User talk:Andysmith248/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Speedy deletion nomination of Downsizing (book)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Downsizing (book), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Block (businessman)

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Block".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 12:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Konecki (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Konecki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon Konecki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Humphrys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classic FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri controversy has been accepted

Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri controversy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 19:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Wales has been accepted

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri story for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boris Johnson–Jennifer Arcuri story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thangam Debbonaire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Premiership of Boris Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Andysmith248

Thank you for creating National Television Award for Special Recognition.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Note that other editors have called for additional sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- DeFacto (talk). 15:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but that wasn't an attack page in any way. Andysmith248 (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Simon Konecki concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Simon Konecki, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Simon Konecki

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simon Konecki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Emily Sheffield

On 19 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emily Sheffield, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Emily Sheffield, the new editor of London's Evening Standard, left British Vogue as part of what was called a "posh girl exodus"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emily Sheffield. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Emily Sheffield), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Times Radio

Hello - it looks as though we're finally close to a consensus on Talk:Times Radio but we're awaiting your input. Could you give us your opinion please? GDBarry (talk) 20:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Just replied at bottom of page. Andysmith248 (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Wasn't the response I was expecting - looks like more fun and games! GDBarry (talk) 21:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Sure does, the talk length is looking pretty heavy now. Andysmith248 (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

GDBarry, will you be returning to work towards a conclusion on the talk? Andysmith248 (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Times Radio Consensus

Hi, as above, we're close to a consensus but it would appear GDBarry isn't happy about your opinion. I full support your opinion that the list should remain as it is. I only agreed to the removal of the list to keep the peace, but as you can see from the onset of the debate, I would give my full support for the list remaining on Times Radio as it stands, with no further names being added unless they have Wikipedia articles that comply with WP:GNG. - Funky Snack (Talk) 10:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I will continue the conversation with you over on the article talk page so we can carry on to work to a proper resolution. Andysmith248 (talk) 21:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Personally, this has gotten WAY out of hand. People disagree over articles, but I've never known anything like this just because non-notable people can't be added to lists. I give it less than 24 hours before certain individuals become involved. I've been accused of harassment. Hilarious. I almost spat out my tea when I saw the accusation. - Funky Snack (Talk) 21:58, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

I've not been involved with contentions as convoluted as this either. It seems an issue so minuscule that it shouldn't have warranted editors going through the agony of following sections and sections of talk page discussion, accusations of harassment, etc. Andysmith248 (talk) 22:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

I fully agree! - Funky Snack (Talk) 22:13, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

May I ask for your input and for you to put your side across in the dispute resolution? - Funky Snack (Talk) 22:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

I was not able to contribute to the dispute resolution as it was closed just before I logged on today. However, I have said on the talk page that I would also like the RfC to be closed. Andysmith248 (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dominic Grieve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrats.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominic Cummings scandal (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dominic Cummings scandal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dominic Cummings scandal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Neil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2019 general election.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Andrew Neil Interviews

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Andrew Neil Interviews".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bibliography of Boris Johnson

Hello, Andysmith248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bibliography of Boris Johnson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sasha Swire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sasha Swire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Swire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)