Jump to content

User talk:Diannaa/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7→Archive 10

Has that rangeblock expired yet?

Because I think he's back... HalfShadow 17:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

No, it does not expire until tomorrow. I will replace it with the wider range block and see if we can fix the problem. --Diannaa (Talk) 21:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
It is a bank holiday in some parts of the UK so perhaps he was logged on at his hotel or his gran's. Whatever. I have applied the wider range block and we'll try it for a week. If no innocent bystanders are calling for my blood we will try a longer block. --Diannaa (Talk) 21:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
The only other option is an indef SP, otherwise he'll just wait it out. You're sure this probably won't effect anyone but him? I'd prefer not to go SP; as I said it'd probably have to be until one of us dies, but if this is causing disruption I'd rather not be responsible for that. HalfShadow 21:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
The wider range block affects some 8000 IPs but when I checked, only eight of those IPs had actually edited the encyclopedia during the months of October and November. One person did a few edits on a star trek article, and another chap updated a few articles about various towns in Britain. I think I would like to proceed, as if he can't get through, eventually he will get bored with trying and will get a life, maybe. If the other folks are keen to edit, they will still be able to create accounts elsewhere and then edit from this range. Or we could go back to the narrower ranges under the assumption that our fellow just had the day off and went out of town. An indef on your talk page is of limited value as he will just find someone else to pester. --Diannaa (Talk) 21:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
I'll leave that up to you then. It's just this guy's been doing this for two months straight, so we may have a lifetimer here. HalfShadow 22:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I understand. I will leave it with the bigger range for a week and then decide where to go with it next based on what happens. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Any clue why he would copy this diff? Or does it look random? --Diannaa (Talk) 22:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Might as well drop the rangeblock and go indef sp. I'm not playing tag with the little fuck. HalfShadow 17:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Courcelles has indef semi'd your talk. Sorry this did not work out. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

New username

Do you like my new username? WAYNESLAM 22:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

It's great!! --Diannaa (Talk) 23:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!!! WAYNESLAM 23:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

edit conflict

Sorry, but I edit conflicted with you while copying the numbers from my slot on the page to the leaderboard, which changes my ranking. You can check my contributions and see that I did not copyedit beyond the timelimit. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, there are always a few glitches of this kind. Don't worry, I trust you. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Final newsletter

The final newsletter for the Guild of Copy Editors November 2010 backlog elimination drive is in development here. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 01:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I missed reading your first message. Yes, I think it is good to go now. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Barnstars

Calculations for barnstars are done and are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/November 2010/Barnstars for review. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

96.248.218.94

I just reverted some comments from this IP on their own talkpage directed at all of us; I hope that my edit was not out of line. If you agree, would you consider revoking talk page access for the duration of the block? Nothing productive is coming from this IP address. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 04:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

I think you are right; I have revoked talk page access. --Diannaa (Talk) 05:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Hey, how are you liking your new job here? ;) Drmies (talk) 05:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
It's not so bad. What a busy talk page! --Diannaa (Talk) 05:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Why did you delete the International Cinematographers Guild

I work at The Cinematographers Guild and decided to create a page for us, but it was instantly deleted before I had a chance to respond to the Speedy Deletion notice. You'll see the the Writer's Guild, a sister local to us, has a similar page up. Can you please replace the page that I had created, since I had not had a chance to save a backup copy of it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jill.bronner (talk • contribs) 01:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in creating an article for this organisation for wikipedia. There are several problems with your submission. You cannot post copyright material on Wikipedia even if you are the copyright holder, unless special licensing permissions are in place. That is because Wikipedia aims to be freely distributable and copyable by anyone, and all content must have the appropriate documentation in place before that can happen. Please see this policy Wikipedia:Copyrights which explains how it works.
The second problem is conflict of interest. Writing an article about your own organisation or that of a client is strongly discouraged, as it is difficult to maintain the required neutral point of view.
So if you wish to add the copyrighted content to a Wikipedia article, the proper licenses and permissions will have to be in place. Please see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how that would be done. Or, you could write a new article that does not closely paraphrase the material available on line. And you would have to avoid the conflict of interest guideline while doing so. Even then, the article could be speedily deleted if the organisation is deemed not notable enough for an article. Sorry the reply could not be more favourable. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 01:27, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Userfication request

Please userfy LadyKiller(band) for User:LadyKillerRock. Gigs (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Now what?

OK, so you beat me by two minutes (see User talk:LadyKillerRock)...but mine is technically more correct since the "band" is not capitalized...what to do now? :-)  Frank  |  talk  01:40, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

I will delete mine. Thanks for your help (not) :P --Diannaa (Talk) 01:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I was just looking to inject a little wiki-humor. You clearly beat me...2 minutes is an eternity. :-)  Frank  |  talk  02:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes but mine was capitalised incorrectly, a total userfy fail. You win this round, Frank. Well played. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
As my kids would say - deadpan - lol. (Yes, I think it can be uncapitalized now, in an understated sort of way.)  Frank  |  talk  02:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Mind deleting a few categories?

I emptied these categories as part of the Great Backlog Drive. Category:Articles_with_minor_POV_problems_from_January_2008, Category:Articles_with_minor_POV_problems_from_February_2008, Category:Articles_with_minor_POV_problems_from_March_2008 However, I can't delete them and some of them have sat for a couple days. Would you mind deleting them? Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

All done :7 --Diannaa (Talk) 06:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

CSD?

Hi D! Could you give me your take on this, just to share opinions? I AfD'd this after cautiously not wanting to slap a G3 on it immediately; However, the way the AfD is going, it seems I would have been right anyway. Is there anything stopping me from doing a G3 right now before the AfD runs its full term?--Kudpung (talk) 09:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) "G3 - hoax" is only used for blatant hoaxes, where the misinformation is so obvious it constitutes complete vandalism. I did remove the negative unsourced content. (I have made a user subpage containing examples of articles deleted under CSD here.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Apparently, the admin thought it was G3 too. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I am not sure I agree with G3, though the references and quoted reviews do not check out. The artist actually exists. But he has only got one song available so far, and does not meet notability guidelines IMO, so it could have been deleted under A7. The article also qualifies for a BLP prod as it is unreferenced.
In a more general sense, I think the article qualifies for speedy deletion as the guideline says "Speedy deletion is intended to reduce the time spent on deletion discussions for pages or media with no practical chance of surviving discussion." And since Courcelles deleted the article under a speedy deletion criterion, it looks like the fact that you started the AFD process does not preclude proposing a speedy if one of the criteria fit. A speedy tag should not be applied to an article that has survived one of the other deletion processes. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:49, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


AfD

Hello. I was trying to nominate an article for deletion, but I'm pretty sure I screwed it up. If you could help me out it would be much appreciated. The article is Saleem Shahzad. Thanks! --TwistOfCain (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive!

We have reached the end of our fourth backlog elimination drive. Thanks to all who participated.

Stats

GOCE November 2010 backlog elimination drive graphs
  • 58 people signed up for this drive. Of these, 48 people participated in the drive.
  • Although we did not eliminate the months we planned to (January, February, and March 2009; and August, September, and October 2010), we did reduce the backlog by 627 articles (11.2%), which was over our goal of 10%.
  • 49 awards will go out to 33 of 48 participants. Check out the complete list of barnstar winners here.

Barnstars

If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you participated in the September 2010 backlog elimination drive, you may have earned roll-over words (more details can be found here). These roll-over words count as credit towards earning barnstars, except for leaderboard awards. We will be delivering these barnstars within the next couple of weeks.

Our next drive is scheduled for January 2011. In the meantime, please consider helping out at the Wikification drive or any of the other places where help with backlogs is needed.

Thank you for participating in the last 2010 backlog elimination drive! We look forward to seeing you in January!

Your drive coordinators –The UtahraptorTalk to me/Contributions, S Masters (talk), and Diannaa (Talk)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

Question: If we didn't total our word counts by Nov. 30 11:59pm, then they don't count towards our awards in the end, right? Even if we did the work? thanks --Aichikawa (talk) 17:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately that is correct. There is only about a 5-minute grace period to get your material posted, as the page is usually closed right on time. --Diannaa (Talk) 08:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

George Augustus Selwyn

Deleting something because you don't like the reference is a lot easier but much less helpful than finding a reference that might be considered more acceptable. George Selwyn's alleged necrophilia is perhaps the most historically remembered fact about him. I can add a reference to a book instead of that website but it contains the same info and is less accessible.173.112.102.252 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC).

For something so peculiar it would be better to use them both. Books are totally acceptable as references. --Diannaa (Talk) 06:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
I am new to editing and unsure how to add it, could you give me a hand? It is in The Aristocrats by Stella Tillyard but I don't have the page number. I see in Google Books there is a reference in "The misfits:a study of sexual outsiders" by Colin Wilson on page 17. How would that be added?173.112.102.252 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC).

Here is the correct format:

<ref>{{cite book |title=The Misfits: A study of Sexual Outsiders |last=Wilson |first=Colin |year=1988 |publisher=Grafton |page= 17}}<ref>

You paste this in after the info you glean from the book. Then the wiki formatting automatically does its thing and the citation appears down below in the refercences section. There is also a cite template for information from the internet; here is a blank:

<ref>{{cite web |url= |title= |author= |date= |publisher= |accessdate= }}</ref>

Unfortunately omni.sytes.net seems to be a blacklisted website, so I have removed that source from the article. I am logging off now so if there are any further questions I'll get back to you tomorrow. Happy editing! --Diannaa (Talk) 06:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the info and helping with this. I am going to add the famous quote by Henry Fox and reference the Tillyard book I will get the page number later.173.112.102.252 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC).

Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive

22 articles already? It looks like you stole my technique of wikifying really short articles! :) Thanks for working so hard ... this drive is pretty much going downhill right now... Guoguo12--Talk--  20:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

I also removed many from the category that did not actually need wikification. I will do some more tomorrow. Short articles can be found using Catscan. If you want to use it and don't know how, please let me know. --Diannaa (Talk)

Withdrawing from elections?

Hi Dianna, can I withdraw from the current election? I just don't think I should run anymore after a few things happened here on Wikipedia. Thanks! Derild4921Review Me! 01:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh I am so sorry you had a bad experience. You were in a good position to win a post. I will mark you as withdrawn from the election. --Diannaa (Talk) 06:37, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
It's fine, just a question opened my eyes a bit. I'll do some more work in the future drives and run again next time. :). Thanks! Derild4921Review Me! 15:43, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Okay, that's the spirit. Cheers! --Diannaa (Talk) 15:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to hear about your bad experiences, Derild. We always appreciate your help and hope to see you around the GOCE. – SMasters (talk) 16:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
On another matter, Diannaa, I am sorry that I posted out a few notes to a handful of editors to alert them to the elections. A few of them voted for you as well. The original thinking for me to write to them was that I thought, why not write to some editors who do use the request page, but are not GOCE members, and let them know that we are getting more organized, and are alive and kicking. I did it in good faith, but I guess now it has turned on me. If I really wanted to lobby for votes, I would have written to 100 editors, not 19. I consider us as friends and co-workers here, and have been for a fairly long time. I would hate to see this put a wedge between us. At one stage today I got a bit demoralized and considered if I should pull out. I do feel that the questioning is bordering on a personal attack against me. But I think I need to stand up and not be bullied by this one user. If you feel that I have been unfair, please do let me know, and I will consider any appropriate actions. Thanks. – SMasters (talk) 16:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
No, just leave it alone. It is better if you win as you are the better candidate. --Diannaa (Talk) 16:23, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
OK, thanks for understanding. I feel a lot better now. – SMasters (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Your barnstar

The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star
I award you this exclusive barnstar, the Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Barnstar, for your exceptional copyediting efforts during the GoCE November 2010 Drive, where you copyedited an impressive 164 articles with a combined total of 87,095 words (147,982, with rollover words), Diannaa, I hereby induct you into the exclusive Order of the Caretaker club. Congratulations, and thank you for all your hard work! — Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:21, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Diannaa. You have new messages at SMasters's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GOCE leaderboard awards

Leaderboard Award–Article Count–2nd Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Diannaa for copy editing a total of 164 articles (Second Place) during the Guild of Copy Editors' November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations and thank you. – SMasters (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


Leaderboard Award–Word Count–4th Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Diannaa for copy editing a total of 87,095 words (Fourth Place) during the Guild of Copy Editors' November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations and thank you for a great effort! – SMasters (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


Leaderboard Award–5K+ Articles–5th Place
This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Diannaa for copy editing a total of two 5K+ articles (Fifth Place) during the Guild of Copy Editors' November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations and thank you. – SMasters (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism on your talk page

You know, you can block your most recent talk page vandal for block evasion. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 22:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I was gonna try a range block but your idea is better as the range block would affect 268,000,000 people !!!! --Diannaa (Talk) 22:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Fortunately, the software won't actually let you perform that large of a block! The biggest you can do is a /16, that blocks 65,536 people. (I personally am loathe to do anything larger than /19) Courcelles 23:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I thought it was hilarious. Luckily he quit after the second block. Are there that many people in the UK?? OOpsie, there goes continental Europe. My bad! --Diannaa (Talk)
Don't joke too much! Even with the limit of /16, it is still possible to block access to Wikipedia from entire countries, especially in the middle east and the south Pacific. (A mere /20 will, for instance, take out all access from the nation of Vanuatu!) Courcelles 00:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Let me put it this way, Diannaa. A range block like that would be enough to wipe out editing access to every single Canadian eight times. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 00:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Or you can block two IPs and wipe out the entire nation of Qatar? access_denied (talk) 04:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting the vandalism on my talk page :) --5 albert square (talk) 23:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

No prob, glad to. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

On the Beiber protection

Diannaa, placing a six month full protection on an article is not in line with policy. Take out the VOA's that are so old they could be sold as vintage Champagne, add PC2 on top of semi; but you can't lock everyone out of an article for half a year on account of some autoconfirmed vandalism. Courcelles 03:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC) :All right. What would you recommend? --Diannaa (Talk) 03:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

I have put it to semi with all edits to be reviewed except those with reveiwer status. Thank you for your advice. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Restore the semi, to stop the drive-by garbage, and add PC2 to make the reviewers look though any edits from autoconfirmed users that are not reviewers or sysops. That'll stop what it is we're seeing, 3 to 5 year old accounts that came out of hibernation to vandalise. (And it's not like there can be TOO many of the darn things. Though having indeffed three tonight, I might be wrong, but we can easily get rid of them as they appear.) Written after ec: Good, that's the best way to handle things. I'll watchlist the article and use the banhammer on the "vintage" accounts as needed. (Though the idea of actually having to read a word about Justin Beiber kind of makes me cringe ;) )Courcelles 03:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
I thought of checking him out on YouTube to see what all the fuss is about but thought better of it. Maybe tomorrow. :7 --Diannaa (Talk) 03:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
OK I looked. Now I am scarred for life :( --Diannaa (Talk) 03:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Then I'll save myself the agony! Courcelles 07:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Lod Airport massacre

thanks Diannaa. that persistent IP is really bothersome.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. Unfortunately when they come to the talk page they also only push the POV. But please continue to try to explain Wikipedia policies to them. Thanks for reporting this. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

protection of Justin Bieber

I guess it wasn't due to this source. Cheers, Jack Merridew 03:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh god that is so funny. Thanks --Diannaa (Talk) 04:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
seems you needed a laugh.
<joke>Dad: Hey, this new Miley Cyrus song is awesome! Daughter: That's Justin Bieber.</joke>
Jack Merridew 04:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Cleaning up Batlagundu

I am one of the contributors to this page. Kindly let me know what needs to be done to improve this page. Thanks Kbala1055 (talk) 07:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

I will start clean-up and copy editing today. --Diannaa (Talk) 19:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

I was wrong

Dear Diannaa, sorry for my emotional complaint. Now I see you sent the same warning to the other editors engaged in the edit war. Therefore, my complaint that your were treating us unequally was wrong. I apologize for that. Monkh Naran (talk) 03:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

That's Ok. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 03:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Give this lad a slap of the trout, would you?

Cybermud (talk · contribs)

I see a potential edit-war starting at Equal pay for women, so I warn both sides (I have to, or it seems like I'm taking sides) and he hits me with an improper template. HalfShadow 03:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

I will look right now and see what I can do. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:16, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't necessarily mean jump up and down on him, but the last time I only warned one side I was specifically asked by an admin why I didn't warn both. HalfShadow 03:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Cybermud is incredibly angry right now. I am still looking at the diffs here. You did right to warn both editors; I just did the same on Inner Mongolia. I have kinda got a wording worked out about what I will say on their talk page and will report back in a minute. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I know you generally shouldn't template regulars, it's just in the case of edit warring it's the most efficient way. As I said to him, I'm just trying to make sure they both don't get in trouble. HalfShadow 03:23, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Templates are good because they have specially designed neutral wording. The 3RR template is sorta like a speeding ticket; there's no nice way to do it so the neutrally worded template is best, even with regulars. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Okay, my message is now up on their talk page. I think they have stepped away from the computer for a while as they have not edited for about 25 minutes. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 03:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
"Respected"? Damn; I'd prefer "feared", but I'll take it. HalfShadow 03:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Well we don't want to show all our cards too soon, hmmm? --Diannaa (Talk) 03:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

Your deletion of Multi-track drifting

I would just like some insight as to why an article that passed AfC in the form it was deleted in (not including the image) should be deleted. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/compliments? Complaints and constructive criticism? 03:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The image was a copyright violation and thus was deleted. I could find no record of the article passing afd, only the creator moved it into main space claiming it had passed. Please provide a link to where it was approved it you can find it; I could be wrong. My rationale for deletion was G3: Blatant hoax: this is an internet meme and a thing they do in manga comics, not real life. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry if I'm interpeting your logic wrong; but other internet memes with no relevance to real life are still up. The one under real is also from Japanese manga. It appears you are saying they should all go as well. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/compliments? Complaints and constructive criticism? 03:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
That is not what I am saying. What I am saying is if you would kindly provide me with a link wherein this article passed afc. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Hard to do that with no AfC search functionality and no article history to go on... but I'll try Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/compliments? Complaints and constructive criticism? 03:43, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Got it! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Multi-track_drifting
Here is the full history of this version of the article; a previous version was deleted on Sept 30, 2007.
Collapsed annoying too-wide content
(del/undel) (diff) 03:13, December 7, 2010 . . Diannaa (talk | contribs | block) (587 bytes) (Reverted 2 edits by Subtle revenge to last revision by Delicious carbuncle (HG)) (del/undel) (diff) 03:11, December 7, 2010 . . Subtle revenge (talk | contribs | block) (631 bytes) (del/undel) (diff) 03:02, December 7, 2010 . . Subtle revenge (talk | contribs | block) (559 bytes) (Undid revision 400983366 by Delicious carbuncle (talk) this is not nonsense) (del/undel) (diff) 02:59, December 7, 2010 . . Delicious carbuncle (talk | contribs | block) (587 bytes) (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD A10).) (del/undel) (diff) 02:59, December 7, 2010 . . Delicious carbuncle (talk | contribs | block) (559 bytes) (rm obvious copyvio (deleting admin should have a word with uploader)) (del/undel) (diff) 02:57, December 7, 2010 . . 71.237.78.214 (talk | block) (632 bytes) (This is not Wikipedia:CSD#A10) (del/undel) (diff) 02:33, December 7, 2010 . . Delicious carbuncle (talk | contribs | block) (655 bytes) (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD A10).) (del/undel) (diff) 02:14, December 7, 2010 . . Barts1a (talk | contribs | block) (631 bytes) (added Category:Internet memes; removed uncategorized using HotCat) (del/undel) (diff) 02:13, December 7, 2010 . . Bearcat (talk | contribs | block) (642 bytes) (categorization/tagging using AWB) (del/undel) (diff) 05:18, December 6, 2010 . . Subtle revenge (talk | contribs | block) (602 bytes) (del/undel) (diff) 05:07, December 6, 2010 . . Subtle revenge (talk | contribs | block) (742 bytes) (added stub tag) (del/undel) (diff) 04:59, December 6, 2010 . . Subtle revenge (talk | contribs | block) (728 bytes) (cleanup) (del/undel) (diff) 04:58, December 6, 2010 . . Subtle revenge (talk | contribs | block) (756 bytes) (moved Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Multi-track drifting to Multi-track drifting: Approved) (del/undel) (diff) 04:54, December 6, 2010 . . Subtle revenge (talk | contribs | block) (756 bytes) (Multi-Track drifting)
I concede. If this were more easily found after article deletion I wouldn't have posted this anyway! Sorry to bother you. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/compliments? Complaints and constructive criticism? 04:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
No worries. I almost fell for it as well. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
There is no reason why we could not have an article about this as an internet meme or a thing they do in manga, if people think it is notable enough and sources could be found. This article was not acceptable as it was presented as a thing that people could actually do. That is why I cchose category G3.` --Diannaa (Talk) 21:15, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

And now for something completely different

You are going to have to stop deleting the fun facts on Ellis Field. It is true and and is a respected aspect of walpole —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.184.139 (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Please see here, where it discusses that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

SMTown_Live_'10_World_Tour

Thanks for the page protection! Matthew Yeager (talk) 04:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

There were nearly a hundred krappy edits; must have been a 4chan attack. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:21, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Waning

:P Thanks for that correction. It certainly isn't waning. Netalarmtalk 05:08, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

No, in fact it is heating up, again. The guy is confused enough as it is, so I made a wee correction. --Diannaa (Talk) 05:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Ralph Nader

I am surprised by your comment per semi-protection of the article. I do not think it is an accurate assessment. After accusations of vandalism were revealed false, the "3RR" was indicated. There was one contributor on the "ANI" who mentioned many POVs at work other than myself. Were you to further examine IPs edit history, you would find cordiality and willingness to listen and compromise with other editors, save one, who is under the false assumption that creating NPOV in a biography means to insert excessive subtopic criticism not appropriate to the article subject. I have retained all information by moving it to proper articles and sections. Perhaps you will reconsider your position upon closer inspection. It is important to draw conclusions from one's own investigation, rather than hearsay or presumption. Thank you for your attention. 99.59.98.198 (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The article is semi-protected for one week. Please do not take it personally. I did indeed thoroughly investigate and I stand behind my action. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I do not take the protection personally, nor am I questioning your decision to do so. However, your notation "Protected Ralph Nader: disruptive POV edits by multiple IPs", I find misleading (a) as per above, (b) the fact that the disruption occurred when a named user falsely accused IPs of vandalism, likely as a form of personal attack, and WayneSlam acted inappropriately, which was determined per ANI, and (c) it omits said named user, who has admitted to pushing a negative POV under the false assumption that the article is "too positive" and inserting negative content will create NPOV, when in fact such a position overtly opposes NPOV. I have denied, and will continue to deny, that the IPs edits are based on POV, or that these edits are intended for any other purpose other than to improve the article. Thus, with respect, I find your notation misleading, if not altogether incorrect. 99.59.98.198 (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I know about Wayne and he has now had his rollback, Huggle, and Twinkle privledges taken away. I did not mention the registered user in my rationale for protection because a registered user is not stopped by semi-protection. It is true that IPs are not the only ones who participated in the edit war or the only ones who behaved disruptively. Note that there were absolutely no talk page edits for this article from November 30 to December 6: people were simply reverting reverting reverting and giving their rationale by edit summary only, if at all. I apologise; it was not my intention to diss IP editors or make like registered users are always in the right. Clearly at least two of them were wrong in this instance. Not necessarily in the choice of content they wanted to insert or remove, but in their behavior. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:26, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate your thoughtful response. Thank you for taking the time to do so. 99.59.98.198 (talk) 09:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
User:Diannaa, whom do I notify if I suspect someone is using two or more accounts to create the appearance of consensus? 99.59.98.198 (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
You need to initiate what we call a "sockpuppet" investigation. Here is the link: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations#Submitting an SPI case. If you need any help pulling your report together please let me know. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Beta clamp

Hi. I am trying to engage User:Betaclamp in a discussion by starting a merger discussion by inserting a merger banner on the Beta clamp article page and posting a comment on the user's talk page. However the user keeps reverting the addition of the merger template and has not responded to any of my comments. Given the number of reverts the user has made after being warned, I think administrator intervention at this point may be appropriate. I would appreciate if you would look into this further. Thanks. Boghog (talk) 07:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

In the interest of full disclosure, I should also mention this discussion. Boghog (talk) 07:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
OK, User:Betaclamp has finally responded here. I will followup and see where that takes us. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 07:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I did have a quick look at this page last night when he shut down the redirect and reopened the page as an article. I converted it back to a redirect-from-merge, as you probably already know. Please keep in touch if you need a hand with anything. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 01:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Why Did You Delete My Indital Pages? I've worked with other Admins on creating this page

Why did you delete my created Indital page? I've worked very diligently with other Wikipedia admins to ensure the content of this page is consistent with Wikipedia guidelines, and now all that work has been deleted...I work for a variety of companies who want to utilize Wikipedia to give content about their company, and NOT USE IT AS A MARKETING RESOURCE. I've worked with admins to make sure this is the case, but now my Indital page has been deleted. I've put considerable time and effort into creating this page and worked with others to make sure the page is correct and now all that work is gone.

I'm fine with updating the pages to be more fitting of the guidelines if you believe I need to. Just please reestablish my page and help me be a continuing contributor to the community. This is part of my job, and losing this pages is very detrimental, especially since others have previously approved them.Jmlnarik01 (talk) 18:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

The reason your page was deleted is because it met the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion class WP:CSD A7: "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant". Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a business directory. The article still fails to meet the notability guideline. The page is now available in your user space at User:Jmlnarik01/Indital for further work. If you choose to move it into main space again, it will likely be deleted again. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 01:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, there's a bit more discussion on this on my talkpage, just so you're aware there's a few of them. --Stephen 02:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I did notice that earlier. Thanks --Diannaa (Talk) 04:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Chess article

Hi there. Thanks for the recent corrections you made to this article. The regular chess editorial crowd (myself included) have some deficiencies in the English grammar department, so your changes are most welcome (—fingers crossed no-one reverts them!). Brittle heaven (talk) 01:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi! I will carry on tomorrow. The work is going quickly. I will try moving pics around and will clean up the refs too. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Diannaa! Thanks for responding to my request. If there is anything Chess wise that you would like clarified feel free to ask myself or Brittle heaven above. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 02:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. It's shiny and new :-) Regards, SunCreator (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
You're welcome. It was so fun. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for helping revert the vandalism on my talk page. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 04:15, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. The user received a short block. The edits seem out of sync with their recent activities, so I wonder what's going on. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that user's contributions to L Kensington's page in the recent changes log, but you had already blocked him when I went to report him ;) . However, judging by the nature of the good contributions stopping in early August 2010, I would say that the original user left. Then 90.194.145.174 comes and makes "apostasy vandalism" [1], which L Kensington reverts. After a bit, Jkl678 (talk · contribs) arrives and re-vandalizes. [2] I am suspicious of a compromised account, so should I request checkuser to determine if 90.194.145.174 compromised Jkl678's account? Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes, that is a very good idea. The recent edits do not in any way resemble the edits from August. Jk1678 is blocked for a few more days, so there is still time to investigate. Thank you for taking the initiative here; much appreciated. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:15, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

AWB

Admins are automatically approved to use WP:AWB. If for some reason it doesn't work, just add yourself to the list.--Chaser (talk) 06:32, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the quick response. --Diannaa (Talk) 06:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Michigan Attorney-General

I see you partially dealt with this issue before, and would like to ask you to do it again. As I believe you are aware, User:Samahiaka18 continously inserted an inccorect version of the Michigan State seal, with a blue outer ring rather then red. This is despite the fact that the State Seal has red, while the seals of Government officials are blue. After both my and your reverts, the user appears to have given up on that, but then began removing the Seal all-together since he/she didn't get their way. Now an IP address(which I suspect is User:Samahiaka18 not signed in) continues to remove the seal, despite warnings. Can you please take what action is necessary to stop this. Fry1989 (talk) 19:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

The seal on the Michigan Attorney General article should be blue. There is a red one up there right now, the state seal, as we have not got a blue attorney general seal available. I note that you have not posted any warnings on the talk page of the registered user, and the IP has not received a warning since December 4. You need to realise that new or unexperienced users may not see your edit summaries, and therefore may literally not be getting the message. I am posting a modified level 2 warning template on the IP's talk page. You can use these templates too if you like; they are available at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. I will watch-list the article for a while and help you monitor what happens next. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, and I'm sorry if I'm not dealing with it the right way. I've requested the AG's seal be made on the Commons, then we can put it up here. Fry1989 (talk) 22:11, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
That is a good idea. Don't worry about not knowing the "right way", there are so many rules that no one can possibly know them all. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
The IP now points out that use of the Great Seal is illegal on all but official documents of the State of Michigan, so I guess we will have to remove it from the article. http://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,1607,7-127-1638_8731-22832--,00.html --Diannaa (Talk) 22:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
The USe of the Seal is illegal for commercial uses, however, it's use for education purposes is NOT restricted. This is in standing with all national insignias, The IP is using it as an excuse to get their way. Fry1989 (talk) 00:19, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Without seeing a copy of the Act, I can't say what is correct. They say nothing about educational purposes on the website. Perhaps if you could get the Attorney General seal uploaded that would resolve the debate? --Diannaa (Talk) 00:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
The Sec of State's website(who is custodian of the Seal), coroborates that it is commercial use that is illegal. Also, their depiction shows the seal with a redish-brown and MOST certainly NOT blue. The IP has absolutely no proof the seal is blue, nor can I find any. The seal should be re-inserted, as the IP has not done anything constructive, or given proof to their claims. Sec's websiteFry1989 (talk) 00:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Surely you can see the inconsistency here. First the IP claims the seal is Blue and tries to re-insert it several times, and then once it is made clear by myself and then yourself that the blue one won't be used, they then claim the use of the seal is illegal. The IP has no sources, and only is trying to get the blue one used, and if not, then to have no seal used at all. Fry1989 (talk) 00:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I understand your point. But the website clearly says the use of the seal is illegal, excpt for official govt documents. So the IP could be right about that part. I am not going to insert it. If you wish to attempt it yourself, that is your right. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:37, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
I think I'll wait for the AG seal to be created. The point I wished to make has been made. However, if the Ip attempts to remove the Seal from other pages, uch as the State, or the Governor, we may have a bigger issue. So for though, it seems just to be regaring the AG's page, so I'll leave it alone. I got a vacation coming so wanna relax a bit before I go. Thanks anyways for putting up with my rambling, I can be kinda harsh some times, and tough deal with, though I mean well. Fry1989 (talk) 00:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
That's the spirit. Don't let him get to you. It's no fun any more if you do. Have a good wiki break :)) --Diannaa (Talk) 00:49, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

mistaken speedy deletion

A short article, Manaf Abd al-Rahim al-Rawi, was deleted by you today on the grounds that it was an 'unsourced attack article'; I presume it was an oversight, since the article was indeed sourced (to a detailed New York Times article), and the subject of the 'attack' was a member of Al Qaeda. I've provisionally restored the article, with original source, and added a second unrelated source reference. You might want to drop a note to the user who added the speedy deletion tag that they're being overenthusiastic with the speedy deletes; I believe that was Mkativerata . jackbrown (talk) 08:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

The subject of the article is not actually mentioned in the NY Times article. Therefore the article was unsourced. You have sourced the second sentence to that article, so you do not actually have a source for saying that he gave information to the authorities that led to the killings. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/world/middleeast/24iraq.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=all
I see you have recreated the article and added http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=1&id=20993, which does mention the person and give some of the details. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:36, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanx

I just wanted to thank you for having warned user Counterdem about his recent edits. I supose his edits are not intentional vandalism, but they are however nationalistically motivated. The worste is that they are very annoying because they require time and effort from a number of editors to correct them. Well, thank you once more. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 01:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Legacy of the Korean War article move

Diannaa, please take a look at Talk:Legacy of the Korean War. I've posted a name change request. Your input is invited. --S. Rich (talk) 23:14, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!--S. Rich (talk) 00:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

Create an ANI thread concerning abusive behavior by Lunalet?

I have created a draft for an ANI notice here. Please let me know if you think I should create such a thread, since I feel that Lunalet's abuse of SMasters has gone waaaaay to far. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind an uninvolved admin to look at everything, but without creating a lot of drama. Please ask SMasters what he thinks we should do. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Firstly, thank you both for your support and understanding. Lunalet has done nothing very constructive with his account except cause wide disruption and attacks on several editors. He has wasted all our time. I have had to answer to so many of his attacks rather than helping with so many pending copyedit requests that we have. If we have enough evidence, I would support going for this. The elections are almost over, but I'm worried that the badgering will spill over into the Guild. Also, if we can prevent him from badgering other good editors outside the Guild, we would have achieved something good. But ultimately, I leave the decision to proceed or not with Reaper Eternal. – SMasters (talk) 02:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
I saw this and thought I'd give my opinion. Lunalet shows more interest in attacking the Guild (specifically SMasters) than constructively contributing to Wikipedia. There's plenty of evidence, as can be seen in Reaper's ANI draft, so I'd support an ANI report. However, like SMasters said, the decision is up to Reaper. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 03:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
So the general consensus is to create the report? I would like Diannaa's input on whether she supports such a report or not, though. (I don't mind filing the report and dealing with the drama.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
If SMasters is ok with it, I will support it too. Thank you for your help, Reaper. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Created the thread. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Some people suspect Lunalet is a socl puppet of User:LAz17, but Wikistalk shows no overlap between the edits of LAz17 and SMasters. Sarek of Vulcan has removed the most recent attack. I have posted to the ANI thread. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Weather Satellite: GOES East

Hi Dianna, i'm new in wikipedia

Can u help me with this problem: i try to fix a mistake in Weather_satellite: and you revert this The GOES is a Geostacionary satellite, like METEOSAT (europe), INSAT (india), GMS (Japan). All Geostacionaty satellites orbits over equator,... GOES 12 (east) orbits over equator at 74W longitude... the amazon river runs over equator! where is the reference about "over mississippi" ?

References:

Geostationary orbit (Orbit Allocation)

GOES NASA Project Science

GOES FAQ

Interactive GOES East

Sorry my english, it´s bad, Thanks for you help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlitosau (talk • contribs) 05:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

You are correct. That is the position of Goes-East as of May 10, 2010.
http://www.oso.noaa.gov/goesstatus/spacecraftStatusSummary.asp?spacecraft=12
Sorry, I did not realise they had moved the satellite. --Diannaa (Talk) 05:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

RE: Copy Edit Requests

I am certainly still interested on working with them. Just been swamped with work, but I am working on them when I can. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 12:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi and thanks for your copyedit of Round Church, Preslav! It's much appreciated :) Best, — Toдor Boжinov — 17:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

You are welome. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:15, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Congrats!

Congrats on becoming a coordinator! Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! --Diannaa (Talk) 04:11, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors Coordinator election

Do you think we should send a note out thanking all those who voted in the Coordinator election? I already contacted SMasters about this, and he thinks we should just include it in our final end of year newsletter. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 00:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Yah, I agree with SMasters. We are nearly at year end, and we could send a wrap-up out about a week before our next drive is due to start. It could include a wrap of our activities for the year; a summary of the election results and a thanks for voting; and an invite to our next drive. What else? I am missing something. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Maybe encourage people to copyedit some articles in the requests section so we have a nice clean page for the start of the drive? Sorry if I haven't been keeping up with that well, I have been getting requests on my user talk page ;> . Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you very much for the comprehensive copyedit you made for the 2009 Alabama Crimson Tide football team article! I know it is a longer one, and it is much appreciated as I plan to submit it for GA review after the holidays when I have more reliable internet access. Thanks again! Patriarca12 (talk) 15:00, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. It might be good enough for GA as-is, but for FA you will probably have to go through again and remove more sports-isms. Good luck! --Diannaa (Talk) 23:32, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Newsletter

I have begun developing the end-of-year GOCE newsletter here. Feel free to make any changes you feel necessary. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 00:44, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

I will. I am gonna look at Famine in India for a while and will check it out anon. Thanks for getting it started. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:47, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

joe rogan

i have cited two sources. please refrain from editing the article any more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.46.148 (talk) 03:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

i repeat, i have cited two sources. one is a HIGHLY respected mma fansite, the other is a bona fide news source. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.46.148 (talk) 03:36, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Could you please help?

Hello, since you seem to be a very good copy-editor, will you please look over these short subsections if your not busy. Thank you and happy editing. Nascar1996 17:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Sure; I will check it out later today. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:26, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Oopsie, I forgot. It's done now. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:30, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. Nascar1996 11:10, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas
and a Happy New Year
to you and your family.

May your day be filled with
pleasant surprises.
Link to Image

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Sumsum2010 (talk) at 04:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC).

Thank you!

I personally thank you for keeping all that vandalism off of my user page. Always appreciated! I'm Flightx52 and I approve this message 20:26, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

talkback message deliver to materialscientist

can you bring a talkback message to User: Materialscientist about your replying comment to a blocking message on User Talk: Pixiemasters?


69.236.172.42 (talk) 04:58, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes indeed, that is a good idea. --Diannaa (Talk) 05:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review

Have you ever reviewed an article at GAN? If so/not, would you like to review this article? I want to know what problems I need to address before the article is ready to be a Good article. Thanks, The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 22:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Are you asking for a mock GA review? I could do that. I have to finish my manga article, and will get to it shortly.--Diannaa (Talk) 23:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
The article is currently at WP:GAN. It was nominated in October. I'm asking for an actual review, but if you only have time for a mock review, I guess that's fine. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 23:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Well shit, I 've never done one. I guess I will give it a try. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
I think I took care of everything. Could you take another look at it? The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 03:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I just found out that I'll be busy with holiday stuff until Monday, so I won't be able to go to the library to look for reference material until then. Is that alright? The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 23:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, thanks for letting me know what's happening. There will be no strict dealine for completion since the holidays will get in the way of prompt action! We will just leave it open until you get the information. Have a great Christmas! =D --Diannaa (Talk) 23:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. You have a nice Christmas too, Diannaa. :) The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 23:15, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle

Thanks for copyediting Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle! It looks very good. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:13, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Glad to help. --Diannaa (Talk) 16:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

talkback

Hello, Diannaa. You have new messages at Pixiemasters's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

69.236.172.42 (talk) 01:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)User: Materialscientist

Inquiry: Write NPOV of a company history only

Hi, if I would like to write a history of a company in NPOV (no promotion on company & its products), something like Coca-Cola & Nestle done, how can I do that? 219.95.123.254 (talk) 02:05, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. --Diannaa (Talk) 16:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Good work

I notice you speedily deleted the terrible Pelvic congestion syndrome article. There was nothing correct there at all. That was a good decision; keep up the good work. --Diannaa (Talk) 07:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Just curious - how did you notice it? (And I'm glad someone else looked in to it) Prodego talk 08:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I was patrolling with Huggle when the user placed the Prod, so I investigated. We need an article on this topic, but the one we had was totally unrelated to the facts. There are some reliable sources out there, including an article on the Johns Hopkins website. Maybe I will be writing an article today! Cheers, --Diannaa (Talk) 17:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually I was the one who prodded the article, the user just blanked it. Good work on the article, cheers! Prodego talk 00:50, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. Merry Christmas! --Diannaa (Talk) 02:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote WikiLove and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove by adding {{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}} to any editor's talk page with a friendly message.

--The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 02:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

5 albert square (talk) has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote WikiLove and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove by adding {{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}} to any editor's talk page with a friendly message.

--5 albert square (talk) 02:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

You are invited to join the discussion at Category talk:Wikipedia files on Wikimedia Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})

Merry Christmas!

WAYNESLAM has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote WikiLove and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove by adding {{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}} to any editor's talk page with a friendly message.

WAYNESLAM 03:24, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Thanks, nice tree. Best of the season. - Dank (push to talk) 18:37, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Reaper Eternal (talk) has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote WikiLove and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas!

Spread the WikiLove by adding {{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}} to any editor's talk page with a friendly message.

Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Diannaa. You have new messages at Reaper Eternal's talk page.
Message added 23:24, 25 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback: SpikeToronto

Hello, Diannaa. You have new messages at SpikeToronto's talk page.
Message added 21:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— SpikeToronto 21:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you...

...for your kind note on ANI, and of course your help with that issue! I worry about that a bit -- how many more of those are there? I know precious little about TV shows and I'm not even sure I can spot a hoax unless I'm following one of these serial vandals around. Most of them acquire an identifiable style after a while. (I don't watchlist ANI any more ... too much drama for drama's sake ... I've come to believe hanging out there too much is a burnout risk.) Thanks again and have a happy holiday season, Antandrus (talk) 21:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, most pop culture topics are outside my area of expertise as well. I don't watchlist ANI either, but I do tend to read it almost every day. I participate only lightly as I am pretty new at the admin-game. Best holiday wishes! --Diannaa (Talk) 22:42, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Having Problems with an Editor.

Please can you help regarding User:Intothefire, WP:Harassment, WP:Canvassing, and WP:Game. Thanks --Sikh-History 23:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

I will have a look shortly --Diannaa (Talk) 23:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
I have investigated and posted some suggestions for behavioural improvements on both of your talk pages. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 01:30, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Fellow editor, Thanks for the response. The main concern was for me the WP:AGF and accusations of WP:Sockpuppetry. You re right about [this], and I should have responded in a better fashion. The reason for this particular instance is that on Jat people there had been a prolonged discussion by Admin User:Dbachmann into the removal of 19th Century sources. I must admit I get frustrated with the India based articles, as 99% of editors and anonymous IP's comes on to "big up" their own "caste" group. I will do better. Thanks--Sikh-History 08:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for taking my criticism in good spirit. I know what you mean about the India/Pakistan articles. People are constantly juggling for position and status rather than trying to improve the encyclopedia. You are actually one of the few who do not behave that way. Thank you for reporting this incident. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi fellow editor, I am trying my best but the editor keeps making baseless accusations as in here. Thanks --Sikh-History 12:09, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
I have posted another message on his talk page. There is no new incident he is complaining about; he is still complaining about the removal of that talk page post. Please try to avoid this user for the next while if possible, and hopefully things will cool down. There will be no way to avoid them permanently, as there is overlap in the type of articles you wish to edit. And make sure your editing and behavior is above reproach, so he will have no new ammunition for further complaints. I have watch-listed both your talk pages and will monitor events. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. I may go on a wikibreak for a bit. :) Thanks --Sikh-History 00:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa
Please read my note for you on my talk page .Cheers Intothefire (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
I really don't think this editor understands that if I am a WP:Sockpuppet then there is a way of dealing with it rather than posting nonsense absolutely everywhere and WP:Wikistalking. Thanks --Sikh-History 19:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
My response has now been posted on his talk page. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:12, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Don't you think there is an element of WP:Lawyering to this beaviour by Intothefire? Thanks--Sikh-History 15:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
I think its more like a case of WP:IDHT. Perhaps my last post will get results. They have not edited since, so hopefully that means they are thinking about what I said and will not stalk you any more. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:15, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

I am concerned you may be sending the wrong message here

You say that it is not a social network and yet you let these things go without a thought. Birthday committee? are you serious? please explain because i really dont think you are sending the right message there. is it because i am new and you enjoy harassing new users to feel superior? This is legitimate wiki-related talk so dont try to go and say im being off topic on people's talk pages. I would genuinely like to know why these things go on. This environment has not been welcoming at all. Needless to say i am very upset at the behavior of your sysops. thank you for your time.--Marsha Watson (talk) 05:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

I am not actually a member of this birthday committee, so sorry, so I cannot comment on that. You are very welcome here if your aim is to improve the encyclopedia; if you are here to chit-chat with your friends, you have come to the wrong place. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 05:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
What an evasive response. are you a sysop? i dont see you leaving templates claiming that they are social networking on their talk page or removing them from the site completely? I am physically ill at your hypocrisy. --Marsha Watson (talk) 05:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Well you certainly make a good point. --Diannaa (Talk) 05:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

History of Sesame Street

Dianaa, thanks for completing the copyedit of this article. A few people have done some cursory copyedits of it, but with your thorough job, I believe that it's now ready to be submitted to FAC. Which, I must admit, is a bit anxiety-provoking for me, since I've found the FAC process to be a tad brutal, doncha know. You have helped immensely. Wish me luck, and hope you have a Happy New Year. Christine (talk) 12:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes I do know, especially with certain reviewers; they are very frank. Sorry you had to wait so long for your edit. Good luck! --Diannaa (Talk) 15:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

Hi Diannaa! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:14, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation, but I already have too many wiki-commitments. Good luck with your project! --Diannaa (Talk) 21:18, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Silver Reef GA review

One of my relatives died recently, and I was wondering if I could write about the Anasazi history of the area on Tuesday instead of today? Thanks, The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 21:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Of course, that would be ok. We did not set a firm deadline so anytime in the next week or so would be awesome. Sorry to hear about your loss. --Diannaa (Talk) 21:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your sympathies. Out of curiosity, how much more must I write before you promote the article? One paragraph? Two? More than two? The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 21:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
One or two paragaphs, depending on how much info you find. Something about their diet; what kind of dwellings they lived in and how far away from the actual town of Silver Reef; interactions (if any) between them and the white settlers; were they still living in the area when the settlers arrived? That would be great and would give a little more depth to the article. Thanks --Diannaa (Talk) 21:46, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
How does it look now? The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 01:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Good! I will pass it. Please try to tighten up the language on the new material again, while I find out what to do next to get it listed. Congratulations! --Diannaa (Talk) 01:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
I got it. I'll work on tightening the language. Thanks for your help! The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 01:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Ok, I see how you did it. Easy peasy. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
There we go, the new paragraphs are now pertty nicely written. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

The December 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive Needs Your Help!

Please help!

The December 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is almost complete. Please help, as the backlog has begun to climb back up. Already exceeding 20,000 articles! The backlog was down to 19,275, let's try to put it back down there by the end of the drive! We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please remind your friends to help as well.Thanks for all your help thus far!

Regards,

Ancient Apparition (talk · contribs), Mono (talk · contribs), Nolelover (talk · contribs), Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs), and WikiCopter (talk · contribs).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wikiproject Wikify at 01:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC).

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

AWB 2

Can you help me around with AWB? I'm interested in also doing the tag removal for the Wikify articles, and I want to know how to do that. WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • simplicity • lost • defense • attack) 02:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

You need to get permission in place first; if you do not already have it go to Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage to get permission. Once you are ok'd, you can download the software onto your computer. On mine (Toshiba laptop running Windows 7) it placed the software and documentation in a folder in the "Documents" section.
I have AWB perm, and it's downloaded.
Start up the software and set the parameters: place the category you wish to review in the slot labelled "category" over on the left under "Make List". Press "make list" and it will generate a list of all items in the category. Click on the tab marked "skip" and ask it to skip all articles where no changes are made. It will then pause only on articles where if finds something. Once you press "Start" (a button available once you click on the "Start" tab) then you will be asked to log in. Use your Wikipedia username and password. The software will then begin reviewing the articles and pausing on ones where it finds things.
So I can do any category, basically, that has Articles that need Wikification, right?
As it is only judging whether or not there are enough wikilinks present, you will still need to review and add section headers, info boxes, and the like. You can also fill in the metadata at the bottom of the page on biographies. You will sometimes improve the linking as well, of course. I would tend only to do the simpler ones in the AWB browser window as it is quite small and a little more awkward to use than the regular interface.
OK
I have just been reviewing one month at a time (I am going to finish Oct 2008 in a minute), but if you wish to look at larger lists is is possible to save your work partway through a list. Just go to the "file" tab in the upper left corner and save the settings, either as the default, or you can create a different name for your save if you like. Then you can resume a larger list exactly where you left off.--Diannaa (Talk) 03:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, Diannaa. I thought you had a special filter or something (proves my stupidity on AWB). WikiCopter (radio • sorties • images • simplicity • lost • defense • attack) 22:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, the filter you create is by inserting the name of the category you wish to review in the wee box. The AWB will check all its various parameters. For instance on lots of articles it wants to add an "orphan" tag or make other changes. But for our purposes, wikification drive, I have been skipping those and just focusing on the ones where it says the Wikify tag can be removed. I think you are understanding it now, yes? --Diannaa (Talk) 01:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

User talk:160.39.54.179

Many thanks for your attention with that user. Off2riorob (talk) 05:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Reason for not copy editing

My apologies, but the internet has been out at my house for a while and I haven't been able to gain access to a computer with internet access so that I could at least warn people about it. I am going to remove myself anyway as I haven't exactly done much to help. My apologies once again. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Apology accepted :) Please feel free to help out when you are able. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar awarded!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Awesome Huggling! Ϫ 15:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much!--Diannaa (Talk) 22:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Rajput history

Hi Dianna.Sorry for the late merry Christmas and a happy coming New Year.I am going to try to write the Rajput article in chronological order.I will write the article on talk page first and then if you think it sounds ok to write on the main page the we will move it to the main page.I have read Col. James Tod,s Annals and antiquities of Rajasthan.There is material available on the internet on a website "Project South Asia" from Greek, Roman and Chinese sources. For Example, Megasthene,s Indika, Heaun Tsiang,s Bhuddist records of the Western world.All my material will be from the foreign sources which can be verified.Just bear with me for a few days. Thanks.Rajbaz (talk) 17:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I will watch your progress with interest. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
By the way if this is for the article History of Rajputs, you will want to coordinate with User:MatthewVanitas as he is working on the same thing right now. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Dianna.It,s Rajbaz.I am trying to write the Rajput article in chronological order, so that it makes sense.I am using foreign sources only e.g., British historian Tod,s Annals, Greek historian Megasthene,s Indika, Chinese historian Hiuan Tsang,s Budhist records of the Western world.I am not trying to write Rajput hitory.That will be too long.Tod,s History of Rajputs is in 4 volumes with aproximately 1000 pages in each volume.This article is just going to be a drop in the ocean.this is just going to be a sketch for the main Rajput article in chronological order.
  • The reason i am writing it on the Rajput talk page is for all the editors of this article to see whether they agree with it or not.I have already let Matthew Vanitas know about my intentions.If everyone agrees then we will put it on the main page.Cheers.Rajbaz (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Tip

Diannaa, when you block a user and they can't edit their talk page please use {{Uw-blocknotalk}} when that happens. WAYNESLAM 21:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok Wayne. Thanks for the tip! I did not know about this template. --Diannaa (Talk) 21:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Your welcome. Let me know on my talk page if you need any help! I'll help you the best I know, Diannaa. WAYNESLAM 03:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
I know you will. Thank you. -Diannaa (Talk) 03:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Your welcome, and will you please watch my talk page since I'm watching yours, and plus thanks for that revert on my talk page. WAYNESLAM 19:16, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I already watch your talk page. --Diannaa (Talk) 19:20, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Oh, okay. WAYNESLAM 19:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Socks and cotton buds

Sorry~ Hope you had a laugh anyway! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.226.128.237 (talk) 05:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Year-end Report

Season's Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2010. Read all about these in the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report.

Highlights
  • Membership grows to 503 editors
  • 2,589 articles removed through four Backlog elimination drives
  • Our encounter with Jimbo Wales
  • Guild home pages reorganized and redesigned
  • Report on our inaugural elections
  • Guild Plans for 2011
  • New barnstars introduced
  • Requests page improved
  • Sign up for the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive!
Get your copy of the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. See you in 2011!
– Your Coordinators: S Masters (lead), Diannaa, The Utahraptor, and Tea with toast.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Diannaa/Archive_5&oldid=1257783049"