User talk:Barry Wom

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

I’m not a sockpuppet

Ok, I didn’t realize that the article I tried to create was originally created by a sockpuppet. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to submit it 3 times, but was rejected immediately and I’m desperately needed some advice on improving the article. Perfectcheck373 (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Argylle

I am disheartened to see the casting information removed. I can add citations if needed. It seemed self-explanatory that the actors were in both films by means of the link to the original Kingsman film. Starlighsky (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, they're playing different characters in Argylle. In any case, such information does not belong in the Cast section. Barry Wom (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)—[reply]

They are actually characters with different names, even though they are the same actors in both films. I can add it to the Talk Section. Starlighsky (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about raising the subject at the article's Talk page, please do so. I can't see the purpose of pointing out that two of the actors played different characters in the previous film. Barry Wom (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Without going into too much detail, it was a clever implication that the villains in the 1st Kingsman were actually the protagonists in "Argylle". In "Argylle", the gait of the "Keeper of Secrets" in the castle-type of building went along with this implication...to explain would take more details from the films to explain. I can bring it up in the Talk page, because a published review may have noticed this. Starlighsky (talk) 17:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Supermansion/Robot Chicken connection

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SuperMansion&diff=prev&oldid=1243589563

I'd like you to look at the images from both shows, one at the top, the other in trivia. https://robotchicken.fandom.com/wiki/Holy_O's

Both shows have an identical box of Holy O's. Why do you say they're not related at all? 2600:4808:8852:7300:886E:3D6C:E1E8:8398 (talk) 06:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "Related" field in the infobox is solely for remakes, spin-offs, adaptations and such. Barry Wom (talk) 10:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transformers Prime

This show isn't on Discovery Family anymore. Don't revert my edit again. Jonghyunchung (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many times have I told you: Stop reverting my edit on this page! Jonghyunchung (talk) 02:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plot edit warring

If the edit warring resumes after the blocks expire, please report each IP block involved to WP:ANEW with sufficient examples for someone to make a longer term block. Also, please try to use more detailed edit summaries. Terse explanations like Rv plot creep are more likely to result in a repeated edit. While user talk page explanations definitely help, it's good to use both more detailed edit summaries and user talk page explanations, especially for repeated issues. Finally, please be more cautious about edit warring and WP:3RR. You don't need to be the only person reverting an subpar edit. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die Hard films worth

Re: your revert of the inflated worth. Actually, you can apply currency conversion. I took each film from their years of release, and then took a tally from that. Dollar amounts for Hollywood films (e.g. Gone With the Wind) get the nominal and inflated treatment on their respective pages, Die Hard should be no different. 184.166.97.71 (talk) 19:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Gone with the Wind article gives two inflation adjusted figures, both of which are attributed to reliable sources. You'll need to find a similar source for the Die Hard series. Barry Wom (talk) 08:44, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]