User talk:Addshore/Archive 19

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Addshore. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

←

Archive 17

Singapore Wikidata map

Hi,

Could you make a map of Wikidata items of Singapore ? This could help to define goals for the Singaporean WP Project (and even a WM chapter..)

Thank you --CreativeC (talk) 09:38, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Edit: If you could make red dots on the OpenStreetMap map of Singapore instead of your usual yellow dots on black it would be great --CreativeC (talk) 09:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Massimo, we (Archined, een onafhankelijke, community based website van de Lage Landen over architectuur en meer) vonden de foto die je had gemaakt van de Zuidas heel treffend voor een artikel dat gaat over het aanstellen van een hoofdstedelijk stadsbouwmeester. https://www.archined.nl/2018/07/gezocht-hoofdstedelijk-stadsbouwmeester-m-v-met-zonder-witte-jas We hebben je naam gelinkt naar je wikipedia-pagina, mocht je een andere verwijzing wensen, laat het ons weten news@archined.nl Geniet van de zomer, vriendelijke groet, Marina — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.205.132.88 (talk) 08:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jbhunley/Bureaucrat chat

Hello fellow bureaucrats, in regards to a current RfA that has met its time, I would like your assistance in judging the community consensus presented in the discussion at Jbhunley's RfA. Your input would be most welcome at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jbhunley/Bureaucrat chat. Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

I have questions about why my edits to Henry Berry Lowry pages were removed.

One reason given was that the edits seemed to be self-promotion. I do not understand that...I did not write the book. However,I did find it helpful and it enriched my knowledge about the Lowry history. I thought it would add the same to other researchers.Jackie25 (talk) 19:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)Jacklyn RosenfeldJackie25 (talk) 19:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Please see my proposal to rename the “Winter Olympics categories

Category:2018 Winter Olympics venues to Category:2018 Winter Olympic venues; and for earlier years from 2018 back to 1924 (23 categories) Hugo999 (talk) 11:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Bot Approvals Group inactivity notice

Hi Addshore,

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Bot_Approvals_Group#Bulk_inactivity_removals regarding our new activity requirements based on the recent RFC. This will impact your BAG membership, unless you meet the activity requirements in the next 7 days. SQL ^{Query me!} 00:52, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Addshore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Addshore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Bot reapproval after inactivity

Hi Addshore, I'm wondering if you can help me with this, as the administrator taking the previous action. I'd like to have my bot reapproved after deflagging for inactivity. See Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#User:BsherrAWBBOT. Thanks. --Bsherr (talk) 22:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak
Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:47, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Muslim user templates

Category:Muslim user templates has been nominated for renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Request Help.

Hi! @Addshore: Request your help and Intervention with what I feel is attempt to block me from editing. I had an Edit on the page Deepika Padukone which was reverted by Krimuk2.0, I took to the Talk page to discuss it with Krimuk2.0 and thats when some other editor Black112 Made an Edit on that page. And now I am been accused of being a Sockpuppet. Could you please help me out with this and give me some clarity. Thanks. (Purplecart (talk) 09:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC))

Notification of pending suspension of bureaucrat permissions due to not meeting bureaucrat activity requirements

Following a community discussion ending August 2015, consensus was reached to remove the bureaucrat permissions of users who have not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years. As a result of this discussion, your bureaucrat permissions may be removed if you do not return to bureaucrat activity within the next month. If you do not return to bureaucrat activity and the permissions are removed, you will need to request reinstatement at RFB. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past bureaucrat efforts. (Last qualifying action was 12 August 2015 according to bureaucrat activity report). Hope all is well. –xeno^talk 20:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Ah, I didn't see this, but I had been looking at the report independently and raised it at WP:BN since we seemed to be a bit behind on it. Mentioned you in it, so wanted to give you a heads up. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Makes sense to remove it to me, I don't think I'm going to be getting into active cart duties any time soon ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 13:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  - Fair enough, and I totally understand. Do feel free to pop 'round to m:SRP to request voluntary removal. –xeno^talk 13:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
    - Done https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions#Addshore@enwiki ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 14:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the work you did for the project in that capacity. Best regards, Uninvited Company 20:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Орден для вас!

	Орден Анти-вандализма
	The Best Administrator of Wikipedia Grader Russia (talk) 14:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Greetings!

Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list.

Highlights for this newsletter include:

ARBCOM

Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it.

BAG

Several (1 + 12 = 13) users have been retired/resigned from the BAG due to inactivity, per our new activity requirements (discussion).

BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG.

Two BAG members retired
- Madman (talk · contribs) retired.
- BU Rob13 (talk · contribs) vanished and retired.
Three new BAG members have been voted in, welcome to the BAG!
- Primefac (talk · contribs) joined on 2018-12-12 (RfBAG). Primefac operates PrimeBOT (talk · contribs) which does a plethora of tasks.
- TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) joined on 2019-01-21 (RfBAG). TheSandDoctor operates several bots including DeprecatedFixerBot (talk · contribs).
- Enterprisey (talk · contribs) joined on 2019-08-07 (RfBAG). Enterprisey operates EnterpriseyBot (talk · contribs), which does a plethora of tasks, RemindMeBot (talk · contribs) which posts reminders, and codes several scripts.

We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary.

BOTDICT

Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary

Editor-hostile wikitext – describes wikitext structuring that is editor hostile, even if it renders correctly
Spectrum of usefulness – describes how tasks are deemed useful or not

BOTPOL

Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC).
Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality.
Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION.

BOTREQs and BRFAs

As of writing, we have...

20 active BOTREQs, please help if you can!
14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status).
In 2018, 96 bot task were approved. An AWB search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied.
Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired, and 15 were denied.
10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion).

New things

All bot-related discussion pages now have a centralized and searchable archive box (see discussion). Discussions are searchable per noticeboard, or globally.
{{Bot}} now supports |status=expired (see discussion). This led to the deletion of Category:Indefinitely blocked Wikipedia bots as useless (see discussion).
WP:BOTREQ now mentions WP:SCRIPTREQ and WP:AWBTASKS as alternatives to bot requests.
The bot creation guide now mentions bot flags, and two new languages Awk and MATLAB. Other minor tweaks have been made.
AAlertBot has received major code updates. In particular, WP:AALERTS will now report splits, mergers, and AFC submissions.
Citation bot has received several updates (User talk:Citation bot/Archive 10/11/12/13/14/15/16/17). In particular, the bot stopped the automated removal of |publisher= from {{cite journal}}, and stopped the automated addition of CiteSeerX links, and now uses OAuth to authenticate those who make requests of the bot.

Other discussions

These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active.

See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard.

Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

You've got mail

Hello, Addshore. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hope you will check MemonBhai (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)