User talk:85.150.152.71

Talk:1989 Tiananmen Square protests

Please see reply here or move request instructions here - FlightTime (open channel) 08:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You 85.150.152.71 (talk) 09:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Floyd

I am going to suggest you drop this before someone really takes issue with it.Slatersteven (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Levivich ^{[dubious – discuss]} 17:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UUh...is there something I should change?

85.150.152.71 (talk) 13:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, stop accusing users or Wikipedia of "extreme left perspective" (see wp:npa).Slatersteven (talk) 14:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.Slatersteven (talk) 14:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also wp:forumshop might be worth a read.Slatersteven (talk) 14:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

????

It is an extreme left perspective to destroy cultural heritage and demand reform from a system without institutionalized racism. There is no doubt about it. If an individual looks at it from a neutral perspective, normal discussions would have been had about racist issues. Which do exist, but no laws are targeting any individual group, so it is not institutionalized. The destruction of cultural heritage is a clear refernce to the cultural revolution in China that cost millions of lives and " anti" fa is extreme left: communistic. Why should I not say this clearly in order to show my argument for NPOV? That is why it is NPOV.I have not accused any individual user. What is wrong with pointing out the NPOV? The additions that I am proposing are factual. If you do not like that, back up your opinion with facts, please.

85.150.152.71 (talk) 16:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

If you continue to impugn the character of a recently deceased person with lies, or you continue to spout talking points in forum posts, I will also revoke your talk page access. Drmies (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is why, I did warn you.Slatersteven (talk) 17:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, you need to read wp:blp and wp:crime. You do not get to say people are out of control on drugs if sources do not say THAT!.Slatersteven (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.