The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelidtalk 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
... that Independence Lost argues that most support for the American Revolution was non-ideological? Source: DuVal, Kathleen (July 7, 2015). Independence Lost: Lives on the Edge of the American Revolution. Introduction, pg. xv.
Overall: I believe this article is fine enough to run at DYK, though someone should likely take the time to give the article a proper assessment rating and appropriate Wikiproject banners. The amount of redlinks may also be a concern for readability per MOS:REDLINK as they truly do stick out, but as stated earlier, this is a fairly simple, sweet, interesting article that should be able to appear at DYK, and the amount of red links isn't too jarring. I will note that the hook nominator recently requested a self-block as to prevent them from editing while handling real-life events, so if anyone else wishes to make any comments or concerns regarding this article, it'll probably be waiting a while. λNegativeMP1 09:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I believe this article is fine enough to run at DYK, though someone should likely take the time to give the article a proper assessment rating and appropriate Wikiproject banners. The amount of redlinks may also be a concern for readability per MOS:REDLINK as they truly do stick out, but as stated earlier, this is a fairly simple, sweet, interesting article that should be able to appear at DYK, and the amount of red links isn't too jarring. I will note that the hook nominator recently requested a self-block as to prevent them from editing while handling real-life events, so if anyone else wishes to make any comments or concerns regarding this article, it'll probably be waiting a while. λ NegativeMP1 09:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)