Jump to content

User talk:66.154.146.31

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

September 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Macromolecule with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:42, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Heracleum mantegazzianum, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 15:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Chevrolet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Louis Chevrolet with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bush, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bush was changed by 66.154.146.31 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986483 on 2012-10-24T16:15:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 17:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Guðsþegn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Imhotep because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Guðsþegn (talk) 22:26, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012

[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Imhotep, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 00:57, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:19, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louisa May Alcott with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to User talk:Widr, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 21:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Widr with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, Mathonius (talk) 21:25, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Mathonius with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 21:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to User talk:Widr, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion (talk) 18:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

66.154.146.31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't trolling, or kidding. If I was to have three people write an official magazine article about the new genre (which DOES exist), would my idea then be considered? 66.154.146.31 (talk) 20:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm a little curious about who you are. Very few people have the ability to casually 'have three people write official magazine articles.' I certainly can't buy articles for any music magazines at all. If you are, indeed, an editor for three significant magazines, then, yes- assign the three articles, and after they are published, it'll be easier to verify that this is a legitimate genre of music. I know that magazines plan well in advance, so by the time your articles are published, this 30-day block will have long since expired. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My idea was a legitimate one

[edit]

I wasn't trolling, or kidding.

If I was to have three people write an official magazine article about the new genre (which DOES exist), would my idea then be considered?

(Copied from the other unblock request at User talk:66.154.146.179) So ... you'd like for someone to explain why this [1] was removed from the Talk:Music talkpage by Nikkimaria, and you're prepared to harass other users [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] to further your trolling? I've blocked the three school IPs you've abused so far for harassment for a month, and will extend as necessary. Acroterion (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I tried to be nice and civil with him, but he did NOT assume good faith...and instead deleted every post I made. How does that make me the bad guy?!?

It also doesn't explain why my idea was deleted

Notice that you are not blocked for your comment at Talk:Music. You are blocked for making six comments to user talk pages which were not polite. None of those comments clearly explained that this is a real genre, or that you can provide sources verifying its existence. You immediately attacked without even considering the possibility that you had not yet expressed yourself clearly enough to distinguish yourself from a vandal. In order to edit at Wikipedia, you need the skill of interacting like a reasonable adult with other people, even if you disagree with them. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to this edit to Herbert Hoover, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 21:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Herbert Hoover with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Gatorade, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Killing Fields, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 21:45, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Killing Fields. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

March 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Geraldshields11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to William H. Seward because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Russian American, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 16:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Swedish emigration to the United States, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 16:09, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Velella. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Oregon State Beavers football seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk   19:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Oregon State Beavers football. After seeing your editing past i have decided this is your last warning before i propose for you to be blocked so PLEASE STOP removing and replacing with irrelevant words Bren Harding (talk) 19:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Glen Bell, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 22:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Glen Bell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to History of Christianity has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Frozen yogurt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Plane, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Auric. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Accepted without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Auric talk 22:37, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Radar in World War II. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Ricordisamoa 19:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to History of chess has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of chess with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TJH2018. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Admission to the Union have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TJH2018talk 16:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wood frog have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wood frog was changed by 66.154.146.31 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913734 on 2022-01-25T22:42:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wood frog. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:66.154.146.31&oldid=1139125913"