This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
I wonder if this is somebody who is so well known by a lesser title that the article should be placed there, despite his being given a higher title. For most of his life, the subject of this article was known as either "Earl of Hertford" or "Marquess of Hertford," and under that name he played a significant part in the political events of the day. He was restored to his great-grandfather's dukedom only about a month before his death. Obviously, that restoration was important, but is it important enough to call him by a name he bore for only a month or so? john k20:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a new image of William Seymour (right). Feel free to use it or not use it. I'm pretty sure it's not his son, since the artist did most of his work before 1660, but he is quite different-looking than in the existing image. Dcoetzee09:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Where was William in the succession at the time of his secret marriage to Arbella Stuart?
This article (as well as Arbella's) states that William was 6th in line to the throne (and Arbella 4th) at the time of their secret marriage in 1610. However in 1610 the King had three children living, then Arbella was 4th in line as the only other surviving descendant of Henry VII's eldest daughter Margaret. When Henry VII's descendants through his other daughter Mary are then listed we have in 5th place William's father Edward (who didn't die till 1612), then in 6th place William's childless older brother, also Edward, (who didn't die till 1618). William is the next brother so that would make him 7th not 6th in line, meaning that either his place in the succession has been wrongly counted in this article, or William's father or brother had actually died earlier than the article says, or the genealogy is wrong to give William an older brother ( in which case it could be that either the older brother's birthdate is wrong and he was actually younger, or he doesn't belong to that branch of the family at all). Unfortunately I don't have enough knowledge to work out exactly which of these possible causes has led to the conflicting information in this article.
MrDannyDoodah (talk) 06:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
.jpg)