This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
It is requested that a freely-licensed photograph be included in this article to replace copyrighted images in order to better comply with our policy for non-free content. Many copyright-free image sources are listed at Wikimedia Commons, or you could create your own. Alternatively, you may request permission from the copyright holder of the original images to release them under a free license.
Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Harris County, Texas
Houston
Fort Bend County, Texas
Texas
Waller County, Texas
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
The few sources I browsed discuss Hotze only tangentially as the CEO of the group who hired the accused, and some went so far as to explicitly distance the former from the latter. Are there any sources at this time that specifically link the two men? — Fourthords | =Λ= |21:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's pretty clear from news reports and law enforcement statement that Hotze's group hired Aguirre (among others) to "investigate." [1] Hotze himself confirmed at a press conference on December 16 that he had paid Aguirre, and he disputed that Aguirre had actually committed assault: [2] and while Hotze's lawyer says Hotze didn't direct any of the investigations, he was clearly funding the actions of Aguirre and others. From Salon:
"Jared Woodfill, an attorney and spokesman for Hotze, confirmed that Hotze's group hired Aguirre and about 20 private investigators to investigate fraud in the state.
"[Hotze] did not direct or lead any of the investigations," Woodfill told the Tribune, adding that Hotze instead sent tips to the investigators. "The [Liberty Center] employed the investigation team that looked into the allegations," Woodfill said.
Hotze launched a GoFundMe page to raise money for his "investigation" and claimed on Facebook that he had raised over $600,000 to "expose" the so-called scheme. The GoFundMe page showed that he had raised nearly $70,000 before the page was removed this week after questions from Business Insider. The company said the fundraiser violated its terms of service."[3]
I'd still argue that in the interests of the BLP policy we shouldn't be trying to tie Hotze to criminal activity until reliable sources explicitly do so. All we can say right now is that "Hotze's non-profit employed PERSON, who has been charged with THESE CRIMES." That reeks of undue reaching at this time. We can reach out to the BLP noticeboard and see if I'm off-base, here, though. — Fourthords | =Λ= |17:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article fails to inform readers that there is no evidence to substantiate Hotze's fraud claims. That's a clear NPOV violation, in particular a FRINGE vio. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article doesn't discuss Hotze's fraud claims, therefore needing to refute nothing. In fact, the word "fraud" doesn't appear in the prose at all. With regards to this article's subject, the newest source (2020-12-20 Washington Post) has only the line "[Hotze] also claimed, without elaboration, that the investigation had blocked a Democratic fraud scheme that would have otherwise flipped Texas to Democrat Joe Biden." This single claim doesn't warrant inclusion, and certainly not refutation. — Fourthords | =Λ= |21:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article does indeed cover this man's nonsensical fraud claims. Except, after your edits (which removed text that adhered to the cited RS), it now presents his baseless fraud claims as having veracity, thus misinforming readers and flagrantly violating WP:FRINGE. The Washington Post literally says he is the president of a group that makes unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud. You removed that, and replaced it with text that claims that his group "investigates" "possibly-unlawful" acts of fraud. Your edits should be reverted ASAP. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article does indeed cover this man's nonsensical fraud claims. The word "fraud" did not appear in the prose of the last edit I made. The Washington Post literally says […]The Washington Post does say those things, but that publication does not say that "Hotze made these specific claims of fraud", only that the organization he founded, did. This article isn't about the non-profit he founded, but is a biography of the person himself. — Fourthords | =Λ= |21:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This edit says that the current wording of the article is non-neutral (in particular describing Hotze as a conspiracy theorist and using language that is not supportive of the conservative perspective on some divisive issues). Does anyone have ideas on how to reword? GlobeGores (talk page | user page) 20:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
