happy to see the material in question gone, and I certainly agree with your decision. Thanks for your help. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Activestills

i have got promotion for this text. Doronef (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes. that what i mean... Doronef (talk) 19:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey, the permission is only in Hebrew. anyway i sent it. thank u, and sorry for my bad English Doronef (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

do u know how long is it take to check the permission? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doronef (talk • contribs) 15:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but

No, I have no intention of violating the 3R rule. I'm not sure what to do about User:Gbleem though that has done little over the past few days but reinsert the same edit and leave it at that. Do you have any advice? I've gone for a compromise in removing the entire disputed section for the time being as well as suggested that we ask the Wikiproject Korea group for advice but to no avail. I don't doubt his good intentions but I'm not sure how I can get the point across that there should be some more discussion before we decide on whether the copyright is unclear or not. I see you've put the warning on his talk page too so perhaps that will help. Mithridates (talk) 00:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Cleveland Memory article

Are articles about innovative, on-going community collaborations, which Cleveland Memory Project is, considered "blatant advertising," especially when the external site itself is a non-profit community project? This was my first attempt at writing an article from scratch and perhaps I got the tone or emphasis wrong? Or is something like this fated to be dumped, no matter what? ClevelandMemory (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

If you are interested in taking over the role that Mercury had in providing mentorship, I am willing to work with you. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. —Whig (talk) 05:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out that there was only about a week left to run on the mentorship with Mercury. See here. Is there a reason you think we should extend provisions into January? —Whig (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There have been some complaints here. I have made a good faith nomination, whether it resolves to keep or delete. —Whig (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please take a look in my talk? —Whig (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are mentoring me then I ask you to assume good faith at all times or else I ask you to withdraw. —Whig (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to look into my past history, but if you decline to review it then I would appreciate your not using it against me. —Whig (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see conversation here preceding my AfD. I was encouraged explicitly by one editor to do so. —Whig (talk) 22:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate suggestions for addressing the issues I raised in Talk:Quackery. I do not want to make any moves without some advice, to avoid being called disruptive. —Whig (talk) 22:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been reverted. —Whig (talk) 05:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall having previous interaction with the user who reverted me. I will await your advice before taking any further action or response. —Whig (talk) 05:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The simplest solution is that you haven't adaquately explained why a well sourced (per WP:V) item should be removed per WP:NPOV. I have asked you on the talk page, but because it appears (to me...I could be wrong however) that you have made a good faith but POV edit, I have reverted you back to the revision that has the best WP:CONSENSUS. At the moment (IMO) it appears that the removal of that list including any of the individuals on the list does not have consensus, albeit there is a discussion to move them to a list rather than on the actual article. If you have any questions, you only need to ask on the talk page. Keep a cool head however :-) Shot info (talk) 05:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would an RfC/A be called for? —Whig (talk) 06:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably better to inquire on the talk page (rather than here). But seriously, an RfC will probably just end up agreeing with the established consensus. The best thing to do is look at ways of improving the article, but by all means if you feel a RfC is called for, go for it. Thanks Shot info (talk) 06:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been reverted again. There is also a complaint with an unfortunate edit summary and threat to ban me immediately. —Whig (talk) 07:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have had previous encounters with this user. —Whig (talk) 07:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May I at least complain politely? It isn't right that some users are allowed to be uncivil to me. —Whig (talk) 07:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I see your comment now. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whig (talk • contribs) 07:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have received a complaint on my talk page. I have also been reverted. —Whig (talk) 09:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The POV tag was also reverted here but was restored by another editor. —Whig (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had no intention to violate the letter or spirit of any editing restriction. I will try to be more careful but it seems I cannot edit mainspace at all when there is disagreement unless I want to be criticised. I did not consider my edits reverts. —Whig (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am proposing to submit a request to WP:RSN, which I have drafted here. There was previous discussion here. I would like your input on whether this request is appropriate and whether I should accept the offer to have the other editor submit it in my behalf, or what improvements you think it requires first. —Whig (talk) 06:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You replied on Elhector's talk, does that mean you think he should be the one to submit it? I should link him as well to the draft in that case, or even otherwise just for his opinion. I'd be interested in a second admin opinion if you think it would be useful before submitting it if that will possibly help make it a better submission. I'm trying not to repeat all the gory details that can be found in the article talk. —Whig (talk) 07:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When a user that has had such serious issues in the past continues to run into the same problems, then something is wrong. The attitude that they are right and everyone else is wrong needs mentorship, not sympathy. We've seen this before and it invariably ends up with them getting banned and their mentor humiliated. Please take some action and do some advising so we can see that Whig is receiving advice that will prevent these problems. Tendentious editors don't need coddling. -- Fyslee / talk 15:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page is not a battleground, and if I need advice I will seek it from colleagues. east.718 at 19:11, December 19, 2007

Image:Joujouka black eyes.jpg‎

Why did you delete the tag I left on this page?opiumjones 23 (talk) 18:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanksopiumjones 23 (talk) 18:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for speedy information. Will do as suggested. opiumjones 23 (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pankorea.jpg

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Image:Pankorea.jpg. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Atropos (talk) 18:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can fix that easily and will gladly. But I have to ask, do you really think it was in the best interest of the wiki to delete the image for that? Atropos (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Computers Ltd

Why did revert my edit to International Computers Ltd? Iccaldwell (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:130.22.190.5

I have reverted your edit pending an explanation. --Afed (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In truth I do not, please explain it to me. I'm merely outraged that the US government is permitted to bend the content of Wikipedia to its will, and I am trying to stop it. --Afed (talk) 22:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mindraker

I noticed that you have reverted Mindraker's onslaught against Elonka. I was also concerned and had looked at Elonka's WP biography and saw that he has made quite a few edits there. Should those be reviewed? --Kevin Murray (talk) 23:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Protected titles/XRumer spambot

I have reverted you, since there is no explanation for suddenly unprotecting dozens of spambot targets. If you could tell us why in the talk page, we would really appreciate it. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Please provide edit summary when editing Mediawiki namespace. Thank you in advance ∴ AlexSm 03:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your block of IP address 72.79.64.219

I think you should know that I unblocked 72.29.64.219, since the block was because it was an open proxy - and it turns out that it isn't an open proxy. Od Mishehu עוד מישהו 07:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that might have been a misfire, the block summary makes no sense and is not in line with the block script I use. I'm going to look into why this happened, thanks for bringing it to my attention. east.718 at 07:22, December 17, 2007

Kendall Walton

Why did you delete the page? And why did you do it so quickly that people couldn't have a chance to check it over? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisjwmartin (talk • contribs) 11:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page proection

Please fully protect the Afghan-Americans article from vandals who are sockpuppets of the banned User:Beh-nam vandalising the page and also removing your page protection tag. Full protection for a year is the best solution as there is not much to edit on that article for now, and if someone wants to add something (which will probably very rarely) they can use talk page first. The banned user Beh-nam and another vandal User:Anoshirawan are changing the correct name "Afghan" (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 July 27#Afghan people) to a false one "Afghanistani" name which we Afghan-Americans find silly. Banned user: Beh-nam is Canadian and Anoshirawan is German, so they are not Afghan-Americans. If you do us this favor we will very much appreciate it, thanks.--Ziblam (talk) 11:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some thought

Hello, East718, I come here to finish up the unresolved discussion. As you pointed out, anonymous ip users are easily regarded as new users, suspicious editors, vandal, possible sock puppets or something else. Although Watermint chose the absurd behavior instead of discussion, I could've understood him a little. Admittedly I was very upset at you more than watermint's report yesterday. After I saw your apology and you fixing your personal things, my pent-up feeling quickly tied down.

However , I want to clarify your suspicions of "remarkable policy and process"and "editing in a contentious area under ArbCom sanction" I haven't said that I'm a new user but my ip address keeps changing. I sometimes see other people's edits on Wiki with my (my neighbors' or broadband's ) ip address. If I was knowledgeable enough of English wikipedia, I would not consume my time for a while to search help and read the whole incident page to make a report again. You can guess where my opinion on recent administrators was from.

As for the article, you don't know how frequently the article on Wiki and naming issues on Google map are exposed to public in East Asia via notable media. Changing the small rocks' name was for headlines several times. Sometimes, editors from other language Wiki come to visit here only for it. Right before the poll begun for changing the title name last spring, many new accounts were registered and all major media broadcasted about it. You may see more people with one-headed mind in future. If one party unilaterally pushes their agenda and peace(yeah peace) is scattered, several editors might emerge from elsewhere. What I edit on it is just one and the article is even beyond my ability (I'm poor at reading documents written in old Chinese characters) However, except that the countries resolve the matter in action, I guess the disputes around the islets keep continuing like this.

For the last, it is not fair that accusers are always free themselves from any bondage. I have a proposal to prevent this absurd thing happening again. If someone wants to request for a checkuser, checking the accuser should be done first. I still want to make an issue on this matter, and let me know where I have to go if the incident report page is not good place for it. Regards. -72.79.47.75 (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm sorry about that. My comment was in bad faith and that's why I retracted it. I used to be an anonymous user with around 3,000 edits across dynamic IPs myself before I registered an account, so I know what the stigma feels like. About Checkuser, the people who perform the CUs usually examine all parties involved, but I do admit there are no checks of the sort of the sort for a simple proxy check. If the person who reported you is one of the nationalist edit warriors, don't worry, they'll get theirs some day. east.718 at 16:16, December 17, 2007

Sorry for my late answer, I was busy and the big holiday is coming. :) You seem to be a nice fellow. I agree with your opinion on the editor. He might get a lesson someday if he keeps continuing that kind of behaviors rather chooses a discussion or cooperation with other parties. Okay i got your point, and have a wonderful holiday! --72.79.44.194 (talk) 00:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

Curious as to why the decline ? I'm not involved in editing the article myself so I don't mind, just wondered about clarification. Thanks for acting on my other request. Cirt (talk) 16:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

There's only been one fast series of reverts in the past month, and it's been accompanied by talkpage discussion. I'll keep my eye on it and step in if it gets worse. Cheers, east.718 at 16:45, December 17, 2007

Sounds good. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't out of line with the WP:RFPP report. Cirt (talk) 16:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry to bug you, but just to double-check - were the two requests appropriate to ask for even if one was turned down, and were they both formulated appropriately? You can respond here that's okay, if you just say I did it okay then this thread can be done for now. Thanks for all your help. Cirt (talk) 17:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

You can request as many articles at once as you want. east.718 at 17:27, December 17, 2007

Oh, no that's not what I was asking, I was just checking to see if each individual request was appropriate, and if each one was requested in the proper manner on the WP:RFPP page. Cirt (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

If you're asking whether your requests were malformed, they weren't. You can dump just about anything onto that page, I would hope that us admins are smart enough to figure something as simple as page protection out. :-) east.718 at 17:31, December 17, 2007

Okay, just checking, thanks. Cirt (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Jim Jagielski

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jim_Jagielski. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jimjag (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karabinier

Why did you remove the uniforms and shoulder insignias pictures? They were okey and the only ones what anybody had ever uplaoded here.

I want to hear an explanation! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karabinier (talk • contribs) 00:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meier & Frank edit

Regarding this edit, may I ask why the link was removed? It was added a long time ago, and matches the other entries on the page. If it needs to go, then all the links need to go. Even if the article is to be deleted, red links are OK. Aboutmovies (talk) 02:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

underconstruction

Is the {{underconstruction}} tag that you placed at Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Twinkle/doc still relevant? Royalbroil 03:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

question

can you put new terms? I tried this and it got deleted.

-Rob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robfwb (talk • contribs) 09:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleted photos

Why did you delete the photos from Che Guevara's page ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redthoreau (talk • contribs) 15:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AselAsleh.jpg

Can you point me to the deletion of this image? It is still up on Wikipedia see right|thumbnail--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then you shouldn't delete the image (as you did), as it still exists on Wikipedia, just on the commons--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Priority call

Can you please tell me why you deleted my contribution on 'priority call' at 23.34 on December 15, 2007?

Jimprice43 (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjects

Hi there! Um, how do you start a new WikiProject? Thanks.-- Vintei Talk 17:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Restaurant Week

What do I have to do to get this information to the public? The copy was rewritten three times in order to please Wiki editors and no one has responded to me as to what needs to be changed.

I'm simply describing an event that happens in Los Angeles once a year and 2008 will be the inaugural year:

http://www.dinela.com/restaurantweek/

I work for the Visitors Bureau and we operate dineLA.com Wkarz (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Early deletions

Hello. It looks like you have been deleting images after they have been tagged for only 6 days instead of the full 7. Please remember to check the time and date of the tags before deleting them. Remember that if an image is tagged on Dec 11 @ 2359 UTC, it should not be deleted until Dec 18 @ 2359 UTC, rather than at the beginning of the 18th. Best regards. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country_data_Tobago

The flag used in this template does not appear to have any official status. I posted comments that that effect on the talk page, but I have heard no reply. Since you're the admin who protected the page, I figured I'd ask for your input, instead of editing the page myself. Thoughts? Guettarda (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken the liberty of switching out the fair-use image for a free-use, if more general one. Adam Cuerden ^talk 09:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image help

I've never had to do a deletion of any kind for an image before. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a couple of painting images where the artist had put improper licensing restrictions on them (don't remember the artist's name; one image had Venice in the title) and you took care of the deletion process. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Activities of User:NewYork1956

Hi there, You seem to be an admin that specialises in image issues. User:NewYork1956 uploaded an image Image:ElisabethSchwarzkopf.jpeg that just seems to be a simple steal from Britannica Online Encyclopedia and the copyright is with Baron—Hulton Archive/Getty Images. We had a minor revert war in Elisabeth Schwarzkopf until he realised his position was untenable. I tagged the image for deletion and it was subsequently also tagged by a bot as an orphaned image. User:NewYork1956 subsequently requested deletion himself Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 December 16 and has been reverting edits on various pages in an attempt, I suppose, to hide his plagiarism.

Similarly, on Victoria de los Ángeles he has recently uploaded an image that judging by [8] used to be on Wikipedia but was deleted in October.

This chap seems to be uploading lots of images using suspiciously similar reasons e.g. usually claiming that they are "in a promotional photograph from 1956". His cavalier attitude makes me suspect the provenance of all his uploads. Can you have a look at his work and see what you think? Nunquam Dormio (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh actually I requested that first image be removed myself after I changed the image in the article, and the other image on De Los Angeles could have been deleted for a number of reasons, such as no fair use provided, which isn't the case now. The user above is someone I hope not to have to deal with again.
NewYork1956 (talk) 09:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whig

I've given him an informal warning about it, but Whig does seem to be editwarring at Quackery, in, at the least, violation of the spirit of the 1RR probation. It might be best to let him off with a warning this time, but one has to wonder what he thinks he's up to. Adam Cuerden ^talk 09:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of image from Graham Technology

Hi there,

I would like to ask how I am supposed to add an image to a page without it being deleted.........I work for the organisation in question and am therefore qualified to use the image in this sense, what do we have to fill out to make sure the editors do no remove the image?

Specfically in regard to Graham Technology.

Cheers!

Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.177.183 (talk) 12:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC) Image:GT logo.jpeg[reply]

Unfortunately, "permission to use on Wikipedia" isn't sufficient for inclusion; all content has to be free as in freedom, not free as in beer. If you want your media to be used here, you will have to legally release it under a free license such as the GFDL or a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. east.718 at 19:08, December 19, 2007

And we don't want people editing their own articles regardless. Secretlondon (talk) 20:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks for the info folks, not trying to sell anything...just give truthful account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.177.183 (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation on why Greater Katy Article was deleted

East718 I was wondering why you deleted the Greater Katy article. I found the article informative and I worked on it (did not create it) often. It explaned where and what the Katy area is and how it is seperate from the town of Katy. It outlined the schools and areas that are not a part of the town of Katy, and the subdivisions. As a person that has been in Katy since 1972 I would often direct new comers to the area to bot the Katy, Texas article and the Greater Katy Article. I am requesting that you restore the article. I am wondering if you deleted it because in your own opinion you felt is was not noteworthy. Alos, Greater Katy is an area and the proof are the road signs along I-10 starting just before Barker Cypress that say "Greater Katy" and telling you where to exit.

Hope you restore it! Thanks!

--Mickeyp2814 (talk) 14:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kaiser Maxim

Thanks for your help with this. I thought something seemed fishy about the account, but wouldn't have known what connections to make. Pastordavid (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Harrington

I noticed that you've accepted User:Doublethink64's claim to be veteran British fascist Patrick Harrington. You really cannot do that for *any* figure in politics, especially not one as controversial as Harrington. If that account wishes to prove the own the copyright to the things they've uploaded they need to do it via an email to OTRS. They also need watching with regards to conflict of interests as they've been throwing their weight around and editing in a partisan manner. It's the sort of thing it's best to stay out of unless you know what you are doing. Secretlondon (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sorry if I came across as harsh.. Secretlondon (talk) 21:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enlighten me!

Does the colour of the border on your signature change automatically? Every time I see it, its a different colour :) Qst 21:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I thought it must :) Qst 22:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Electroknight

Hi,

as you decided to delete the Electroknight page can you please delete all other artist pages here on Wikipedia.

-EK —Preceding unsigned comment added by Electroknight (talk • contribs) 23:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benito Giuliani

Don't ever do what again? --Latish redone (formerly All in) (talk) 00:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

That was the fastest block I've ever seen. (That wasn't done by a bot at least) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

t.A.T.u. Articles

Please, if your going to remove 2 high quality images from to differnt articles, atleast post SOMETHING in your edit summery so we know your not just screwing off with your admin powers. 69.250.142.218 (talk) 01:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reason for deletion is always found in the image's log; if memory serves me correctly they were deleted for being images not licensed for commercial use or derivation. east.718 at 02:31, December 20, 2007

School of St. Mary

Why did you take off the image SOSM.jpg?KC109 (talk) 03:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle - "too new"

I no longer get the "too new" message, so it looks like it is fixed. Thanks for the quick response. — ERcheck (talk) 06:36, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Senang Hati

Hi, and thanks for dealing with this user. I'm wondering what should happen to the two AfDs that were started:

--Jack Merridew 06:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, all seems sorted. As an added bonus, this impersonators tagging cause me to add a few refs to the article on the town of Tampaksiring where the Senang Hati Foundation is located. I had forgotten all about President Soekarno's Tampaksiring Presidential Palace - and so I added a bit about it. An additional bit that I can't add - lacking a source besides locals who told me about it - is that Bung Karno built the palace overlooking a water temple where young Balinese women bathed for the view; Soekarno had quite the reputation for his conquests. --Jack Merridew 08:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Tensta

Hi, I've gone ahead and undone this deletion. Although the substub was (and is) a mess, there's plenty of potential for expansion and asserting notability [9][10] ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 21:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Chuck Bartowski Page (TV series)

Hi, I was just wondering what your exact reason was for the deletion of the page, I'm kinda new to actually editing stuff and all so I didn't fully understand the deletion process that you used and what it meant. Now that NBC has picked up a full season order for the show, and that viewer rating numbers are up all evidence is pointing that it will be around for a while, and that is deserves a more extensive page (like Heroes). I just thought I should ask before re-creating the page your opinion since you deleted it in the first place.--Ngeunit1 (talk) 06:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think that it deserves a page, and if you don't have any objections then please if you can restore it, thanks.--Ngeunit1 (talk) 06:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VIN Codes

An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of Ford VIN codes. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. On the 14th December you deleted a number of articles tagged with {{prod}} relating to VIN codes these have been listed for review at the linked discussion. Gnan garra 06:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Please, tell me where is my hate speech? Why are you guys lying? Is on my page written: "All americans should be killed or they are pigs"? It is not, cause I didn't write it. I will oppose terrorism (UCK) until the end of my life, and I don't remove anything from your profile, but why do you do that to mine? You CAN NOT call someone who fought in first lines to defend his homeland. There war war criminals on both sides, but he is not a war criminal. I respect you and I don't ask you to respect me because you are an administrator, but I ask you to either stop attacking my page or tell me why do you do it. Can I at least get back - this user opposes terrorism (without noting that UCK is albanian?). One more thing, if you continue doing this I will report you to other administrators (why don't you remove albanians who write UCK who slaughtered babies in Prizren 1998. are "liberators" on their profile?). As you have right to respect for example Einstein I have right to believe that he's an idiot, you can believe about Ratko Mladic whatever you want but until it's proven you can NOT delete him from my page. If we would do things like that then hundreds of users who respect Avril, Britney would be banned if admins like it. I ask you to return those box without being banned! Good luck! --Србија до Токија (talk) 08:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me do you know what is Seselj judged for? I watched most of the judging and they have not a single proof, until they prove it (they never will, because he is a good man), I have right that he is my idol I DON'T INSULT ANYONE. There is also no proves for Mladic so please explain me WHERE do you find hate speech? Your excuses to attack my page are not good so I m returning them (with some preparations), if you continue attacking my page I will note other administrators. I 'll change boxes now, you tell me are they good or no, but don't delete them yourself with no reason. --Србија до Токија (talk) 17:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat as long as I don't insult anyone, you have NO right to vandalize (right expression you had no reason to do it), my page. If you believe Britney is a good singer, if I 'm an admin is it normal that I ban you or vandalize your page because she was also convicted? Same thing for other singers. Also you better start removing those "This user supports UCK liberators" or I will do it, instead of attacking my pages. I respect you, but what you are doing is not good at all, you are not doing job of an admin very good. And do you know that for 5 years there is nothing against Seselj I watched it, they have nothing! And yeah do you know that it was revealed and Hague itself admited someone payed "eyewitnesses" to lie? Do you know how much books Seselj wrote? Over 50 and each of them about 1000 pages with little or no pictures. Do you know what is his IQ?--Србија до Токија (talk) 17:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey!

Why did you delete DSC 0884 s1.jpg from RJ Rosales? If it's about permission, you could've at least put that down put down a note instead of deleting it altogether. Answer back please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocean-blue399 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will the picture be usable if I get permission from the owner to use it for other sites besides Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocean-blue399 (talk • contribs) 12:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you a third time, but I have to be totally specific. To get them to grant that kind of permission, do I have to get the owner to make a word-for-word kinda thing, or is there some form they can fill out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocean-blue399 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

688

I must comment that CSD on the RFD fo the London Buses route was so speedy i didn't have time to check after i was notified. Simply south (talk) 12:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pindos (slang)

You have deleted the subject article, but the Pindus (disambig) remain. Also, note, the russian article for Pindos still exists. Russians hate Americans, even in Wikipedia. No need to reply. Just think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.200.246.207 (talk) 13:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Early deletions redux

It appears you're still doing it, e.g. [11]. Really, use Template:CSD/Subcategories. Or read the text of Category:Images with no copyright tag, which changes daily to let you know what is ready to be deleted. All the best, – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 23:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good. Thanks for working on the backlog! – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 23:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephania Bell

Re Stephania Bell: You very properly deleted this article today after its PROD tag (which I had placed there) expired. I believe the editor who created the article is a little confused about what happened to it -- he left a note on my talk page today. I'm not sure what he's likely to want to have happen, but I am going on vacation as of today and will only be checking in sporadically over the next week. I just wanted to say that he might be contacting you about this article and I thought you might like to look at my talk page -- not only the entry near the bottom, but the entry near the middle of the page -- for background information about its history. Incidentally, I don't care if you recreate the article at his request, or quite the opposite -- I'm sure your judgment will be appropriate in the circumstances. If you have questions or problems, I'm at your service. Accounting4Taste:talk 00:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ren Sohma

Hi. You deleted the Ren Sohma article after the PROD I'd placed on it expired (which is good). Alas, I didn't realize before that she was completely missing from the character list. Would it be possible to get the contents of the deleted article so I can add her to the character list? AnmaFinotera (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! All merged in :) AnmaFinotera (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceability of Image:RockfordFosgate T15kW.jpg

Greetings. I had tagged this image as replaceable, and the uploader objected that because the amp is expensive, the image is not replaceable. You were the processing admin, and you agreed with the uploader that the image is non-replaceable. I think you were incorrect -- we almost never keep non-free photos of objects that still exist, no matter how expensive they are. So I nominated the image for deletion at WP:IFD to get more opinions. It's absolutely nothing personal -- I appreciate you working on the backlog -- I just think you might not have as much experience with how we understand WP:NFCC#1. Anyway, you might want to comment at the IFD nomination. All the best, – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Miyagi Gakuin Women's Junior College

No apology is necessary, since nothing significant was lost. I was rather struck by quickness. -- Taku (talk) 07:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

You recently protected Template:GBR2. I don't know what kind of problems the template was having, but the problem with the template as it is, is that it links to Great Britain which is an article about an island, not a country. Since this template seems to be exclusively used in articles about athletes who compete or competed for the UK it should link to United Kingdom either directly or piped under "Britain" or "UK." --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 11:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Nazi Germany

Maybe this should be semi'd for a while? Spellcast (talk) 19:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Flashover movie Poster

why did you remove the the graphic i made for the film i derected? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.185.104 (talk) 00:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The image was deleted under our speedy deletion criteria because it lacked source information for a week. For help on how to correctly source images, please see our image use policy. east.718 at 00:40, December 23, 2007

Vera Isler-Leiner

Why did you delete the article about the Jewish artist Isler-Leiner? We had informed Wikipedia about the free copyright for this article. Vera Isler-Leiner and Artforum Culture Foundation gave the written permission to publish. Do have any problem which has to do with antisemitism? Please, don't go on to drive us crazy with your deletion. User:Artnet-wik

Cross River Gorilla

Hey there. I don't think that the image for the Cross River Gorilla should have been removed. The owner of the image gives permission of use for educational and non-commercial purposes, and I linked directly to the page which stated that. --Mikco (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random Smiley Award

Hi there. I noticed tonight that the links in the Random Smiley Award that I got from TomasBat had gone red. I checked and I saw that you were the deleting admin for User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward. I don't know anything about Pedia-I's being a sockpuppet or anything, but the template's a cute fun one that fosters good will and collaboration. If you're amenable, I would appreciate it if you could supply the code of the template so I can recreate it in my own userspace. Then the old page could be redirected to my new subpage. ~~There are really a lot of pages that have that template transcluded, so that last step would be neccessary too.~~ Thanks! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 04:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, the pages don't have the template transcluded, just linked to. Anyways, it would be nice for the links in those templates to turn blue again. Cheers! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 04:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for undeleting and moving the page! I see now that there are several versions of the template on other subpages I will have to redirect too, but that will have to wait until tomorrow after I get some sleep. Do you think I should eliminate the line, "originated by Pedia-I" since he's a banned user? I always thought it looked silly there even before all this. Thanks again, and have a good night. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 05:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photo of Heather Kuzmich

Why was the promotional photo of Heather Kuzmich deleted and removed? A proper rationale was presented for this promotional image. Soarhead77 (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geek squad

Hi!
I think this page is redundant, isn't it? There's already an article called Geek Squad. I'm not sure but I think both cover the same topic. If I'm right would you please delete one of them? Thanks. --Fromgermany (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Prods

Hello East718, I noticed that on the 23rd of December you deleted en masse a whole raft of expired prods. In future could you please be sure to follow policy correctly (Wikipedia:PROD#Procedure_for_administrators). With regard to No.3 "If you agree that the article should be deleted, delete it giving an informative deletion reason" you failed to do this for any of the deleted prods. Your only deletion reason for all of them was, "Uncontested proposed deletion" with all due respect that really isn't adequate. My regards to you, RMHED (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:AzaToth/twinkledeprod.js can be helpful. ;-) --Maxim_(talk) 14:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental deletion

Just so you’ll know, I reverted this edit, where you delete more than you probably intended. --teb728 t c 21:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protection issues

Hello East718. I added your salt page to Wikipedia:Protected titles/Specific Admin. You should probably clarify the entry. Could you also go easy on the mass protection of low risk templates as well. Hundreds of them were transcluded onto a only few pages. Thanks. While I am here I will also mention that fully protecting your own talk archives is really against policy. People may still want to edit them for a variety of legitimate reasons. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of broken redirects

Hello East718, I see you've been deleting plenty of broken redirects — were you using the broken redirect tool for this ? I ask because I just added 10 minutes ago the feature that allows listing of other namespaces than main, and I notice that the list is already almost empty because you deleted all of them. In any case, you are way too fast for me: you removed all the material I was using for testing the script ;-) (and I say this is in a positive way — I know there will be more examples all the time). Cheers, Schutz (talk) 22:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't stop deleting these redirects — this was a joke and a way to congratulate you for your efficiency. Cheers, Schutz (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Beaver Article

Why did you/Wikipedia remove so much information regarding Mr. Beaver and his accomplishments? the Gagliardi Trophy is part of Project college football yet you removed the reference, deleted the photos and have made the page a nothing page. Are you going to follow suit and remove Blake Elliott, Jim Ballard and the others listed. I can't believe that someone is removing this information. --Ryanjcole (talk) 23:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

East, I am the photographer. I gave it a release. What more is needed? --Ryanjcole (talk) 01:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I sent the email in. Giving blanket permission for any D3sports.com photos with the logo -- I add the logo specifically for posting on websites like Wikipedia -- so that if someone does want to take it it would difficult to use it for anything noteworthy without the logo. Other websites in the D3sports.com family include D3football.com, D3hoops.com, D3baseball.com and D3soccer.com for news, D3boards.com, D3wiki.com (unused, future development) and D3photography.com for the photographic end of our work. We have a few other domains but none of them are slotted for development in the next few years. Thank you again for reinstating the images. I wasn't looking forward to redoing the work without the logo and I hope the email I sent in covers being able to upload similarly marked images in the future. --Ryanjcole (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quackery

Reverted. —Whig (talk) 00:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will hold off on more edits for now anyhow as it's Christmas and I'm visiting family. As far as the 1RR restrictions, I protest them. If someone blocks me on that account, I would request review. —Whig (talk) 00:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeking a conflict but the indefinite block was inappropriate. I protest it as such. Any restrictions consequent to an inappropriate block are voluntary and do not give cause to being blocked again. —Whig (talk) 00:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tecate Boys

Why did you delete the page about this Chicano group at California State University Long Beach? This group was founded to help achieve academic success for fellow Chicano Students on campus. Are you racist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.139.98.78 (talk • contribs)

Talk/Rider brian Jakabcin

Hi I was creating a page for the MinimotoGP rider and it was deleted I don't understand why? I correctly followed the appropriate format and provided valid external links and references? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.177.131.159 (talk • contribs)

Hi! I've never deleted an article called "Brian Jakabcin", but two other administrators have: Jj137 and Jerry. Perhaps you would be helped better by contacting them. east.718 at 04:43, December 24, 2007

user-requested deletions

I need some help with some images that I unfortunately have to delete. Reason being almost all of them were shot for another photographer who hired me as a second shooter for some of his weddings. Although I believe I have legal copyright to the images, my posting them here does not conform with the permissions granted for reprinting as per the OTHER photographer's contract with his clients. And since NONE of them were photographed in a public venue -- they were all private affairs -- I don't believe there is any "shot in public" rational that can be applied. You have deleted another image for me, can I list here the remaining images I need deleted? --Mactographer (talk) 23:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks. You're a life saver! Here they are. A lot of them are in commons, can you delete there too?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bride-in-dress.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:First-dance.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bride-veil.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Groom-and-flower.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bride-in-gown.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wet-wedding.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A-new-bride.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bride-flowers.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Couple_in_arms.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Indian-bride.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Marriage-license-signing.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Groomsmile.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bride-portrait.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bride-by-pillar.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Flowergirl-bride.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Dunsmuir-wedding-walk.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A_romantic_kiss.jpg

There might be a few more, but this is the bulk of them.

Thanks so much!!

--Mactographer (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help. I will run thru the rest of the images and see if I have a couple more or not. Thanks again!! --Mactographer (talk) 01:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, here's all the rest I can find. I "think" I found all the rest I need deleted. Thanks so much!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bride-groom-walking.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rings-2006.jpg
--Mactographer (talk) 03:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again!! I think that's it! --Mactographer (talk) 04:25, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, looks like this one is still here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Rings-2006.jpg --Mactographer (talk) 10:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Montenegro

To change this bit:

into:

The WWII flag isn't a legal flag - it's just the military flag used only becasue the real ones were banned. And the 1876 one is the one under which Montenegro became recognized as an independent country. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

? Hm. There seems to be an error... --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! The below "var" has to be changed accordingly too. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yarennoka page

I appreciate your help with working on the Yarennoka article. I've been adding some side-notes with more information about the event, but user "Tuckdogg" keeps deleting my changes and edits things to his liking. Can you help me at all with this? Reith52 (talk) 20:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another coding question

Hey, how's it going? I've got another question, this one's again about signatures. For some reason, even though I've got my sig in an inline DIV, it only displays inline on lines that have been indented somehow, either from a colon or a template (such as the one you've got around your talk page content). Otherwise it always goes on a new line. My sig is at User:Equazcion/s. If you could give me a hint on how to try and fix this I'd really appreciate it. Thanks!

Equazcion •✗/C • 20:53, 12/25/2007

I think it could be because a previous element was displayed block-style (inline after block will still block). Can you get at me with a screenshot? east.718 at 21:04, December 25, 2007

Thanks -- I added a test section to the end of my talk page, you can see the result there.

Equazcion •✗/C • 21:08, 12/25/2007

Your top and bottom margins are so large, that they're breaking the borders of the block. Lose the margins or drop the font size, and you should be OK. east.718 at 21:10, December 25, 2007

The font is already at 10px, I dunno how much smaller I can go. I tried adding margin:0 but that didn't do it. It's possible this is just a caveat of mediawiki or something but if you think of anything else let me know. Thanks again :) PS. Did you mean padding rather than margins?

Equazcion •✗/C • 21:17, 12/25/2007

Maybe, I can never remember which is which. Anyway, the quick fix on your talk page should work. east.718 at 21:19, December 25, 2007

Ha. I knew you were the one to ask. I didn't know you could use small's like that. You rule. Thanks big time!

Equazcion •✗/C • 21:21, 12/25/2007

Recurring weapons in the legend of zelda series

I'm not sure why a delete happened, since I provided evidence of reliable sources, and a redirect would have been cleaner, but oh well. Could you please copy the page to User:KrytenKoro/Universe of The Legend of Zelda series/Items, like I several times requested? We still need to merge the info, if it can't have a separate article.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 01:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't do it soon, can you at least give me an estimate as to when it will be done? We were planning on working on the project as soon as classes ended, so we kind of need that information.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is pathetic

All right, what the heck? I was trying to create a page (admittedly, it probably would have been considered a stub, but it was a start), and a legitimate page it was (admittedly, about a conspiracy theory, but a legitimate conspiracy theory), but almost before I got back to look at it, it was gone! I know this was done to fast to be human, so I call it a VERY flawed system, that just deletes pages and threatens users who create them, regardless of the pages' true significance. I trust that you will get on this soon, but in the meantime, I'd very much appreciate it if you would not count these occurences as warnings, and if you would at least reestablish the page (Azerbaijan does not exist). --Aztruth (talk) 07:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maelgwnbot

I've unblocked User:Maelgwn's bot as it was clearly doing as requested here. Secretlondon (talk) 09:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the worning

The editors are not applying same policies on all articles and going some topics unfair weight. and i already declared that i use that term about crusade as a literal sentence, but these admins are just pushing these words to other side. --Faraz Ahmad (talk) 09:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mart Sander images

User:Zanderz has stated: "my name is Mart Sander, and I do hold copyright to each of the pictures that I have uploaded. These were made by the photographers who work for me, they have been paid for their work and resultingly I own the copyright. Uploading the pictures I do release them into public domain. If there are any problems, my e-mail is mart@martsander.com. See [12]

Can you reinstate this image? Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halsdon1.jpg

Hello Can you let me know why you removed the photosgraph from the page on Furse (surname)? I am sure you have your reasons, but I'd like to know what they are so I can avoid errors. The photograph is copyrighted, but freely available as it is watermarked. I hoped I made that clear on the delcaration page, but perhaps not. Thanks Showjumpersam (talk) 00:28, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for getting back to me, re: the photo. As it happens, that photo is no longer freely available from the website (www.beafordarts.co.uk) as it once was -- but if it being watermarked is enbough on it's own I won't argue! I had put it in as there are few of that part of the world at that time and it gives a nicer 'quick reference' for landed gentry in the westcountry.

Thanks again! Showjumpersam (talk) 00:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonfly CMS

Hello, before i reopen the Dragonly CMS page, i wanted to ask you why you deleted it, i need to understand, i dont wanna do something thats is not how wikipedia wants it to be, and i dont want to create an open/delete war, so please could you explain to a new wikipedia member like me why you deleted the page, Dragonfly CMS is an opensource software, so i tried to do a similar page like the one about Drupal another opensource cms, but the Dragonfly CMS page got deleted and not the Drupal page, so whats the difference, what did i do wrong? Chris963 (talk) 00:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, me again, you replied to me that the Dragonfly CMS page was closed AFTER a discussion about it ... my question: how do you define "after", the discussion was open since few days, the last reply to that discussion was mine, where it told the "readers" that i had fixed WP:N concerns, so why didnt you wait for the end of the discussion? ([[13]])

Another question, as i said before, i had added the sources to the wikipedia page, the deletation review had been opened because of that, so if i fix something and there is no more reason to delete, why did you have to delete it? For example if we take a look, at the first deletation review, we clearly see that most people are in favor to keep the article, but it got deleted, so before i open one more deletation review, i want to understand why articles get closed whatever i or others say? please explain ;)

Another question i have is, as i wrote on my page, i treied to create a similar page, like the one for Drupal, both pages were almost the same, except the informations of course ;) so why do you delete the Dragonfly CMS page, and dont touch the Drupal page? Chris963 (talk) 20:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you ignore my messages and dont talk to me? Chris963 (talk) 15:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Felony Records

Hi, I've just asked at WP:DRV for restoration of Butt Trumpet and 1208 (band), which I feel were unjustly lumped together with the Felony Records AfD (which, in and of itself, I am not questioning). Please feel free to comment. Chubbles (talk) 00:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Homeopathy

I have been reviewing some of the conversations and would like to make a constructive response to the claims that homeopathy has been somehow disproven and that water memory is absurd. I have a source that answers this objection, as follows:

“

Such strongly critical or downright sarcastic or ironic stances do not appear entirely justified: the concept of the "memory of water" is no more than a metaphor denoting the hypothesis whereby the physicochemical properties of water can be modified by a solute and remain so for a certain period of time even in the absence of the solute itself. If this were true, biology and medicine would undergo not a revolution, but certainly a significant increase in knowledge and in the related applications. It is not a matter here of postulating an "entity" (memory) which may reside in the water, but of studying the physicochemical properties of water itself. In this sense, talking about memory is not so very different from talking about temperature, dielectric constants, viscosity, and other properties.

An example may serve to clarify the concept here: if we take a little water and put it in the freezer, after a certain period of time it will freeze. On removing the water from the freezer, it will be observed that the block of ice, though now exposed to room temperature, will remain a block of ice for some time. Thus, there exists in water a property which enables it to "remember" for a certain amount of time that it has been kept in the freezer. For those who find this example self-evident, we can give another: if we take a tape coated with ferric hydroxide and subject it, as it is running, to a series of differences in potential in precise succession, changes in charge occur on the magnetic substrate; the tape will remember those changes for hundreds of years. It is not the memory of water, in this case, but the memory of iron, which consists in a particular form that the magnetic substrate assumes on the tape.

”

—Whig (talk) 01:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to post the above quote, in reaponse to Filll's comment.[14]. Would it be appropriate to provide a source citation as well? —Whig (talk) 01:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I posted it, and he has replied disregarding the entirety of the authors' point. Do you think it would be constructive for me to participate in a responsive dialogue? —Whig (talk) 04:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Removal (Taylor_Roberts.jpg)

Hey, what image license should I use for Taylor_Roberts.jpg? It is the subject's photograph, she owns the rights to it, and wants it up online. How should I go about getting this up correctly? I'm only accustomed to placing my chemical structures up that I've made and released to public domain. Thanks! (Ccroberts^{( t · c · g )} 03:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Re: Old deletion discussions

Wow, somebody got a bot on the task! I see red! :) JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent SD Tag Removal From Page

Hello, I tagged what appears to be a non-notable biography page, Krystie McCauley, for speedy deletion under db-bio; but several users have been continually removing the tag instead of following its instructions for holding onto the page. I am willing to have the page go to AfD if others view it as being notable, but I am not convinced given that the people removing the tag are an IP user and a user with no history other than the page in question. Thanks. Mh29255 (talk) 08:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I just wanted to get some clarification. Mh29255 (talk) 08:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ottoman

why did you removed that work?--Orkh (talk) 08:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

but it was there for 2 years? can you put that pic there again? its very important work i think.--Orkh (talk) 08:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, but since last mounth that pic is under attack by 2-3 guys. could you protect it with me pls? thanks for your help.--Orkh (talk) 08:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the image?

I'm talking about Crusader invasion of Egypt? Leave a note in the discussion page explaining your motive. The image is accurate and licensed. Tourskin (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

aaaaahh... so sorry... the thing is i thought I had made a mistake in the licensing. Ok, sorry then about that. Tourskin (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Clifford

You recently removed the photo of this actor in one of his near-current TV roles. As far as I could see, the photo was properly labelled as fair use, with a rationale etc. Please let me know why you removed it.

Thank you. Patche99z (talk) 12:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zombies!

Hi - saw a couple of recent "zombie" blocks. If/when you have the time it would be good to hear where you found the info - no disagreement at all as the behaviour is cross wiki, just trying to widen my education! Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time, appreciated. I've bumped into quite a bit of Xrumer stuff on other wikis. I'll take a look at your block log from time to time and block the IPs elsewhere at the very least. I'll maybe nudge a few folk too, always good to keep the place clean :) Regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More appreciation! I've pointed Drini towards it too as he was cleaning some small wikis as well. I would so like to see cross wiki blocking, the time would be spent much more effectively, cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aston Students Guild

You should not have deleted the above. I was in the process of improving it for the new contributor who had created it, and I had placed a 'hangon' on the article. Aston University is a significant and notable university and their guild without doubt deserves an article. I will be recreating it if possible for the contributor.Paste (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ma (negative space)

Thanks for noticing the delete tag but should you not give some sort of reason for declining it so soon? Abtract (talk) 21:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A new flavor of SALT

Hello, I'm dropping you a note because you are listed on Wikipedia:Protected titles/Specific Admin as an admin that is maintaining a personal SALT page. Recent software updates now allow deleted pages to be protected just like other pages. Please consider migrating any pages on your personal list to normal protections, and clearing them off of your list. There still may be situations where a personal list may be the best way to handle a page though. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Dear Mr. East. I would like to enquire as to why did you remove the photos on Samy Vellu, Karpal Singh and Ong Ka Ting just to name a few. As far as I know, the Bahasa Melayu Wikipedia uses these picturesso far without incident. Also, I would like to point out that you might have unintentionally erased the Samy Vellu article too. I am not a master Wikipedian, so I hope you can resolve this. Thank you very much KMChin (talk) 03:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr. East, thank you for your brisk reply. To be honest with you, I don't know what those pictures are licenced under. They were captured by the Malaysian Government, and people have the right to use it (in your workplace, home etc.). Under what are these photos licenced? Thank you KMChin (talk) 03:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Vincent Atanasoff

Hi, there. You declined the request to permanent semi-protect this page. (No reason was given.) Can you advise as to what I should do next? Having to revert the same vandalism to this page every day "feels" like a revert war. Robert K S (talk) 03:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's only happened once in the last week. The page was semi-protected. When the temporary semi-protection was lifted, it was back to the vandalism. Do you need a dozen more reverts before the page is semi-protected? If you look into it a bit closer, it's not a content dispute. The figure in question was an American with paternal Bulgarian ancestry. He never held a Bulgarian citizenship. His nationality was American and only American. If someone edited the lead of George W. Bush on a daily basis to assign him British (or French, or Chinese, or Armenian) nationality, is that a content dispute, or is that vandalism? If you look at the edit history, the vandal leaves no room for discussion or rationality: "I am just going to remove American and only leave Bulgarian. ... Tit for tat, from now on no more American will be included day after day!" ... "There all done, only Bulgarian to be included! When someone is plainly bieased, we too can be this way, until NPV is established. No compromises!" ... "From now on I and other Bulgarians will outright be removing 'American' as Robert K S removes 'Bulgarian'. PLain and simple, the battle will go on forever if need be!" etc. Robert K S (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A few days on this and no reply, but you didn't answer my question. What's the next step? An IP user repeatedly vandalizes the page with the declared intention to keep doing so. (A message on that IP user's talk page seems to indicate that the IP user is a sock puppet for a registered user who has made a crusade of the same edit, but I have no way of verifying that.) Both the IP user and the other user have edit histories that are limited solely to articles dealing with Bulgaria, and have talk histories indicating they have made nothing but contentious edits intended to heighten the "glory" of Bulgaria on Wikipedia (in other words, boosterism). Is there anything to do to stop the vandalism, or do I just go back to reverting every day? Robert K S (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright confusion

Hello. Yesterday you removed the g12 speedy tag I'd placed on Bradford Colliery. I was surprised by this decision; the page I referred to makes an entirely credible claim that this is a National Coal Board document dating from 1959, which means it will still be under crown copyright (and thus not licensable under the GFDL) for another two years. The Wikipedia article is clearly a modified version of the same original text (nobody writes something like that as the first draft of an article). As a former admin with several thousand copyright deletions under my belt, I'm dead certain this should go, and I hope you'll reconsider this call. Cheers, --Robth^Talk 06:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vedanta Kesari : cover page

hi, You have removed the cover page of Vedanta Kesari that i had added for my article on Vedanta Kesari at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedanta_Kesari I had obtained the approval of the Editor of the magazine with whom the copyrights exist. Could you please let me know if there was anything wrong on my side in choosing the correct copyright template etc. Thanks in advance Ramashray —Preceding comment was added at 10:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to non-existent pages

Dear East718, you deleted several re-directs I made. Yes, they were to a non-existent page, but that page is a page that I am creating and working on as we speak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Random Pipings (talk • contribs) 15:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GROWAPAIR

Where'd this guy go? It wasn't advice I gave too often, but I guess often enough to notice it's absence pretty darn quick. :-( -- Kendrick7^talk 21:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask John Reaves, who deleted Wikipedia:Stop whining already. Once that happened, GROWAPAIR was deleted as a broken redirect. However, after a cursory glance at the deleted article, I'd guess that it got deleted because it was unnecessarily harsh. I'd love to see a similar essay, but less on the hardassness... EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benito Giuliani

Hello, I don't remember receiving a response to my question a few days ago, regarding your post on my talk page. Here it is again, just in case you missed it:

Don't ever do what again? --Latish redone (formerly All in) (talk) 00:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

which was in response to this message on my talk page:

Don't ever do that again. east.718 at 04:40, December 17, 2007

--Latish redone (formerly All in) (talk) 22:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Danaullman

I had an offline conversation with Dana Ullman, User:Danaullman on Wikipedia. He is evidently a well regarded expert in his field, however well or poorly that field is held in the regard of some people. In any case, he is a new user of Wikipedia and made a number of mistakes which he admits. He would like to be able to return to editing Wikipedia under some kind of mentorship but would like an unbiased person, and not one of the anti-homeopath lobby to help him learn the rules and follow them. I am making this request with his knowledge and consent but he did not ask me to do so. —Whig (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate the suggestion. As I understand he is blocked I will ask in his behalf, though from what I understand him to have done it is correct that he was blocked in my opinion. He was very direct with me and I believe he wants to be a constructive editor, however. —Whig (talk) 06:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to understand that it is not correct to label homeopathy as pseudoscience. It is a system of medicine which either does or does not work, and depending on whether you rely upon empirical or statistical methods as your tool you may have a different understanding. Both are part of science. —Whig (talk) 23:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned talk pages

Hi east, just letting you know that I have successfully cleared your list orphaned talk pages, with the exception of one which I'm not particularly sure about. Cheers, Spebi 02:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You too! :) Spebi 02:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot U1

How were you able to delete those ClueBot subpages so quickly? jj137 ^♠ 05:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was unaware of that. jj137 ^♠ 05:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your support in my successful RFA. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 07:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undapakru

Undapakru - Could you explain the reason why you'd deleted the image? It comes under fair use of living person, right? & I don't think there is any copyvio. Thanks, --Avinesh Jose (talk) 10:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outsidepchs.jpeg

Why exactly was this image removed from Port Charlotte High School? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 23:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I guess I'll try to take a picture of the school myself without copyright. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 16:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signature request

Hey, I really like your signature, I was wondering if you could make me one? Your choice on how it looks, just no girly colors! --n1yaN t 00:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alina Smith

Hello, I see you've been working with speedy deletions. Could you delete Alina Smith so I can move Alina there? The article was duplicated. I'm not sure if i put the right CSD tag on it. Thanks so much. --Dan Leveille^TALK 11:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. Thanks anyway. I didn't realize you were currently inactive. --Dan Leveille^TALK 11:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I'm trying to get Od Mishehu to delete the page, then I can redirect it. But some anonymous user is editing it and doesn't understand what he's doing. I'll figure it out - and it's 6:45am. I need to go to sleep, haha. --Dan Leveille^TALK 11:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks buddy, and thanks for fixing my talk page. :) You're my favorite! --Dan Leveille^TALK 12:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Country data Yugoslavia

Hello. The protected page Template:Country data Yugoslavia links to Serbia for its tennis alias for some reason. Even though Yugoslavia Davis Cup team and Yugoslavia Fed Cup team both exist, the page is linking the tennis templates to the Serbian versions. Could you remedy this? Much appreciated. --Thewanderer (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted

here. I intend to respond on Talk:Quackery. —Whig (talk) 21:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted again and I object to this one. I would like your suggestion on proceeding, and will pause for now. —Whig (talk) 01:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuant to discussion of this, I have been accused of a personal attack on my talk page. —Whig (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considerable heat is also being shed in my direction here. —Whig (talk) 21:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk revert. —Whig (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. —Whig (talk) 02:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PearsonWidrig DanceTheater

Why don't you like the tone warnings on the top of that article? [15] Just wondering, I don't really have a strong preference. - cohesion 04:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, yeah, I should remove those faster. Sorry for the trouble. :) - cohesion 05:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Chinese deletions

Today, you deleted my page Roufous-tailed Rock Thrush (in foreign languages) despite the fact I had requested from another administrator assistance in what I consider to be the rogue undo-ing action of another wikipedia author.

I had added information that I consider valuable to the Roufous-tailed Rock Thrush page, and another user had deleted it without really any discussion whatsoever. My understanding is that Wikipedia is an open encyclopedia and that I have as much rights as any other non-administrator to add valuable information.

Because the other user Jimfbleak had deleted the information, I asked for intercession and explained the situation on the talk page. While waiting, you deleted the Roufous-tailed Rock Thrush (in foreign languages) page without addressing my concerns, discussing the action or evidently even consulting the administrator whom I had e-mailed for intercession.

I feel strongly that Jimfbleak's deletion of my information is uncalled for. If it turns out that, like Jimfbleak, the English Wikipedia is xenophobic, I would be very sad. I hope you will undo your deletion of my page and/or address the issues. Wakablogger. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wakablogger (talk • contribs)

Vandalism on the Landmark Education page

User:Spacefarer is hacking/vandalising the page to bits with no use of the discussion page. Suggesting revert to page before his chooping occurred and freezing it. Apparently there is an LE convention (Global Transformation 2020) very soon, hence the rapid edits. Anything you can do to help out would be appreciated.--Pax Arcane 17:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]