User talk:Bkonrad/Archive 88
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bkonrad. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | Archive 89 | Archive 90 | → | Archive 95 |
Rollback query
Was this an accident? I don't see what was so wrong with my response. › Mortee talk 23:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Just an accident. I went to undo it and someone had already reverted it. older ≠ wiser 00:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- No worries, just thought I'd ask in case I'd mucked something up without realising. › Mortee talk 00:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of The Witcher (TV series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Witcher (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Witcher (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- AlexTW 08:44, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Why are you deleted a page?
Page Deepak Kumar, you are recently deleted this page, Even same people of this name move to Deepak Kumar (disambiguation). That created page was all right according to IMDB of Celebrity biography. InKwrite (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- If you think this new Deepak Kumar it's notable,do not overwrite the disambiguation page. Create a separate new article for him. older ≠ wiser 01:20, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
My edit
Hello Bkonrad, I was wondering why you keep undoing my edits. There's nothing wrong with them.--Zainchupacabra (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, your edits add an unambiguous entry to a disambiguation page. older ≠ wiser 00:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi
I was wondering why do you keep undoing my edits? Wikileb123 (talk) 19:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Your revert of my edit
Why did you revert my edit adding a hidden comment to Douchebag? [1] IntoThinAir (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Why did you add such a useless comment? older ≠ wiser 01:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- To warn potential vandals trying to emulate a webcomic joke by vandalizing the page that they shouldn't do so, as it is a waste of their time. This is in keeping with the editnotice on the disambiguation's talk page. IntoThinAir (talk) 02:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Is there a history of editors making such specific edits? The language is so specific as to enact the very thing it cautions against. older ≠ wiser 12:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- To warn potential vandals trying to emulate a webcomic joke by vandalizing the page that they shouldn't do so, as it is a waste of their time. This is in keeping with the editnotice on the disambiguation's talk page. IntoThinAir (talk) 02:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Re: Zoee
Hi there, You keep deleting the page I'm trying to create Zoee, but you never seem to explain why you don't approve of it so I can amend. Could you possibly share the reason why it's not meeting your standard? Thank you :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowerblossomtravel (talk • contribs) 07:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- The article has been previously deleted. I suggest you try creating a WP:DRAFT of the article and let other edits determine if it now satisfies notability criteria. older ≠ wiser 12:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
The problem is that the reader will not find W.I.T.C.H. Women's International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell, explicitely there (both Your modifications). AVS (talk) 06:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)