User talk:Bearcat/Archive 73
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bearcat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | Archive 74 | Archive 75 | → | Archive 80 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wiki Loves Africa 2023
A tag has been placed on Category:Wiki Loves Africa 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Medicinals for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medicinals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
QuietHere (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
LGBT categories
Hello, Bearcat,
I hope your new year is starting off well! Recently, an editor has been emptying out categories for gay and lesbian artists of certain nationalities as you can see in Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion. Since I know you care about LGBT issues and categories, too, I thought I'd ask for your opinion and request that you look over the situation.
On one hand, we discourage editors from emptying categories "out of process", especially systematically like this and prefer them to use CFD. On the other hand, the categories being emptied were created just over a year ago by a sockmaster so they are not longstanding categories that have been around since the early days of Wikipedia. Perhaps it is preferable that individuals are categorized in the broader LGBT categories than specifically as "gay" or "lesbian" actors or musicians. I'm not really sure about this categorization change which led me to your talk page. I have posted a note on the editor's talk page asking for them to start using CFD but I haven't reverted their edits. Thanks, in advance, for checking this out. Liz Read! Talk! 22:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User vot-1
A tag has been placed on Category:User vot-1 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Album chart usages for Billboard Top Albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, Bearcat,
- This category is unlikely to be deleted, I just wanted to alert you that it was empty. Maybe it needs an empty category tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
About 罗放
Please consider monitor the edits of 罗放. They have quite an immature and biased edit pattern and behaviour. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 22:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- To Eric Liu，You have repeatedly displayed hostile, and prejudiced behavior. And the template creation and editing you mentioned in zhwiki are constructive operations for sure, if you have any question you can go to the talk pages of those templates and give your opinion instead of personal attacks. I don't think it's very polite for you to harass around like this. 罗放 (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- It is solely based on solid observation. I don't think you know what a proper category should be like, especially since most of the categories created by you were empty and uncategorized (whether on zhwiki or enwiki), and probably have an inappropriate title. I'm not "harassing" you, it's just fact that your casual edits often have to be taken care of. Since I don't come here often, it's also perfectly normal to seek help from the enwiki local community, I presumed. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 23:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide examples for categories I created on enwiki which were empty, otherwise your accusation of "most of the categories created by you were empty....." is clearly falling into the scope of personal attacks. Please note that comment on content, not on the contributor should be the proper practice here. 罗放 (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- (Also maybe @Liz since they're involved in some of the edits, sorry if this bothers you) —— Eric Liu（Talk） 16:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- It is solely based on solid observation. I don't think you know what a proper category should be like, especially since most of the categories created by you were empty and uncategorized (whether on zhwiki or enwiki), and probably have an inappropriate title. I'm not "harassing" you, it's just fact that your casual edits often have to be taken care of. Since I don't come here often, it's also perfectly normal to seek help from the enwiki local community, I presumed. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 23:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Revision Deletion of a Picture
Hello. I'm not really sure how this works, but I am trying to have deleted an old thumbnail of my picture. It was uploaded incorrectly and I had only noticed it 15+ months after the fact. I'd like to send you the link over an email, but I am uncertain how to do that. Can you advise? Thank you. Jmc555 (talk) 22:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Robert MacKay (actor)
Hi Bearcat - howya doin'? I was about to prod Robert MacKay (actor) but it's an article you created, presumably on the strength of his Canadian Film Award nomination. I don't think that's enough to meet WP:GNG. Is there anything more that can be done to support this gentleman's article? Regards, PKT(alk) 14:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:TVOntario has been nominated for renaming
Category:TVOntario has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:TVOntario people has been nominated for renaming
Category:TVOntario people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Bearcat, in that discussion, I suggested this specific subcat might be best to delete. Your input to my counter-proposal (pro/con/other) is always welcome! - RevelationDirect (talk) 22:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Low-importance Unassessed Rocks and minerals articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:NA-importance Unassessed Geology articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Request for feedback for Draft:Yayzy
Hi Bearcat, I've seen you've been contributing to quite a few pages including Monzo's page, and was wondering if you can help give feedback on Draft:Yayzy as well. Thanks! Jerry3zs (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Rumours (TV series) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumours (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
QuietHere (talk) 04:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia files indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User nan-t-3
A tag has been placed on Category:User nan-t-3 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Hazel McCallion
On 30 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hazel McCallion, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)