User talk:2/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Cinema Bizarre
You tagged the article as needing wikification and for being unsourced. Neither is true; the article cites (and had cited) the Allmusic profile of the band, and is well enough wikified that I don't really see it being an issue. Chubbles (talk) 13:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- The really dispiriting thing about this article is how poorly it's been treated since I created it. Nearly all the edits made to it have had no substantive content (notwithstanding some contributions by ChrisHH). They've consisted of anon edit-warring over the bandmembers' names and fansite-like additions of the members' zodiacal signs. Well, and deletion attempts. Last night ChrisHH, who speaks German, finally added some more historical background to the page. Hopefully it'll be going somewhere now. Chubbles (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- The article noted the positions of the band's charting hits in Germany and Switzerland from minute one. Chubbles (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- The very first revision of the article included this discography:
- The article noted the positions of the band's charting hits in Germany and Switzerland from minute one. Chubbles (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Discography Fatal Attraction (2007) #9 Germany, #28 Austria
Singles Lovesongs (They Kill Me) #9 Germany, #32 Austria "Escape to the Stars" #36 Germany, #61 Austria "Forever or Never"
This information never left the page; it was not unclear or vague in any way. Chubbles (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
second signature test
does it work now? Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 15:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
RfA - Toddst1
Hi Mr Senseless, thanks for supporting my RfA, which passed with 42 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutrals. Special thanks goes to my nominator, Kakofonous. I'm pleased that the Wikipedia community has trusted me with the mop and I take it very seriously. Cheers! Toddst1 (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Susan Colebank
Can someone help me with Susan Colebank article —Preceding unsigned comment added by HowTo REad (talk • contribs)
I dont understand why I can not have this article. I dont understand. American Idol people get them and they are not famouse. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HowTo REad (talk • contribs) 20:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Susan Colebank
her work is in librarys across the USA so it should met standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HowTo REad (talk • contribs)
ShamanDhia
ppl are helping me with the narrative, you just missed the re-write, please send suggestions for corrections with your responses, thanks the Hitochi Princess (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)ShamanDhia
I know it's small, but thanks. i've been given the run around for copying ONE SENTANCE from a government website as i do all the alcohol agencies, and i couldn't take much more. makes a change to see users here thank each other for once as well :) ninety:one 14:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Vergina sun
Mr Senseless: would you mind taking a look at [[Image:VerginaSun4Elements12GreekGods.gif]]. There is no copyright information, and the image is slated for deletion next week. Is there any way to get rid of it sooner? It is unsourced and frankly pseudohistorical garbage. Aramgar (talk) 22:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
the Moleskin article has non-copyright infringing versions in its history.
Hi. Before tagging the Moleskin article as a copyvio, for immediate speedy deletion, you should have checked its history to see if there were versions that were not copyvio. No big harm done, I have reverted the article to an earlier version that is definitely not copyright violating (as it is all my own words). Please also check the articles talk page to get some idea about the history of the article before speedying the article for *any* reason. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
SF-36
The assertion of notability wa present even in the version you speedied. When you doubt there is sufficient notability, please use PROD, not speedy. sorry, you';re right, I did mean context --it said it was a survey form regulation & gave the link to the source for it. that;'s contex in my book. If one can tell what the article is about, there's context. But just a friendly note. DGG (talk) 01:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
What the buck
Why delete it i proved he featured on homophobia on a noteworthy gay magazine The Advocate[1] and has a regular segment of fox[2] and had been nominated for a youtube award [3]Dwanyewest (talk) 21:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Yuckfoo
This editor has been the subject of a Request for Comment regarding their choice of username. FYI, the previous discussion is here. -- Longhair\talk 20:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- The request was withdrawn, nothing ever came of it. -- Longhair\talk 20:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Fraternity
No problem, at least it makes the review easy (: Although US college fraternities are popular topics, they are difficult (although not always impossible) to get to GA because of the lack of independent sources, which means they tend to rely on the fraternity website. That, and the fact that editors are often members of the organisation, makes them unbalanced.
Signing for archive purposes. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
You dick
I am no vandal Enoktalk 13:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Please see the note I left on your talk page. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Deletions
Hello Mr Senseless. Delete and merge[4] is not a valid closure as it would violate copyright. Either it is deleted, or it is merged. When it is merged please indicate where it was merged from and to (see WP:MERGE). Please also have some respect when you're dealing with real people.[5] When someone writes their autobiography it is not necessarily blatant advertising, and it is somewhat tactless to treat it as such. Please consider more civil deletion reasons. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello Mr Senseless, regarding your recent activities at the above AfD, you may not be aware that only administrators should close AfD discussions as delete. After all, non-admins can't delete articles. Please keep this in mind in the future. Cheers, faithless (speak) 19:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
In the future, please do NOT attempt a non-admin closure in the case of a deletion. You, not being an admin, are not capable of deleting an article and as such, should never close an AfD with a deletion result. This type of AfD must ALWAYS be closed by an admin. AnmaFinotera (talk) 20:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Relisting debates
Don't forget, when relisting AfD debates (like these two), that you remove them from their original log after placing them in the current day's AfD log. (I usually hidden comment them out, but others just delete them...that's a choice of preference.) Here's what I did. Cheers, — Scientizzle 23:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:User talk page, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Law Lord (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Leave It to Beaver
I don't care about that game article, but I thought there was a central site where nominations for deletion of all articles were discussed. I'm not seeing a reference to it. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 04:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- So you can propose deletion unilaterally, the guy is on vacation and doesn't know about it, and 2 weeks later he comes back and it's gone. That is not an appropriate way to do things. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 04:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Dimitris Labatos page
Can You please help us to keep the Dimitris Labatos page? By editing it to make it acceptable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arrowcargo (talk • contribs) 11:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Can you explain your no consensus close of this, it's highly frowned apon for non-admins to close AFDs that are no consensus, and this AFD has very weak comments on the keep side in particular (almost everyone is WP:USEFUL). I'm tempt to WP:DRV the results of the AFD. Secret 12:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Explain and help with Imprev page
Can you please explain the speedy deletion of the Imprev page. I took great care to read the rules and to write it in a way as factual and in the nature of Wikipedia. There are hundreds/thousands of corporation pages existing in Wikipedia and we want to be one of them while complying with the rules. How may I create it for acceptance?
User :jamesoweng(talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think the message Mr Senseless left on your talk page explains it pretty clearly. Maybe you should read it. Toddst1 (talk) 00:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
actually it is just looks like a standard twinkle template. there is no consistency at all regarding corporations. i am asking for a human response since he made the conscious choice of targeting one of 5000 corporations worded exactly the same way on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesoweng (talk • contribs) 02:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Jamesoweng (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- I left a clearer note on your talk page. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: Deletion of Black Deathcore
Hey, i'm fine with the deletion of it. It's just something I saw there and created a page for based on what my understanding of it is, based on some of the talk i've had with my friend Roger, who studies music. ChaosVonGin (talk) 03:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of Journalist (Russian magazine)
I have no objection. I just wanted to prevent a red link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CCorward (talk • contribs)
- Not archiving, signing to fix that. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 23:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: rvv
No problem... Cheers, bro! κaτaʟavenoTC 00:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome. I was looking for suspicious entries on Newpage Patrol, saw this redlink of a username which was as close to suspicious as I found... --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 01:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please clarify the basis for your proposal to delete this article. It is part of the Wikipedia Catholic Church project and fulfills the guidelines of numerous categories. It is a large and prominent Catholic parish in the San Fernando Valley of California with thousands of members. What is the possible ground for deletion??????Cbl62 (talk) 23:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have responded on the article for deletion page you created as follows: "This is a new article about a Catholic church in the San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles County, California. The church has been in existence for 80 years and has thousands of families in the parish. How can this possibly be a proper subject for deletion? It falls within the scope of two established Wikipedia projects, one on the Catholic Church and the other on schools. It also fits within at least four Wikipedia categories: Category:Roman Catholic churches in California, Category:Elementary schools in California, Category:Roman Catholic elementary schools in the United States, Category:Churches in Los Angeles, California. The fact that an editor has to spend time defending a legitimate article against unsubstantiated proposals for deletion is a significant deterrent to good editors. Certainly, the article needs work, and that will happen with time. The proposal to delete was made within minutes after its creation. This is really discouraging." I ask you to reconsider your proposal.Cbl62 (talk) 23:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- I appreciate the note you left on my Talk page. The debate got me riled up, but I'm glad we were able to reach consensus. Cbl62 (talk) 19:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- i my view, I consider this a perfectly good faith AfD nomination--I too am a little bothered by these articles unless they show actual specific ntability. DGG (talk) 00:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Saint Andrews Catholic Church
- I have a favor to ask. Due to a brain lapse, I accidentally created an article St. Anthony Catholic Church (Pasadena, California) under the wrong name. The correct name is St. Andrew's Catholic Church, and I have since moved the content to the correct name. Can you assist in deleting the erroneous, now blanked, entry for St. Anthony? Cbl62 (talk) 00:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks.Cbl62 (talk) 03:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Deletion Review for Guernsey Live
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Guernsey Live. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Dead6re (talk) 07:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Re:Anawatazi
I apologize if this is the wrong place to talk. I am new to Wikipedia yet I have used it for years. I noticed you were on my thread or article I started entitled "Anawatazi". I was wondering of you can give more insight to why it was deleted. Anawatazi is a true pseudonym that a very very famous fighter used during his reign as the undefeated Black List champion. Can you give me more insight or show me where to go to get this article reinstated. This article took years of research and it is extremely true and accurate. Thanks and sorry if this is the wrong place for this discussion. I am still trying to figure out the navigation of this site.
(Damushy1 (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC))
Sincerely, Damushy1.
Hi. When you bring something to DRV that I originally nominated for AFD, would you please notify me as well? It would be nice to have the heads-up. Thanks (and don't worrry, I'll be re-upping the nomination in a few months). --UsaSatsui (talk) 08:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Admin coaching
I think that right now, you're being a little hasty. You've only been here for five months, just slow down. I think that you would benefit from waiting another month of working on articles before seeking coaching. I have my hands a little full at the moment, but you could ask my buddy User:Revolving Bugbear if he'll take you on right now. The other admins are pretty full too. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 23:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- By the way, nice singing. I've never really heard a tenor sing a soprano part well before. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 23:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Wasted my time? Don't be absurd. You're a user on the right track, just keep working and don't be hasty. bibliomaniac15 Do I have your trust? 23:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Question
I've tried changing my skin in my preferences. After saving I did the F5 refresh button, but it still didn't work. Any advice? Thanks Wikifan4 (talk) 15:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Wikifan4
Also, do I have to put in my username after the four tildes? Will it still sign my username after it if I just enter: Wikifan4 (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)?
lol, nevermind. I suppose I just answered my own question. Wikifan4 (talk) 15:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Legal terminology: "without valid charge"
Hi - thanks for your reply on the help page. I am kinda thrilled that I got a properly qualified responder.
Three things -
- Firstly, please share you thinking as to why/how its NPOV. ("without valid charge" sounds serious to me and probably to editors who find it POV too). They'll want reasoning.
- Secondly - is there another very brief way of conveying this information, another very brief phrase that could be used instead?
- Thirdly - Would a conservative lawyer answer the same way? Is there another common way of viewing this situation legally that would view "without valid charge" as spin, POV, etc?
Finally , even if you dont answer any of the above, thanks for your initial answer. SmithBlue (talk) 08:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
 Welcome to the Opera Project! |
|---|
|
Hello, 2! We're delighted you've signed up to join us! Opera is a very active, medium-sized project with more than 4,400 articles - it's smaller than the mega-projects like Music etc, but it is also larger than closely-focused projects such as Richard Wagner. We have a discussion page linked to the main project page where you signed in. Participants work together on articles, see for example the Composer of the month, Singer of the month and Can you help? features on the Project page. Please take part! The scope of the project is huge: 400 years of history, many countries and many languages. For that reason the editing style of opera articles can sometimes be complicated, so we have detailed guidelines for formatting on the project page, covering the tricky points like opera titles, capitalization, categories etc. Please don't be too bothered if you make a few mistakes at first - we all went through the same thing when we started! Some opera editors use reference books such the New Grove Dictionary of Opera, New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, the Oxford Dictionary of Opera and the Viking Opera Guide. These are helpful for checking facts and providing the essential references required on Wikipedia. It's great if you can get access to these books. However if you don't have access to books, there are still many other ways you can contribute to the project: compiling lists of recordings, writing synopses of your favourite operas using CD librettos, translating texts from other languages, picture researching, writing biographies of contemporary singers from online sources etc etc - and see also the To do list for articles needing attention. We hope you have a great time on the Opera Project. |
--Kleinzach (talk) 01:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for Rollback
Hi. I've granted your request. Please remmeber to use the tool wisely, and check out the instruction page for help, or feel free to ask me. Pedro : Chat 22:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
ER
Just so you know, I gave you a review on your editor review. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 22:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Notability (toys and games)
Could you provide some comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (toys and games) about why you created these proposed guidelines? There's some (small) discussion there about if these guidelines are really needed or if they're an example of WP:CREEP. Thanks! --Craw-daddy | T | 13:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Alexandcatafixed.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Alexandcatafixed.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 18:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Fair Use Rationale for DarienLakeFunCountry.jpg
I've added a fair use rationale for the image DLFC.jpg, If this satisfies your requirements, please remove it from speedy deletion. Thanks! (I'll be adding FURs for the other logos used on the DL article soon, if that's ok with you.) →ClarkCTTalk @ 17:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Gives references and seems notable any reason you did a CSD? RT | Talk 16:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Not sure why you want to delete this article. First off I gave references, secondly the Wall Street Journal deemed him important enough to write several paragraphs about, and thirdly AIM is a program that tens of millions of people use everyday, don't you think that it's inventor should be given credit??KAOSv.s.CONTROL (talk) 16:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:SAI-crest.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:SAI-crest.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Speedy deletion of Template:BlatantOW
A tag has been placed on Template:BlatantOW requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)