User talk:Closedmouth/Archive 19
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Closedmouth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | → | Archive 25 |
Newkirk
Closedmouth, that was a sloppy mistake. Thanks for catching it. I explained on the talk page. Cheers.Griswaldo (talk) 21:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- That's fine. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Prods on Rodney Sneijder
Hi Closedmouth. I tagged both prods on this for separate reasons. The BLP prod was because it was an unreferenced BLP. The regular prod was because he doesn't meet our notability guidelines. If you wish to object to the regular prod because you think he's notable feel free to do that. But I don't think you should object to the second prod just because the BLP prod is already attached. If someone comes along to source this article I'd now have to delete it through AfD. There are times when it is advantageous to use both prods simultaneously. ThemFromSpace 12:42, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Reconfirmation diff to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe
Hello. This is a message to inform you that your name has been removed from from the list of Wikipedia Signpost subscribers. Do not worry; this is simply a method of reforming the Signpost so that automated bots do not fill up retired users' talk pages with Signpost subscriptions (see discussion here) and to make life easier for the Signpost. If you wish to re-receive subscriptions, please send a reconfirmation edit to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe by signing with
- MessageDeliveryBot [you can also use a user talk subpage (like
- MessageDeliveryBot, replacing SUBPAGE with the subpage for the delivery), but this won't trigger your "New messages" bar.] Thank you for understanding.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of TeleComNasSprVen (talk) at 06:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC).
- ...the fuck? --Closedmouth (talk) 14:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- You're being forced into retirement. Thank you and have a nice day. Killiondude (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Rudolf Skácel
Thank you very much for kindly deleting the edit containing the expletive on Rudolf Skácel's goal scoring attributes. I personally have no idea how my account was used to insert this piece of vandalism but I will endeavor to track down the culprit. I have since changed my password and can only apologise to you for any in inconvenience caused. Ant321 (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm so confused. --Closedmouth (talk) 09:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
Nomination of Christmas Don't Be Late (film) for deletion
The article Christmas Don't Be Late (film) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Don't Be Late (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
Review of speedy deletion of Rick Stokes
Hi, I was looking over the history of this article (after reading a query from the article creator at Portal talk:LGBT). The second edit was to blank it and request deletion as an attack page. I wonder though if before deletion, you looked at the blanked article. I see nothing there that could be construed as an attack. It needs work, but it claims notability and is not negative towards the subject. Could you please review your deletion and either restore the article or tell me and the article creator why you do not feel that is appropriate? Thanks, LadyofShalott 18:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, huh, I must have read the first paragraph in the wrong context. Apologies, feel free to restore it. --Closedmouth (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll go restore it now! LadyofShalott 02:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Repeated and persistant vandlaism by User talk:170.91.194.9
We'd all appreciate your taking further, and stronger, action. Viva-Verdi (talk) 23:21, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Lazyhawk
Dear Closedmouth,
Regards to blocking of User_talk:Lazyhawk's IP. I've checked the address specified by ProcseeBot, and I can't connect there. Have you checked yourself that it is an open proxy indeed?
As for Lazyhawk, he's well known Russian wikipedian in very good standing, so I'd ask to trust him and to try to assist him in attempts to understand what's wrong. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 14:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- I checked it again last night, and it seems to have been rotated or whatever, and is no longer open. I was going to unblock it myself but slakr beat me to it. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 07:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Bow Leg
Hi
I do not know what happened there - I had two problems last night
First there was a problem when the secure server went wrong last night - during a save I had two AWB windows which came up and told me I had new messages - the secure server was down though and I could not re-login in. I closed AWB and logged in on the normal servers.
I shut down AWB and then re-opened it.
Secondly when I did a later AWB session the Fronds plug-in was automatically enabled. It gave me an AWB window that was full of one word repeated hundreds of times down the screen
Again I shut down AWB and then re-opened it.
As far as I was aware it hadn't made a save at either of those points so I truly do not know what went wrong. I will look at my other edits around that time to make sure nothing else was corrupted.
Thanks for letting me know Chaosdruid (talk) 12:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- I have checked ten minutes before and after the one you found and the rest are ok. I still have no clue as to how it happened - thanks for fixing it though :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 12:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
RE:
Wait, you're right. I thought he was doing the vandalism. Flying on auto-pilot has drawbacks, eh? :P m.o.p 22:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
National Asshole Day
It is a fictional holiday but it deserves a Wikipedia page. Restore the page now.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Helenak0991 (talk • contribs)
Indonesian misinformation vandal back again...
Hello.
The Indonesian misninformation vandal has returned right this minute. This time, he used the address 118.137.75.198 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Probably, the rangeblock on the 118.137.0.0/17 has now expired and is now taking advantage. Need your action ASAP. Thank you. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 11:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Never mind. Already blocked for 12 hours. But just in case, if you could do rangeblocks, can you put reapply it on the 118.137.0.0/17 range? The guy must taken advantage since the rangeblock expired a few days ago. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 11:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'll keep an eye on it. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Ehsan ghaem maghami is Iranian, not Israeili!
I've changed the mistake on "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_chess#Most_simultaneous_games" but you reverted it! Take a look here to see where he is really from! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ehsan_Ghaem-Maghami —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.61.181.24 (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- But the title of the source is "Israeli strips Iran of Guinness world record in chess"[1]. Has somebody screwed with that? --Closedmouth (talk) 11:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's the old news, this record is broken multiple times, I've removed the old source from the section, there's also a problem in "See Also" section, could you please change that, the mistake is repeated there92.61.181.24 (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- That should be fixed; apologies for the warning, you can remove it if you'd like. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's the old news, this record is broken multiple times, I've removed the old source from the section, there's also a problem in "See Also" section, could you please change that, the mistake is repeated there92.61.181.24 (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
quickerazy
sorry
- Okay. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
IP socks
Hi, Closedmouth, thanks for reverting the edits on Real Steel and such. Not sure if you are familiar with Pricer1980 and his IP socks (or someone in a very similar pattern), but I explained the situation to another editor here. We could block, but I'm not keen on it because we have to find the next IP that pops up. (I've reported a few already, just seems easier to monitor the one right now.) Erik (talk | contribs) 12:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Page reverted by someone without a clue
You are mentioned. Care to comment here? -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
What the hell was this?
See Pattiso talk page, someone seems to think that he was born in 1978?!BHillbillies (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
You recently proposed that this article be deleted: [2] I agree with your concerns, and have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carole Lieberman. Robofish (talk) 01:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I want
your love and I want your revenge. Killiondude (talk) 08:04, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Get your buttocks into IRC. --Closedmouth (talk) 08:08, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
91.122.81.253
Sorry to disturb you, can you please block 91.122.81.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)? It is being used by a known Russian vandal putting false miscellaneous "anime" info on Philippine TV programs like Super Inggo. Needing your action ASAP. Thanks. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 09:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Closedmouth (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
User talk:198.189.140.205
There is some funny business going on at User talk:198.189.140.205, whose unblock you declined, you may want to swing by that way again. Monty845 (talk) 22:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC) Looks like another admin already took care of it. Monty845 (talk) 22:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
Joseph Kuklinski
Can you restore Joseph Kuklinski please, you can take it to AFD if you want. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Closedmouth (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Article about Molly O'Connell
Why you removed the BLPPROD tag on Molly O'Connell article? I guess you should not remove the tag and continue it for delete until the actual date expires. Would you join the deletion discussion for discuss on the deleting article. ApprenticeFan work 13:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Because Molly O'Connell#References, thought that was kinda obvious. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:23, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Relation Art
Thanks. I really screwed that one up. First I bungled the move, then I missed fixing the redirect that was made through the bungle, even though I do this day in and out. I think I need a vacation.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I read the contract, we're allowed to make a mistake every now and then. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
Ayurveda - Deletion Log - March 26th
Hey there Closedmouth, I am trying to dispute a deletion of a page I developed Ayurveda (band) and you posted something on the Deletion Log (Mar 26th) that I don't understand. I am wondering if you could explain it to me and then perhaps hold my hand through this dispute process. I am finding it to be very confusing and am most anxious to work with the Wiki Gods to clarify my position on the page and to make changes that might be in order. Anything you could do would be most appreciated. Whysosirius (talk) 13:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- I simply deleted a redirect to the page which had already been deleted. I had nothing to do with the deletion of the article itself. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Who should I be addressing this with, do you know? Whysosirius (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Orangemike (talk · contribs) deleted the article in question. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Who should I be addressing this with, do you know? Whysosirius (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
Regarding an unblock request you declined
I note your response here. My query is whether the other party was giving permission or stating the physical possibility? LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- That was the most awesome unblock decline I have ever seen. (No wonder people are so eager to become admins.) 28bytes (talk) 21:39, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have to second that, pure awesomeness. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 01:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
For your response to Negi(afk). Nyttend (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC) |
- You're a lovely audience. I'm here all week. Try the veal. --Closedmouth (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
+1 Frank | talk 12:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Objection
19:02, 1 April 2011 Closedmouth (talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Companyia Elèctrica Dharma" (Deleted because "G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page".(TW))
NOTE: THIS ARTICLE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. I'll keep building it up on the incoming days. If you would like to help improving the English language expression or helping anyway, please, don't hesitate. Tnx! - This is a 40 years band, the most important from my country. And I am a begginer at Wikipedia. At least I quit 3 years ago since there's all this bourucracy started. I don't know exactly where to type things as this "hold on" etc and have other things to do also in my life. Please just stop preassure. IT'S A CONTRIBUTION and I think it's important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joel També (talk • contribs) 19:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't delete the article, just the talk page. The article is still here: Companyia Elèctrica Dharma --Closedmouth (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Don't delete
Please don't delete any of my pages such as User:UncleDouggie/test4 unless I specifically request it. I'm rewriting Twinkle and need lots of very weird looking stuff to test error conditions. Thanks. —UncleDouggie (talk) 08:09, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, it looked like you were done with it. --Closedmouth (talk) 09:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I continuously run queries on all my pages even if I don't make any actual edits. I need to see exactly how the API returns errors. —UncleDouggie (talk) 09:12, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Closedmouth, I'm just wondering why you indef'd Negi (afk). I hadn't seen anything that I would call terribly actionable since my block expired, and your block summary of "troll" was not terribly enlightening. I'm not looking for a change, because I can't say I disagree, but I would like some clarification. Cheers. lifebaka++ 15:59, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- He's made it clear through his general attitude and through off-wiki communication that his sole purpose here is to cause disruption. I would go so far as to say he's performing a breaching experiment, but that's probably giving him too much credit. He is essentially an inveterate troll; he's contributed nothing to Wikipedia except vitriol and personal attacks and I see no reason to afford him the ability to continue to do so. --Closedmouth (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ah. Thanks for the clarification. I have had a touch of off-wiki communication with him myself (which I invited), and you might be right. Still, I'm going to do my best to give him a chance before I wash my hands of the situation. Supposing that he can convince me that he will stop trolling and I forward the emails stating such to you, would you be terribly opposed to an unblock? lifebaka++ 18:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I gave him a 4im warning for vandalising SPI, then he vandalised the AfD page by removing the banner at the top of it so I reported the user to AIV. He was banned from the IRC for trolling and has communicated to me and others that he has no interest in contributing other than trolling. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:50, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I would be sceptical. Very sceptical. --Closedmouth (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ah. Thanks for the clarification. I have had a touch of off-wiki communication with him myself (which I invited), and you might be right. Still, I'm going to do my best to give him a chance before I wash my hands of the situation. Supposing that he can convince me that he will stop trolling and I forward the emails stating such to you, would you be terribly opposed to an unblock? lifebaka++ 18:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Ray William Johnson
Hello, I see that you are the administrator responsible for salting =3, the popular show name of Ray William Johnson. This article has now been created, and has stood for over a week without a deletion attempt. Could you please create =3 as a redirect to Ray William Johnson, as well as any other related pages which were repeated created, that I am unaware of? Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 00:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Closedmouth (talk) 04:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
24.116.79.135
Hi, Closedmouth. Re your revert here, I think a final warning is also in order. (RevDel would also be appropriate per criteria 2 and 3, although I'm pretty much indifferent to the namecalling.) In any case, it's clearly one user at the IP, and they haven't made a constructive edit yet. My original warning to them stemmed from an incident of pure vandalism hiding behind a plausible edit summary. One more misstep and they should be blocked. Rivertorch (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- There were no edits from the IP after my revert, so I left it. Also don't see anything particularly heinous in the edits requiring revdel, seems like pretty bog-standard vandalism to me. --Closedmouth (talk) 19:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
Adept (band) deleted??!!!
Adept is a great band, and has significant popularity over in Sweden. Why has it been deleted? Is this a joke??? is there a new article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.121.55.4 (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Reasons for decline of unblock
Dear Closedmouth,
Can you please explain to me the reasons for the decline of request? Frankly I'm not sure why I was blocked to start with and I don't really understand much about IP addresses and how they work so I would appreciate if you use "layman's terms" in this regard. I'm not contesting your decision, but if I want to avoid things like this I would need to understand how it happened and how to avoid it. Thanks for your understanding. --Mahaodeh (talk) 08:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Are you serious? If you're posting here you're clearly not blocked. --Closedmouth (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Can you unblock me
I am Newcrash and I have been blocked and my request to be unblocked was decline. I gave my reasons way I sould be unblocked. At the time I was doing small edits and made a few articles but still looking at the guide lines. Some time later on the 18th April I got a massages saying that I was bloacked because I was Sockpuppet Ryan kirkpatrick which I have tried to explain that I am not him which has not worded. I am still trying to get unblock and I ask for your help and would be really thankful if you could unblock me think you. Newcrash (Newcrash) 19:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Offensive edits
I see that you have redacted the edits by user:86.161.97.4 to the Alan Shearer article. He/she has made identical edits to Gabby Logan and Ewan McGregor. Can you do the same for them as well? Thanks. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:21, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- Beg you pardon - they have now been redacted. Sorry to bother you! Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi, I'm not sure I understand your BLPPROD on this article, there appear to be sources in the External links section which demonstrate the chap exists and is an editor of a publication, they are just not wrapped in footnotes. I have doubts about notability, but that's a different issue. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 07:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Wasn't me. --Closedmouth (talk) 07:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, thanks. Fæ (talk) 07:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
VT
Regarding Vojsava Kastrioti, who was the user that requested the protection? The result of various discussions on RSN(latest) and RfC{Request for Comment) has been not to include any of the sources that User:Zoupan is always reverting.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 08:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- WhiteWriter (talk · contribs) requested the lock, and I protected the wrong version on purpose, as admins are required to do. --Closedmouth (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Are you saying that the protected page is "biased, nationalistic, libellous, inaccurate" ([3]) ? How the reader is informed on that and how the article can become a true encyclopaedic one? --Euzen (talk) 14:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Well, i asked for help alredy, but as user Zjarri managed to obtain lower article protection to semi-protected, we should count minutes until edit war begin again. But thanks anyway, i tried. Most related POV-push editors are willing to use talk only when wrong version in on the air, so... I give up anyway. Thanks for your kind help. :) --WhiteWriter speaks 18:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yesterday! :) --WhiteWriter speaks 14:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
help me
how are you ?
i hope youre good
i need help with locking an article so it doesent get any more attention
someone told me an article was written about me on here and i checked it out i have made some corrections and hey there was this thing about getting the article deleted
im guessing youre an admin so i want you to check it out please
thanks a lot
the article is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugaspott
Sugaspott (talk) 10:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Is there anything in particular that you have a problem with? A quick look shows that there aren't many references that we would define as coming from reliable sources, so if those aren't found the article may be deleted at some point. If there are any factual inaccuracies, point them out and they can be removed. --Closedmouth (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Wait, are you also Wikispott (talk · contribs)? If so, please only use one account to edit, thank you. --Closedmouth (talk) 10:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Just stopping by to say thanks for the quick typo-fixes you did on my user page. It's somewhat embarrassing to have inadvertently used an American English spelling in a paragraph about my dislike of American English :P Thanks! ★KEYS★ (talk) 20:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Due to your cryptic message, I discovered a set of about 1600 pages that are quite silly. gj! --MZMcBride (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
More like 2600, I guess. Additional info available here. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:17, 4 May 2011 (UTC) Like I liked this page. Killiondude (talk) 05:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Dislike you. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Bio
Hey, I'm currently writing a bio, and am not sure i'm doing it all correctly, as it's my first post. Is there any way you could take a look at it and help me with formatting? --Downsadie (talk) 03:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, do I post that at the top of the one I wrote in my userspace (before I move it live)? Also, can I only link other pages to it once it's live? Last question: How do I add a picture? Is that another thing that can only be done once live? Thanks!--Downsadie (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
Thank you for stopping to contribute to my page. Let me know if I can ever return the favor. willis4play (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank You!
Thank You! GaneshBhakt (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:04, 5 May 2011 (UTC).
Just a heads up
Hi. :) The issue of the above user's image uploads was raised at ANI today, and I'm afraid that I am in disagreement with you about the usability of the copyright license here, as it seems to preclude derivative works by requiring that the material be "reproduced accurately". Since I see now that you had expressed an opinion at his user page, I wanted to let you know that the images are now at PUF: here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Crap. Sorry for the mess :( --Closedmouth (talk) 16:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, it's an understandable first impression. :) I've just encountered the accurate reproduction issue before. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Ok, I'm sorry...:'( — Preceding unsigned comment added by DymlaBuchye (talk • contribs) 16:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Template:English has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Colonies Chris (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?
Facepalm
Re [4] - my bad, thanks for fixing that. I am not sure what I was thinking there. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:22, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, happens all the time. --Closedmouth (talk) 06:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News