User talk:B.MorganUK
Welcome!
[edit]Hi B.MorganUK! I noticed your contributions to Remittances to Nepal and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 09:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hey SuperMarioOdyssy101,
- Thank you for the warm welcome! I've made contributions and edits to three different articles, which were accepted and remained on those pages. I actually need some guidance on how many edits are required for a fresh article publication on Wikipedia. I've heard that a writer/editor must have a profile history with at least 10 contributions to start a fresh article, which will further require 10 edits to be published live on Wikipedia. Is that right? Please enlighten me!
- Thank you in advance! B.MorganUK (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Remittances to Pakistan (August 21)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Remittances to Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hello Curb Safe Charmer!
- I only used authoritative and published journals, news, and websites as resources since I first learned about these in Wikipedia guidelines while contributing to existing Wikipedia articles with my 10 edits. Can you please specify which resources you exactly considered unreliable so I may replace them? This will also help me differentiate between all the published sources being reliable and unreliable. Thank you! B.MorganUK (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello, B.MorganUK!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:Remittances to Pakistan has a new comment
[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Remittances to Pakistan (August 31)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Remittances to Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Dear @SafariScribe,
- I believe there may have been a misunderstanding or oversight in your decision.
- While I appreciate your input, I believe that "Remittances to Pakistan", just like existing similar Wikipedia pages such as Remittances to Nepal, Remittances to Bangladesh, Remittances to India, etc., warrants a standalone article for several reasons:
- Scope and Depth: Remittances are a significant economic driver for Pakistan, constituting a substantial portion of its GDP. Given the topic's importance and complexity, a dedicated article can provide a more comprehensive and in-depth analysis.
- Clarity and Organization: A standalone article allows for a clearer and more organized presentation of the topic. It can delve into specific aspects of remittance flows, such as sources, recipients, and their impact on various sectors of the Pakistani economy.
- Accessibility and Relevance: A dedicated article on remittances makes it easier for readers interested in this particular subject to find the information they need. It also enhances the relevance of Pakistan's economic data and analysis within the broader context of global remittance flows.
- Given the aforementioned reasons, I urge you to reconsider my article for publication as a separate Wikipedia article. I will continue to enhance its content and scope over time. Thank you! B.MorganUK (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @SafariScribe,
- I believe there may have been a misunderstanding or oversight in your decision.
- While I appreciate your input, I believe that "Remittances to Pakistan", just like existing similar Wikipedia pages such as Remittances to Nepal, Remittances to Bangladesh, Remittances to India, etc., warrants a standalone article for several reasons:
- Scope and Depth: Remittances are a significant economic driver for Pakistan, constituting a substantial portion of its GDP. Given the topic's importance and complexity, a dedicated article can provide a more comprehensive and in-depth analysis.
- Clarity and Organization: A standalone article allows for a clearer and more organized presentation of the topic. It can delve into specific aspects of remittance flows, such as sources, recipients, and their impact on various sectors of the Pakistani economy.
- Accessibility and Relevance: A dedicated article on remittances makes it easier for readers interested in this particular subject to find the information they need. It also enhances the relevance of Pakistan's economic data and analysis within the broader context of global remittance flows.
- Given the aforementioned reasons, I urge you to reconsider my article for publication as a separate Wikipedia article. I will continue to enhance its content and scope over time. Thank you!
- B.MorganUK (talk) 08:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Remittances to Pakistan (September 4)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Remittances to Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hello @Utopes,
- It seems that you declined the article without properly reviewing it. The draft has 20 references properly cited through Wikipedia Visual Editor. All the references are according to the Wikipedia Guidelines. Please review it again and allow its publishing. B.MorganUK (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Remittances to Pakistan (September 11)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Remittances to Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
September 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Kindly stop adding mentions of 'Ace Money Transfer' or other such companies throughout Wikipedia, we are not a venue for advertising. MrOllie (talk) 13:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pakistani diaspora, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Remittances to Pakistan has a new comment
[edit]ACE Money Transfer (Company) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, ACE Money Transfer (Company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAEš 17:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]Hello B.MorganUK. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:B.MorganUK. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose ā e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=B.MorganUK|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken ā you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits ā please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GRINCHIDICAEš 17:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)