User talk:Coren/Archives/2009/August
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Coren. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
CorenSearchBot bug
It complained about freshwater withdrawal at User_talk:Rajah#Freshwater_withdrawal, both the article and the putative source webpage are sourced from a public domain source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2202.html . Maybe have the bot check for source references from .gov sites on putative source pages? Thanks! --Rajah (talk) 06:09, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Ashes Series 1954-55 and 1958-59
I am separating my articles England cricket team in Australia 1954-55 and English cricket team in Australia 1958-59 as they were too long and created 1954-55 Ashes series and 1958-59 Ashes series, there was some confusion for the bot as I cut and pasted one article from another while keeping the text on the old one. I plan to do the same for England team in Australia 1970-71 and 1970-71 Ashes series.--Philipjelley (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Godfrey Way Mitchell
Moved from Sir Godfrey Way Mitchell. All other articles where person was knighted do not have "Sir" as part of the title for the page. LRB2000 (talk) 11:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Nirmaljaya
The web page kashi.org/majaya has no reltaion with Flexible foam article. Please remove CorenSeearchBot alert. Nirmaljaya 1:57 pm, 3 August 2009 —Preceding undated comment added 17:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC).
Francisco de Soto
Would you say the Francisco de Soto article is still a substantial copy of http://www.hoasm.org/IVL/SotoF.html? Nappyrootslistener (talk) 15:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Nappyrootslistener
Wawashkamo Golf Club
The article Wawashkamo Golf Club cites the golf club's own webpage, http://www.wawashkamo.com, but does not copy its text in any way, and your bot is in error. I request that your copyvio logo and message be removed. Thank you. Bigturtle (talk) 01:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Music Council of Australia
The CorenSearchBot is is error in pointing to the site is has as the source of the text. That site had in fact taken the text from the MCAs own website. It is the site referred to by the Bot that is in breach. The wording here is not a copy of the original material. I have deleted the SearchBots reference on the page and added a note to that page's discussion page. Thanks. Yergnaws (talk) 14:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Meira Chand
The bot is only partly correct. I have indeed used text from Meira Chand's website but only as a model. I have substantially edited and refined the original. Lgh (talk) 06:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Tom Racer
I was in the throes of editing the page and mistakenly saved it before finalising etc. You can check by later and inspect. All is well now with no copyright problems. Thanks (George-Archer (talk) 15:29, 8 August 2009 (UTC))
User:Tajik
Tajik (talk · contribs), a very racist, controversial and disruptive editor with long history of blocks, is still vandalizings pages of groups of people he doesn't like [1], he's edit-warring, he uses sockpuppets and annon IPs to curse, abuse, attack, insult, and offend people of other races. Here he is cursing at other editors and also adding in the article that the mother of a politician in Afghanistan was raped by ethnic Tajiks He did the recent vandalisms on Kabul, Afghan (name), Abdullah Abdullah (politician), Talk:Jamal-al-Din_Afghani, Sher Shah Suri, and others. He is constantly editing articles pertaining to Afghanistan and its people with very negative view. By trying to evade from admins, he first edits with his usual user name and then vandalizeand edit-war with a set of IP # but all appear to be in the same location in Germany where he lives. He and the IPs share the same view, always refusing to accept Afghanistan's existance in the 18th century [2], [3], giving Tajiks a good name and the people that he hates (the Pashtuns) a very negative image almost every page he visits. He is trying to change Afghanistan into Iran and remove the Pashto language from every article, which is the one of the official languages of the country. I'm pretty sure he is using those IPs and socks, he is trying to change his writings when he uses IPs to fool admins.119.73.1.41 (talk) 00:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- The same post as here. The IP is that of banned User:NisarKand (and his 100+ sockpuppets). Checkuser evidence has been presented. Cheers. Tajik (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
What a speedy bot you have - it picked up a similarity with a web page that only has the track listing for this album. As there is more info in the article than the web page referred to and because the track listing is (I think) public domain I've delted the tag. DISEman (talk) 01:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
CSBot...
...absolutely rules. Notwithstanding the inevitable false positives, it is an amazingly useful tool. Truly, I regard it as essential to helping maintain a legal website. Just wanted to say. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Howdy, Coren! Not sure why but the bot tagged the beginnings of this article and my handwritten article entry as being a copyvio. I tried to compare it to what it found but didn't really see anything too similar. Thought I'd drop you a note letting you know. Cheers!!! Basket of Puppies 15:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Tommy Coakley
Hi, your wee bot has incorrectly tagged this article as a copyvio. I have explained the situation at the article's talk page; I'd appreciate your input. Regards, GiantSnowman 15:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Your bot is confused
See here and here. --candle•wicke 15:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Home of heroes
Thanks for trying but again the home of heroes site is not subject to copyright because all the data is contained on government sources and repackaged. I know that your bot catches a lot of copyright problems but I have as I have mentioned time and again this info isn't subject to copyright. I admit I put the "tag" but I SOULDN'T NEED TOO. Since I have mentioned this nicely and rudely, every time corenbot erroneously spams my talk page with the copyright tags I will just return the favor notify you. My recommendation would be to add logic or something that skips the HOH site. Cheers and happy spamming. --Kumioko (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Ponce City Hall
Thanks for the message. I will work on the article to improve it substantially. Should be finished shortly.Rob99324 (talk) 02:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Howdy again. Article is CONSIDERABLY re-worded and large portions of previously incorporated text from the copywrited article has been removed. All other sentences borrowed from the c/r artcile has been re-worded. Article is now clean. Please re-bot as appropriate. Regards, Rob99324 (talk) 19:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
New exclusion parameters for Corenbot?
Re: the listing of Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2005, admittedly no Magna Carta, as a copyright violation of Theorator.com text. Theorator lists bills with text from, say, the Library of Congress; IHFA '05 contains a bill, transcribed by an editor, with text from, say, Library of Congress. Is it possible to exclude Theorator.com and other such sites from results? Anarchangel (talk) 04:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
The text "detected" by the bot is the quoted speech of the judge in the case, Lord Justice Sedley, which makes up his ruling. Keristrasza (talk) 18:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, incorrectly tagged http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidal_Cantu_Garza as a copyvio. I have explained the situation at the article's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vidal_Cantu_Garza; I'd appreciate your input. Regards, Vicantu (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Cadillac Cyclone
Hi, your bot has tagged Cadillac Cyclone as a copyvio. I have explained the situation at the article's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cadillac_Cyclone talk page; all copyrighted material has been removed. I'd appreciate your input. Regards, JamesMadison (talk) 23:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
I dont really know why the bot tagged that page but if it really did find any copyright material then i have already rewrote everything in my own words and credit has been given to the information sites at the bottom of the page. Hope everything is all right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biala Gwiazda (talk • contribs) 19:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
All the best, Biala Gwiazda (talk) 19:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Bill Gibson (boxing)
This article has been rewritten and includes more information than just one source. It also is well-referenced. Thanks. --Pennsylvania Penguin (talk) 18:14, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I got an automated message saying that the blurb had been copied, which is kind of true, but the website it said the blurb came from was different. TrekMovie.com (the "copied from" site) would have received the original blurb first, I have copied the blurb properly from the Memory Alpha page, and placed a reference there as well. Is this OK or do I need to slightly reword the entire blurb? Dave (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
RSDRF
Hi I am confused in regards to why I cant reference the explanation to the page we own. I want others to know of this idea and thus want to be able to use this new word RSDRF and let others know about the existence and about the history behind it....please let me know —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaragourji (talk • contribs) 18:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
G.A.M.A.
Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts
Please explain the reason why I cant post from my website an explanation of what Gurnick Academy is? Thanks Zara Gourji 18:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Zaragourji —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaragourji (talk • contribs)
Michel Gondry 2: More Videos (Before and After DVD 1)
The page I created was flagged. The information on the page is in the public domain. It lists the content of a DVD for sale to the public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.133.6.60 (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Notice On CorenSearchBot
I just recently published an article on the King Genet and received a notice about the copyright violention. I wrote the article myself and used sources from the World Conservation Union. The source your bot suggested that I was violenting was http://pandapedia.com/w/index.php?title=King_Genet&action=edit&redlink=1 This website is a Wikipedia minor and is stated so at the bottom of the article page. Please add this to CorenSearchBot's list. KnowledgeRequire (talk) 22:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Medal of Honor citations
Good day to you sir, Thanks for fixing corenbot to stop identifying home of heroes as a copyright vio everytime I create a new Medal of Honor recipient page. Unfortunately, now I am getting http://www.combatleadership.com/Heroes_Results.asp?MedalID=591 as a copyvio. The text displayed here is exactly what is displayed in the Army Center of Military History site so therefore is not subject to copyright. Could you please add this site to the list of sites not to count. At least for Medal of Honor citations anyway. --Kumioko (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Mythdon proposal at ANI
This message is being sent to inform the Arbitration Committee of a sanction proposal forbidding me from editing Arbitration Committee pages and talk pages. Discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Mythdon and Arbitration Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
CorenSearchBot -- New Riders (album)
Greetings, Coren. As per your bot's request, I'm letting you know that I removed a "csb-pageincluded" template that it had placed on an article. See Talk:New Riders (album)#CorenSearchBot for more information. (If you reply here I will see what you say.) — Mudwater (Talk) 02:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyright
I put " " to let everyone know it was copied. So there! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Âgora V (talk • contribs) 03:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Peter Toon
The article has been extensively changed. The source document was merely one source of the obit; there have been numerous postings of it all over the continuing Anglican web. Now that these (revised) basics are up, it can be developed with all the many references which should build given the merits of the man. SongspiritUSA (talk) 09:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Bot may have made an error
I've noticed that your bot rarely makes errors but it had tagged almost all the contributions of Un8chimu as copyvios. However, they are released under the GNU Free Documentation License and it was at the bottom of the linked page. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, since the switch to dual-licensing on June 16th, text which is available under the GFDL only is no longer permissible, it has to be released under WP:CC-BY-SA or a compatible license, which GFDL is not. The bot was right. MLauba (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Whoops, I'd forgotten about that. Thanks for reminding me. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 11:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
You don't need to..........
label articles from California Marine Sportfish as Copyright violations because they are in the public domain . Dr. Szląchski (talk) 04:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, that statement you link to is sorta annoyingly vague; it tells us that the contents is generally in the pubic domain, which does little to tell us what, specifically, is or isn't. It does look as though the article on actual fish probably are though— but that's a good reason to remove the tag, not for not tagging at all: the act of removing the tag is positive acknowledgment that a human being has reviewed the copy and found it okay. — Coren (talk) 12:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Kurdish Women's Rights Watch
This article has been rewritten in the light of your message. It should be OK now. Please checkFatepur (talk) 13:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Re: Alexander Railroad
The text in question was corrected/rewritten. It should meet the standards now, please check, thanks! Arthunter (talk) 13:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
J._John_Mann
Would you please remove the copyright violation notice on this article? I was trying to figure out how to let readers find my article under "J. John Mann" and "John Mann" both when I received your notice. The copyright notice is now on the Talk Page. Thanks. Psychiatry777 (talk) 19:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyright - Meruidae
I edited any info that might violate any copyrights, it should be good now, but inform me if there is any problems. Bugboy52.4 | =-= 19:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
New US PD template
Hi - I've created a new PD template for OSHA ("Template:OSHA"), could you add it to your list that excludes it from copyvio? Sincerely, Novickas (talk) 18:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Humanology
The bot found an article I had written earlier and had somehow ended up on www.wikibin.com and the article I had written I have updated and was looking to put in Wikipedia. How do I correct this issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JacobDaniels2 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
CSB down?
Hi Coren, we haven't had any new listings at SCV for 16 hours straight, which somehow seems deeply unplausible. How's CSB doing? Best, MLauba (talk) 22:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- It's working again since yesterday. Is CSB running on the toolserver? The latter was down for a while this week. MLauba (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- No, it's running on a server I own — I just gave it a swift kick in the booty yesterday. I'm currently at [wikimania2009.wikimedia.org Wikimania] so I just restarted it without comments. — Coren (talk) 14:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Riot Games
Your bot told me the page i was editing was a copy, indeed it is a copy but from an article i made in wikia. Riot Games is an article fully developed by me. The original article is on http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/RiotGames
Charliefr99 (talk) 14:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Linux and GNU/Linux
Thanks so much for the meeting today with RMS. As I said in the meeting, I would certainly appreciate any help you can give in mediating and unsticking the whole issue over at Talk:Linux in relation both (a) the name of the article and (b) the issue of referencing the operating system in other articles.
I tend to think it would make most sense to move on (b) first since I think we're actually pretty close to consensus on that issue. I'm looking forward to help your help! —mako๛ 20:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'll obviously have very little (read: absolutely no) available time until next week, but I'll pull my sleeves up and get to it as soon as I return to routine. I'll email RMS as soon as I am ready to start, so we can get this ball rolling. In the meantime, I'll try to spend some of my Copious Free Time to catch up on the history to get a better feel of the players and the actual issues; I'm pretty sure we can arrange a solution that's going to be acceptable to everyone. — Coren (talk) 23:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
CSB error
CorenSearchBot made an error here, just wanted to let you know. ceranthor 22:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
More info please
Hi, I'm seeking more information to your reply at User talk:Jimbo Wales#Opinions.2Fadvice please. -- Banjeboi 03:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
We Should Have Gone To University
The bot has flagged text from the article We Should Have Gone To University. I suspect this is because, currently, most of the article is track the track listing. I didn't use the website that the bot cited, only my copy of the album. FredTheDeadHead (talk) 19:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
No copyright violation
Notice — Copyright (c) 2009 Jim Diamond. The author of the Biography aquired his facts from personal contact with Jim Diamond and is the orginal author for the Biography at the link.
There is no copyright violation
Look for "Offical Biographer: Kurt Roskopf" at the end of the Biography on the Weblink. I am the orginal author for this Biography and intend to use my existing work which I independently created from personal communication with Jim Diamond, which was used for the Website and have copyright permission from Jim Diamond to use the Biography as a contribution to Wikipedia.Mega Genius® Biography
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Deadalus821 (talk) 04:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Explanation about how to resolve this left at Talk:Jim Diamond (Mega Genius). MLauba (talk) 08:10, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
subst:article-cv|:Robin Raina
Subject: subst:article-cv|:Robin Raina
Dear Moderator-
This page is a biography of Robin Raina and his work as a CEO and Founder of an International Charity and has references to Robin Raina Foundation site(www.rainafoundation.com) founded by him. There is no copyright violation as I am a senior member of Robin Raina Foundation and head the Public Relations division. Through this email i am confirming that any text content from rainafoundation.com page can be published on wikipedia. We explicitly permit use of the contents under CC-BY-SA and the GFDL.
I have already sent an email from my rainafoundation.com email id approving of the contents. (redacted)
Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avington2915 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- Please follow the instructions given at WP:PERMISSION in order to resolve this issue. Regards, MLauba (talk) 23:41, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Rewritten article Snmrh (talk) 02:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Jean-Marie Luton
The article is same as tht in the ESA website. [[4]] I will see that it isn't a exact copy. Regards.--Johnxxx9 (talk) 19:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Apologise for not knowing the protocol sufficiently. OZ ART was trying to enter a comment about the Australian Artist KAY LIPTON, on account of her exciting new art that can be seen on the Internet.(OZ ART (talk) 21:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC))
Reece Crowther
Just got a message re: the article Reece Crowther suggesting the article was a substantial copy of another - this was correct, as the article was a recreation of a previous Wikipedia article, deleted under criteria that no longer apply. The text found by CorenBot was at Wikibin.org, an archive of deleted Wikipedia articles. Hope this is appropriate, if not let me know and I'll fix. Gialloneri (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Citizendium
Your bot seems to flag copies of Citizendium articles imported into Wikipedia, even though the licenses are now compatible. Is there any way you could exempt Citizendium copies that have been cited with the proper template, {{citizendium}}? --Cybercobra (talk) 01:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Quite right. Will do shortly. — Coren (talk) 01:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Should work now. — Coren (talk) 17:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Your bot flagged the new pages I created for Parcel of Rogues (album) and A Parcel of Rogues (album). I did not use the proper page renaming procedure, but instead did a cut-and-paste. These are new page titles with relocated content and the previous pages have been redirected and a disambiguation page created. I have removed the tag and requested the appropriate administrator assistance to preserve edit histories. Thanks for the heads-up. Shorn again (talk) 16:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Borg
Yes, fair point. I understand the double bind you guys face in terms of "secret" discussions. I'm sorry for the tone of my post; to be honest, I should probably just unwatchlist the case pages at this point since everything that can be said (by me, at least) has been said. In the past, I've noticed that cases which enter a phase like the current one often close with admonishments and other relatively minor remedies, presumably because the stasis reflects a serious division of opinion on the proper course and the admonishments represent an acceptable compromise. In this case I feel like that would be a poor outcome, for the reasons I (somewhat testily) put forward in my post.
I've also sometimes watched a case reach a conclusion with which I disagreed, and then wished I'd spoken up during the case - I say that just to explain my continued posting. Anyhow, sorry for the tone of the post. Obviously, your explanation is both simpler and more rational than mine, and I don't think I have very much new to add to that case. I'll leave it in your (collective) hands. Happy editing. :) MastCell Talk 16:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Heh. For what it's worth, I empathize with how difficult and painful it can be to watch the deliberative process in action in the cases where it stutters like this. It's the inconvenient of our advantage: that we are a committee means we cannot act overly rashly, but also means we can get into binds like this. I didn't think your tone was too far off — I sometimes feel that way myself — but I felt it needed a bit of explanation. — Coren (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)