User talk:213.205.251.59

November 2015

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Roadman because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roadman. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Roadman was changed by 213.205.251.59 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930972 on 2015-11-04T16:18:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm K6ka. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Moses Swaibu, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to James Dayton. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Thomas Bennett Community College— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Maggie De Block. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 18:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard of Shrewsbury, Duke of York. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 16:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

213.205.251.59 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My IP appears to be caught up in a week-long blog range block due to vandalism at MMR vaccine controversy. As Bishonen has also protected that article for six months, is there a need for the range block too? Hundreds of IPs like me cannot make positive contributions.

Decline reason:

The block is anon-only, so won't prevent you from editing. You just need to sign in to an account. If you don't already have an account, one may be created for you via WP:ACC. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.