User talk:Âgora V

Welcome!

Hello, Âgora V, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Building chicken coops, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dr.K. logos 22:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Building chicken coops

The article Building chicken coops has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a manual. WP:NOTMANUAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dr.K. logos 22:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Building chicken coops

Hello Âgora V. I'm Airplaneman. I see you have created the above article. I suggest you merge this article into chicken coop, giving it it's own section. I'll merge it in a day if you don't respond. Regards, Airplaneman ^talk 22:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Building chicken coops

I have nominated Building chicken coops, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Building chicken coops. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 22:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ancient arabic numerals. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Dr.K. logos 23:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bb's. Zhang He (talk) 23:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of To have

The article To have has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Intelligentsium 23:48, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Old spice high endurance"

A page you created, Old spice high endurance, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 00:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Mason, Texas

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fort Mason, Texas, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.texasescapes.com/Forts/Fort-Mason-Texas.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]