User talk:93.174.8.204

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

January 2015

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Framwellgate Bridge— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

testing

Please don't vandalize Wikipedia—even just momentarily to make a "test" of editor responses. Please use the sandbox instead. Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 21:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 21:52, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Joel Ward (footballer)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joel Ward (footballer) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dion Dublin, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: S1jobs.com (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S1jobs.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 93.174.8.204, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fife, you may be blocked from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Milford Mercury (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Milford Mercury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

On four separate occasions the name Morgan Allen has been removed from the "Notable former pupils" section of Croesyceiliog School article, e.g. your latest edit here. On none of these occasions has any explanatory edit summary been provided. I wonder would you care to provide some kind of rationale or explanation for these edits, preferably at Talk:Croesyceiliog School? Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --John (talk) 16:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 2017–18 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Qed237 (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@Qed237: Here's the source:[1], feel free to undo. You can unblock if you wish though it's a shared IP so can't vouch for anyone else. 93.174.8.204 (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am nit an administrator and I can not block or unblock anyone, but thank you for that source. I will taka a look shortly. Qed237 (talk) 20:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

93.174.8.204, as you are keen to contribute productively, why not just create your own account? You can then easily escape the week's block, as well as the negative connotations which come with having to share this ip address with vandals. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Milford Mercury concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Milford Mercury, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm GnomeSweetGnome. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Frankenstein have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 17:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bitcoin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 06:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Heaton-Harris, you may be blocked from editing. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Milford Mercury

Hello, 93.174.8.204. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Milford Mercury".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 16:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Robin Hunter-Clarke— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:17, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Weymouth, Dorset, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 12:01, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hans Rottenhammer. Ifnord (talk) 13:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Hartlepool— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bushy Parkrun, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]