User talk:Cordless Larry/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 15

Please comment on Talk:Umpqua Community College shooting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Umpqua Community College shooting. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks page for Actor . Christopher Lee Power

Hi Cordless Larry

Thanks for your message. Thanks for the link. I did also find a few links such as this one http://radioclatterbridge.co.uk/index.php/latest-news/42-phil-rostance/1367-actors-wanted-to-break-free which is about his book and have included that, is this a good reference and I have included a link to a newspaper a few years ago regarding him being an actor. How many reference do I have to include. Will it go a head with just a few and if so will the two paragraphs remain , or do I have to change them. Leepbreaking (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

There's not a specific number, Leepbreaking, but the more the better. It's also about quality: coverage in national newspapers counts for more than local newspaper coverage when it comes to establishing notability. I'm a bit confused by this particular subject, I have to say. He seems to have quite a limited CV, but there is talk of a film being made about his life. Am I missing something? Cordless Larry (talk) 09:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer on the teahouse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Democratics (talk • contribs) 09:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

John Burgess

I may be a beginner who has made a mistake on manually adding references Cordless Larry but you are very wrong in your assumption that my text is a copyright violation. johnburgessactor.com is my site and all the text is my composition. A friend of mine was advising me on setting up a blog for my late father and wrongly left the text designed for the planned new Wiki page on the blog page. He has now taken it off the site. If you go to the site now, there is no text. How have you obtained the full text?

John Burgess was my late father and this is my project in honour of his memory.

What do you suggest now? I obviously feel aggrieved to be accused of copywright violation for something I wrote myself.

Thank you

Harvey Burgess Harveyburg (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Harveyburg, and thanks for your message. I found the text via a Google search and accessed Google's cached version of the page. Using text from another website on Wikipedia isn't just a matter of ownership of the copyright. All text on Wikipedia is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 licence, so source material used here needs to be available under a compatible licence. If you own the site, you could make the material available under the ShareAlike licence, but you should be aware that that would make it available for use by everyone - not just Wikipedia editors. Given that John Burgess was your father, you should have a read of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, which strongly discourages editing of articles about people you are related to. If you do want to go ahead, then there are instructions there on declaring and managing your conflict of interest. You should follow these. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Cordless Larry

Thanks for your response.

I am happy to declare a connection and adhere to the conflict of interest policy.

Can you please clarify some issues for me. Firstly, in respect of the share alike license, I understand what you are saying about text that is on Wikipedia. But in terms of my johnburgessactor.com site, as I say, the text that I composed was placed on my site in error and has now been withdrawn. It will never again appear anywhere other than on Wiki. Does that not resolve the point you make about me having the choice to make the material on my site available under the share alike license or is it still a problem that it is/was present on Google's cached version of the page?

Also, please can you explain to me why you have concluded that my additions on Wikipedia were insufficiently sourced. Can you please explain this and give me some examples. This is extraordinary to me. Not only are many of the plays and TV shows John Burgess appeared in, in the public domain (IMDb and Theatricalia for example), they are also referred to in the obituary written by Mike Leigh in The Guardian, which I placed in the exernal links section.

In terms of the personal information about my father's life, how is that insufficiently sourced?

Thanks for your assistance

Harvey Burgess

Harveyburg (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello again, Harveyburg. The fact that the post on the other wesbite has been deleted may well be sufficient, but I am not an expert on copyright. I would give you some advice on referencing, but your additions to the article have now been supressed due to the copyright concerns and I therefore can no longer see them. From memory, the issue was that several of the sources you used did not meet our criteria for reliable sources, and there were statements such as about your father's family background and education that were not followed by inline citations. Placing a link to a source in the external links section is not sufficient, because a reader will have no idea what parts of the article are based on it. That's why you need to use inline citations. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's greets!

Iryna Harpy (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Cheers, Iryna Harpy. The same to you, and here's to a successful year ahead improving ethnic group articles! Cordless Larry (talk) 22:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2012 Sydney anti-Islam film protests

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2012 Sydney anti-Islam film protests. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

2016

	Happy New Year 2016!
	Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary blisters. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:19, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Cullen328. I've been around these parts for a long time, but thankfully not since 1885 as that sounds tough! Cordless Larry (talk) 23:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

pictures

tyvm i actually really need that u r very kind and i would like to know how to put them on my profile thx again :) HAVE A MAGICAL AND HAPPY NEW YEAR :) :) :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by United kingdoms my home (talk • contribs) 00:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello again, United kingdoms my home. I mentioned Wikipedia:Picture tutorial in response to your Teahouse question, which should tell you all you need to add pictures. Or did you want information on userboxes? There is a directory of those at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Gallery. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

thank you so much

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Cordless Larry: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. United kingdoms my home (talk) 15:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

United kingdoms my home has given you some of her sunshine! for your help promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else sunshine, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. † — Preceding unsigned comment added by United kingdoms my home (talk • contribs) 15:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)‎

.

!

Hi there. You have forgotten to remove the montage from Bengalis and Bangladeshis. Thanks. --78.145.16.86 (talk) 18:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, 78.145.16.86. I have already removed it from Bangladeshis, but I'm one editor and there are hundreds, if not thousands, of these articles, so I can't deal with them all myself. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, you do deserve something. What about Arabs? User:Marchjuly and a canadian user of Italian ancestry are doing your same job. I'll try to ask admins if they award you.--78.145.16.86 (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Several people are doing the job, 78.145.16.86 - some of them much more so than me. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups#Implementing consensus, although there are others who haven't commented there. I'm not sure how or what an admin would award me with, but I'm not doing this for rewards in any case. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Cordless Larry, I think subjective infobox montages from articles like man and woman should also be removed per WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES. According to the updated Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Images_for_the_lead, "Articles about ethnic groups or similarly large human populations should not be illustrated by a gallery of images of group members". The men and women represent "large human populations", so I think they are in the scope of the new guideline.64.62.219.165 (talk) 23:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

You'd have to start a discussion proposing that, 64.62.219.165, because it is clear that those article are outside the scope of the ethnic groups RfC. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

I see. I am not sure that I can properly present the issue. Maybe you could start the discussion, or otherwise I will ask someone else, because I think those galleries really need to be discussed. 64.62.219.165 (talk) 23:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm not willing to do that for you, 64.62.219.165. I suggest that you start a discussion at Talk:Man and/or Talk:Woman initially. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Cordless Larry!

Happy New Year!

Cordless Larry,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Peppy Paneer (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

Thank you!

I appreciate the help that you have given me. --RedExplosives 22:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Not a problem RedExplosiveswiki, but do remember to sign your comments using the four tildes! Cordless Larry (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

David Bowie

I reverted you as the information you added was bloat. This is a featured article after all (albeit a pretty poor one) and any major changes or additions should really be discussed on the talk page. Although having seen the bastardisation of late on this article over the past few days (possibly years), I fear I may be too late. Cassianto^Talk 18:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I saw that thanks, Cassianto. I think that if there's going to be a section on his politics, it needs to cover more than just his supposed sympathy for facism, otherwise it's a case of WP:UNDUE. I've already started a discussion at Talk:David Bowie#Political views. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Like I say, in its current state, this would be laughed off the pages at FAC, unfortunately. I'm just worried that the already long article is going to be made longer. Let's see the outcome of the discussion you've been kind enough to start; I'm happy to be proved wrong, of course. I've replied there, thanks. Cassianto^Talk 18:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Yep, I'm not making any claims about the current state of the article, and this was the first time I had edited. I was just trying to balance out what I saw as a rather unbalanced section. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

No, and I agree with the UNDUE claim. He certainly wasn't noted for his strong political views, as far as I know, so to have this in a section on its own is only asking for trouble in terms of more stuff being added. With that in mind, I'd be cheering for the section's removal. Cassianto^Talk 19:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Oops I feel so stupid :( thank you so much for your help :) YuHuw (talk)

No problem at all, YuHuw. You just needed to read the full instructions at Template:Unsigned. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

I was trying to get my head around them, and thought maybe I would just experiment and then I's see where I went wrong and would be able to correct it, instead I really got myself in a fuddle. Thank you so much for helping out. YuHuw (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Deleting my account

Hi people! I would like to have my account deleted.😓 But I don't know how. Please help, explain what to do. Thx😕😓❣🎱 Crableg lover (talk) 00:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Crableg lover. I see that you have also posted this at Wikipedia talk:Teahouse. The correct place to post Teahouse questions is Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions, and you're more likely to get an answer there. Anyway, to answer your question here, you can't delete your account as all edits need to be attributable to a username. There are a few things you can do, though. One is to simply stop using your account. Others are described at Wikipedia:FAQ#How do I change my username/delete my account?. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ethnocracy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ethnocracy. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Help me

please cordless help me i dont understanding which part that you have objection on it if i write Egypt instead of Egypt, i will through the mistake?

please help me, i have a big problem with my ceo of my companyMohamed gom (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Mohamed gom. I did a Google search for several of the sentences in the Ahmed Abou Hashima article, and they were exact matches for material on various websites. That's not allowed. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If Ahmed Abou Hashima is the CEO of the company you work for, then you should also read and follow the advice at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:50, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

please cordless check my updates, all content are right if you search for my CEO you will find all data on the article true. i'm not professional writer on Wikipedia, i tried to follow Wikipedia terms please solve my problemMohamed gom (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

The issue is not whether the material is true, Mohamed gom, although the article is written in a promotional tone, which is against Wikipedia policies, and does not cite any sources, which is another problem. The main issue is the copyright violation. Much of the text appears to be taken from this article. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

you are right,

but iman khatab has written the aricle, which is iman the media manager of egyptian steel company and she responsible for write all information about my ceo

i will add sourcesMohamed gom (talk) 21:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

That doesn't give Wikipedia the right to use the material word-for-word, Mohamed gom. You also shouldn't be using sources written by employees of the company for anything other than basic facts about it. You need to find independent sources to base the article on. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

request

hi cordless larry please i want to know if wikipedia have agencies which i can communicate with them to write article with right content because i cant write the article alone please tell me which way can i go through thanks cordlessMohamed gom (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello again, Mohamed gom. If you need advice about editing, then the [Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]] is the place to ask. If you want to find someone to write the article for you, then I'm afraid I don't know where to suggest looking. You could try asking that question at the Teahouse, though, and I'm sure someone would know. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:10, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Biography

Guys, How can i put in my biography on Wikipedia? And how can i upload my photos? For Sure Chip In Please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musiige Patrick (talk • contribs) 08:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

The best place to ask this is at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions, Musiige Patrick. However, if you are planning to write an autobiography article, then you should be made aware that this is strongly discouraged. See Wikipedia:Autobiography. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muhammad

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muhammad. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Freedom Caucus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Freedom Caucus. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Littlest Pet Shop: Popular (web series) created

Hi, I'm Nana. I wanted to alert you that can I use the reference of LPS Popular wiki? I changed the text to avoid copyrights. --黄天使魚類❤(☎) 02:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello again, YellowAngelFish. No, you can't use Wikia as a source, as it is not considered reliable, in the same way that Wikipedia articles aren't seen as reliable sources for other Wikipedia articles. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

You have also recreated the article without addressing the concerns that resulted in its deletion the first time around. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

I don't get it. What does "address the concerns" mean? Please tell me... --KawaiiCafe (talk) 04:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm confused, KawaiiCafe. Were you also working on this article with YellowAngelFish? Addressing concerns means understanding why the article was deleted (failing to demonstrate notability) and making sure that any future attempt does not suffer the same problem (i.e. by demonstrating notability). Cordless Larry (talk) 08:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Don't call me KawaiiCafe, and call me Nana. And no, I am not working with YellowAngelFish. I just moved to this account, KawaiiCafe. --KawaiiCafé ◯⁀ ‿‿ ⁀◯ (☏) 08:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

I used your username to address you, KawaiiCafe, which has the additional benefit of notifying you. I don't know why you have created a new account, but you should probably have followed the instructions at Wikipedia:Changing username instead, so that your editing history is maintained in one account. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

I believe LPS popular is very significant. Many children are creating their own TV shows with dolls, many of them LPS dolls, instead of watching corporate made-TV. This show a dramatic shift in the way the younger generation is consuming media, by being producers of their own shows. One show with the greatest following is 'LPS Popular'. KawaiiCafé ◯⁀ ‿‿ ⁀◯ (☏) 08:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

In the way that the term is used by Wikipedia, notability is not the same thing as significance, KawaiiCafe. Take a look at Wikipedia:Notability and WP:Golden rule, which explain what the term means here. Basically, you need to provide evidence that the subect has been the subject of significant coverage in independent sources, by citing those sources in any article. If you want to have another go at creating an article, I suggest using Wikipedia:Articles for creation to start a draft. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Steve Wilks

Hi cordless larry thanks for the heads up i am not the man to do this halfcast is what he his and he his proud so it is not offensive can you touch it up for me with the info that is there has i wont be able to do that and i set it up so to give him a presence how can i get it up together i know i ask many question but it is love has he is love thankyou(__peterdow123_________) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterdow123 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

If you are not the person to write the article, Peterdow123, then I'm not sure why that is what you have done. I don't know what sources exist on him and don't have the time to find them (if they exist), so I can't really help. "Half-caste" might not be offensive to you or to the subject of the article, but it will be to many of our readers. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

ahhhh this is killing me i am a music man and not a computer program wiki man ahhhhh i just need the site up for the artist it is saying about picture copywriter ahh i won the pic can some one look at the site and do some adjustments with the info to make it in good stead please it would make my day and kill the stress vibe thanks please i will appreciate very very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterdow123 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

The image you used has been identified as a copyright violation. There's nothing I can do to change its copyright status, I'm afraid, Peterdow123. I suggest that if you want to learn about editing Wikipedia, you start at Wikipedia:Your first article. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Please mate can you help me fix the page the info is real and legit steve wilks is a great music man and i have the info legit to spread to the world but don't know how very well can you HELP ME? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterdow123 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

I can help by suggesting that you read Wikipedia:Your first article, Peterdow123. The issue is not with the accuracy of the article, but with compliance with Wikipedia's policies. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

ok i will do that now but i know i sound foolish but what do i have to do to make it right thank you for your time and help in this matter thanks you from the soul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterdow123 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

The most important thing is to find reliable, independent sources to base the article on, Peterdow123 - newspaper or online news articles and the like. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

yeh larry i am looking and i just added a few link like that i will look for more has it needs to be up he deserves to be seen and i will help that i love his music nd what he stands for i am brown also and live in a different world than many this is what i don't have the skills to be up to standard but i try with the help of good people thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterdow123 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Sandbox resolution

I thought I'd let you know how my issue from the Teahouse was resolved, so you could advise someone else in a similar situation. The admin merged the revision history from before the article back onto my sandbox. Libertybison (talk) 07:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, Libertybison. That's good to hear. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Sock investigation

Thanks much. Looks like I might have bit off more than I can chew. In the past, really blatant DUCK situations like this have not required diffs. If you can help with diffs of at least those seven it would be great. Coretheapple (talk) 13:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Surely the evidence in this case is that all of the accounts are promotional SPAs, Coretheapple? Of course, it may be possible that the same person isn't behind them all, but it seems likely that they are. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Exactly. If you have the time, feel free to contribute diffs as you have. I think they just want to see diffs showing similarity, not necessarily misconduct. I thought the user histories were sufficient. That diff you found already was very helpful. Coretheapple (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Actually that's not necessary - edit history was not that long. SPI report finished. "Only" eight socks. Thanks again for your help - that diff is very important!Coretheapple (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Lance Hohaia

Thanks for your reply. As I stated in my initial query, I am Lances' father and there are a few U tube clips under Lance Hohaia where I do verify various aspects of his rugby league career but I was thinking that it would be ideal to create (?) a bio of his 'Early Years phase' in one area and Wikipedia would be the vehicle. It's a fantastic source of information. I'm mindful of what you say about verifiable but at the end of the day, those aspect/articles originated from somewhere (sometimes fake!!)and that's what I on about. I am Lances' father and you can't get more hands-on than that! How about I email this article to you....you read it and then pass judgement? 125.238.134.95 (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC) parental for 33 years.

Yes, I understand what you're trying to do, but it has to be possible for everything you add to Wikipedia to be verified by any reader checking a published source, so none of it can be based on your personal knowledge or experience. It's still not clear to me what the nature of the documentation you have is, but please do feel free to e-mail me using Special:EmailUser/Cordless Larry if that will help. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Crikey dick mate I'm getting confused with all this techno-speak......why is life so complicated nowadays?? I clicked onto that highlighted address that you said to email you and 'permission error' came up. Obviously I'm too dumb to fathom all this out so if you want to, can you just email me at rexhoho@gmail.com (so I'll have your email) and I will return mail the early years bio.....otherwise I might just have to forget the whole process. Thanks for your time in this matter. 125.238.134.95 (talk) 22:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

That's possibly my fault - I forgot that you need to be a registered user to use the e-mail function (I think). I'll drop you an e-mail now. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

My Sandbox page

Hello,

I'm new to putting articles on Wikipedia and I'm very confused on how to put them on! I made a Sandbox but I'm not too sure if I even did that right. You replied to my thread and said you could help me out, so if you could that would be great! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidannoval (talk • contribs) 05:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello again, Aidannoval. You seem to have created User:Aidannoval, but that should be the place for information about you as an editor. Your sandbox would be at User:Aidannoval/Sandbox. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

sources

If I mention a comment by B. C. Khanduri from this source, then am I POV pushing ? The google snippet view is small, but can be read.

The eighth paragraph of this article by Deccan Herald states "The JNUSU under Leftist control has a dubious reputation. In 2000, it organised a mushaira, inviting poets from Pakistan, at which India was ridiculed and anti-India statements made. Two soldier veterans of the Kargil war objected and were beaten up. They were hospitalised. Sacrifices made by Indian soldiers in war with Pakistan count for little among our intellectuals at JNU." The word anti-India is mentioned. If I mention that in Wikipedia, then is it POV edit? --Captain Spark (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Captain Spark. If you add material in Wikipedia's voice that states that JNU is under leftist control or is anti-India, then yes, I think that is POV. If you carefully explain that Khanduri and Herald have described it as such, then it probably isn't POV. See WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV on this. I hope that helps you. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

No I didn't mention JNU is under leftist control or anti-India. I quoted and mentioned that the comment was made by BC Khanduri, but still it was reverted as POV pushing. Captain Spark (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

In that case, Captain Spark, you should discuss the matter at Talk:Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi, per WP:BRD. I don't know much about the context, but even if a comment has been clearly attributed to a source, if it is considered a marginal or extreme view, then including it in the article might be considered undue weight. Perhaps that is why you were reverted, but I don't know. Take it to the article talk page. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I tried talk page, but it's not working. I won't comment there anymore. They know many policies which I am not aware right now. Captain Spark (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

When you say it's not working, Captain Spark, do you mean that people are disagreeing with you, or that the discussion is not attracting enough contributors to establish consensus? If you want wider involvement, you might consider making use of Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

They are claiming that my sources are not reliable which are from Deccan Chronicle, Daily Mail, IBN-7 and Rajasthan Patrika, which states something opposite of sources from these three: Rediff.com, The Tribune (Chandigarh) and The Hindu. They claim Deccan Chronicle article was written by Srinivas Kumar Sinha, so can't be trusted as he is a retired army officer. They find Daily Mail was written by a biased writer and as it is published in 2016, it is wrong about an incident in 2000. They find IBN-7 and Rajasthan Patrika as local newspaper and the source is personal opinion and tabloid. Among the sources that they support, I found only The Hindu as neutral according to their own logic as the Rediff.com (website founded in 1996, publishing an online article in 2000, when the website is 4 years old) and Tribune editorial which is also written as personal opinion. They trust the personal opinion of the Tribune editor but not the personal opinion of those who wrote the articles in Deccan Chronicle and Daily Mail. Captain Spark (talk) 10:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

I suggest opening a request for comment, Captain Spark. I don't know much about those sources, other than the Daily Mail - which I would avoid (see WP:DAILYMAIL) unless it's just to factually report the opinion of a columnist there. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

thank you

Thank you for having answered my question on the Teahouse, okay I'll avoid telling it my article.Luke de paul (talk) 13:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Iceni Academy (Colchester)

Hello, I know that there are discussions for deletion for this article, but possibly adding extra references and making the page a 'stub' could possibly improve the chances of survival for this article?

Please reply to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:East_Anglian_Regional

Thank you. East Anglian Regional (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Adding more references might help if they demonstrate that the school meets the criteria set out at WP:ORG or WP:GNG, East Anglian Regional. Most schools don't meet these criteria, though. Making the page a stub doesn't deal with the notability concerns. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Addition to a page

Dear Cordless Larry, A section titled "famous and notable maltipoos" has been deleted twice by you from the Maltipoo page. And you left a message to propose these editions on your Talk page. May I know why did you delete it? I have restored it again, I hope you don't delete it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.12.98 (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

I meant on the article's talk page. The material is not supported by secondary sources. See Talk:Maltipoo#Notable dogs for an explanation. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	wait i have got extra info about good shepherd eng school . but need a day time. so please take out the tag. it is a useful article for the school students.if you do the help ,you can help some students of the school. wiki tamil 100 16:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, Wiki tamil 100, the deletion discussion is underway at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Shepherd English School, so I can't remove the tag from the article. You can comment on the discussion or improve the article in the meantime, though. The discussion will run for a few days yet. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

its ok. i had made it because it is the school where i study. i knew about my school well. but exams are held for me.so please do something by attending the discussion. this my kind request. wiki tamil 100 16:08, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

You need to demonstrate that the school meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines, Wiki tamil 100. See Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Cordless Larry (talk) 16:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	thank you for your help and co-operation.i had written my opinion about the school in the discussion page. if i did any mistake sorry. wiki tamil 100 16:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

OK, Wiki tamil 100. In future, if you want to leave me a message, please post it as a regular talk page comment, rather than awarding me a barnstar. This is not what barnstars are for. You also need to sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~). I suspect that you are doing so manually at present, as there is no link in your signature as required by Wikipedia policy. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

I knew it well. but i thought of awarding you with lots of barnstars. i like your kindness. you can leave me some message, every time in User wiki tamil 100|talk i can't understand. is the school's article escaped from deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki tamil 100 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 13 March 2016‎ (UTC)

No, Wiki tamil 100. The deletion discussion will continue for several days at least and will be closed according to consensus. Please sign your posts as described above. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your answer on my question "Additional link etc." I hope this is the correct way to do that. Windeman (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia not a "reliable source"

Thanks for your edit and message. Most academic institutions do not allow Wikipedia as a "reliable source" for papers, etc. It's ironic that Wikipedia takes the same view of itself. Vejlefjord (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Well, I wouldn't say that it is ironic but rather simply necessary, Vejlefjord. The risk of circular referencing would be too great if this rule didn't exist. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of state leaders in 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of state leaders in 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk page indentation

Cordless Larry, please have a look at Help:Using_talk_pages#Indentation. Following the standard indentation style on talk pages makes discussions easier for others to follow. RockMagnetist(talk) 23:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Which edits or page does this message refer to, RockMagnetist? Cordless Larry (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Most of your edits at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Religious_Bias. RockMagnetist(talk) 23:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Take another look and you'll see that it is the editor who I am responding to who is not indenting comments, RockMagnetist. I have been indenting mine. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Oops - sorry about that! I wasn't paying close enough attention to which link I clicked. RockMagnetist(talk) 23:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

No problem, RockMagnetist. People asking questions at the Teahouse often fail to indent their comments (and to sign them) as they are new and inexperienced. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Question

Is my post "Article title as possible original research" on the Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard the proper place to have it? I've never used this noticeboard and no one responded to my post. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 10:50, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that is the right place, but that noticeboard doesn't appear to be very active these days. Give it a few days and hopefully you'll receive a reply or two, Mitchumch. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 10:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

As you say i have give you a link of deleted page.

First of all thank you so much for your reply. It's name is mithilalok & here is the link " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mithilalok ".

I am waiting for your reply.Designprasho (talk) 08:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I have already replied at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions, Designprasho. Let's keep the discussion there. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello Cordless Larry. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 09:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Dubrovnik

Hi there. I don't think I lost anything in that revert to last stable version. Did I? I think that content you restored came afterward. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Anna Frodesiak. Your revert changed "was" back to "will be". That change was made a couple of days before your revert. Not a problem though! Cordless Larry (talk) 10:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Ah, it must have been added and removed during that span. My revert shows no difference between the 06:18, 10 March 2016‎ version and my version. I feel a bit daft today. I have been doing some off-wiki things today that have taxed my brain and I'm a bit spaced out. I still haven't quite figured out when it was added and removed. :) Thank you kindly for finding that. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

No worries at all, Anna Frodesiak. I'd had it in my mind to make these changes since I first saw the edit in any case. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, my friend. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Another contributor re-inserting incorrect information

Hi there, I corrected a factual inaccuracy on the page on a living person (Sugata Bose), by deleting the claim that he is married to Ayesha Jalal (the page on whom I also corrected). Mr Bose is unmarried. Another contributor repeatedly re-inserted the inaccurate information (on both pages), using as 'source' media items which contain the inaccurate claim (probably taken from Wikipedia!). As I am deleting inaccurate information, I cannot put in any 'attribution'. Also, it is not possible to provide proof of something that is non-existent. There is a legal affidavit by Mr Bose available online which shows he has no spouse. But as I am only deleting wrong information, not adding any, I couldn't see any way of referencing it. I can't understand why the other contributor insists on the wrong marital status....Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danube41 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Danube41. The best place to discuss this would be on the talk page of the article concerned, which is at Talk:Sugata Bose. If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia, head on over to Wikipedia:Teahouse. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Emily's D+Evolution changes...

...hi, and thanks for helping me out on the album page for Emily's D+Evolution. It looks like you included some interview excerpts/quotes, which is awesome. I resubmitted it, and again, much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewcasebier (talk • contribs) 22:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

And I've accepted it! Congrats on the acceptance, Matthewcasebier, and thanks for your help, Cordless Larry. /wiae /tlk 12:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Religion and Advertising of Controversial Products

Hello Larry,

I have recently contributed to Wikipedia. The article that i have written is Religion and Advertising of Controversial Products. I see that the article may be deleted on some grounds. I was hoping you can give me some suggestions on how i can improve this article. Also i was thinking that maybe i should shorten this and add this to the advertising page rather than having a page for its own.

Your advise is appreciated!

Regards,

Akshay Massey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaymassey (talk • contribs) 21:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Akshaymassey. Religion and Advertising of Controversial Products reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article, and appears to include original research (did you conduct the questionnaire?), which Wikipedia does not publish. I suggest heading over to Wikipedia:Teahouse for further advice. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Larry,

I did not conduct the study not developed the questionnaire, but i do agree with your insights. Where can i request this article to be taken off? I will modify this article as per the requirements and post it under the advertising section.

Thanks for your help!

Akshay Massey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaymassey (talk • contribs) 22:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

The deletion discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion and Advertising of Controversial Products, so you might want to comment there, Akshaymassey. Please note that Wikipedia doesn't have an "advertising section", though. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia: Requested articles

You often advise people at the Teahouse who want article about themselves or their bands to post requests to WP:Requested articles. While that is the right answer on paper, there is no right answer in reality. You are essentially telling them to put their requests in, if not a black hole, a rabbit hole. (It isn't a black hole because they are still there, and the information paradox does not apply. However, articles very seldom come out of the hole. Rabbits and wiki-gnomes may go in and out, but they seldom bring articles out.) You are probably doing the right thing, in that, if they think that they will get their articles some day, they will avoid posting them to AFC and wasting everyone's time. Perhaps the right answer would be to tell them that if they or their bands are notable, someone else will do it, but, since they probably aren't notable, no on will do it. As long as they think that their articles will come out, it is a Lie to children. Thanks, sort of. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Good point, Robert McClenon (although I think "often" is a stretch), and I myself wonder whether it is worth telling people to post there, but that is the correct forum, whereas the Teahouse isn't the place to ask other editors to write an article. I'll consider just telling them what you suggest in future. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

After writing that, I think that it is best to do as you do. Just tell them to go to RA, and maybe they will do so, and maybe nothing will happen for a while. That keeps them from asking us to write their article, or from submitting a draft and asking us to clean it up from their bias. I think that the advice is a Lie to children, and is the right advice to give to children who want us to help them. Once in a while, they may really have notable topics. Usually, they don't. It is often kinder to tell them to go to a rabbit hole than to tell them that they aren't notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

What I was going to write above, but didn't quite get around to, Robert McClenon, was that I think in future I might tell them that if the subject is notable, or becomes notable, then at some point it will get written about, and that putting in a request might speed that up that process a little, but that there's no guarantee. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

I put my grandfather in in 2013. He was the principal author of the United States Code. He hasn't come out. Actual notability is no evidence that an article will come out. However, it is a useful rabbit hole. If you shrink to rabbit size and go down the rabbit hole, you won't bother the rest of us. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Specialized Bicycle Components, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chris McCormack, Javier Gomez and Matt Hunter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

All fixed. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Collaboration

Lets collaborate on a article . Hihiimpal (talk) 01:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, Hihiimpal, but most of my time for Wikipedia is being dedicated to the Teahouse at present. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

you are so helpful and informative! Keep it up!

Sparkling Waters (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Sparkling Waters. Happy editing to you! Cordless Larry (talk) 17:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Domestic violence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domestic violence. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thanks for taking the time to welcome newcomers. It's too bad I can't give you one of my pies in real life. =) Best, Ellen -- EllenMcGill (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Superdiversity

The DRN thread cannot be opened until you are properly notified. Also, the filing party misspelled your user name, but I corrected it. We are still waiting for proper notice. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Is there anything I could or should do, Robert McClenon? Cordless Larry (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

No. If you are properly notified, you are encouraged, but not required, to file a statement, and are encouraged, but not required, to participate in moderated discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Also, did you see my comment about the removed RfC? How does that affect a possible case? Cordless Larry (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I saw it. It doesn't affect a case, since it was withdrawn. An open RFC would pre-empt other dispute resolution. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, Robert McClenon. To be honest, judging by the user's comments on the article talk page, I don't think they really understand much about how Wikipedia works, and they may well not be aware of what they need to do in relation to DRN. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

First, it is common for filing parties who come to DRN not to understand much about DRN or Wikipedia. That isn't a problem if they are willing to listen, because the moderator can explain how Wikipedia works and how DRN works. It only becomes a problem if one of the parties (filing or otherwise) is stubborn, and then the moderator can fail the case after admonishing the parties. Many new editors don't understand, but DRN can be a way to learn. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Second, I have never heard of superdiversity outside of Wikipedia. That makes me think that it is Commonwealth English, and it appears that the closest American English equivalent is affirmative action. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Third, since the dispute seems to be about superdiversity in New Zealand, it isn't clear whether the article should be superdiversity, or superdiversity in New Zealand, or New Zealand, or what, but that can come out in DRN, if accepted. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Robert McClenon. My point was really just that the editor could perhaps do with some guidance on how to notify the other parties, as I suspect that they don't realise they need to do this. Perhaps a Teahouse invite would be in order? I'd be perfectly happy to take part if the case gets off the ground, though I am by no means an expert in the topic. The only reason I got involved is that the article is on my watchlist from when there was some dispute over use of the term at Somalis in the United Kingdom. I am familiar with some of the literature, however, and I can say for sure that superdiversity isn't the same thing as affirmative action. The latter is a policy prescription designed to reduce inequalities between racial or ethnic groups, whereas superdiversity is really a descriptive concept that describes the changing nature of diversity in countries such as the UK. The idea is basically that whereas such countries have a history of large-scale immigration from a limited range of countries, in recent decades these migration flows come from a much broader range of countries and include an increasing range of people, from workers to students to refugees. This article, by the sociologist who coined the term, explains it better than I can. On your final point, I agree that there is some confusion about the article is actually about. The material about New Zealand was added relatively recently, and is the source of the dispute. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I understand your point about the difference between superdiversity and affirmative action. However, the term superdiversity is not, to the best of my knowledge, used in the United States, so that I assume it is a Commonwealth term. As to whether to notify the other party how to notify, I will let them ask. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

It's barely used outside of academia (in fact, outside of the discipline of sociology), Robert McClenon. There is some literature applying the concept to the United States and to the Netherlands, but most of it is focused on the UK from what I can tell. If you asked a British person on the street what it meant, though, I very much doubt that they would have heard of the term. It doesn't get used much in the media or in policy circles, from what I can tell. By contrast, I was at the British Sociological Association conference last week, and it was a bit of buzzword. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

In that case, the term may not have existed around 1970 in the United States, but was implemented by a reform of the immigration act which eliminated national origin quotas and focused on in-demand job skills and family unification, and had the effect of significantly increasing immigration from Latin America and Asia as opposed to from Europe. I don't know what superdiversity would be in New Zealand since I don't know what non-British immigrants New Zealand has traditionally had. I understand that the United Kingdom has accepted some number of immigrants from former African and Asian colonies, so that superdiversity would be from other parts of Asia and Latin America. So in the political sphere it is a goal of immigration policy, while affirmative action has to do with citizens and examines their national origin. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

I remember Somalis in the United Kingdom, where eventually someone had to be topic-banned. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that article led to all sorts of fun and games, Robert McClenon (sarcasm!). Cordless Larry (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, the first time the term was used was by Steve Vertovec in 2005. Of course, the conditions it describes may have pre-dated that significantly. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:56, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok

Ok, cordless larry. :-) ~~(…MA.Tay.CA…)~~ (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

I know list is incomplete, it need,s work, but It is difficult for me to work alone, list need more editing by another jatt users. ~~(…MA.Tay.CA…)~~ (talk) 10:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, ~~(…MA.Tay.CA…)~~, but it is better to reply at the Teahouse, where you originally asked your question. I did not say that the list was incomplete, but pointed out that there were problems with the links - some of which point to articles not bout Jat clans. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Ok. ~~(…MA.Tay.CA…)~~ (talk) 10:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

I hereby award you the Cup & Saucer Award of Integrity

	Cup and Saucer Badge
	Awarded to those who uphold the values of the Teahouse by being respectful and courteous to guests and hosts alike. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
For gently reminding us to hew to our principles. ;) J-Mo 23:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Jtmorgan. That means a lot, especially coming from you. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Updating a Page Name on Wikipedia

Hi Cordless Larry,

How do i update a business or company name i have created on wikipedia.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragonmyth4time (talk • contribs) 09:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Dragonmyth4time. If you want to update an article that you have create, navigate to that article and click the "edit" tab at the top of the page. If you have any other questions about Wikipedia, you might want to ask them at the Teahouse, where you can get input from a wider range of editors. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I now see that you probably mean that you want to change the title of an article. To do that, you need to click "Move page" on the "Page" drop-down menu, but you can only do so once your account is autoconfirmed, which happens automatically once it is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits. I can move a page for you if you give me the details. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Latest removal at Bulgarian Turks

Please, join Talk:Bulgarian Turks and state your grounds. Thank you. --87.227.209.36 (talk) 05:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)