Jump to content

Talk:Thanksgiving

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2024

[edit]

"Uganda" Under the Thanksgiving in Rwanda section should be corrected to "Rwanda" 72.83.0.110 (talk) 03:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Tollens (talk) 04:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we Cook the turkey

[edit]

Into is pretty cool 216.104.120.28 (talk) 01:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 November 2024

[edit]

In Observance > United States change "was federally formalized by an 1863 by presidential proclamation by Abraham Lincoln in 1863" to "was federally formalized through an 1863 presidential proclamation by Abraham Lincoln in 1863" Brundagejoe (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Many thanks The AP (talk) 09:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Germany' section

[edit]

The German section shouldn't be here because it has no connection with the US/Canada Thanksgiving, because it's already listed in the Harvest Festivals and List of Harvest Festivals articles, and because it's unreferenced. I propose that it should be deleted. Robert P Connolly (talk) 14:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the thanksgiving celebrations don't have a connection to Thanksgiving (United States) and Thanksgiving (Canada), though? Valereee (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But they are referenced. Robert P Connolly (talk) 05:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, the answer to content (that isn't dubious) being unreferenced is ideally to find references for it or if you don't feel like doing that, tag it for references. Valereee (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looked it up at the German wikipedia: Erntedankfest on de.wiki; that article has more than a dozen references. I've added one that seemed good, but honestly we probably need an article on Erntedankfest rather than having it forward to harvest festival. Valereee (talk) 14:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for deletion

[edit]

For the reasons given in 'Agreeing with this article being mostly nonsense', this article is superfluous. I propose it for deletion. Robert P Connolly (talk) 16:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See, the box at the top of this page. This article has already been kept. The statements you refer to in that talk page section seem like mostly nonsense. Alanscottwalker (talk) 16:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I take your point. Robert P Connolly (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 December 2024

[edit]
183.83.160.61 (talk) 07:54, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The AP (talk) 08:17, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]